Articles
<![CDATA[Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Penerima Protokol Notaris yang Meninggal Dunia ]]>
<![CDATA[Putra, Eko Permana]]>;
<![CDATA[Yuliandri, Yuliandri]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ Alhurriyah Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2608
<![CDATA[answer the needs and interests of the community of legal certainty, as stated in the agreements, agreements and agreements made by the parties in the form of authentic deeds. The making of an authentic deed as a perfect proof and no further evidence is needed to strengthen the arguments in a legal case. Authentic deed consists of minuta deed and a copy of the deed. Minutes of deed are kept by a Notary who is part of the Notary protocol which must be kept and maintained by the notary because it is a state archive. Article 1 number 8 of the UUJN states that "Authentic Deed that is kept as a notary protocol is minuta deed, that is, the original deed which includes the signatures of the registrants, witnesses, and Notary that are kept as part of the notary protocol. Notary recipient of other notary protocols obliged to save this deed is not responsible for the contents of the deed of the notary protocol that it receives. The notary is obliged directly to the Notary protocol. The death of a Notary Public, in addition to leaving problems regarding work pending, of course, will also leave other problems related to the Notary protocol. Notary recipient of the Notary protocol is not the deed maker of the Notary protocol submitted to him. The notary recipient of the protocol can provide services to the client or the public by issuing a grosse deed, a copy of the deed and a citation of the deed of minuta deed which is part of the Notary protocol that has been submitted to him.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT DALAM PEMASANGAN HAK TANGGUNGAN (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 285 PK/Pdt/2013) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nidya Sari, Tri]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah, Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.484
<![CDATA[Dalam pemberian Hak Tanggungan dengan membuat Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan (APHT) oleh PPAT terlebih dahulu dibuat perjanjian utang piutang yang menjadi dasar Hak Tanggungan. Fransisca terhadap PT Bank Central Asia (BCA), Kantor Notaris/PPAT R. Sabar Partakosoema, Dinny Herlela, Kepala Badan Ketahanan Nasional Jawa Barat, dimana dalam hal ini Tergugat II yaitu Kantor Notaris/PPAT R.Sabar Partakosoema kalah penggugat Surat Hak Milik (SHM) dan juga APHT atas nama tergugat, penggugat juga merasa dirugikan karena kerugian tersebut, penggugat sebagai pihak yang melaporkan kerugian tersebut dibuat, namun penggugat yaitu Maria Fransisca tidak merasa bahwa dia telah kehilangan SHM dan APHT. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah atau norma dalam hukum positif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Hak Tanggungan. Dalam hal ini Notaris membuat dan mengesahkan akta otentik dalam perjanjian Kredit, dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) berwenang untuk membuat dan mengesahkan Surat Kuasa Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Akibat hukum yang timbul karena pemasangan hak tanggungan yang tidak dilakukan oleh UUJN adalah batal demi hukum dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan mengikat dan kreditur pemegang hak tanggungan akan kehilangan hak istimewanya sebagaimana diatur dalam UUHT. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Memasang Hak Tanggungan Yang Menyimpang Dari UUJN Terkait Perkara Nomor 285 PK/Pdt/2013 Seperti Mencabut Minuta Akta Jika minuta akta hilang maka dapat dikatakan Notaris tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya untuk menyimpan minuta akta dengan benar.]]>
<![CDATA[Peranan PPAT dalam Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik di Kota Sungai Penuh ]]>
<![CDATA[Setiawan J, Pujha]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Syofiarti, Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.853
<![CDATA[PPAT is a public official authorized to draw up Deeds for Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT), in which the deed will be used as basic evidence for registration of Mortgage Rights at the Land Office and PPAT is required to submit APHT and supporting documents to the Land Office within 7 days after the deed is signed. In Article 14 of the Electronic Mortgage Service Regulations, it has also been limited to the 7th day, if it is not carried out then the PPAT mortgage registration document is automatically uploaded, it is considered giving approval by the system. The presence of Electronic Mortgage Registration has not run smoothly and has resulted in APHT and supporting documents submitted by the PPAT in the Sungai Full City area to the Land Office past the applicable regulatory deadline. The results of the study found that: 1. The role of the PPAT is to check Certificate, Making Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT), Power of Attorney for Imposing Mortgage Rights (SKMHT), and submitting Deeds for Granting Mortgage Rights and supporting documents to Creditors (Banks) to continue registration to the Land Office by Creditors (Banks), but with a lack of understanding and the knowledge of the PPAT in SungaiFull City regarding the registration of Mortgage through electronic system services, the role of the PPAT in SungaiFull City is still not in accordance with Ministerial Regulation Number 5 of 2020 concerning Electronically Integrated Mortgage Services. 2. PPAT Constraints in Registering Mortgage Rights Electronically in Sungai Full City, namely: There is still a lack of inspection, Network Disruption, collateral object certificates have not been validated and problems found, there are legal violations against PPATs who do not comply with the time limit provisions in submitting APHT and supporting documents to the Land Office and abusing authority by carrying out creditor user account obligations.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Dibawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 362/PID.B/2020/PN PDG) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nanda, Novitra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah, Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.900
