Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.609
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Ushuluddin Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Bina Praja SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Jurnal Istiqro' Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Anterior Jurnal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MEMBANGUN NEGERI Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Journal of Islamic and Law Studies (JILS) Contemporary Society and Politics Journal The Sociology of Islam Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Pendidikan Palangka Law Review Jurnal Jurisprudence Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review
Muhammad Wahdini
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Products and Political Configuration in Post-Amendment Indonesia: Narratives, Actors, and the Influence of the Digital Society Wahdini, Muhammad; Habibi, Ahmad; Shaleh, Muhammad Noor
Contemporary Society and Politics Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Contemporary Society and Politics Journal (CSPJ)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/cspj.v4i1.5678

Abstract

This research discusses the dynamic relationship between political configuration, the character of legal products, and the role of the digital society in Indonesian legal politics post the Fourth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Two classical views on the relationship between law and politics, between law as a social controller and law as a product of societal dynamics, serve as a foundation for understanding contemporary realities. Mahfud MD's findings on the relationship between political configuration and the character of legal products indicate that political changes have direct consequences on the orientation of the regulations that emerge. However, this study highlights that the current political configuration is no longer solely determined by elites and formal structures, but also by a new force: the digital society. The emergence of actors such as influencers, online activists, and political buzzers marks a shift in the way the public participates and influences the course of legislation. On the other hand, the open digital space also presents threats in the form of polarization, disinformation, and digital oligarchy. Through a qualitative approach and literature study, this research finds that Indonesia's legal politics today are becoming increasingly complex, full of challenges, but also hold new hope for broader and more meaningful public participation. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of adaptive legal reforms, paying attention to digital dynamics, and strengthening media ethics as part of the Indonesian legal political ecosystem that upholds decency.
PERSEPSI ULAMA MUHAMMADIYAH KALIMANTAN TENGAH TERHADAP PENGAKUAN KAWIN BELUM TERCATAT: (Rekognisi Fatwa Majelis Tarjih Tentang Pencatatan Nikah) Wahdini, Muhammad; Norcahyono, Norcahyono
Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : IAI Darussalam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30739/darussalam.v14i1.1648

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze two key variables between the policy of acknowledging marriages that have not been recorded by the Dukapil and the fatwa of the Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council through the perceptions of Muhammadiyah scholars in Palangkaraya City. The type of field research is that researchers conduct direct interviews with careful objects with a phenomenological approach. The results of this study indicate that several sources chose to look at different spaces for the case of unregistered marriage, there is a condition that non-sirri marriage is done intentionally. So it is not absolutely forbidden to marry siri. Regarding the Dukcapil policy, Muhammadiyah Ulama see the positive side with the intention to accommodate and provide administrative convenience to the perpetrators of unregistered marriages who may not know the obligation to register marriages. However, it is certain that the Dukcapil must pay attention to the provisions of the Marriage Law in order to create harmonization between policies. The Muhammadiyah cleric of Palangkaraya city has the principle of Maslahah in this case.
Deauthorizing Fatwa on Money Politics: Shifting Religious Morals in the Era of Transactional Democracy Muhammad Wahdini; Muhammad Torieq Abdillah; Hamzah, Alya Aulia Rachman
Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review
Publisher : MUI Sulawesi Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64016/parewasaraq.v4i2.59

Abstract

The recurring phenomenon of money politics in every electoral contest in Indonesia reflects a persistent tension between religious moral authority and electoral political rationality. Although Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah, and the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) have issued fatwa forbidding money politics as a form of risywah (bribery) that contradicts Islamic principles of justice and trustworthiness, the practice continues to thrive at the grassroots level. Therefore, this study aims to investigate why the fatwa on money politics issued by major Islamic institutions in Indonesia have been ineffective in shaping the political behavior of the ummah in the Reformasi era. A qualitative method framed within the sociology of fatwa and the politics of Islamic law was used. This combined analytical perspective was used to examine fatwa as both normative-legal texts and socio-political instruments. Data were collected from fatwa documents, organizational publications, as well as elite and community responses to the practice of money politics. The results showed a process of deauthorization of fatwa, namely the weakening of religious moral authority under the growing dominance of transactional democratic logic and pragmatic electoral rationality. In this context, fatwa function more as symbolic moral references than effective instruments capable of transforming political behavior. The results underscore the need to reorient religious authority from a purely normative approach toward an ethical-political praxis that is more responsive to contemporary socio-political realities. In conclusion, this study contributes theoretically by expanding the understanding of the relationship between religion and politics in Indonesia and enriching scholarly discussions on the effectiveness of fatwa within the modern democratic sphere.
Nusyuz in Husband-Wife Relations: An Islamic Legal Analysis of Husbands' Time Limitations and Family Mediation among Police Officers Sodiq, Yanwar; Ariyadi; Tanjung, Ardi Akbar; Wahdini, Muhammad
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v26i1.29765

