Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.179
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Bestuur Yustisia Lentera Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Hasanuddin Law Review Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Mulawarman Law Review JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Health Sains Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Indonesian Journal of International Law Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Yuridika Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) IPSSJ JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 54 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 54 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Trade Liberalization, Domestic Trade Policies and the Failure of Reducing Poverty: The Case of Indonesia I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.4.1.2289.6-12

Abstract

The existence of international trade has provided important benefits for reducing poverty. Many countries then have concluded trade agreements, to reach this goal by committing trade liberalization. The relatively high number of poverty has raised some concerns, questioning the effectiveness of trade liberalization. Putting Indonesia as a case study, this article weighs the role of trade liberalization and domestic trade policies in reducing poverty. This article argues that the existence of domestic trade policies is more significant than trade liberalization. The unfair practices, corruption, and the overwhelming spirit of national interest that colour domestic trade policies, contribute to the failure of reducing poverty instead of trade liberalization.
The Rise of Centralistic Governance in Spatial Planning in Indonesia and Australia: A Comparative Study Widiatedja, I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit; Qadam Shah, Mohammad; Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Yogantara, Pande
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70120

Abstract

Since the Reformation, spatial planning governance has moved away from authoritarianism toward a more democratic style of government. However, the current Job Creation Regulation has heralded the return of the centralistic governance in spatial planning. Surprisingly, Australia is also experiencing this trend. This study will look at how the centralistic phase of spatial planning was implemented in Indonesia and Australia. By using a normative method, the results reveal that the spirit of centralization is obvious in the Job Creation Regulation. The central government has a dominating role in the implementation of spatial planning. It also controls the issuing of detailed plan. Because of the need to produce a digital map, the central government now has a power over the granting of spatial planning permission. In Australia, the local government evaluates and decides on the vast majority of planning applications. A countervailing tendency, nevertheless, has seen state governments take on some of the planning and decision-making duties once exercised by local governments. The state minister and development assessment panels are now responsible for authorization of significant projects. This pattern appears to depoliticize and simplify the application process for development projects, especially when those projects have financial advantages.
CAN INDONESIA INVOKE PUBLIC MORALS EXCEPTION UNDER THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) FOR PROHIBITING CROSS-BORDER GAMBLING? Widiatedja, I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit
Yustisia Vol 7, No 2: August 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i2.19914

Abstract

Under the WTO, Indonesia is obliged to liberalize its markets through establishing the schedule that comprise a list of services that can be either opened or closed to foreign suppliers.  However, Indonesia’s schedule is vague as to whether gambling services are closed to foreign suppliers. Through this loophole, the practice of cross-border gambling services has been rampant, resulting in some consequences, especially those related to money laundering and underage gambling. Tackling this problem, Indonesia could apply public morals exception that allows member states to impose trade prohibition. By using public morals exception that was applied in some WTO cases, this article explores the way in which Indonesia could justify prohibiting cross-border gambling services. This article claims that Indonesia has a justification to impose public morals exception under the WTO to prohibit cross-border gambling services within its territory because the prohibition would be designed to protect public morals; it would be necessary to protect public morals; and the prohibition would equally apply  to both foreign and local suppliers in cross-border gambling services in Indonesia.
Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Pada Perseroan Terbatas I Komang Ferdyan Julyatmikha; I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 10 No 01 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i01.p5

Abstract

Tujuan studi ini untuk mengkaji kewenangan Notaris atas penerapan prinsip mengenali pemilik manfaat pada perseroan terbatas, bagaimana kewenangan notaris dalam mengungkap pemilik manfaat dan Tanggung jawab notaris atas pemilik manfaat yang tidak diungkap dalam akta autentik. Metode penulisan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undanagan. Hasil dalam penelitian ini menjunjukan bahwa Notaris berwenang untuk mengungkap pemilik manfaat saat pendirian, pendaftaran, pengesahan korporasi untuk keabsahan akta autentik yang dibuat oleh Notaris. Tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap akta yang dibuat bilamana ditemukan pemilik manfaat adalah pada prinsipnya Notaris tidak memiliki tanggung jawab mutlak bilamana ditemukan adanya pemilik manfaat yang tidak disampaikan oleh perseroan. Namun tentu saja apabila berdasarkan seluruh data-data dan keterangan yang sudah diberikan oleh klien Notaris masih gagal dalam mengidentifikasi dan memverifikasi pemilik manfaat tersebut maka Notaris dapat dikenakan pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata.
Co-Authors Adyt Dimas Prasaja Utama Anak Agung Ayu Mirah Kartini Irawan Astari, Ramadhan Bagus Made Bama Anandika Berata Cahaya, Bunga Lily Dewi, Ni Luh Putu Ratih Sukma Dewi, Ni Luh Sri Mahendra Dharma Bakti, I Gede Alvin Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara Elizabeth Sefanya Roulina Fayza Bratanova Soebroto Horatius, Bryan Regis I Dewa Gede Palguna I Gede Pasek Eka Wisanjaya I Gede Putu Putra Wibawa I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Agung Ngurah Dwija Iswara Aditya Ningrat I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Komang Ferdyan Julyatmikha I Made Budi Arsika I Made Yonathan Hadi Sanjaya I Nyoman Suyatna I WAYAN WINDIA Ida Bagus Erwin Ranawijaya Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra Ika Widi Astuti, Ika Widi Jesica Winanda Leksono Putri Jessi Grasiela Putri Bengngu Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Nicky Novita Kayla Nixie Salsabil Halim Kent Revelino Chandra Komang Eky Saputra Luh Putu Gita Dharmaningtyas Made Gde Subha Karma Resen Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain Mohammad Qadam Shah Nadine Arieta Ravinka Nadirsyah Hosen Naufal Nafie Ramadhan Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Putu Ari Putri Pertiwi Ni Putu Ayu Utari Laksmi Ni Putu Devy Handayani Pratiwi, Agustina Ni Made Ayu Darma Priskila, Jennifer Gracia Purwani, Sagung Putri ME Putra, I Made Agus Sunadi Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa Putu Tantry Octaviani Putu Tuni Cakabawa Landra Qadam Shah, Mohammad Qadam Shah, Muhammad R. Caesalino Wahyu Putra R.A. Tuty Kuswardhani Ramaputra, Gede Angga Wirabhuwana Rosariani, Putu Eka Savitri, Pande Luh Made Devi Shah, Mohammad Qadam Shara, Made Cinthya Puspita Stephanie Maarty K Satyarini Venditha Velicia Virginia Dillys Kurniawan Yogantara, Pande