Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.767
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Bestuur Yustisia Lentera Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Hasanuddin Law Review Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Mulawarman Law Review Indonesian Journal of Global Health research JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Health Sains Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Indonesian Journal of International Law Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Yuridika Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) IPSSJ JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 55 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 55 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN UNDER INDONESIA’S PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENTS (PTAs) I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Yustisia Vol 8, No 2: August 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.24594

Abstract

International trade has resulted positive impacts, such as alleviating poverty and increasing jobs. All countries then start concluding trade agreements multilaterally, regionally and bilaterally. The existence of preferential trade agreements is increasingly significant due to the deadlock of multilateral trade agreements. Although providing benefits, international trade has adversely affected environment. Some international treaties suggest how countries should include environmental concern in their PTAs. Unlike traditional PTAs, most of modern PTAs have incorporated environmental concern, reconciling the goal of trade liberalization and environmental protection. In Indonesia, there is a link between international trade and environmental harm. This article aims to show the existing Indonesia’s PTAs, analysing how Indonesia has put, and how it should put environmental concern in its PTAs. This article argues that only a few Indonesia’s PTAs have incorporated environmental concern in their provisions. Moreover, when they include environmental concern, there is no further elaboration on how this process should be undertaken. Compare to other existing PTAs, Indonesia should start incorporating environmental concern in its PTAs, and then allow the right of government to impose protective measure in order to preserve environment. 
CAN INDONESIA INVOKE PUBLIC MORALS EXCEPTION UNDER THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) FOR PROHIBITING CROSS-BORDER GAMBLING? I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Yustisia Vol 7, No 2: August 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i2.19914

Abstract

Under the WTO, Indonesia is obliged to liberalize its markets through establishing the schedule that comprise a list of services that can be either opened or closed to foreign suppliers.  However, Indonesia’s schedule is vague as to whether gambling services are closed to foreign suppliers. Through this loophole, the practice of cross-border gambling services has been rampant, resulting in some consequences, especially those related to money laundering and underage gambling. Tackling this problem, Indonesia could apply public morals exception that allows member states to impose trade prohibition. By using public morals exception that was applied in some WTO cases, this article explores the way in which Indonesia could justify prohibiting cross-border gambling services. This article claims that Indonesia has a justification to impose public morals exception under the WTO to prohibit cross-border gambling services within its territory because the prohibition would be designed to protect public morals; it would be necessary to protect public morals; and the prohibition would equally apply  to both foreign and local suppliers in cross-border gambling services in Indonesia.
RETIRE IN PARADISE: URGENSI PENGATURAN PARIWISATA PENSIUNAN (RETIREMENT TOURISM) DI INDONESIA I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja; I Made Budi Arsika; Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati; Putu Tuny Cakabawa Landra
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (8288.993 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.1

Abstract

AbstractConsidering to a series of problems, particularly related to the environment of conventional tourism development patterns, Indonesia should start developing retirement tourism. Compare to conventional tourism, retirement tourism has more significant benefits, both seen from the financial ability of tourists, job opportunities, tourist attractions, and its proximity with the vision of sustainable tourism. From international, national, and local regulations, the Indonesian government has a legal basis to create and develop retirmenet tourism. In relation to the construction of regulatory model of retirmenet tourism in Indonesia, there would be three model to be considered, namely (1) the regulatory model that considers the special nature and needs of retirement tourist; (2) the regulatory model that supports the concept of sustainable tourism; and (3) the regulatory model that collaborates with other tourism-related institutions. In addition, as a comparative form of study, this model should consider the law and practice of retirement tourism in other ASEAN countries, especially if they have a more organised system in handling retirement tourism.Abstrak Dengan memperhatikan sederet permasalahan, khususnya terkait lingkungan hidup dari pola pengembangan pariwisata konvensional, Indonesia sudah selayaknya mulai mengembangkan pariwisata pensiunan. Pariwisata pensiunan memiliki sejumlah keuntungan, baik dilihat dari kemampuan finansial wisatawannya, peluang kerja, atraksi wisata, dan kedekatan visi pengembangannya dengan visi pariwisata berkelanjuta. Dengan melihat pengaturan internasional, nasional, dan lokal, pemerintah Indonesia memiliki dasar yuridis untuk mengembangkan pariwisata pensiunan secara integral dan komprehensif. Terkait dengan konstruksi model pengaturan pariwisata pensiunan, terdapat tiga model pengaturan yang dapat dikembangkan meliputi: (1) model pengaturan yang memperhatikan sifat dan kebutuhan khusus wisatawan pensiunan; (2) model pengaturan yang mendukung konsep pariwisata berkelanjutan; dan (3) model pengaturan yang bersinergi dengan instansi lain yang terkait. Disamping itu, sebagai bentuk komparatif studi, model pengaturan pariwisata pensiunan selayaknya mempertimbangkan model pengaturan pariwisata pensiunan di Negara ASEAN lainnya terutama di negara yang lebih dulu dan lebih terorganisir dalam mengelola pariwisata pensiunan.
Paralyzing the WTO from the Inside: The Deadlock of the Appointment of Appellate Body Judges and its Repercussions I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja; Mohammad Qadam Shah
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1093

