Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.273
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Ushuluddin Al-Ahkam Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Bina Praja SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Jurnal Istiqro' Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Anterior Jurnal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Journal of Islamic and Law Studies (JILS) Contemporary Society and Politics Journal The Sociology of Islam Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Pendidikan Palangka Law Review Equality Before The Law Jurnal Jurisprudence Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan
Muhammad Wahdini
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Nusyuz in Husband-Wife Relations: An Islamic Legal Analysis of Husbands' Time Limitations and Family Mediation among Police Officers Sodiq, Yanwar; Ariyadi; Tanjung, Ardi Akbar; Wahdini, Muhammad
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v26i1.29765

Abstract

The high professional demands on police families often result in limited time spent together by husband and wife, leading to a decline in communication, jealousy, suspicion, and domestic conflict. In such circumstances, nusyuz is often narrowly understood as a wife's disobedience, even though it can be rooted in more complex relational disharmony. This study aims to analyze the problem of nusyuz resulting from husbands' limited time and to examine the practice of family mediation as a conflict resolution mechanism in police families in Gunung Mas Regency, Central Kalimantan. The study used a qualitative method with a normative-empirical legal design dominated by a normative-conceptual approach. Data were obtained through interviews with the marriage registrar and two informants from police families, as well as a review of the Qur'an, hadith, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and Islamic jurisprudence literature. The results indicate that nusyuz is more accurately understood as a symptom of relational disharmony resulting from weakened communication and unmet spiritual needs, rather than solely physical disobedience. Family mediation is the primary choice due to its familial nature and privacy, although it has the potential for bias if not conducted neutrally. The novelty of this research lies in the reinterpretation of the concept of nusyuz as a relational problem and the integration of the perspective of maqashid al-syari'ah in assessing family mediation based on sharia justice.
Legal Politics of Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 concerning Sharia Financial Institutions in the Field of Sharia Banking Ichwan Ahnaz Alamudi; Muhammad Torieq Abdillah; Dian May Syifa; Muhammad Wahdini
Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/jhm.v13i2.12812

Abstract

This research is motivated by the gap between the ideals of the comprehensive implementation of the sharia-based financial system in Aceh and the reality of implementation which still faces various challenges, both in terms of regulation, institutions, and community readiness. Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 concerning Sharia Financial Institutions (LKS) is the main instrument in realizing this transformation, so it is important to study it from the perspective of legal politics background that is the background of its formation. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal politics in Qanun LKS and its implications for the Islamic banking sector in Aceh. This research uses a type of normative legal research with a qualitative approach, through a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through literature studies, then analyzed descriptively-analytically. The results of the study show that Qanun LKS is a political and legal product that reflects the integration between Aceh’s special autonomy authority and the application of Islamic sharia in the economic sector, especially banking. The implementation of Qanun LKS encourages the conversion of the conventional banking system to sharia as a whole, but still faces various obstacles such as institutional readiness, infrastructure, and the level of public literacy. This study concludes that the success of these policies is highly dependent on the consistency of implementation, adaptive regulatory support, and increased public understanding of the Islamic financial system. The contribution of this research is to provide a comprehensive understanding of legal politics in Islamic financial regulation and become an evaluation material for the development of more effective policies in the future.
Exploring Sociocultural Determinants and Resilience Mechanisms Among Young Married Couples in Rural Meratus, South Kalimantan Mariani Mariani; Yusna Zaidah; Raihanah Abdullah; Muhammad Wahdini; Fauziah Hayati
Al-Ahkam Vol. 36 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2026.36.1.26106

Abstract

This study examines the sociocultural determinants and mechanisms of family resilience among young couples in the Dayak Meratus community, South Kalimantan. Contrary to the global narrative that views early marriage as a structural vulnerability, this study demonstrates the existence of resilience mechanisms rooted in local culture. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach with 22 informants, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, and then analyzed thematically. The results indicate that institutionalized social practices such as arranged marriages, communal living patterns, land grants as initial economic capital, and minimal external intervention serve as social capital that strengthens family resilience. Resilience is determined not only by biological age but also by kinship support, cultural values, and the interaction between customary law, Islamic law, and state law. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘a and ‘urf, these practices contribute to the protection of offspring, honor, and economic stability, although they still pose potential conflicts with marriage age regulations. This study emphasizes the importance of a contextual socio-legal approach in understanding the phenomenon of early marriage in Muslim indigenous communities.
The Construction of Customary Judge's Decision on Plantation Conflict Resolution from the Perspective of Huma Betang Philosophy: A Case Study in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan: - Achmadi Achmadi; Armadiansyah Armadiansyah; Sanawiah Sanawiah; Muhammad Wahdini; Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogli
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6970

