Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.057
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Autotech: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo Masalah-Masalah Hukum NOTARIUS Diponegoro Law Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Tadulako Law Review INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Ius Constituendum Global Health Management Journal UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services JUSTISI JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Darma Agung Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Journal of Judicial Review International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Journal Philosophy of Law Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Law and Legal Reform SENMEA Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services
Pujiyono Pujiyono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 59 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : lex scientia law review

 1 
Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia Sumardiana, Benny; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Cahyaningtyas, Irma
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744

Abstract

This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.
Position for the Formulation of the Principle of Ultimum Remedium in the Criminal Law Codes in Various Countries Adhari, Ade; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Shidarta, Shidarta; Widyawati, Anis; Suryani, Leony Sondang
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14061

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of a fundamental and universal principle in criminal law: the principle of ultimum remedium. This principle advocates for the use of criminal sanctions as a last resort, to be employed only when all other avenues have been exhausted. The primary focus of this study is to examine how the principle of ultimum remedium is articulated within the criminal codes of various countries. The countries selected for this analysis—Germany, Slovenia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Kosovo, Montenegro, and Kyrgyzstan—were chosen randomly. By scrutinizing these formulations, the study aims to delineate an ideal framework for the application of the ultimum remedium principle. This research utilizes a doctrinal methodology, and through this lens, the article finds that legislators in numerous countries frequently integrate the principle of ultimum remedium implicitly within provisions that address basic principles and limitations of the use of criminal law, basic principles and limitations of criminal law enforcement, basic principles and limitations of criminal sanctions, and basics of criminal accountability. Nonetheless, some countries have explicitly codified the principle of ultimum remedium within provisions titled "The Principle of Subsidiarity of Criminal Repression." These articulated principles serve as crucial guidelines for legislators and law enforcement authorities.
Co-Authors Ade Adhari Agusta, Evelin Nur Agustiawan, M. Hendri Ahmad Ridwan, Nur Almira Rahma, Ardita Andiojaya, Agung Anis Widyawati Aprilia, Indah Siti Ardi, Muhammad Khalif Arief Suryono Arifin, Alif Wisuda Aryani, Fajar Dian Aulia Syifa Sjamhars Barda Nawawi Arief Bhakti, Rizky Atswari Cahya Wulandari Claudia, Natasya Debora Natalia Sudjito Dwi Maryono Edy Suprapto Encep, Encep Fernando, Zico Junius Hardiani, Putri Ikhsan Ikhsan Irawan, Chandra Noviardy Irma Cahyaningtyas, Irma Jamal Wiwoho Jaya, I Nyoman Serikat Putra Khamami Zada Kholdaa, Madya Cinta Kristiani Kristiani Kukuh Tejomurti, Kukuh Mahardika, Sylvester Enricho Mara Sutan Rambe Mardiana - Maria Silvya E. Wangga Marmi Sudarmi Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin Muhammad Ishar Helmi, Muhammad Ishar Nabitatus Sa'adah Najlalinka, Zahrafhia Ndraha, Agung Silwanus Nugroho, Sofyan Nur Rochaeti Nur Rochaeti, Nur Pati, Umi Khaerah Prabawani, Riski Dysas Pranoto Pranoto Priscilia, Erika Pulungan, Muhammad Al Faisal Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra, Aista Wisnu Putra, Risqi Perdana Putra, Yagie Sagita Putrajaya, Nyoman Serikat Raharjo, Prasetyo Rani Tiyas Budiyanti Redita Suryadarma, Fatika Rian Saputra Roikardi, Dodi Roy Rovalino Herudiansyah Sa'adah, Nabitatus Sahid, Mualimin Mochammad Saptanti, Noor Saputra, Andika Oktavian Sembiring, Rya Elita Br Setiyowati, Dyah Kusumaningtyas Shidarta Shidarta Sidharta, Sidharta Simbolon, Putu George Matthew Slamet Subiyantoro Solikah, Mar’atus St Syarifah Sulistyo, Edhei Sunny Ummul Firdaus Supeno, Bambang Joyo Suryani, Leony Sondang Tuhana Tuhana Umi Rozah Wicaksono, Adi Hardiyanto Windraswara, Juniardi Yasin Surya Wijaya Yunus Husein