Abstract

The high professional demands on police families often result in limited time spent together by husband and wife, leading to a decline in communication, jealousy, suspicion, and domestic conflict. In such circumstances, nusyuz is often narrowly understood as a wife's disobedience, even though it can be rooted in more complex relational disharmony. This study aims to analyze the problem of nusyuz resulting from husbands' limited time and to examine the practice of family mediation as a conflict resolution mechanism in police families in Gunung Mas Regency, Central Kalimantan. The study used a qualitative method with a normative-empirical legal design dominated by a normative-conceptual approach. Data were obtained through interviews with the marriage registrar and two informants from police families, as well as a review of the Qur'an, hadith, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and Islamic jurisprudence literature. The results indicate that nusyuz is more accurately understood as a symptom of relational disharmony resulting from weakened communication and unmet spiritual needs, rather than solely physical disobedience. Family mediation is the primary choice due to its familial nature and privacy, although it has the potential for bias if not conducted neutrally. The novelty of this research lies in the reinterpretation of the concept of nusyuz as a relational problem and the integration of the perspective of maqashid al-syari'ah in assessing family mediation based on sharia justice.
The Construction of Customary Judge's Decision on Plantation Conflict Resolution from the Perspective of Huma Betang Philosophy: A Case Study in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan: - Achmadi Achmadi; Armadiansyah Armadiansyah; Sanawiah Sanawiah; Muhammad Wahdini; Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogli
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6970

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study examines the construction of the decision of the Basara Hai Customary Peace Assembly No. B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 which has implications for the decision of the Palangka Raya District Court Number 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk to resolve the plantation conflict that occurred in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia which had the potential to provide a lighter sentence for the defendant. Methodology: The study utilized a mixed research method consisting of doctrinal (normative) and non-doctrinal (socio-legal) research methods. Both methods were used to analyze legislative products or court decisions at the macro-analysis level empirical realities. They aimed to study and solve problems that were conceptualized at the micro-analysis level as symbolic realities. This study used the sociological and anthropological juridical approach methods that aimed to observe written laws and the law in practice. Results: The findings of this study showed that the construction of customary judges' decisions upholds the values ​​of belom bahadat (customs of life regarding politeness/ethics/high morals of the Dayak indigenous community). These values ​​must be applied in all philosophical, sociological, and legal aspects. The decision of the customary judge also has implications for the construction of the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN that aims to provide legal justice and certainty for the disputing parties. Applications of this study: This study offers findings from the construction of customary judges in upholding customary law based on the values ​​of belom bahadat which have implications for the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN in providing justice for defendants who have undergone customary trials and the defendant's obedience to applicable customary laws as an effort to resolve conflicts. Novelty/Originality of this study: The doctrine of customary law in the form of a customary judge's decision from the Huma Betang perspective is used by state judicial institutions as the basis in providing recommendations or legal considerations for law enforcement in providing justice and legal certainty for the disputing parties. Keywords: Decision construction, Customary Judge, Philosophy, Huma Betang.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan penelitian: Penelitian ini mengkaji konstruksi putusan Majelis Perdamaian Adat Basara Hai Nomor B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 yang berimplikasi pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk untuk menyelesaikan konflik perkebunan yang terjadi di Kabupaten Seruyan, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia yang berpotensi memberikan hukuman yang lebih ringan bagi terdakwa. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian campuran yang terdiri dari metode penelitian doktrinal (normatif) dan non-doktrinal (sosio-legal). Kedua metode tersebut digunakan untuk menganalisis produk perundang-undangan atau putusan pengadilan pada level analisis makro realitas empiris. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengkaji dan memecahkan permasalahan yang dikonseptualisasikan pada level analisis mikro sebagai realitas simbolik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dan antropologis yang bertujuan untuk mengamati hukum tertulis dan hukum dalam praktik. Hasil: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi putusan hakim adat menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai belom bahadat (adat istiadat kehidupan mengenai kesopanan/etika/moral yang tinggi dari masyarakat adat Dayak). Nilai-nilai tersebut harus diterapkan dalam segala aspek filosofis, sosiologis, dan hukum. Putusan hakim adat tersebut juga berimplikasi pada konstruksi Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN yang bertujuan untuk memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menawarkan temuan dari konstruksi hakim adat dalam menegakkan hukum adat berdasarkan nilai-nilai belom bahadat yang berimplikasi pada Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN dalam memberikan keadilan bagi terdakwa yang telah menjalani persidangan adat dan ketaatan terdakwa terhadap hukum adat yang berlaku sebagai upaya penyelesaian konflik. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Doktrin hukum adat berupa putusan hakim adat dari perspektif Huma Betang digunakan oleh lembaga peradilan negara sebagai dasar dalam memberikan rekomendasi atau pertimbangan hukum bagi penegak hukum dalam memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Kata Kunci: Konstruksi putusan, Hakim Adat, Filsafat, Huma Betang.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Muhammad Torieq Abdul Helim Achmadi Achmadi Achmadi Agus Alimuddin Ahamed Sarjoon Razick ahmad habibi Ahmad Syarif Ahmad, Jafar Aisyah, Lisda Akbar Tanjung, Ardi Ardi Akbar Tanjung Ariyadi Ariyadi Ariyadi, Ariyadi Armadiansyah Armadiansyah Budiarti, Erlita Fatmawati, Amelia Fikrianoor, Ardiyan Hamzah, Alya Aulia Rachman Handayani, Iva hasanudin muhammad Ibrahim Mohamed, Adil Hassan Jubba, Hasse Kamsi Kamsi Kamsi, Kamsi Lilik Kholisotin Lisda Aisyah Mahmud Hibatul Wafi Maulana Adi Tama Muhammad Noor Shaleh Muhammad Torieq Abdillah Muhammad Torieq Abdillah muhammad, hasanudin Norcahyono Norcahyono SALASIAH SALASIAH, SALASIAH Sanawiah Sanawiah Sanawiah, Sanawiah Septianor Nugraha Sodiq, Yanwar Sudirman Sudirman Syahroni, Akhmad Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogli Yamani, Antung