<![CDATA[Humans as social beings are always in contact with other humans, where in human relations they often make agreements both verbally and in writing which lead to an agreement. An agreement made in writing intends to provide legal certainty and legal protection for both parties if a dispute occurs between them at any time. In a written agreement, the subject and object of the agreement will be clearly visible. While the object can be described as something that is done by the subject, namely things that are obligatory to the authorities against which party has the right. A written agreement can be made by private deed or by authentic deed. Authentic deed made by a Notary. Notary as a public official who is the only one authorized to make authentic deeds and other authorities determined by law. In court, if what is presented as evidence is only an underhanded deed considering the limited strength of evidence, then other supporting evidence is still being sought so that evidence is obtained which is considered sufficient to reach the truth according to law. Based on this, problems arise regarding: 1) What is the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg regarding private letters legalized by a Notary. 2) What are the legal consequences of private letters legalized by a Notary against Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg. This study uses the Normative method, namely by examining primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg is related to private letters legalized by a Notary, proof of letters, namely the legalization of private deeds which only have formal evidentiary strength, namely the strength of evidence which provides certainty that an incident has actually occurred which is contained in the private deed by the parties and public officials have acknowledged it. single public prosecutor. The legal consequence of private documents legalized by a notary is that private deeds do not have perfect evidentiary legal consequences because they lie in the signatures of all parties to the agreement. An underhand deed only gives legal consequences of proof that are perfect for the benefit of the party to whom the signatory wants to provide evidence, while for third parties the legal consequences of proof are free.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan yang Disahkan oleh Notaris pada Perkara Perdata (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2020/PN Pdg) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sarza, Rinaldi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah, Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.938
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out and analyze how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary as evidence in the trial process at court in civil cases, to find out and analyze the judge's consideration of civil case decisions, and to find out and analyze the notary's responsibility for the deed has been legalized in the Civil Code. The research method in this research is the normative research method. Normative legal research is legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of this study, want to show how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary in civil cases, basically the strength of proof of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary the power of proof cannot be equated with an authentic deed, underhanded deed legalized by a notary if denied the power changes as proof of the beginning of writing.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris yang Meninggal Dunia Kepada Majelis Pengawas Daerah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman ]]>
<![CDATA[Ihsan, Junaldi]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Delfiyanti, Delfiyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.948
<![CDATA[For this reason, this research aims to explain: 1. How is the implementation of the handing over of protocols for notaries who have died in Padang Pariaman District? In this writing, empirical juridical legal research (sociolegal research) is used. The Juridical Approach is used to analyze various Legislative Regulations related to the above problems. In contrast, the Empirical Approach is used to analyze law by looking at legal realities in society. The implementation of the submission of the notary protocol begins with notification of the death of a notary by the heirs to the Padang Pariaman Regency MPD. Then the MPD appoints a notary recipient of the protocol to forward it to the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia to issue a ministerial decision as a basis for the legality of the protocol holder.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris dalam Pemeriksaan Protokol Notaris di Kota Solok ]]>
<![CDATA[Putri, Reza]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Syofyan, Syofirman]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.949
<![CDATA[Notaries in carrying out their duties for the general public are required to be under the supervision of an institution that is neutral, impartial, and independent. The purpose of this supervision is so that the Notary seriously carries out the duties of his office in accordance with applicable rules and codes of ethics in order to maintain the security of the public who make deeds to the public. Notary Public. Another aim is to avoid Notaries who are irresponsible and do not comply with the Notary's code of ethics. The establishment of a supervisory institution is referred to in Article 1 point 6 of the UUJN which states that the Notary Supervisory Council, hereinafter referred to as the Supervisory Council, is a body that has the authority and obligation to carry out guidance and supervision of Notaries. In Solok City in 2022 there will be eight Notaries, whereas in the examination carried out by the Solok City Regional Supervisory Council in 2022 only four Notaries were examined. Based on this, researchers are interested in conducting further research by analyzing: 1) the implementation of the authority of the Regional Notary Supervisory Council in examining Notary Protocols in Solok City. 2) the obstacles and efforts of the Regional Notary Supervisory Council in carrying out inspections of Notary Protocols in Solok City. This research is descriptive analytical, using an empirical juridical approach. Using primary data as the main material with a study of secondary legal materials. Based on research, it was found that: the implementation of the authority of the Solok City MPD in examining Notary protocols has carried out guidance and supervision related to the implementation which was carried out in 2022, there were around four out of eight Notaries who were not examined. The problem with MPD is that when MPD carries out inspections, several Notaries are not in their offices at the time of the inspection. Which results in Notaries not being checked by the MPD. Efforts made by the MPD were to summon the Notary concerned to appear at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights to have the protocol checked by the Chair of the MPD and notaries who were not examined were made a priority in the examination for the following year.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Mengenai Unsur Melawan Hukum dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Pratama, Angga]]>;
