Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Pekerja Anak sebagai Anak Buah Kapal (Studi Anak Buah Kapal Nelayan Juragan di Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus) Aisa, Nora; Lubis, Khairani; Fendri, Azmi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.985

Abstract

Child labor is a child who does any type of work that has a nature or intensity that can interfere with education, endanger safety, health and growth and development can be classified as child labor. The prohibition to employ children is contained in Article 68 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which regulates the prohibition of employers employing children. However, the fact is that there are many child laborers, one of which is child labor as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. The prohibition of working for children is intended to provide protection for children, child protection is all activities to ensure and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop, and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity, and receive protection from violence and discrimination. The problems in this study are (1); How is the protection of child laborers as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus (2); What are the factors that cause the existence of underage crew members employed in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. This research is a type of empirical normative research that uses secondary data (literature) and is supported by primary data based on field research, such as observations, interviews, and surveys. Based on the results of the research, it can be described that the legal protection system for child laborers as crew members has not been implemented in accordance with the law.
Pendaftaran Akta Wasiat Ke Pusat Daftar Wasiat oleh Notaris di Kota Padang Pratisa, Devia Rahma; Fendri, Azmi; Syofiarti, Syofiarti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.990

Abstract

Registration of a will at the will registration center by an online notary in the city of Padang is a notary's obligation as regulated in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, whether there is a will or not, a notary is still obliged to register the will within the first 5 (five) days of every week. the following month, as for notaries in the city of Padang who do not register a register of wills or a register of zero wills caused by the notary's negligence, this can cause losses to third parties or heirs, besides that the notary has also been deemed negligent in his obligations as regulated in the UUJN. This study proposes a formulation of the problem, namely: 1. What is the urgency of registering a will at the center of the testament register by a notary in the city of Padang? 2. How is the practice of registering a will at the center of the register of wills by a notary in the city of Padang? 3. How is the supervision of the notary's obligation to register a will at the testament register center in the city of Padang? This study uses a juridical-empirical approach.The research results show that: 1. The urgency of registering a will deed is apart from the notary's obligations in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, registration of a will is very important because if the will deed is not registered, the notary in his SKW will not be able to calculate the distribution of the heirs, the notary will experience difficulties when making the APHW so that the recipient of the will will experience difficulties in obtaining inheritance rights, therefore the inheritance returns to ab intestate inheritance so that the recipient of the will in the SKW cannot be named 2. The process of implementing will registration according to several notaries in the city of Padang is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, namely Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 60 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Reporting Wills and Applications for Electronic Issuance of Will Certificates.The notary no longer sends a physical list manually as proof of a report regarding a will that has been made, the notary only needs to register to be able to enter the Director General of AHU's website and send a report regarding the will online 3. In carrying out supervision the MPD conducts an examination on the basis evaluation is then carried out coaching, during the examination if the person concerned (notary) still violates it then the MPD makes a recommendation to the MPW to be followed up on.
Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Wasiat yang di Buat Dihadapannya di Kota Padang Hayaturrahmi, Salma; Fendri, Azmi; Hasbi, M
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.991

Abstract

A will is a ideed that contains a person's statement about what he wants to happen after he dies, and which can be revoked by him. Notary as a public official is given by laws and regulations the authority to make all agreements and deeds as well as what is desired by those concerned. One of the powers of a notary is to make a deed relating to a will, this is in accordance with the provisions in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter j and k of the Notary Office Law. This study proposes the formulation of the problem, namely: 1 What is the authority of a notary regarding a will made before him in the city of Padang? 2. What are the notary's obligations regarding the will made before him in the city of Padang? 3. What is the form of the Notary's responsibility for the will made before him in the icity of Padang? This research uses a juridical-empirical approach. The results of the research that has been carried out are: 1. The notary's authority over a will made before him in the city of Padang, namely the authority granted by law to a notary is to make a deed related to a will as mandated in UUJN which is related to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter i which reads: "make a list of ideeds relating to the will according to the order in which the deed was drawn up every month". A will includes a deed drawn up before a notary. A will made directly before a notary is a public will or open will. In this case, the party who wants to make a will comes personally before the notary and states his will. Furthermore, the notary makes the will desired by the person facing it. 2. The notary's obligation to the testamentary deed drawn up before him in the city of Padang is to notify, report and register all wills he makes to the Central List of Probates (DPW) and the Probate Court (BHP) both open wills (openbaar itestament), written wills (olographis testament) as well as a closed or secret testament. 3. Responsibilities of the Notary regarding the will made before him in the City of Padang, include the following: a.) Moral responsibility. b.) Ethical responsibility. c.) Legal responsibility (formal and material).
Tanggung Jawab PPAT dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah di Kota Padang Ramadi, Dilon Scandhiva; Fendri, Azmi; Hasbi, M.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1002

