Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

STEM-Based Instrument Integration: Enhancing Systems and Science Skills in Teaching Likita, Egy Razka; Abdurrahman, Abdurrahman; Hasnunidah, Neni; Jalmo, Tri
International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society Vol 2 No 3 (2024): International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijecs.v2i3.3461

Abstract

This research aims to describe STEM-based practicum instrument componentinstrument to stimulate students' system thinking skills based on the views of teachers and students. This research involved 50 middle school science teachers in Lampung Province. The method used in this research is a mixed method with explanatory sequential design to obtain quantitative and qualitative data through questionnaires and interviews. The results of the research show that teachers and students have a positive perception towards the development of STEM-based practicum instrument component. This research found the fact that there are some difficulties experienced by teachers in the use of STEM-based practicum instrument component. Teachers believe that the use of STEM-based practicum instrument component can stimulate the system thinking ability and have an impact on the improvement of students science process skills.
Argument-Driven Inquiry, Gender, and Its Effects on Argumentation Skills Hasnunidah, Neni; Wiono, Wisnu Juli
Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4676

Abstract

Argumentation is considered by science teachers as a major component of science education. Middle school students need to be empowered in their argumentation skills to answer challenges to global competition. This study aimed to compare the argumentation skills between male and female students in science through the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model and guided inquiry model. There were 317 participants (150 male and 167 female) eighth-grade students of several schools in Bandar Lampung. The Pretest-posttest Non-equivalent Control Group Design was used as a part of a quasi-experimental design. The experiment class applied the ADI model and the control class applied the guided inquiry model. The data were collected by argumentation test, questionnaire of implementation learning syntax, and participant’s response. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA test and qualitative techniques. The results indicated that the ADI model led to a significant increased in argumentation skills in the science context. Moreover, there is no difference in the achievement of females and males. When students were encouraged to state claims and support their claims with data, warrants, and backing, it was observed that their argumentative discourse increased in terms of both the structure and the complexity of the argumentation. In light of the findings, it is suggested that the argumentation activities should be developed to promote students' science content knowledge and argumentation skills of both male and female students. 
Production and Utilization of Moodle-Based e-Learning to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Skills with the STEM Approach Restanti, Mida Ayu; Hasnunidah, Neni; Suyatna, Agus; Abdurrahman, Abdurrahman
Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/tadris.v8i2.19298

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a Moodle-based e-learning platform with a valid, practical, and effective STEM approach to enhance Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The research methodology employed for development purposes was the ADDIE model, consisting of five distinct phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The selection of research subjects for the field trial was conducted through cluster random sampling, wherein experimental and control classes were chosen. The experimental class utilized a Moodle-based e-learning solution for instructional purposes, while the control class adhered to traditional learning methods. Data were collected using validated questionnaires and written tests. The findings indicated that the Moodle-based e-learning products with a STEM approach are effective in enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills. This was evident from the average n-Gain gain falling in the "medium" category at 0.62 and an effect size also in the "medium" category at 0.43. Student responses to the Moodle-based e-learning were very positive. Based on the research findings, the researcher offers some recommendations. Teachers aiming to utilize this product could enhance its effectiveness by incorporating additional platforms into their learning activities and resources. Additionally, other researchers interested in advancing further studies can introduce problem-solving activities to stimulate higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in everyday situations. In conclusion, the Moodle-based STEM e-learning product is effective in enhancing students' HOTS.
Meningkatkan Argumentasi Ilmiah melalui Integrasi Argument-Driven Inquiry dan STEM dalam Lembar Kerja Elektronik untuk Pendidikan Sains Menengah Fitria, Ade Rizka; Hasnunidah, Neni; Fadiawati, Noor; Suyatna, Agus
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 7 (2025): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11603