<![CDATA[Danil, Elwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.964
<![CDATA[This research will examine the analysis of the judge's considerations regarding the element of unlawfulness in Article 2 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Study of the Padang District Court Corruption Court. The research method used is normative research or literature study assisted by interviews as supporting data. This research is a descriptive analysis because this research is expected to provide a concrete picture regarding the interpretation of the unlawful element in Article 2 paragraph 1 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The results of the research are that the element of unlawfulness in material terms no longer has binding legal force, while formally the element of unlawfulness in criminal acts of corruption still has binding legal force, which means that a person can be punished if the act is committed. violate statutory regulations.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Pekerja Anak sebagai Anak Buah Kapal (Studi Anak Buah Kapal Nelayan Juragan di Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aisa, Nora]]>;
<![CDATA[Lubis, Khairani]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.985
<![CDATA[Child labor is a child who does any type of work that has a nature or intensity that can interfere with education, endanger safety, health and growth and development can be classified as child labor. The prohibition to employ children is contained in Article 68 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which regulates the prohibition of employers employing children. However, the fact is that there are many child laborers, one of which is child labor as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. The prohibition of working for children is intended to provide protection for children, child protection is all activities to ensure and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop, and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity, and receive protection from violence and discrimination. The problems in this study are (1); How is the protection of child laborers as crew members in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus (2); What are the factors that cause the existence of underage crew members employed in Teluk Kabung Tengah Bungus. This research is a type of empirical normative research that uses secondary data (literature) and is supported by primary data based on field research, such as observations, interviews, and surveys. Based on the results of the research, it can be described that the legal protection system for child laborers as crew members has not been implemented in accordance with the law.]]>
<![CDATA[Pendaftaran Akta Wasiat Ke Pusat Daftar Wasiat oleh Notaris di Kota Padang ]]>
<![CDATA[Pratisa, Devia Rahma]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendri, Azmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Syofiarti, Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.990
<![CDATA[Registration of a will at the will registration center by an online notary in the city of Padang is a notary's obligation as regulated in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, whether there is a will or not, a notary is still obliged to register the will within the first 5 (five) days of every week. the following month, as for notaries in the city of Padang who do not register a register of wills or a register of zero wills caused by the notary's negligence, this can cause losses to third parties or heirs, besides that the notary has also been deemed negligent in his obligations as regulated in the UUJN. This study proposes a formulation of the problem, namely: 1. What is the urgency of registering a will at the center of the testament register by a notary in the city of Padang? 2. How is the practice of registering a will at the center of the register of wills by a notary in the city of Padang? 3. How is the supervision of the notary's obligation to register a will at the testament register center in the city of Padang? This study uses a juridical-empirical approach.The research results show that: 1. The urgency of registering a will deed is apart from the notary's obligations in article 16 paragraph 1 letter j UUJN, registration of a will is very important because if the will deed is not registered, the notary in his SKW will not be able to calculate the distribution of the heirs, the notary will experience difficulties when making the APHW so that the recipient of the will will experience difficulties in obtaining inheritance rights, therefore the inheritance returns to ab intestate inheritance so that the recipient of the will in the SKW cannot be named 2. The process of implementing will registration according to several notaries in the city of Padang is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, namely Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 60 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Reporting Wills and Applications for Electronic Issuance of Will Certificates.The notary no longer sends a physical list manually as proof of a report regarding a will that has been made, the notary only needs to register to be able to enter the Director General of AHU's website and send a report regarding the will online 3. In carrying out supervision the MPD conducts an examination on the basis evaluation is then carried out coaching, during the examination if the person concerned (notary) still violates it then the MPD makes a recommendation to the MPW to be followed up on.]]>