Abstract

The responsibility borne by PPAT is not only to the parties in terms of making land deeds but is also responsible for managing the deed effectively so that it is completed quickly, monitoring land sale and purchase transactions, and carrying out PPAT obligations by PMNA/Kep BPN RI No. 3 of 1997 concerning provisions for the implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning land registration as amended by the regulation of the head of the land agency Number 8 of 2012. An empirical juridical approach method was used, where data collection was carried out by field research which can support existing theories after analysis conclusions are drawn. Based on the research results, it was found that there were still PPATs carrying out their duties not based on the provisions of the statutory regulations written above.
Penetapan Honorarium Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta di Kota Pariaman Saputra, Raji; Fendri, Azmi; Delfiyanti, Delfiyanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1088

Abstract

The violation of the Code of Ethics that occurred in Pariman City was caused by the Notary's actions which were not in accordance with the Regulations on the Notary's Office and the Notary's Code of Ethics. Meanwhile, the violation of the Code of Ethics in Pariaman City was the determination of the Notary's Honorarium which was below the stipulated standards. determine the UUJN and the Notary's Code of Ethics, with this the Notary concerned has violated article 36 UUJN No. 2 of 2014 and the Notary's Code of Ethics in article 4 paragraph 10. Implementation of determining the Notary's honorarium in making deeds in the city of Pariaman. The honorarium received by Notaries in Pariaman was a violation of the Code of Ethics which violated Article 4 paragraph 10 of the 2015 Notary Code of Ethics. according to its authority. Up to Rp. 100,000,000.00 the maximum honorarium received is 2.5%, then above Rp. 100,000,000.00 - Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 one billion the maximum honorarium received is 1.5%, above Rp. 000,000,000.00 honorarium received is based on an agreement between the Notary and the parties, but does not exceed 1% according to the object for which the deed is made. The honorarium received by Notaries in Pariaman was a violation of the Code of Ethics which violated Article 4 paragraph 10 of the 2015 Notary Code of Ethics which resulted in the Notary concerned committing a violation, for several reasons, namely because the client was incapable and there was a mutually acquainted relationship between the client and the Notary concerned. Supervision by the Notary organization in determining the Notary's honorarium in connection with the making of deeds in the city of Pariaman. Supervision from the Indonesian Notary Association (I.N.I) on the behavior and actions of Notaries in Pariaman so that unhealthy competition does not arise through the determination of Notary Supervision to differentiate between the behavior and actions carried out by Notaries in carrying out their positions by the Supervisory Council.
Pelaksanaan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris yang Pensiun dengan Permintaan Sendiri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Serta Implementasi di Kota Padang dan Padang Pariaman Syahrul, Reski Novita; Fendri, Azmi; Delfiyanti, Delfiyanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1157