Abstract

The establishment of the dispute settlement procedure that consists of the Panel Report and the Appellate Body has been the most remarkable characteristic of the World Trade Organization. Aside from the most productive international dispute resolution process, it has consistently adopted a rule-oriented procedure in enforcing the commitments made during trade negotiations. Since the last five years, however, the dispute settlement process has confronted an existential crisis. While conflict resolution through consultations and panels continues, the process under the Appellate Body is forced to stop. The United States has impaired the appointment of additional judges to this body, preventing it from obtaining the quorum required to hear appeals. This paper aims to identify and analyze the deadlock of the appointment of the Appellate Body judges and its repercussions for international trade governance, including Indonesia. This deadlock could jeopardize the viability of the global trading system as there would be no proceeding to hear the dispute at the appellate level. Some cases that involved Indonesia would also be affected, particularly if the parties are willing to continue this process to the Appellate Body.  
The Rise of Centralistic Governance in Spatial Planning in Indonesia and Australia: A Comparative Study I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja; Mohammad Qadam Shah; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Pande Yogantara
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70120

Abstract

Since the Reformation, spatial planning governance has moved away from authoritarianism toward a more democratic style of government. However, the current Job Creation Regulation has heralded the return of the centralistic governance in spatial planning. Surprisingly, Australia is also experiencing this trend. This study will look at how the centralistic phase of spatial planning was implemented in Indonesia and Australia. By using a normative method, the results reveal that the spirit of centralization is obvious in the Job Creation Regulation. The central government has a dominating role in the implementation of spatial planning. It also controls the issuing of detailed plan. Because of the need to produce a digital map, the central government now has a power over the granting of spatial planning permission. In Australia, the local government evaluates and decides on the vast majority of planning applications. A countervailing tendency, nevertheless, has seen state governments take on some of the planning and decision-making duties once exercised by local governments. The state minister and development assessment panels are now responsible for authorization of significant projects. This pattern appears to depoliticize and simplify the application process for development projects, especially when those projects have financial advantages.
PENGATURAN TRANSAKSI PEMBAYARAN MENGGUNAKAN ASET KRIPTO DI INDONESIA I Gusti Agung Ngurah Dwija Iswara Aditya Ningrat; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 11 (2022)
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Artikel ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengkaji regulasi terkait transaksi aset kripto di Indonesia guna mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan aktivitas transaksi menggunakan aset kripto. Metode penelitian yang dipakai yakni metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statue approach serta disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwasanya perdagangan aset kripto sebagai aset komoditas memiliki izin dari Kementrian Perdagangan, dalam hal ini Bappebti, dengan keluarnya Permendag No. 99 Tahun 2018. Hal ini semakin diperkuat dengan Peraturan Bappebti No. 3 Tahun 2019 serta Peraturan Bappebti No.5 Tahun 2019. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwasanya aset kripto bisa diklasifikasikan sebagai properti tidak berwujud yang bisa diperdagangkan ataupun properti hukum yang dipakai sebagai dasar hukum untuk perdagangan melalui teknologi perantara berupa elektronik melalui perjanjian khusus dan sarana komunikasi. Namun, menurut undang-undang mata uang, hanya mata uang rupiah yang diperbolehkan sebagai mata uang nasional serta menurut PBI No. 18/40/PBI/2016 dan PBI 19/12/PBI/2017 tentang penerapan teknologi keuangan menetapkan bahwasanya pemakaian aset kripto dilarang digunakan sebagai mata uang namun diperbolehkan sebagai aset komoditas. Kata Kunci: Aset Kripto, Blockchain, Transaksi, Komoditi, Kontrak Berjangka. ABSTRACT This article aims to examine regulations related to crypto asset transactions in Indonesia in order to find out how transaction activities using crypto assets are regulated. The research method used is the normative legal method with the statue approach and is presented descriptively. The results of the study show that crypto asset trading as a commodity asset has a permit from the Ministry of Trade, in this case CoFTRA, with the issuance of Permendag No. 99 of 2018. This is further strengthened by CoFTRA Regulation No. 3 of 2019 and CoFTRA Regulation No. 5 of 2019. This shows that crypto assets can be classified as intangible properties that can be traded or legal properties that are used as a legal basis for trading through intermediary technology in the form of electronics through special agreements and communication facilities. However, according to the currency law, only the rupiah currency is allowed as the national currency and according to PBI No. 18/40/PBI/2016 and PBI 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning the application of financial technology stipulates that the use of crypto assets is prohibited from being used as currency but is permitted as a commodity asset. Key Words: Crypto Assets, Blockchain, Transaction, Commodity, Futures Contract.
Perang Rusia-Ukraina dan Ancaman terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi di Rusia Kent Revelino Chandra; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i02.p12

