Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PENGUATAN KEMAMPUAN GURU IPA SMP DI LAMPUNG SELATAN DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN BAHAN AJAR BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DENGAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY Neni Hasnunidah; Arwin Surbakti; Median Agus Priadi; Wisnu Juli Wiono
Ruang Pengabdian : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 2, No 1 (2022): RUANG PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakPengembangan profesionalitas guru terutama harus didasarkan pada kebutuhan individu guru itu sendiri, selain kebutuhan institusi dan kelompok guru. Selama ini terindikasi bahwa guru terutama pada jenjang SMP/MTs mengalami kendala dalam menyusun program pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan saintifik, apalagi dalam mengimplementasikannya. Kegiatan Pelaksanaan Iptek bagi Masyarakat (IbM) telah diselenggarakan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan guru-guru IPA SMP di Kabupten Lampung Selatan dalam mengembangkan bahan ajar berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI). Dosen sebagai nara sumber sekaligus pakar pendidikan dalam sistem pembinaan profesional guru mengkoordinir pelaksanaan program dan implementasinya. Hasil kegiatan IbM ini menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pemahaman guru tentang perancangan bahan ajar IPA SMP berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry. Keterampilan guru meningkat terutama dalam menyusun Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) IPA SMP berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model ADI. Dengan demikian, kegiatan pengabdian yang dilakukan telah berjalan secara efektif dan sesuai dengan hasil yang diharapkan. Kata Kunci: argument-driven inquiry; pendekatan saintifik; profesionalitas AbstractThe development of teacher professionalism must primarily be based on the individual needs of the teacher himself, in addition to the needs of the institution and group of teachers. So far, it has been indicated that teachers, especially at the SMP/MTs level, have problems in developing a scientific approach based learning program, especially in implementing it. The implementation of Science and Technology for Society (IbM) has been held to improve the understanding and skills of junior high school science teachers at South Lampung in developing teaching material based on scientific approach with the Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model. Lecturers as resource persons and education experts in the development of teacher professionalism coordinate the implementation of the program and its implementation. The results of the implementation this IbM indicate an increase in teacher understanding of the design of junior high school science teaching materials based on the scientific approach with the Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model. Teacher skills are improved, especially in compiling a Science Worksheet for Students in a Junior High School based on a scientific approach with argumentation. Therefore, the implementation of IbM carried out effectively and in accordance with the expected results. Keywords: argument-driven inquiry; professionalism; scientific approach DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/rp/v2i1.hal.10-25
Pengembangan Buku Penuntun Praktikum Sistem Peredaran Darah Manusia dengan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Widya Hendriyani; Neni Hasnunidah; Berti Yolida
Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Bioedusiana
Publisher : Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi - Universitas Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (223.357 KB) | DOI: 10.34289/bioed.v5i1.1455

Abstract

This study aims to produce a practical guidebook of human circulatory system with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model for students at junior high schools. The design of this research was RD with 4-D model including define, design, develop, and disseminate. However, this research was only up to the develop step. The result of this study is in form of a practical guidebook of human circulatory system and using language that is easily understood and in accordance with EYD. Then, the practical worksheet consists of student identities, title of practices, basic theories, objectives, research questions, tools, materials, work steps, argumentation schemes, argumentation sessions, and reports. Next, the results of validation of experts and practitioners as well as the results of the readability test of the students obtain "Excellent" category. Moreover, the results of the implemented tests of all practices obtain "Almost All Activities Implemented" category. As a result, the practical guidebook of the human circulatory system with ADI model is valid and practical.
Analysis of Creative Thinking Skills Through the Application of a Scientific Approach Based on Academic Ability Disparity Neni Hasnunidah; Dian Aulya; Arwin Surbakti
Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
Publisher : Magister Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jpb.v11i1.24344

Abstract

Creative thinking skills are crucial for students in facing challenges and obstacles in the future. This study aims to analyze the creative thinking skills of students based on differences in academic abilities. This type of research is comparative with the ex post facto research design. The sample selection technique using purposive sampling obtained a sample of 114 students. The results showed that there were significant differences in creative thinking skills (p <0.05) between students with higher, moderate, and lower academic abilities. Creative thinking skills of students with higher academical abilities were significantly different (p <0.05) from students with lower academic, but not significant (p> 0.05) from students with moderate academic. Creative thinking skills of students with moderate academic abilities were not significantly different (p> 0.05) with students with lower academic. The average value of creative thinking skills in each group is low because students experience difficulties in empowering creative thinking skills. The benefit of this research is to find out the creative thinking skills of students so that they can be used as a reference in evaluating learning.
Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model on students' creative thinking skill: Environmental pollution Inas Nuha Afifa; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol 14 No 1 (2021): Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/biosferjpb.17316

