Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : UIR LAW REVIEW

Sertifikat Sebagai Alat Pembuktian Yang Kuat Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah Arifin Bur; Desi Apriani
UIR Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9.106 KB) | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2017.1.02.952

Abstract

The assurance of legal certainty over the control of land rights is very urgent, especially in the current state of the state. For this reason the government regulates the registration of land in the Basic Agrarian Law and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. With the registration of land rights, the right holder obtains the certificate as a strong evidence. In this regard, the negative publication system is embraced in a land registration system that aims to protect the true rights holder. However, on the other hand the land registration publication system in Indonesia also contains positive elements as seen in the provisions of Article 32 paragraph (2) PP. No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registry.
Pembangunan Hukum Ekonomi di Indonesia (Dalam Perspektif Alih Teknologi ) Zulherman Idris; Desi Apriani; Miftahur Rachman; Erlina Erlina
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(2).16288

Abstract

The existence of foreign capital which can be called the owner of the technology is very much needed. However, this great need and hope is not accompanied by a perfect clear legal basis, in fact specifically regarding technology transfer it is only contained and part of the law on foreign capital investment and patent provisions, whereas in reality the legal actions that occur cannot only be accommodated by the provisions foreign investment law and patents only, but also other aspects. This research is normative legal research which examines primary legal materials and other secondary data. From the results of the study, it was concluded that there are no specific regulations for technology transfer in Indonesia. In practice, it is only accommodated by licensing provisions, articles 9-13 of the Foreign Investment Law, and the Patent Law. Even these regulations are not yet representative and comprehensive so they cannot accommodate problems that arise in rapidly developing business practices. In connection with technology transfer regulations that do not yet have a specific code of conduct, this deficiency needs to be addressed relatively quickly so that there is certainty and legal protection for the parties involved in it, because so far the existing regulations have not been able to comprehensively accommodate legal problems. which arises mainly in relation to technology transfer which occurs through direct investment in the form of capital goods, except through licensing of technology.
Ketentuan Sanksi Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia Ditelaah Dari Aspek Law is a Tool of Social Engineering apriani, desi; Idris, Zulherman; Nasir, M
UIR Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): UIR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2025.vol9(1).24394

Abstract

After the job creation law, the provisions for sanctions for violations of the law on the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition have changed significantly. Criminal sanctions are abolished, and administrative fines are changed to a maximum of 50 percent of net profits or 10 percent of total sales during the period of the violation. This change has attracted the attention of researchers who study from various aspects, including from the accounting aspect. In law, there is one of the famous theories, namely Law is a Tool of Social Engineering, which means that law is a tool for social engineering (changing society for the better). Based on that, the author sees that this study is important to be carried out so that the researcher will produce ideal conclusions and recommendations for future business competition law reform. This research is a normative legal research with a legislative, and theoretical approach. The results of the study show that sanctions according to the business competition law after the job creation law do not support the functioning of the business competition law to achieve positive changes among business actors according to the purpose of the law to prevent the occurrence of monopoly practices and unfair business competition. The author suggests that the provisions of the sanctions be reviewed and reviewed in the future reform of the business competition law so that the business competition law is able to form behavior and culture that prioritizes healthy business competition by prioritizing creation and innovation.