Abstract

The objective of this research is to explore the regulation of freedom of opinion and expression under international law and its implementation within the context of Russia's national law, particularly in relation to the Russia-Ukraine war. The study aims to examine and analyze the justifiability of the current restrictions imposed by Russia under international law and whether they align with the established criteria. According to General Comment No. 34, freedom of opinion should not be subject to limitations during an emergency, whereas freedom of expression may be restricted under specific conditions outlined in the Siracusa principles. These conditions encompass the requirement for restrictions to be based on clear and accessible laws, serving legitimate purposes, and implementing measures that are proportionate to protect the relevant interests. Through normative legal research methods utilizing statutory, case, and factual analysis, along with a conceptual/analytical approach, this paper concludes that freedom of opinion and expression are safeguarded and their limitations are determined as outlined in the ICCPR. As a result, Russia's actions in curbing freedom of expression do not align with the principles of international law. Penulisan ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi berdasarkan hukum international serta bagaimana pengaturannya dalam hukum nasional Rusia di tengah perang yang terjadi antara Rusia dan Ukraina. Tulisan ini berupaya mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis ketepatan pembatasan hak berpendapat di Rusia menurut hukum internasional. General Comment Nomor 34 menyatakan bahwa kebebasan berpendapat adalah salah satu elemen, yang tidak akan pernah bisa dibatasi walau dalam keadaan darurat sekalipun. Hal ini kemudian berbeda dengan kebebasan berekspresi yang dapat di batasi apabila memenuhi secara komulatif syarat dari prinsip-prinsip siracusa, yaitu: Pertama, pembatasan wajib berdasarkan hukum yang dapat diakses dan tidak kabur. Kedua, pembatasan wajib memiliki tujuan yang sah. Ketiga, pemerintah wajib menetapkan pembatasan dimana merupakan limitasi yang serendah mungkin untuk melindungi kepentingan yang ada. Metode penelitian hukum normatif digunakan dalam penyusunan penulisan ini, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan fakta, serta pendekatan konseptual/analitis. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi telah dilindungi dan ditentukan batasan-batasannya dalam ICCPR. Dengan demikian, tindakan Russia dalam membatasi kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi adalah tidak sesuai dengan kaidah hukum internasional yang berlaku.
PENGATURAN PRINSIP MOST FAVOURED NATION (MFN) WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION DALAM PELAKSANAAN EKSPOR-IMPOR DI INDONESIA Elizabeth Sefanya Roulina; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 5 (2023)
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penulisan jurnal ini yaitu untuk menganalisa pengaturan Prinsip Most Favoured Nation dalam pelaksanaan perdagangan internasional dengan menggunakan metode normatif. Prinsip ini merupakan prinsip dasar yang disepakati oleh World Trade Organization. Salah satu urgensi disepakatinya General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT) yang pada akhirnya menjadi organisasi internasional yang bernama World Trade Organization (WTO) adalah persaingan dagang antara negara maju dengan negara berkembang. Sebagai salah satu negara anggota dari WTO, Indonesia harus tunduk pada prinsip most favoured nation. Dimana prinsip ini menekankan setiap anggota WTO diharuskan untuk memberlakukan negara lain dengan sama dalam kebijakan ekspor-impor dan tidak diperbolehkan untuk memberi perlakuan yang mengistimewakan atau diskriminatif terhadap negara lain. Kesetaraan ini menimbulkan permasalahan yang menempatkan Indonesia sebagai negara berkembang pada posisi sulit, karena tidak dapat menetapkan pembatasan tariff pada negara pengekspor atau negara maju yang terikat pada prinsip most favoured nation. Kata kunci: Most Favoured Nation, WTO, Ekspor, Impor, Indonesia ABSTRACT The purpose of writing of this journal is to analyze the regulation of Most Favored Nation principles in international trade using normative methods. This principle is one of the basic principle agreed upon by the World Trade Organization. Competition between developed and developing countries became, to some extent, the origin of the formation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that eventually became the World Trade Organization (WTO). Indonesia as a member of the WTO must adhere to the principle of most favoured nation. This principle emphasizes that WTO members are required to provide equal treatment in export and import policies and should not give preferential and discriminatory treatment to other countries. This equality raises problems that put Indonesia as a developing country in a difficult position, because it cannot set a tariff barrier on exporting countries or developed countries that are bound by the most favored nation principle. Key word: Most Favoured Nation, WTO, Export, Import, Indonesia
HAM DAN LEGALISASI EUTHANASIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INDONESIA DAN BELGIA Jesica Winanda Leksono Putri; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 6 (2023)
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan studi ini untuk meninjau legalitas praktik Euthanasia dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia dan Belgia serta kaitannya dengan HAM. Studi ini lalu menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Salah satu pro dan kontra dalam praktik dunia medis yaitu Euthanasia (good death) untuk mengakhiri penderitaan pasien akibat penyakit yang tidak dapat disembuhkan, setelah melalui berbagai upaya medis lainnya. Oleh karena itu, sangat penting untuk menganalisa seperti apa pengaturan Euthanasia di Indonesia dan Belgia, serta kaitannya dengan HAM. Hal ini karena belum terdapat peraturan di Indonesia yang secara tegas mengatur tentang Euthanasia, sedangkan Belgia membolehkan Euthanasia melalui Belgian Act of Euthanasia.
Akibat Hukum Mengenai Status Anak yang Lahir Dalam Perkawinan Campuran (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda) Jessi Grasiela Putri Bengngu; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.219