Abstract

ADI learning model supports the syntax of the learning process through investigative activities of environmental pollution problems and their impact on the ecosystem. The model implements practicum to challenge students' creativity in presenting the results of practicum through students' arguments. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the ADI learning model and evaluate the students' creative thinking skills. This was a quasi-experiment study with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The sample was taken with cluster random sampling technique, 42 students were divided into 2 classes in 7th junior high school at Global Madani School, Bandar Lampung. Results were analyzed using covariance analysis and the effect size was measured by the partial eta-squared value. Aspects of creative thinking skills that were measured: fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and metaphorical thinking. The result shows the application of the ADI learning model had a significant effect in improving students' creative thinking skills with a significance value of 0.013 (sig.<0.05). The effect of implementing the ADI learning model had high effectiveness in improving the students' creative thinking skills with a partial eta squared value of 0.147 which was categorized as large (sig ≥ 0.14). Therefore, the ADI learning model affects improving students 'creative thinking and had an impact on high effectiveness in improving students' creative thinking. Finally, the learning model is recommended for Biology teachers to increase students' creative thinking skills effectively.
Pengaruh Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Perbedaan Kemampuan Akademik Intan Kamila Zahara; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Helina; Neni Hasnunidah
Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP) Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (390.5 KB) | DOI: 10.19109/jifp.v2i2.2630

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah pada materi cahaya dan optik di SMP Negeri 13 Bandar Lampung. Sampel penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII.2 dan VIII.3 yang masing-masing berjumlah 32 siswa. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pretest dan posttest menggunakan instrumen keterampilan argumentasi siswa yang diuji menggunakan uji Independent Sample T-Test dengan SPSS 21.0 . Berdasarkan hasil dari uji Independent Sample T-Test nilai Sig.(2-tailed) < α (0,000< 0,05), maka dapat dinyatakan terdapat perbedaan rata-rata keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah pada kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan adanya perbedaan rata-rata N-gain pada siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi di kelas eksperimen 0,70 dengan kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol 0,55 dengan kategori sedang. Kemudian pada siswa berkemampuan akademik rendah di kelas eksperimen 0,55 dengan kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol 0,48 dengan kategori sedang. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran ADI memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah.
PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL ADI TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS BERDASARKAN PERBEDAAN TIPE KEPRIBADIAN Fadila Nurhusna; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Herlina; Neni Hasnunidah
JOURNAL OF KOMODO SCIENCE EDUCATION Vol. 1 No. 01 (2018): Science Education in 21st century (NOVEMBER)
Publisher : Unika Santu Paulus Ruteng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.481 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the ADI model on critical thinking skills based on different types of choleric personality, melancholy, phlegmatic, and sanguine. This study uses a quasi-experimental type Pretest-posttest Control Group Design. The results showed that there was a significant effect of learning with the ADI model on critical thinking skills in the type of choleric personality, melancholy, phlegmatic, and sanguine and there were differences in critical thinking skills between the four personality types, namely choleric and melancholy, phlegmatic, sanguine, this is because choleric students who are more likely to appear more active in communicating and moving quickly to act, wherein this ADI model are required to give a lot of argumentation through verbal or communicating between fellow students to give their arguments. This shows that the use of the ADI learning model is able to improve students' critical thinking skills.
PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY (ADI) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMP BERDASARKAN PERBEDAAN JENIS KELAMIN Lulu’Atul Farida; Undang Rosidin; Kartini Herlina; Neni Hasnunidah
PASCAL (Journal of Physics and Science Learning) Vol 2, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.387 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model ADI terhadap kemampuan argumentasi siswa berdasarkan perbedaan gender. Metode yang digunakan adalah Quasi Experiment dengan menggunakan desain Pretest Posttest Non Equivalen Control Group Design. Data diambil dengan pretes dan postes essai keterampilan argumentasi. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan Independent Sample T-Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; penerapan model pembelajaran ADI berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa, terlihat pada nilai sig. 0,02 pada siswa perempuan dan 0,01 pada siswa berjenis kelamin laki-laki: terdapat perbedaan keterampilan argumentasi antara siswa perempuan dengan siswa laki-laki, terlihat pada perolehan nilai sig. dan  nilai N-Gain. Siswa perempuan memeperoleh N-Gain sebesar 0,71 dengan kategori tinggi dan siswa laki-laki memperoleh N-Gain 0,63 pada kategori sedang setelah diterapkan model ADI, sehingga dapat disimpulkan siswa perempuan memiliki keterampilan argumentasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa laki-laki.
Kajian Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Pokok Animalia Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik di SMA dengan Peringkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda Tantri Dewantari; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains Vol 5 No 1 (2022): BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (705.762 KB) | DOI: 10.31539/bioedusains.v5i1.3285