Abstract

This study explores the integration of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model with a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) approach in interactive e-worksheets to enhance students' scientific argumentation in food biotechnology education. Using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, 60 ninth-grade students from SMPN 1 Tanjung Bintang were assigned to either an experimental group, using ADI-STEM e-worksheets, or a control group, using conventional printed worksheets. Data were collected through a validated open-ended test assessing scientific argumentation components: claims, data, warrants, and backing. Analysis of N-Gain scores, t-tests, and effect sizes indicated that the experimental group showed significantly greater improvement across all indicators, with a large effect size demonstrating substantial impact. The integration of ADI and STEM not only fostered deeper cognitive engagement but also improved students' ability to form structured, evidence-backed arguments. These findings highlight the potential of combining inquiry-based learning with interdisciplinary STEM content in digital formats to enhance higher-order thinking and scientific reasoning. The study contributes to 21st-century science education and calls for further research on its long-term and broader effects.
Development of Peer-Scaffolding-Based Learning Program to Train the Performance Assessment Ability of Prospective Science Teacher Jalmo, Tri; Hasnunidah, Neni; Fadiawati, Noor; Priadi, Median Agus
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of the research is to develop a peer scaffolding-based learning program to equip prospective science teacher students with the ability to develop performance appraisals. This program was developed using a 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate), the development of which has reached the stage of feasibility testing (Develop). Data collection techniques with questionnaires to measure the validity of the feasibility of learning programs and essay tests for the ability to develop performance appraisals. The results of this study indicate that the learning program developed got an average score of 4.00 (very valid category) in all aspects of feasibility. The results of the program trial show that there is an increase in student abilities seen from their N-gain (0.41: moderate criteria). Improvement in the aspect of the ability to understand the scope of the assessment with “low” criteria (0.036), planning an assessment with “medium” criteria (0.72). Based on this, it is concluded that the program developed is quite effective in providing performance appraisal skills for prospective science teacher students.Keywords: learning program, peer scaffolding, performance assessment.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i1.pp284-293
Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning Hasnunidah, Neni; Amanda, Dhea Olivia; Meriza, Nadya; Lengkana, Dewi; Dewi, Pramita Sylvia
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning. Objective: This research aims to analyze students HOTS on the Classification of Living Creatures material using Liveworksheet argumentative worksheets through the Discovery Learning model at SMP Negeri 1 Natar. Methods: This research is a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The research subjects were 69 class VII students sampled from a population of 384 people using simple random sampling techniques. Cognitive tests (C4, C5, & C6) were analyzed using the Independent sample t-test. Data on student responses were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. Findings: The results of the research show that there is a significant difference in the N-gain value (P<0.05) between learning using the Discovery Learning model and discovery-model based argumentative liveworksheet. The high scores in the experimental class were the evaluate skills (N-gain 0.63) and analyze skills (N-gain 0.62), while in the control class the three HOTS indicators were low. Based on the results of the student response questionnaire, it was found that almost all students (82.25%) gave very positive responses to the use of argumentative lifeworksheets. Conclusion: The liveworksheet effectively improve students' HOTS.        Keywords: HOTS, classification of living things, liveworksheet argumentative worksheet, discovery learning model.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp351-372
The Effect of e-Worksheets in Eco-Friendly Technology Oriented with Argument Driven Inquiry Model to Improve Students Argumentation Skills Hasnunidah, Neni; Andriani, Devi; Abdurrahman, Abdurrahman
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to describe the effect of implementing e-worksheets on environmentally friendly technology materials with the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in improving students' argumentation skills. This study involved 60 grade IX students in a junior high school in South Lampung, Lampung province. The research design used was a non equivalent pretest-posttest control group design with an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 30 students. Students in the experimental class get learning assisted by e worksheet with the ADI model, while students in the control class are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The results showed that students who were taught using the e worksheets with the ADI model had a higher N-gain (g=0.61 with medium criteria) than students taught using the PBL model (g=0.17 with low criteria). Furthermore, the effectiveness of learning environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model shows a high category (ES=0.84). This shows that the e-worksheet material on environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model was effective in improving students' argumentation skills. Keywords: e-worksheet, argumentation skills, argument-driven inquiry. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp744-753
Habits of Mind and Concept Mastery of Cell in Multimedia Virtual Class Environment: A Case of Biology Students in Lampung University Rakhmawati, Ismi; Hasnunidah, Neni; Priadi, Median Agus
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 20, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The ability of students to use Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is still not optimally integrated with learning. Even though most students already have gadgets, internet connections are available via campus hotspots. Based on this, learning in higher education cannot be separated from the use of computerized and online-based technology. The integration of ICT into vclass-based multimedia learning is a potential thing to develop. This vclass-based multimedia application is expected to improve habits of mind and conceptual understanding of biology cell of students. Improved learning outcomes can be demonstrated through conceptual understanding which are the ability to understand the concepts that exist in the learning material after the learning process takes place.Keywords: habits of mind, mastery of concepts, cells, virtual class. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v20i1.pp17-22
Improving Students' Understanding of Science Concepts: is there a Relationship Between Learning Models and Academic Ability? Hasnunidah, Neni; Rosidin, Undang; Kadaritna, Nina
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model, which is considered appropriate for use in higher education, is still not able to overcome students' difficulties in developing argumentative discourse so that their understanding of concepts tends to be low. The management of the learning process for students with different academic abilities requires scaffolding in the ADI model which is implemented gradually from the class, group, and individual levels. This research has produced an Argument-Driven with Scaffolding (ADIS) model which is a modification of the ADI model with the addition of standpoints and phasing. Standpoint as a statement of claim functions in generating arguments through debate. Meanwhile, the phases consisting of initiation, development, and reinforcement function in the development of individual argumentation skills. This study aims to compare the understanding of the concept of students with different academic abilities by using ADI, ADIS, and conventional learning models. The design of a non-equivalent pre-test-post-test control group was used on 180 prospective science teacher students at the University of Lampung. The concept comprehension test is used to measure students' ability to understand the concepts taught from answers in the form of essays. The test questions relate to the level of thinking from Bloom's cognitive domain, namely remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The results of the analysis of students' concept understanding data using ANCOVA showed that the achievement of concept understanding with the ADIS learning model was equivalent to ADI but higher than the conventional model. Students with high academic ability have a higher understanding of concepts compared to students with low academic ability. The highest average concept understanding was achieved by students with high academic ability in the ADIS class, while the lowest average was achieved by students with low academic ability in the Conventional class. The ADIS model has been proven to be able to train students' skills in drafting high-quality arguments and participating productively in scientific arguments in stages so as to improve understanding of concepts. Standpoint as a starting point in argumentation development and phasing (initiation, development, and reinforcement) in the ADIS model is effectively used as a scaffolding for students to develop argumentation skills both classically, in groups, and individually.       Keywords: academic ability, argument-driven inquiry, conceptual understanding, scaffolding.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1224-1243
PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH OPEN-ENDED TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH OLEH SISWA Suwandi, Tri; Hasnunidah, Neni; Marpaung, Rini Rita T.
Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

