Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analysis of Creative Thinking Skills Through the Application of a Scientific Approach Based on Academic Ability Disparity Neni Hasnunidah; Dian Aulya; Arwin Surbakti
Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
Publisher : Magister Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jpb.v11i1.24344

Abstract

Creative thinking skills are crucial for students in facing challenges and obstacles in the future. This study aims to analyze the creative thinking skills of students based on differences in academic abilities. This type of research is comparative with the ex post facto research design. The sample selection technique using purposive sampling obtained a sample of 114 students. The results showed that there were significant differences in creative thinking skills (p <0.05) between students with higher, moderate, and lower academic abilities. Creative thinking skills of students with higher academical abilities were significantly different (p <0.05) from students with lower academic, but not significant (p> 0.05) from students with moderate academic. Creative thinking skills of students with moderate academic abilities were not significantly different (p> 0.05) with students with lower academic. The average value of creative thinking skills in each group is low because students experience difficulties in empowering creative thinking skills. The benefit of this research is to find out the creative thinking skills of students so that they can be used as a reference in evaluating learning.
Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model on students' creative thinking skill: Environmental pollution Inas Nuha Afifa; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol 14 No 1 (2021): Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/biosferjpb.17316

Abstract

ADI learning model supports the syntax of the learning process through investigative activities of environmental pollution problems and their impact on the ecosystem. The model implements practicum to challenge students' creativity in presenting the results of practicum through students' arguments. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the ADI learning model and evaluate the students' creative thinking skills. This was a quasi-experiment study with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The sample was taken with cluster random sampling technique, 42 students were divided into 2 classes in 7th junior high school at Global Madani School, Bandar Lampung. Results were analyzed using covariance analysis and the effect size was measured by the partial eta-squared value. Aspects of creative thinking skills that were measured: fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and metaphorical thinking. The result shows the application of the ADI learning model had a significant effect in improving students' creative thinking skills with a significance value of 0.013 (sig.<0.05). The effect of implementing the ADI learning model had high effectiveness in improving the students' creative thinking skills with a partial eta squared value of 0.147 which was categorized as large (sig ≥ 0.14). Therefore, the ADI learning model affects improving students 'creative thinking and had an impact on high effectiveness in improving students' creative thinking. Finally, the learning model is recommended for Biology teachers to increase students' creative thinking skills effectively.
Pengaruh Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Perbedaan Kemampuan Akademik Intan Kamila Zahara; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Helina; Neni Hasnunidah
Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP) Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (390.5 KB) | DOI: 10.19109/jifp.v2i2.2630

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah pada materi cahaya dan optik di SMP Negeri 13 Bandar Lampung. Sampel penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII.2 dan VIII.3 yang masing-masing berjumlah 32 siswa. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pretest dan posttest menggunakan instrumen keterampilan argumentasi siswa yang diuji menggunakan uji Independent Sample T-Test dengan SPSS 21.0 . Berdasarkan hasil dari uji Independent Sample T-Test nilai Sig.(2-tailed) < α (0,000< 0,05), maka dapat dinyatakan terdapat perbedaan rata-rata keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah pada kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan adanya perbedaan rata-rata N-gain pada siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi di kelas eksperimen 0,70 dengan kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol 0,55 dengan kategori sedang. Kemudian pada siswa berkemampuan akademik rendah di kelas eksperimen 0,55 dengan kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol 0,48 dengan kategori sedang. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran ADI memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah.
PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL ADI TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS BERDASARKAN PERBEDAAN TIPE KEPRIBADIAN Fadila Nurhusna; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Herlina; Neni Hasnunidah
JOURNAL OF KOMODO SCIENCE EDUCATION Vol. 1 No. 01 (2018): Science Education in 21st century (NOVEMBER)
Publisher : Unika Santu Paulus Ruteng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.481 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the ADI model on critical thinking skills based on different types of choleric personality, melancholy, phlegmatic, and sanguine. This study uses a quasi-experimental type Pretest-posttest Control Group Design. The results showed that there was a significant effect of learning with the ADI model on critical thinking skills in the type of choleric personality, melancholy, phlegmatic, and sanguine and there were differences in critical thinking skills between the four personality types, namely choleric and melancholy, phlegmatic, sanguine, this is because choleric students who are more likely to appear more active in communicating and moving quickly to act, wherein this ADI model are required to give a lot of argumentation through verbal or communicating between fellow students to give their arguments. This shows that the use of the ADI learning model is able to improve students' critical thinking skills.
PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY (ADI) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMP BERDASARKAN PERBEDAAN JENIS KELAMIN Lulu’Atul Farida; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Herlina; Neni Hasnunidah
PASCAL (Journal of Physics and Science Learning) Vol 2, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.387 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model ADI terhadap kemampuan argumentasi siswa berdasarkan perbedaan gender. Metode yang digunakan adalah Quasi Experiment dengan menggunakan desain Pretest Posttest Non Equivalen Control Group Design. Data diambil dengan pretes dan postes essai keterampilan argumentasi. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan Independent Sample T-Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; penerapan model pembelajaran ADI berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa, terlihat pada nilai sig. 0,02 pada siswa perempuan dan 0,01 pada siswa berjenis kelamin laki-laki: terdapat perbedaan keterampilan argumentasi antara siswa perempuan dengan siswa laki-laki, terlihat pada perolehan nilai sig. dan  nilai N-Gain. Siswa perempuan memeperoleh N-Gain sebesar 0,71 dengan kategori tinggi dan siswa laki-laki memperoleh N-Gain 0,63 pada kategori sedang setelah diterapkan model ADI, sehingga dapat disimpulkan siswa perempuan memiliki keterampilan argumentasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa laki-laki.
Kajian Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Pokok Animalia Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik di SMA dengan Peringkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda Tantri Dewantari; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains Vol 5 No 1 (2022): BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (705.762 KB) | DOI: 10.31539/bioedusains.v5i1.3285

