Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Akta

The Juridical Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XXI/2023 on KPK Sujono, Sujono; Rahmat, Diding; Permana, Sandhi
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49772

Abstract

This study analyzes Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in coordinating and controlling the investigation, prosecution, and trial of concurrent jurisdiction corruption cases. The research employs normative legal methods with statute and historical approach. The findings indicate that the decision does not alter the justiciability of military courts in handling corruption cases committed exclusively by members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces as the non-concurrent jurisdiction. However, in corruption cases involving both civilian and military elements, the determination of the competent court whether from the general judiciary or military judiciary depends on the defined primary impact of the offense on public or military interests through joint assessment by the Military Prosecution Authority and the State Prosecutor. The legal implications of this decision affirm that the Corruption Eradication Commission retains its authority to handle connectivity corruption cases by adhering to the procedural law on concurrent jurisdiction as regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code and Law No. 31 of 1997 on Military Judiciary. During the investigation phase, the Corruption Eradication Commission collaborates with a dedicated concurrent investigation team from the military judiciary comprising military prosecutors and military police. The examination of investigation results is conducted by the State Prosecutor of the Attorney General’s Office instead of the Commission’s prosecutors or the Military Prosecutor. If the case proceeds to trial at the Corruption Court, the prosecution is led by Commission prosecutors, whereas if it is tried in a military court, the prosecution is led by the Military Prosecutor.
Co-Authors Adi Surya, Ridho Adzkari, Feby Agus Prasatya Agus Riwanto, Agus Altansa, Fadlil Andreas Sinaga, Stiven Andryan Aprynaldi Anggraini, Inah Anthon Fathanudien Anugrah , Sandy Kelvin Ardison Asri Aria Cesar Kusuma Atmaja Aridi, Ali Ario Wendra Aris Budiatno Arya Budi Pratama Asri, Ardison Aungrah, Sandy Kelvin Bambang Widarto Baruna, Muhammad Mirza Bias Lintang Dialog Cipto Pasaribu, Candra Darwis, Nurlely Dhazeng Murwiyandono Diding Suryadi Dikha Anugrah Dipranto Tobok Pakpahan Diyanto Diyanto Ela Nurlaela Eliana, Yosefa Enggartiasto Adipradana Fachroni, Fahrul Farhani, Athari Fathanudien, Anthon Fitri Purnamasari Fonny Olga Winerungan Fransiskus, Dedy Frida Ramadhani Gaol, Selamat Lumban Gios Adhyaksa Gita, Aulia Harini, Mediana Haris Budiman Indah Sari Istianingsih Istianingsih, Istianingsih Jasman Junaedi Junaedi Komar Hidayat Lasmauli Niverita Lindri Purbowati Lovtasya, Fadilla Mahmud, Izmi Izdiharuddin B Che Jamaludin Malik, Ibra Maniur sinaga Muhammad Edra Alamsyah Muhammad Faiz Aziz, Muhammad Faiz Mumuh Muhyiddin Niru Anita Sinaga Nurhadi, Syarif Pasaribu, Candra Cipto Prasetyo, Teguh Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Ristio Rusmantara, I Wayan Sandhi Permana Sarip Hidayat Sarip Sarip Satrio, Bagus Shabarudin Shabarudin Shilvyana Aprilliani Sibarani, Irvan Siregar, Zeta Claudia Sandra Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Subhan Zein Sgn Sudarto Sudarto Sudarto Sujono Sujono Sujono Sujono Sujono, Sujono Sukadi Suwari Akhmaddhian Taufik Hidayat Taupik Hidayat, Taupik Teten Tendiyanto Tri Astuti Handayani TRI PRASETYO, YOGI Umam Ma'arif, Mirojul Waldi, Wedri Wendra, Ario Wilsa, Wilsa Zein Sgn, Subhan Zein, Subhan