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the argumentation ability of students in high school with different accreditation ratings. The method used is a survey with an ex post facto research design and a sample selection technique using purposive sampling. The results of the student's argumentative ability test were analyzed statistically with the ANOVA test with a significance level of 5% and the data from interviews and teacher questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation ratings A was significantly different from those with accreditation ratings B and C. In addition, the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation rating B was significantly different from those with accreditation rating C. In conclusion, the average value of argumentation ability of students in high school with accreditation ratings of A, B and C on the subject matter of Animalia has a significant difference. Keywords: Accreditation, Animalia, Argumentation, Scientific Approach
Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumenation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry Neni Hasnunidah; Herawati Susilo; Mimien H. Irawati; Hadi Suwono
Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jk.v6i2.48183

Abstract

This study is aimed at comparing the quality of students’ argumentation based on conceptual and epistemic aspects between learnings that implement argument-driven inquiry (ADI) and argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding (ADIS) models. The data were collected through dialogic argumentation observation sheets for the students and audio-visual recordings and were analyzed qualitatively. The study invoved 67 participants in the ADI group and 81 participants in the ADIS group. The quality of student argument with the ADI model differed significantly from the ADIS model. Results show that the students in the ADIS class were are better at providing sufficient data to support claims and coherent causal explanations to explain a certain phenomenon, and at organizing accurate rhetorical references when expressing data.
Argumentation skill through a scientific approach: Study at different school accreditations rating Ria Afrilia; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi Vol 5, No 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1339

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in students' argumentation skills in learning biology on the subject matter of the respiratory system through a scientific approach. This research was conducted in class XII SMA in Way Kanan Regency, Lampung Province with an ex post facto design. The sampling technique used in this study was stratified random sampling with the determination of research subjects at SMAN 1 Baradatu which was accredited A, SMAN 2 Buay Bahuga was accredited B and MA Miftahul Ulum Way Tuba which was accredited C. Data collection instruments consisted of argumentation skill tests, interviews, study documentation and questionnaires. The argumentation skill data were analyzed with the help of Excel, hypothesis testing was carried out with one-way ANOVA and LSD test, interview data and learning documents were analyzed descriptively qualitatively with the Miles and Huberman model and questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively in percentage form. The results showed that there was a significant difference in argumentation skill among high school students with accreditation of A, B and C (sig. < 0.05). The average argumentation skill of students from A-accredited high schools was higher than B and C accredited high schools, but the average value of the three schools was very low. Students from A, B and C accredited high schools could make claims well, but had not been able to provide grounds, warrants and backings that are relevant to the claim. This was because students wer not used to working on argumentation questions and teachers had not optimized learning activities with a scientific approach.
Co-Authors Abdurahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Agus Suyatna Aini, Nur Rohmatul Amanda, Dhea Olivia Anitia Fadhila Bumay Arwin Achmad Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Budiasih, Yuli Chansyanah Diawati Dani Jaya Putra Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Devi Andriani Devi Andriani Dewi Lengkana Dewi Lengkana Dewie Permata Dian Aulya Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Een Yayah Haenilah Eko Suyanto Erlis Miarti Fadila Nurhusna Hadi Suwono Hayatun Nufus Hedi Sutomo Herawati Susilo Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Hermi Yanzi I Wayan Distrik Inas Nuha Afifa Indriyani Indriyani Intan Kamila Zahara Ismi Rakhmawati Kartini Helina Kartini Herlina Laya Nazila Lengkana, Dewi Likita, Egy Razka Lismawati Lismawati* Lulu’Atul Farida Median Agus Priadi Meriza Nadya Meriza, Nadya Mimien H. Irawati Mimien Henie Irawati Nadya Meriza Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Ninda Ningtyas Noor Fadiawati Noor Fadiawati Nur Rohmatul Aini Nurfitha Kusumaningtyas Nurhusna, Fadila Nurul Cahyani Pangestuti, Dini Aji Pramita Sylvia Dewi Puput Agustin Pertiwi Rakhmawati, Ismi Restanti, Mida Ayu Ria Afrilia Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Risti Amalia Sari Safira, Cherry Acerola Samantha Tiara Putri Selvina Annis Fajriani Setiawati, Santy Sherly Fadhila Sri Hastuti Noer Susi Ulfah Suwandi, Tri Tajudin Afgani Tantri Dewantari Tirta Sari Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Suwandi Tri Utami Uji Yoga Prastio Umi Nurkhasanah Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Utari, Dartia Uun Febriyani Wahyu Dwi Lestari Widya Hendriyani Wisnu Juli Wiono WISNU JULI WIONO, WISNU JULI Yesi Yosinta Yudhianingrum, Nawang Yuli Budiasih Zahra Mila Putri Zevi Octasari