Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Protection of Women and Children Post-Divorce in Sharia Courts in Aceh: A Sociological Perspective Kasim, Fajri M; Nurdin, Abidin; Muthalib, Salman Abdul; Syarifuddin, Samsinar; Samad, Munawwarah
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v22i2.28747

Abstract

This  study  discusses  the  protection  of  women  and  children  after divorce  at  the  Syar'iyah  Court  in  Aceh.  A  legal  sociology  approach  is  used to  draw  the  decisions  of  the  Banda  Aceh,  Aceh  Besar,  Pidie,  Bireuen,  and Lhokseumawe Syar'iyyah Courts. The interviews were conducted with judges, community  leaders,  village  heads,  heads  of  the  Office  of  Religious  Affairs (KUA),  academics,  traditional  figures,  and  non-governmental  organizations (NGO) activists. This study concludes that the Syar'iyah Court in Aceh, in its  decision,  has  ensured  the  rights  of  women  and  children.  The  Syar'iyah Court  in  Aceh  determined  the  provision  of  'iddah,  muṭ'ah  maintenance, joint  assets,  and  childcare  rights  to  women.  Children  get  living  expenses, guardianship from the family, and care from the mother. Sociologically, the law has functioned as a means of social control through the Syar'iyah Court and judges as the main part of the legal structure supported by other elements of society so that the protection of women and children can be realized fairly.Keywords: protection of women and children; divorce; legal sociology; sharia court AbstrakKajian  ini  membahas  perlindungan  perempuan  dan  anak  setelah perceraian pada Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Aceh. Dengan pendekatan sosiologi hukum,  studi  ini  bersumber  pada  putusan-putusan  Mahkamah  Syar’iyyah Banda Aceh, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen, and Lhokseumawe dan wawancara kepada hakim, tokoh masyarakat, kepala desa, kepala Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA),  akademisi,  tokoh  adat  dan  aktivis  Lembaga  Swadaya  Masyarakat (LSM). Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Aceh dalam putusannya telah memastikan hak-hak perempuan dan anak. Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Aceh menetapkan pemberian nafkah ‘iddah, nafkah muṭ‘ah, harta bersama dan hak pengasuhan anak kepada perempuan; dan anak mendapatkan biaya hidup, perwalian dari keluarga dan pengasuhan dari ibu. Secara sosiologis, hukum telah berfungsi sebagai alat kontrol sosial melalui Mahkamah Syar’iyah dan  hakim  sebagai  bagian  utama  dari  struktur  hukum  yang  didukung  oleh elemen masyarakat lainnya sehingga perlindungan terhadap perempuan dan anak dapat terwujud secara adil.Kata Kunci: perlindungan perempuan dan anak; perceraian; sosiologi hukum; Mahkamah Syar’iyah
Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism Djawas, Mursyid; Nurdin, Abidin; Zainuddin, Muslim; Idham, Idham; Idami, Zahratul
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824

Abstract

Indonesia recognizes several legal systems i.e., state law, customary law, Islamic law, and international law. Islamic sharia in Aceh is part of legal pluralism in Indonesia. This study aims to discuss the application of Islamic sharia from the perspective of legal pluralism. This normative legal study employed a legal pluralism theory analysis. Legal pluralism is a theory that views law not only as positive or written law made by the state but also as a recognition of the legal reality that exists in a pluralistic society. The study collected data by means of a literature review. Findings revealed that Islamic sharia in Aceh as part of the recognition of the concept of legal pluralism has been implemented well in the context of state law, custom, and Islamic law. The state has provided juridical legitimacy through laws in the context of legal substance and judicial institutions or sharia courts. Likewise, revitalization has also occurred in traditional institutions in terms of customary law and customary justice. The argument emphasized in this study is that Islamic sharia in the context of legal pluralism has succeeded in manifesting legal harmonization between the state, custom, and Islamic law
POINT-CONTERPOINT: METODE DEBAT DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP MAHASISWA DI ACEH A. Samad, Sri Astuti; Abidin Nurdin; Samad, Munawwarah; Herawati
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : FISIP Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/jspm.v7i1.24991

Abstract

This article discusses the point-counterpoint method, or debating, in the learning process and its impact on students in Aceh. This study is a qualitative study using descriptive analysis. The debating method is crucial in the learning process because it can determine the success or failure of the learning carried out by lecturers, teachers, and educators. This article concludes that the method of debating opinions in the learning process is carried out by discussing a problem to find the best answer, not looking for who loses. The benefits of the debate method with students, namely increasing thinking power, being active in the learning process, respecting the opinions of others, and being able to work together in groups. Philosophically, using the debate method in the learning process, students will experience cognitive and affective intelligence. Because debating the ability to analyze thoughts, provide arguments and respect for the opinions of others, and express ideas in a polite manner occurs in the learning process the debate of opinion takes place.