Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Strengthening Family Resilience through Family Finance Norms: Between Traditions and Modernity Nizami, Auliya Ghazna; Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh; Abadia, M. Kurnia Rahman
ADDIN Vol 19, No 2 (2025): ADDIN
Publisher : LPPM IAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/addin.v19i2.32525

Abstract

This article examines the normative foundations of family finance in Islam and their pivotal role in strengthening family resilience through a normative-doctrinal analysis of classical Islamic jurisprudence texts, including works by Al-Kasani, An-Nawawi, Ibn Qudamah, and contemporary scholarly interpretations. The study analyzes primary sources from the four major madhāhib (legal schools), Quranic verses, and authenticated hadith collections, while critically engaging with contemporary theories of family resilience and household economics from scholars such as Becker, Putnam, and empowerment theorists. This research employs no empirical data or case studies but focuses entirely on doctrinal analysis and theoretical synthesis. By synthesizing traditional Islamic teachings with modern socio-economic discourses, this research highlights how Islamic financial norms, rooted in concepts of responsibility (mas’ūliyyah), moderation (i’tidāl), and trust (amānah), contribute not only to economic stability but also to the adaptive capacity and emotional well-being of families in the face of changing social realities. This study argues that Islamic family finance norms offer a comprehensive framework that fosters both material sufficiency and holistic resilience, thus demonstrating the dynamic applicability of Islamic legal values in contemporary family life.
Inadequate Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering Regulations in Indonesia (Comparative Law of US and Germany) Putri, Tiara; Amiludin, Amiludin; Ahmad, Dwi Nurfauziah; Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh
Yustisia Vol 12, No 2: August 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v12i2.71835

Abstract

Cryptocurrency as a virtual currency managed by a decentralized system makes it immune to government interference and allows it to transact under pseudonyms. This has the potential for cybercrime and illicit transactions, especially money laundering. This study aims to compare legal instruments in Indonesia, the US, and Germany regarding the use of cryptocurrency as a money laundering tool and to analyze the readiness of Indonesia to respond to this crime. This study is normative legal research conducted using a comparative and statutory approach. These findings show that the US and Germany have extensively regulated crypto. In the US, Crypto transactions are considered MSB, subject to BSA compliance. Each transaction must comply with AML, KYC, and CIP requirements. In Germany, Cryptocurrency is considered a personal asset. The crypto trading must meet the KYC and AML requirements. Indonesia needs advanced regulations because crypto is only considered an investment asset. The investigation is difficult because cryptocurrency is transacted pseudonyms, so connecting pseudonyms with real people is challenging