Abstract

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other authorities as defined in this Law or based on other Laws. Notary is a position that has been regulated in the Legislation. However, there are times when a notary will end his term of office either by stopping at his own request and in the UUJN it is also stated that a notary who stops at his own request must report to the MPD and indicate who will be a substitute Notary for submitting the protocol. The method used in this thesis is an empirical research method. In this research, an understanding was obtained that if a notary stops at his own request, all protocols will be submitted to a replacement notary and appointed by the MPD. However, in the implementation that occurred in the cities of Padang and Padang Pariaman, the handover began with a Notary who stopped at his own request and was notified to the MPD that the MPD would process a letter from the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights. In its implementation, submission of notary protocols in the cities of Padang and Padang Pariaman did not go smoothly. Due to time delays in the process of issuing ministerial decrees, the handover of the notary protocol to a replacement notary is delayed and does not comply with the time period allowed according to UUJN. As long as there is no such decision, the notary cannot issue a copy of the deed for those who need it. However, in practice in the cities of Padang and Padang Pariaman these obstacles can be overcome by providing understanding to the parties or notaries who will retire.
Kedudukan Hukum Akta Pengakuan Hutang yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris (Studi Kasus Perkara Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 2956/K/Pdt/2013) Puspita Siregar, Elvia; Danil, Elwi; Fendri, Azmi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A deed of acknowledgment of debt made by a notary authentically will be followed by a deed of acknowledgment of debt also authentically made by a notary. If the debtor is in default in carrying out his obligations to the creditor, based on the debt acknowledgment deed a grosse deed can be issued, which is the first copy which has the same force as a court decision which has permanent legal force. In this research, the formulation of the problem related to the legal protection of Land Deed Drafting Officials (PPAT) against acts of falsification of data on sale and purchase deeds by applicants, namely: 1. What is the legal position of the Deed of Debt Acknowledgment made before a Notary in Supreme Court case Number 2956 K/Pdt/2013 ? 2. What is the judge's consideration in Supreme Court case Number 2956.K/PDT/2013 in relation to the Deed of Debt Acknowledgment made to the Notary? 3. What are the legal consequences of the decision of Supreme Court case Number 2956.K/Pdt/2013 on the Deed of Debt Acknowledgment made before a Notary? This research uses a juridical-normative approach. The research results obtained are: normative legal research, namely research. The results of the discussion of the problems that arise in this research are that the legal strength of a debt acknowledgment deed made by a notary with an authentic deed is perfect evidence for parties in the event of prosecution in court. Apart from that, the deed of acknowledgment of debt made by the notary is authentically legally binding in accordance with the law for the parties who make it so that it must be adhered to, complied with and implemented as well as possible and in good faith to achieve the smooth implementation of the debt. The legal consequence of making a debt acknowledgment deed made by a notary against the parties in the event of a trial in court is that the parties are bound by a debt payment agreement which they have acknowledged using an authentic notarial deed in the form of a debt acknowledgment deed. The basis for the legal considerations of the panel of judges in deciding the case of a lawsuit for cancellation of a debt acknowledgment deed made by a notary with an authentic deed in Supreme Court Decision No. 2956.K/PDT/2013 is that the cassation filed by Defendant I HH and Defendant II DH does not have strong reasons or does not have a strong legal basis to be submitted to the Supreme Court. However, the clause of the debt acknowledgment deed made by the notary containing the provisions for interest/late fines of 8% (eight percent) per month was canceled by the panel of judges and changed to 2% (two percent) per month because the interest provision was 8% (eight percent). per month, the legal provisions in force in the banking law require that the interest rate on a loan must not exceed 2% (two percent) per month.?
Pembatalan Wasiat Dan Dampak Hak Waris Terhadap Hilangnya Legitieme Portie Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 43/PDT.G/2020/PN Medan Abdullah, Risyad; Fendri, Azmi; Fauzi, Wetria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1699

Abstract

Every transfer of property during a marriage as long as the marriage is not agreed upon, every act of transfer and collateral must obtain the approval of each married partner so that if there is a transfer of joint property during the marriage, the action will be null and void. The formulation of the problem in this research is: What is the basis of the judge's considerations in the case of Court Decision Number 43/Pdt.G/2020/PN Medan relating to the cancellation of wills and the impact of inheritance rights on the loss of Legitiieme Portie? And what are the legal consequences of canceling a will for the parties in the case of Court Decision Number 43/Pdt.G/2020/PN Medan relating to the cancellation of a will and the impact of inheritance rights on the loss of Legitieme Portie? The method in this research is nomative juridical. A notary making an authentic deed is legal principles contained in the Civil Code in connection with making a will deed where a notary cannot make a will deed that bequeaths or bequeaths mixed assets in a marriage that owns the property. is joint ownership, because the action taken will harm the married couple so that it can be betrayed as an unlawful act as in the case in Decision Number 43/PDT.G/2020/PN. Medan. The resolution of the case stems from the return of the wife's rights to some of the assets in the mixture of her marital assets, namely half, while the other half is the inheritance deed of the deceased which should still be inherited by the deceased's heirs
Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Saat Menjadi Objek Sengketa di Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Eksekusi terhadap Objek Perkara Perdata No. 18/Pdt.G/2018/PN Kbr) Abdi, Israr; Mirwati, Yulia; Fendri, Azmi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1727