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the argumentation ability of students in high school with different accreditation ratings. The method used is a survey with an ex post facto research design and a sample selection technique using purposive sampling. The results of the student's argumentative ability test were analyzed statistically with the ANOVA test with a significance level of 5% and the data from interviews and teacher questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation ratings A was significantly different from those with accreditation ratings B and C. In addition, the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation rating B was significantly different from those with accreditation rating C. In conclusion, the average value of argumentation ability of students in high school with accreditation ratings of A, B and C on the subject matter of Animalia has a significant difference. Keywords: Accreditation, Animalia, Argumentation, Scientific Approach
Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumenation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry Neni Hasnunidah; Herawati Susilo; Mimien H. Irawati; Hadi Suwono
Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jk.v6i2.48183

Abstract

This study is aimed at comparing the quality of students’ argumentation based on conceptual and epistemic aspects between learnings that implement argument-driven inquiry (ADI) and argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding (ADIS) models. The data were collected through dialogic argumentation observation sheets for the students and audio-visual recordings and were analyzed qualitatively. The study invoved 67 participants in the ADI group and 81 participants in the ADIS group. The quality of student argument with the ADI model differed significantly from the ADIS model. Results show that the students in the ADIS class were are better at providing sufficient data to support claims and coherent causal explanations to explain a certain phenomenon, and at organizing accurate rhetorical references when expressing data.
Argumentation skill through a scientific approach: Study at different school accreditations rating Ria Afrilia; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi Vol 5, No 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1339