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study examines the construction of the decision of the Basara Hai Customary Peace Assembly No. B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 which has implications for the decision of the Palangka Raya District Court Number 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk to resolve the plantation conflict that occurred in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia which had the potential to provide a lighter sentence for the defendant. Methodology: The study utilized a mixed research method consisting of doctrinal (normative) and non-doctrinal (socio-legal) research methods. Both methods were used to analyze legislative products or court decisions at the macro-analysis level empirical realities. They aimed to study and solve problems that were conceptualized at the micro-analysis level as symbolic realities. This study used the sociological and anthropological juridical approach methods that aimed to observe written laws and the law in practice. Results: The findings of this study showed that the construction of customary judges' decisions upholds the values ​​of belom bahadat (customs of life regarding politeness/ethics/high morals of the Dayak indigenous community). These values ​​must be applied in all philosophical, sociological, and legal aspects. The decision of the customary judge also has implications for the construction of the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN that aims to provide legal justice and certainty for the disputing parties. Applications of this study: This study offers findings from the construction of customary judges in upholding customary law based on the values ​​of belom bahadat which have implications for the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN in providing justice for defendants who have undergone customary trials and the defendant's obedience to applicable customary laws as an effort to resolve conflicts. Novelty/Originality of this study: The doctrine of customary law in the form of a customary judge's decision from the Huma Betang perspective is used by state judicial institutions as the basis in providing recommendations or legal considerations for law enforcement in providing justice and legal certainty for the disputing parties. Keywords: Decision construction, Customary Judge, Philosophy, Huma Betang.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan penelitian: Penelitian ini mengkaji konstruksi putusan Majelis Perdamaian Adat Basara Hai Nomor B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 yang berimplikasi pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk untuk menyelesaikan konflik perkebunan yang terjadi di Kabupaten Seruyan, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia yang berpotensi memberikan hukuman yang lebih ringan bagi terdakwa. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian campuran yang terdiri dari metode penelitian doktrinal (normatif) dan non-doktrinal (sosio-legal). Kedua metode tersebut digunakan untuk menganalisis produk perundang-undangan atau putusan pengadilan pada level analisis makro realitas empiris. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengkaji dan memecahkan permasalahan yang dikonseptualisasikan pada level analisis mikro sebagai realitas simbolik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dan antropologis yang bertujuan untuk mengamati hukum tertulis dan hukum dalam praktik. Hasil: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi putusan hakim adat menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai belom bahadat (adat istiadat kehidupan mengenai kesopanan/etika/moral yang tinggi dari masyarakat adat Dayak). Nilai-nilai tersebut harus diterapkan dalam segala aspek filosofis, sosiologis, dan hukum. Putusan hakim adat tersebut juga berimplikasi pada konstruksi Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN yang bertujuan untuk memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menawarkan temuan dari konstruksi hakim adat dalam menegakkan hukum adat berdasarkan nilai-nilai belom bahadat yang berimplikasi pada Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN dalam memberikan keadilan bagi terdakwa yang telah menjalani persidangan adat dan ketaatan terdakwa terhadap hukum adat yang berlaku sebagai upaya penyelesaian konflik. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Doktrin hukum adat berupa putusan hakim adat dari perspektif Huma Betang digunakan oleh lembaga peradilan negara sebagai dasar dalam memberikan rekomendasi atau pertimbangan hukum bagi penegak hukum dalam memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Kata Kunci: Konstruksi putusan, Hakim Adat, Filsafat, Huma Betang.
The Responsive Law Paradigm in the Enforcement of Election Criminal Offenses: Reorientation of Bawaslu's Authority as an Independent Investigator Muhammad Wahdini; Muhammad Noor Shaleh; Ranti Suminar Endah; Ahmad Baihaki
Equality Before The Law Vol 6 No 2 (2026): EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36232/ebl.v6i2.6358

