Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.783
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal COPE Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Publikasi Pendidikan Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Elemen International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Wacana Akademika : Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika KACANEGARA Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Surya Abdimas Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Abdimas Galuh: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIn) Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan International Journal on Education Insight Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek) Pancaran Pendidikan Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement Jurnal Tatsqif Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Mathematics Education Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Mathema: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Didaktik Matematika International Journal of Review in Mathematics Education Pedagogy Review
Imam Sujadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 65 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 65 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL KESEBANGUNAN BERDASARKAN PROSEDUR NEWMAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL (Penelitian dilaksanakan di Kelas IX SMPN 1 Paguyangan Kabupaten Brebes) Widodo, An Nur Ami; Sujadi, Imam; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20238

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this research was to identify the types of students error at 9th grade of SMPN 1 Paguyangan in solving similarity by using Newman’s error analysis procedure from spatial ability. The type of this research is a qualitative research. Subject’s selection procedure was by using purposive sampling. There are 6 subjects in this research. Data collection technique was task-based interviews. The validity was determined by time triangulation. The data analysis was Miles and Huberman model including reduction, data displays, and conclusion. The results of this research showed as follows. The types students with low spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding errors. The types students with medium spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The types students with high spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were : transformation error.Keywords: types of error, Newman procedure, spatial ability.
PROSES BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PEMBUKTIAN TAHUN AKADEMIK 2014/2015 Yohanie, Dian Devita; Sujadi, Imam; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10048

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to describe the thinking process in proof problem solving using direct, contraposition, and contradiction methods in 2nd semester mathematic education students of Nusantara PGRI University of Kediri with (1) high, (2) moderate, and (3) low learning achievements. The research method employed was qualitative approach. Subject of research was selected using purposive sampling technique, consisting of 6 2nd-semester mathematic education students: 2 students with high, 2 with moderate, and 2 with low learning achievements. Data collection was carried out using interview based on proof problem solving assignment. Data validation was carried out using time triangulation, and the valid data was analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing.  The result of research showed that: (1) The thinking process of students with high learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly and completely, did algebraic operation to connect consequence to premise, in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing the process and proof result. (2) The thinking process of students with moderate learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer when their  proved. (3) The thinking process of students with low learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase is the same, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise difficultly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise using number example, thereby could not prove the consequence. Then in review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing their proof result.Keywords: Thinking Process, Problem Solving, Proof, Learning Achievement 
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 2 SEMEN KEDIRI BERDASARKAN TAHAP PROSES BERPIKIR SOLSO DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Hanafiah, Anis; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10060

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to describe (1) Thinking process of climber students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics. (2) Thinking process of camper students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics (3) Thinking process of quitter students grade VII SMPN 2 Semen in problem solving of mathematics. The thinking process in this research uses steps of Solso thinking, forming concept, logically, and taking decision. This research is qualitative descriptive research. The subjects in this research are taken by purposive sampling. The subjects of this research are 3 students from grade VII SMPN 2 Semen, they are 1 student of climber type, 1 student of campers type, and 1 student of quitters type. The data collection of this research uses polling and questionaire technic based on duties that is done for comparison material. The legality of data used in this research is triangulation time and using reference sufficience. The technic of data analysis used is Miles and Huberman concept, these are data reduction, giving data and getting conclution. The results of this research show that (1) the thinking process of climber students, in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem that have done: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision; (b) arranging the plan for problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (c) doing the plan of problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (d) recheck the result by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision; (2) The thinking process of camper students in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (b) arranging the plan for problem solving by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) not taking decision. (c) doing the plan for problem solving, by (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) taking decision. (d) recheck the result by: (i) forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) not taking decision. (3) The thinking process of quitter students in problem solving of mathematics on steps: (a) understanding the problem by, (i) forming concept, (ii) not thinking logically, (iii) can’t take decision. (b) planning for problem soving: (i) not forming concept, (ii) thinking logically, (iii) can’t take decision, (c) can’t run for the probem solving. (d) not rechecking the problem solving.Keywords: thinking process, problem solving, Adversity Quotient (AQ)
KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 MOJOLABAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Khoiriyah, Nor; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10040