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze in depth the arrangements regarding mixed marriages applied by Indonesian and Dutch positive law and to understand the implementation of international law and Indonesian positive law in determining the status of children from mixed marriages. This research is a normative legal research. It was found that there are significant differences in the regulations regarding marriage and citizenship between Indonesia and the Netherlands, and the status of children born from mixed marriages between Indonesian and Dutch citizens raises various complexities that require special attention. For this reason, it is important for couples with different nationalities who will marry, to first properly understand their respective national laws regarding the marriage, and to deal with the complexity of the status of children born from mixed marriages between Indonesian and Dutch citizens, cooperation between countries in the context of International Civil Law is very important. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan pada mengkaji dan menganalisis secara mendalam pengaturan mengenai perkawinan campuran yang diterapkan oleh hukum positif Indonesia dan Belanda dan untuk memahami implementasi hukum internasional dan hukum positif Indonesia dalam menentukan status anak hasil perkawinan campuran. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Ditemukan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan dalam regulasi mengenai perkawinan dan kewarganegaraan antara Indonesia dan Belanda, dan status anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran antara warga negara Indonesia dan Belanda menimbulkan berbagai kompleksitas yang memerlukan perhatian khusus. Untuk itu penting bagi para pasangan dengan kewarganegaraan yang berbeda yang akan menikah, terlebih dahulu memahami benar hukum nasional masing-masing tekait perkawinan tersebut, dan untuk menangani kompleksitas status anak yang dilahirkan dari perkawinan campuran antara warga negara Indonesia dan Belanda, kerja sama antarnegara dalam konteks Hukum Perdata Internasional menjadi sangat penting.Kata kunci: perkawinan campuran, status anak, perbandingan hukum
Co-Authors Adyt Dimas Prasaja Utama Anak Agung Ayu Mirah Kartini Irawan Astari, Ramadhan Bagus Made Bama Anandika Berata Cahaya, Bunga Lily Dewi, Ni Luh Putu Ratih Sukma Dewi, Ni Luh Sri Mahendra Dharma Bakti, I Gede Alvin Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara Elizabeth Sefanya Roulina Fayza Bratanova Soebroto Horatius, Bryan Regis I Dewa Gede Palguna I Gede Pasek Eka Wisanjaya I Gede Putu Putra Wibawa I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Agung Ngurah Dwija Iswara Aditya Ningrat I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Made Budi Arsika I Made Yonathan Hadi Sanjaya I Nyoman Suyatna I WAYAN WINDIA Ida Bagus Erwin Ranawijaya Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra Ika Widi Astuti, Ika Widi Jati, Gusti Bagus Krisna Arum Jesica Winanda Leksono Putri Jessi Grasiela Putri Bengngu Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Nicky Novita Kayla Nixie Salsabil Halim Kent Revelino Chandra Komang Eky Saputra Laksmi, Ni Putu Ayu Utari Luh Putu Gita Dharmaningtyas Made Gde Subha Karma Resen Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain Mohammad Qadam Shah Mohammad Qadam Shah Nadine Arieta Ravinka Nadirsyah Hosen Naufal Nafie Ramadhan Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Putu Ari Putri Pertiwi Ni Putu Devy Handayani Pande Yogantara Pratiwi, Agustina Ni Made Ayu Darma Priskila, Jennifer Gracia Purwani, Sagung Putri ME Putra, I Made Agus Sunadi Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa Putu Tantry Octaviani Putu Tuni Cakabawa Landra Qadam Shah, Muhammad R. Caesalino Wahyu Putra R.A. Tuty Kuswardhani Ramaputra, Gede Angga Wirabhuwana Rosariani, Putu Eka Savitri, Pande Luh Made Devi Shah, Mohammad Qadam Shara, Made Cinthya Puspita Stephanie Maarty K Satyarini Venditha Velicia