: The Effects of Problem Based Learning Open-Ended Type towards The Improving of Students’ Problem Solving Skills. This study aimed to determine the effect of using openended PBM models in improving problem-solving skills of students. This study was a quasiexperimental with pretest posttest designs not equivalent. Samples were students in class X1 and X6 selected from the population by using cluster random sampling. This research data were in the form of quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data were obtained from the average value of pretest and posttest that were statistically analyzed using t-test at 5% confidence level through SPSS 17. Qualitative data were in the form of a description of the problem solving ability of students, student learning activity data, and the questionnaire responses of students to use open-ended PBM model which were analyzed descriptively. The average percentage of students’ activity in all aspects observed in the experimental class is higher than the control class (experimental = 81.32; control = 64.22). Therefore, learning by using PBM model of open-ended can influence the increasing of problem solving skills by students.  Keywords: problem-based learning model open-ended type, problem-solving skills, biology learning, biodiversity. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v6.i2.201601
Co-Authors Abdurahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Agus Suyatna Aini, Nur Rohmatul Amanda, Dhea Olivia Anitia Fadhila Bumay Arwin Achmad Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Budiasih, Yuli Chansyanah Diawati Dani Jaya Putra Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Devi Andriani Devi Andriani Dewi Lengkana Dewi Lengkana Dewie Permata Dian Aulya Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Een Yayah Haenilah Eko Suyanto Erlis Miarti Fadhila, Sherly Fadila Nurhusna Fitria, Ade Rizka Hadi Suwono Hayatun Nufus Hedi Sutomo Herawati Susilo Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Hermi Yanzi I Wayan Distrik Inas Nuha Afifa Indriyani Indriyani Intan Kamila Zahara Ismi Rakhmawati Kartini Helina Kartini Herlina Laya Nazila Lengkana, Dewi Likita, Egy Razka Lismawati Lismawati* Lulu’Atul Farida Median Agus Priadi Meriza, Nadya Mimien H. Irawati Mimien Henie Irawati Nadya, Meriza Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Ninda Ningtyas Noor Fadiawati Noor Fadiawati Nur Rohmatul Aini Nurfitha Kusumaningtyas Nurhusna, Fadila Nurul Cahyani Pangestuti, Dini Aji Pramita Sylvia Dewi Puput Agustin Pertiwi Rakhmawati, Ismi Restanti, Mida Ayu Ria Afrilia Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Risti Amalia Sari Safira, Cherry Acerola Samantha Tiara Putri Selvina Annis Fajriani Setiawati, Santy Sri Hastuti Noer Susi Ulfah Suwandi, Tri Tajudin Afgani Tantri Dewantari Tirta Sari Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Suwandi Tri Utami Uji Yoga Prastio Umi Nurkhasanah Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Utari, Dartia Uun Febriyani Wahyu Dwi Lestari Widya Hendriyani Wisnu Juli Wiono WISNU JULI WIONO, WISNU JULI Yesi Yosinta Yuli Budiasih Zahra Mila Putri Zevi Octasari