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this research was to describe the ability of student’s mathematical communication who had low, medium, and high early mathematics ability in class VII SMP Negeri 1 Mojolaban on aspect grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence in solving mathematics problem. This research was a qualitative research. The subjects in this research were seven students of class VIIE SMP Negeri 1 Mojolaban, which consisted of three students who had low early mathematical ability, two students who had medium early mathematics ability, and two students who had  high early mathematical ability.The subjects in this research were taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The main instrument used in this research to collect the data was the researcher and the other instrument were a task that contains of test question and interview guide instrument. Data analysis technique were conducted by data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The validity of the data was conducted by using time triangulation that compared the data of the first task based interviews with the data of the second task based interviews. The equal valid data of mathematical communication ability on aspect grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence was made the main finding, whereas the different of valid data was made other finding of the research. The result of this research are the students who had low, medium, and high early mathematics abilities were have imperfect mathematical communication on grammatical, sociolinguistic, strategic, and discourse competence. The imperfection that appear  on each competence caused by some indicators that not fulfilled completely.Keywords: Mathematical communication, grammatical competence, discourse competence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW BERBANTU MEDIA FLASH PADAMATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Kurniawati, Rina; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20244

Abstract

Abstract: This research was purposed to determine: (1) which one produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash, or direct instruction; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each learning style, which one learning model that produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash or direct instruction (4) on each learning model, which one student had better mathematics learning achievement , student who had visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style. This study was a quasi-experimental study with factorial 3x3 design. Population in this research were eleventh grade students of Vocational High School in Sragen. Sample collection were done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data collection were done by the method of documentation in order to test the balance of the population, the questionnaire were used to determine the students learning style and test were used to know the students achievement on material dimension three. Data analysis techniques used ANAVA two ways with unbalanced cells. The results of this study concluded as follows (1) cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) Students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style; students with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style; (3) on each learning style, cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (4) on each learning model (Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, and direct instruction), students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style.Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, Learning Style, learning achievement
Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for Negative Integer in Differentiated Instruction: A Prospective Analysis in Didactical Design Research Riki Andriatna; Imam Sujadi; Ira Kurniawati; Arum Nur Wulandari; Yuli Bangun Nursanti; Kanya Barndt
Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society
Publisher : Program Studi Tadris Matematika Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/hipotenusa.v8i1.2195

Abstract

Integers are one of the essential materials in mathematics, but provides its own difficulties for students, especially with regard to negative integers. This study aims to develop a hypothetical learning trajectory based on the results of the learning obstcale study. Specifically, the alleged learning trajectory is a conjecture on phase D students, namely Junior High School students based on the differentiation of the readiness aspects of high, medium, and low students. This study used development research with a didactical design research approach at the prospective analysis stage, namely analyzing the didactic situation before learning. The development results obtained a hypothetical learning trajectory based on the analysis of learning obstacle and literature review. Based on this, the hypothetical learning trajectory that is compiled consists of four stages starting from the concept of negative numbers, the concept of integers, counting operations on integers, and the properties of calculating operations on integers and their application. In addition to these four stages, the alleged learning trajectory also emphasizes the meaning of the minus sign as a prerequisite concept in integers. The integration of didactical situations in the hypothetical learning trajectory emphasizes the diversity of didactical situations towards students’ abilities as a form of differentiated instruction, especially in differentiating content.
The Impact of Intelligence (IQ) and Learning Styles on Mathematics Learning Motivation and Achievement in Secondary School Students Hadi Prayitno; Imam Sujadi; Isnandar Slamet; Getut Pramesti
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v9n1.p101-117