Abstract

Enforcement of election-related criminal offenses in Indonesia continues to face various institutional obstacles due to the limited authority of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu), which functions only as a supervisor and reporter, while investigative authority rests with the Police through the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu). Data from the National Legal Development Agency shows that in the 2019 General Election, only 345 of 2,798 alleged election criminal offenses discussed at the Gakkumdu Center were declared to meet the elements of a criminal offense, indicating that the effectiveness of election criminal law enforcement remains low. This study aims to analyze the philosophical, juridical, and sociological foundations for strengthening Bawaslu's investigative authority through the perspective of the Responsive Law theory of Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick. This research is normative legal research employing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by secondary empirical data in the form of official reports from Bawaslu and the National Legal Development Agency, as well as scholarly literature to reinforce the normative analysis. The results show that the current institutional design for enforcing election criminal offenses still reflects the character of autonomous law, oriented toward formal procedure, and thus does not yet fully guarantee substantive electoral justice. From the perspective of Responsive Law, effective law enforcement requires institutions that are adaptive, independent, and oriented toward protecting citizens' political rights. Therefore, reconstructing Bawaslu's investigative authority is regarded as a viable legal policy alternative worth considering through amendments to statutory regulations, while still upholding the principle of checks and balances within the criminal justice system, in order to strengthen electoral integrity and the quality of democracy in Indonesia.
Ijma’ Dalam Konteks Penetapan Hukum Pada Suatu Negara Hasanudin Muhammad; Agus Alimuddin; Muhammad Wahdini; Lisda Aisyah
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 2 (2020): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v17i2.2391

Abstract

Ijma’ adalah salah satu metode yang pembahasannya semakin berkembang karena konsep Ijma’ yang dirumuskan oleh para ulama fuqaha terdahulu ternyata di masa sekarang menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana Ijma’ bisa diimplementasikan. Ketika Ijma’ dipahami sebagai kesepakatan ulama maka ulama yang seperti apakah pada saat ini yang dapat membentuk sebuah kesepakatan yang dapat dipakai umat. Kemudian masih memungkinkah akan adanya sebuah ijtihad berbentuk Ijma’ yang akan dikaitkan dengan kontek negara bangsa ini. Dengan metode library research dan content analysis terhadap penafsiran beberapa ayat Al-Qur’an yang terkait. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah sebagai konteks negara bangsa bahwa Ijma’ dapat dilakukan oleh pemerintah dalam hal ini lembaga legislatif sebagai wakil rakyat, sehingga produk-produk hukumnya jika disepakati bisa dikatakan dengan Ijma’. Dan upaya kontekstualisasi konsep rukun Ijma’ dari segi kriteria mujtahid maupun secara yuridis historis bahwa Ijma’ itu adalah sebuah konsensus, maka dalam konteks negara bangsa peraturan-perundang-undangan menjadi keniscayaan menjadi sebuah Ijma’. Konsep Ijma’ ini akan menghasilkan sebuah dalam konteks negara bangsa peraturan-perundang-undangan menjadi keniscayaan menjadi sebuah Ijma’. Seperti Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Wakaf, dan peraturan perundangan lainnya.
Pancasila sebagai Paradigma Sosio-Legal: Wacana Keadilan Sosial dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia Muhammad Wahdini
Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/adil.v1i1.11919

Abstract

This article aims to analyze Pancasila as a paradigm system from a sociological perspective, focusing on the discourse of social justice and legal reform in Indonesia. This study departs from various problems in law enforcement that still show a gap between normative law and social reality, so that the law often fails to deliver substantive justice to the community, especially vulnerable groups. Using a qualitative-normative approach enriched through socio-legal analysis, this article shows that Pancasila not only functions as a source of legal values and legitimacy, but also as a critical interpretive framework for understanding the dialectical relationship between positive law, social structures, power practices, and demands for justice. The findings of this article emphasize that the failure of law enforcement in the reform era is not solely due to weaknesses in regulations or legal instruments, but is more deeply related to the weak internalization of Pancasila's values of justice in institutional practices, the legal culture of officials, and public legal awareness. Therefore, the revitalization of Pancasila as a socio-legal paradigm is a normative and sociological prerequisite for the realization of substantive social justice in the Indonesian legal system.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Muhammad Torieq Abdul Helim Achmadi Achmadi Agus Alimuddin Ahamed Sarjoon Razick Ahmad Baihaki ahmad habibi Ahmad Syarif Ahmad, Jafar Ardi Akbar Tanjung Ariyadi Ariyadi Ariyadi, Ariyadi Armadiansyah Armadiansyah Budiarti, Erlita Dian May Syifa Fatmawati, Amelia Fauziah Hayati Fikrianoor, Ardiyan Handayani, Iva hasanudin muhammad Ibrahim Mohamed, Adil Hassan Ichwan Ahnaz Alamudi Jubba, Hasse Kamsi Kamsi Kamsi, Kamsi Lilik Kholisotin Lisda Aisyah Lisda Aisyah Mahmud Hibatul Wafi Mariani Mariani Maulana Adi Tama Muhammad Noor Shaleh Muhammad Torieq Abdillah Norcahyono Norcahyono Raihanah Abdullah Ranti Suminar Endah SALASIAH SALASIAH, SALASIAH Sanawiah Septianor Nugraha Sodiq, Yanwar Sudirman Sudirman Syahroni, Akhmad Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogli Yamani, Antung Yusna Zaidah