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in students' argumentation skills in learning biology on the subject matter of the respiratory system through a scientific approach. This research was conducted in class XII SMA in Way Kanan Regency, Lampung Province with an ex post facto design. The sampling technique used in this study was stratified random sampling with the determination of research subjects at SMAN 1 Baradatu which was accredited A, SMAN 2 Buay Bahuga was accredited B and MA Miftahul Ulum Way Tuba which was accredited C. Data collection instruments consisted of argumentation skill tests, interviews, study documentation and questionnaires. The argumentation skill data were analyzed with the help of Excel, hypothesis testing was carried out with one-way ANOVA and LSD test, interview data and learning documents were analyzed descriptively qualitatively with the Miles and Huberman model and questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively in percentage form. The results showed that there was a significant difference in argumentation skill among high school students with accreditation of A, B and C (sig. < 0.05). The average argumentation skill of students from A-accredited high schools was higher than B and C accredited high schools, but the average value of the three schools was very low. Students from A, B and C accredited high schools could make claims well, but had not been able to provide grounds, warrants and backings that are relevant to the claim. This was because students wer not used to working on argumentation questions and teachers had not optimized learning activities with a scientific approach.
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.81 KB) | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
EVALUASI PROGRAM PENUGASAN DOSEN DI SEKOLAH (PDS) FKIP UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CIPP Neni Hasnunidah; Abdurrahman Abdurrahman; Een Yayah Haenilah; Hermi Yanzi; Sri Hastuti Noer
Ruang Pengabdian : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 2, No 2 (2022): RUANG PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Lecturer Assignments in Schools or Penugasan Dosen di Sekolah (PDS) is one of the flagship programs for revitalizing TTIs based on partnerships with schools. The PDS program at FKIP Unila that has been implemented needs to be evaluated for its level of success. The purpose of this evaluation is to describe the level of success in implementing the PDS program at FKIP Unila as a whole in terms of context, input, process, and product. The program evaluation model uses the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product). Data collection techniques were used in the form of observation, distributing questionnaires, and document analysis. Evaluation data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively with stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The evaluation results show that the PDS FKIP Unila program was successful in terms of context, input, process, and product. Success in terms of context is demonstrated by the legal basis for program implementation which is clear and has program objectives that are in line with the revitalization of the LPTKs by increasing the professionalism of teachers. Success in terms of input is demonstrated by instructors who are competent in their fields, professional organizing teams, program materials that are by the school curriculum, supporting facilities and infrastructure, and sufficient budget funds. Success in terms of the process includes the implementation of the activity plan according to the specified schedule, the performance of the organizers and instructors being optimal, the participants being able to participate in education and training actively and well, and evaluations are carried out thoroughly both for evaluation of participants, instructors, and organizers. Success in terms of product is obtaining output in the form of best practices in the form of reflective journals, videos, and learning media as well as articles published in international proceedings and reputable international journals. Based on the evaluation results, the implementation of the Unila FKIP PDS program was effective in providing solutions for increasing the professionalism of educators.  AbstrakPenugasan Dosen di Sekolah (PDS) merupakan salah satu program unggulan revitaliasi LPTK berbasis kemitraan dengan sekolah. Program PDS di FKIP Unila yang telah dilaksanakan perlu dievaluasi tingkat keberhasilannya. Tujuan evaluasi ini adalah mendeskripsikan tingkat keberhasilan pelaksanaan program PDS di FKIP Unila secara menyeluruh dalam hal konteks, masukan, proses, dan produk. Model evaluasi program menggunakan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan berupa observasi, penyebaran kuesioner, dan analisis dokumen. Data evaluasi dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif dengan tahapan, yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa program PDS FKIP Unila berhasil dilihat dari segi konteks, masukan, proses, dan produk. Keberhasilan dari segi konteks ditunjukkan dari dasar hukum pelaksanaan program yang jelas dan memiliki tujuan program yang sesuai dengan revitalisasi LPTK dengan peningkatan profesionalitas guru. Keberhasilan dari segi masukan ditunjukkan dari instruktur yang kompeten dibidangnya, tim penyelenggara yang profesional, materi program yang sesuai dengan kurikulum sekolah, sarana dan prasarana yang mendukung serta dan anggaran dana yang mencukupi. Keberhasilan dari segi proses meliputi keterlaksanaan rencana kegiatan telah sesuai dengan jadwal yang ditentukan, kinerja penyelenggara dan instruktur sudah optimal, peserta mampu mengikuti pendidikan dan pelatihan dengan aktif dan baik, dan evaluasi dilakukan secara menyeluruh baik evaluasi peserta, instruktur maupun penyelenggara. Keberhasilan dari segi produk yaitu diperolehnya luaran berupa best practices dalam bentuk jurnal refleksi, video dan media pembelajaran serta artikel yang diterbitkan dalam prosiding internasional dan jurnal internasional bereputasi. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi, maka pelaksanaan program PDS FKIP Unila efektif dalam memberikan solusi bagi peningkatan profesionalitas pendidik. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/rp/v2i2.hal.150-169
Co-Authors Abdurahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Agus Suyatna Aini, Nur Rohmatul Amanda, Dhea Olivia Anitia Fadhila Bumay Arwin Achmad Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Budiasih, Yuli Chansyanah Diawati Dani Jaya Putra Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Dartia Utari Devi Andriani Devi Andriani Dewi Lengkana Dewi Lengkana Dewi Lengkana Dewie Permata Dian Aulya Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Een Yayah Haenilah Eko Suyanto Erlis Miarti Fadila Nurhusna Hadi Suwono Hayatun Nufus Hedi Sutomo Herawati Susilo Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Hermi Yanzi I Wayan Distrik Inas Nuha Afifa Indriyani Indriyani Intan Kamila Zahara Ismi Rakhmawati Kartini Helina Kartini Herlina Laya Nazila Lengkana, Dewi Likita, Egy Razka Lismawati Lismawati* Lulu’Atul Farida Median Agus Priadi Meriza Nadya Meriza, Nadya Mimien H. Irawati Mimien Henie Irawati Nadya Meriza Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Ninda Ningtyas Noor Fadiawati Noor Fadiawati Nur Rohmatul Aini Nurfitha Kusumaningtyas Nurhusna, Fadila Nurul Cahyani Pangestuti, Dini Aji Perdana, Dheonardo Putra Pramita Sylvia Dewi Puput Agustin Pertiwi Rakhmawati, Ismi Restanti, Mida Ayu Ria Afrilia Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Risti Amalia Sari Safira, Cherry Acerola Samantha Tiara Putri Selvina Annis Fajriani Setiawati, Santy Sherly Fadhila Sri Hastuti Noer Susi Ulfah Suwandi, Tri Tajudin Afgani Tantri Dewantari Tirta Sari Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Suwandi Tri Utami Tri Wulandari Uji Yoga Prastio Umi Nurkhasanah Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Uun Febriyani Viyanti Viyanti Wahyu Dwi Lestari Widya Hendriyani Wisnu Juli Wiono WISNU JULI WIONO, WISNU JULI Yesi Yosinta Yudhianingrum, Nawang Yuli Budiasih Zahra Mila Putri Zevi Octasari