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of intelligence quotient (IQ) and learning styles on students’ learning motivation and mathematics achievement among tenth-grade high school students. The research employed a quantitative approach using an ex post facto design. A total of 83 students participated in the study, selected through a census sampling technique, as the entire population of tenth-grade students was included. Instruments used in this study included an IQ test, a learning style questionnaire (covering auditory, visual, and kinesthetic styles), a motivation questionnaire, and a mathematics achievement test. Data analysis involved instrument validity and reliability testing, classical assumption tests (normality and homogeneity), and multivariate analysis (MANOVA) to assess both the direct and interaction effects of IQ and learning styles on learning motivation and mathematics achievement. The results showed that IQ had a significant effect on mathematics achievement (p < 0.05), but no significant effect on learning motivation. Learning styles did not significantly influence either mathematics achievement or learning motivation. Furthermore, there was no significant interaction between IQ and learning styles in relation to either outcome. The coefficient of determination (R²) indicated that the model explained 26.3% of the variance in mathematics achievement and 16.5% of the variance in learning motivation. It can be concluded that IQ contributes to students’ success in mathematics, while learning motivation and performance are also shaped by other factors beyond IQ and learning styles. These findings highlight the importance of instructional strategies that consider students’ intellectual capacities along with affective and contextual factors
Analysis of junior high school students' refractive thinking process in solving numeracy problems Rahmawati Fatkhul Janah; Imam Sujadi; Isnandar Slamet
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 12 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v12i3.18446

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how junior high school students use refractive thinking to solve algebraic problems based on their mathematical skill levels, specifically high and low. Refractive thinking involves a phase where students rethink and modify their approaches to solving algebraic problems. This qualitative study employs interviews and observational methods, with participants consisting of students with both high and low mathematical abilities. The results indicate that students with high mathematical ability navigate the stages of refractive thinking more effectively, including problem identification, strategy formulation, and evaluation. These students are often able to quickly identify errors and experiment with multiple strategies to arrive at better solutions. In contrast, students with low mathematical ability struggle with problem identification and tend to persist with initial, less effective approaches. These findings highlight significant differences in the refractive thinking processes of the two groups, underscoring the need to develop instructional strategies that foster reflective thinking skills, particularly for students with lower mathematical aptitude.
Pendampingan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Deep Learning: Mendorong Adaptabilitas Guru untuk Mengembangkan Mathematical Thinking Siswa Imam Sujadi; Arum Nur Wulandari; Ira Kurniawati; Yuli Bangun Nursanti; Riki Andriatna
Abdimas Galuh Vol 8, No 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/ag.v8i1.21831

Abstract

Pendidikan di Indonesia bersifat dinamis dan memerlukan peningkatan kualitas secara berkesinambungan. Peningkatan kualitas tersebut bertujuan untuk mengoptimalkan potensi siswa, sehingga menciptakan individu yang cerdas, mandiri, dan kompetitif. Ini menjadi tantangan bagi guru untuk dapat adaptif terhadap perubahan serta melakukan inovasi untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Kecendurungan siswa yang masih mengandalkan hafalan juga menyebabkan pemahamannya kurang mendalam dan kemampuannya dalam memecahkan masalah rendah. Oleh karena itu diperlukan upaya pengembangan mathematical thinking sebagai guiding force dalam pemecahan masalah. Deep learning merupakan pendekatan pembelajaran yang menekankan pemahaman konsep dan penguasaan kompetensi secara mendalam, dalam cakupan materi yang lebih sempit sehingga dapat mendukung pembelajaran yang berkesadaran, bermakna, dan menggembirakan. Dengan tiga prinsip tersebut deep learning dapat digunakan sebagai pendekatan untuk mengembangkan mathematical thinking siswa. Namun demikian belum banyak guru yang memiliki bekal pengetahuan serta keterampilan untuk menerapkannya, khususnya pada pembelajaran matematika. Oleh karena itu, Research Group Dikdasmen UNS bekerjasama dengan MGMP Matematika SMP Kota Surakarta melaksanakan pendampingan dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan adaptabilitas guru untuk mengembangkan mathematical thinking  siswa dengan penerapan pendekatan deep learning. Pendampingan dilaksanakan melalui empat tahapan yaitu brainstorming terkait pendekatan deep learning dan implementasinya pada pembelajaran matematika, penyusunan desain pembelajaran, diskusi mengenai implementasi desain pembelajaran, dan refleksi. Hasil pendampingan menunjukkan bahwa guru sudah mampu mendesain dan mengimplementasikan pendekatan deep learning dengan cukup baik. Guru menyatakan bahwa pendekatan deep learning meningkatkan ketertarikan belajar serta pemahaman siswa. Namun demikian guru masih menemui hambatan antara lain keterbatasan waktu, perbedaan kecepatan belajar siswa, serta referensi untuk modul ajar yang terbatas.
The emergent role of artificial intelligence in Mathematics education: Examining students’ acceptance and perception Yuli Bangun Nursanti; Imam Sujadi; Ira Kurniawati; Riki Andriatna; Arum Nur Wulandari
Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July-December 2025
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jemin.v5i2.11242