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze the legal certainty of registering the transfer of land rights when it is the object of a dispute in court and to determine the legal consequences for land rights that have been transferred in the implementation of the Koto Baru District Court Decision No. 18/Pdt.G/2018/PN Kbr. This research uses empirical juridical methods, namely research carried out directly in the field to find out the actual problems that occur, then it will be connected to applicable laws and regulations and existing legal theories. The data collected is in the form of primary data and secondary data. Based on the research results, in the event that Land Rights are the object of a dispute in court, the case registration is automatically deleted within 30 (thirty) days from the date of recording and if there is a status quo order it is also automatically deleted within 30 (thirty) days. day. After the period for recording the object of the court case and/or the record of the object of determining the status quo as intended is deleted and the object of the case is not followed by a determination of collateral confiscation, the registration of the transfer or encumbrance of rights can be carried out. The Court's decision which has permanent legal force (In kracht van gewijsde) is considered correct and in this decision it is punitive (Condemnatoir) control/ownership of the land the object of execution is binding on the third party because obtaining rights to the land from the losing party (Defendant) occurred after If there is a case/case decision then the object of the case can be executed.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Perjanjian Nominee Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar Nomor : 259/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Gin Budiyanto, Budiyanto; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Fendri, Azmi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.1969

Abstract

This study discusses the Gianyar District Court Decision No. 259/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Gin, which declared that Deed No. 10 and Deed No. 12, related to the purchase of land, constitute an unlawful act under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The focus of this research is: (1) How is the regulation of the creation of valid agreement deeds by a notary; (2) The notary's responsibility in the creation of nominee agreements; and (3) The judge's considerations in the court's decision regarding the nominee agreement. Using a normative juridical approach, this study utilizes both secondary and primary data. The results show that the notary has a significant responsibility to ensure that the deeds comply with the prevailing laws and regulations, and to prevent any coercion or fraud. Regarding the nominee agreement, the judge ruled that the agreement was made to circumvent the law, violating Articles 1337 and 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code, as it does not meet the objective requirement of a valid agreement, namely "a lawful cause." This nominee agreement was created with the intention of evading legal provisions prohibiting foreign nationals from owning land titles in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdi, Israr Abdullah, Risyad Aisa, Nora Aldyans Rio Pratra Anafiah, M. Ali Angga Pratama Angga Pratama Angrila Putri Anton Rosari Argi Putra Finalo Baroto, Wisnhu Agung Budiyanto Budiyanto Busyra Azheri Darnis Darnis, Darnis Delfianti Delfiyanti Delfiyanti Devia Rahma Pratisa Dilon Scandhiva Ramadi Dina Shabrina Eko Permana Putra Elvia Puspita Siregar Elwi Danil Ferdi Ferdi, Ferdi Feronika Feronika Feronika, Feronika Finalo, Argi Putra Fithrina, Hendria Frenadin Adegustara Frenadin Adegustara Gusminarti, Gusminarti Hasbi Haswin, Olvi Sri Hilda Hayaturrahmi, Salma Hengki Andora Hengki Andora Ihsan, Junaldi Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Juanda Sari, Vinsa Junaldi Ihsan Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Kharina Aggita Putri Lubis, Khairani Luky Kurniawan luky kurniawan, luky M Hasbi M Hasbi M. Hasbi M. Hasbi Maria Susanti Maron, Yogi Mhd. Lutfi AR Mirwati, Yulia Muammar Kadafi Siregar MUHAMMAD HASBI Muhammad Hasbi Nanda, Novitra Nidya Sari, Tri Nisaul Hasanah Nora Aisa Novitra Nanda Nurul Astri Haliza Petrolika, Petrolika Pratisa, Devia Rahma Pujha Setiawan J Puspita Siregar, Elvia Putra, Eko Permana Putri, Kharina Aggita Rahayu Triningsih, Puja Rahman, Fadhil Raji Saputra Ramadi, Dilon Scandhiva Rembrandt Rembrandt Reski Novita Syahrul Reza Putri Reza Putri Rinaldi Sarza Romi Romi, Romi Rosari, Anton Rully, Jodie Angelia Saimar, Hamda Afsuri Salma Hayaturrahmi Saputra, Raji Sarza, Rinaldi Setiawan J, Pujha Shabrina, Dina Sucy Delyarahmi Syahida, Jeri Gunarko Syahrul, Reski Novita Syam, Misnar Syofiarti Syofirman Syofyan Tatik Kustiati Titin Fatimah Tri Nidya Sari Wetria Fauzi Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yogi Maron Yolanda, Nadiya Yulia Mirwati Yuliandri, Yuliandri Yuliandri, Yuliandri Yuslim Yuslim Yuslim Yuslim Yussy A. Mannas Zulfitri, Amelia