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into education, offering new opportunities for enhancing learning, especially in challenging subjects like mathematics. However, there is limited research on how students perceive and accept AI in mathematics education, particularly in the context of Indonesian higher education. This study aims to explore mathematics education students’ acceptance and perceptions of AI tools in enhancing their learning experience. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the study employed a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire for quantitative data and in-depth semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative insights. The participants were 389 mathematic students from several universities in Surakarta municipality, Indonesia based on non-probability sampling technique through sampling quota. The results show that students generally perceive AI as useful and easy to use, with high scores for Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). AI was appreciated for its ability to provide personalized learning, immediate feedback, and flexibility. However, students' Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU) AI was lower, indicating hesitation toward integrating AI regularly into their learning routines. The findings highlight that while AI has the potential to enhance learning, students still value traditional face-to-face interactions with instructors and are concerned about over-reliance on technology. The study contributes to theoretical framework that AI tools should complement, not replace, traditional teaching methods. Practically, the integration of AI in education should be gradual, with adequate support for both students and instructors. Future research should explore long-term adoption and investigate the role of educational policies in supporting AI integration.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Aziz Adi Wahyu Kuncara Agus Darmawan Agus Margono Agus Margono Agus Setiawan Agus Setiawan Ahmad Abdul Mutholib Ahmad Husni Mubarok Ajeng Novalin Wija Pratiwi Ajeng Novalin Wija Pratiwi Aji Permana Putra Amellia Putri Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Aniek Hindrayani Anita Dewi Utami Annur, M. Firman Ariastutik, Endah Ariastutik, Endah Arisjanti, Nova Ayu Arum Nur Wulandari Arum Nur Wulandari Arum Nur Wulandari Arum Nur Wulandari Asip Cakra Buana Asip Cakra Buana, Asip Cakra Astiwi Comastika Putri Aulia Nurmalitasari Awalia, Kurnia Bambang Sugaiarto Budi Usodo BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Dalud Daeka Damayanti, Elok Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Aulia Citra Kusuma Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Fitri Argarini, Dian Fitri Diari Indriati Djoko Adi Susilo Dona Dinda Pratiwi Dwi Retnowati Dwi Retnowati Dwiani Listya Kartika Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya Dyah Ratri Aryuna Edy Suprapto Edy Suprapto Elywati Elywati Elywati Elywati Endah Asmarawati, Endah ERLAN SISWANDI Etika, Erdyna Dwi Eva Tri Wahyuni Eva Tri Wahyuni Exacta, Annisa Prima Faizah, Farah Farida Nurhasanah Fatkhunur Fariza Rahmadiansyah Fauzi Mulyatna Fawaida, Atina Fengky Adie Perdana Ferdiani, Rosita Dwi Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at Fitria, Camelina Fitriana, Laila Fransiskus Xaverius Agus Siswanto Fransiskus Xaverius Agus Siswanto, Fransiskus Xaverius Frasetyana, Anita Diah Frasetyana, Anita Diah Fredi Ganda Putra Getut Pramesti Getut Pramesti Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Habibi Ratu Perwira Negara Hadi Prayitno Hanafiah, Anis Hanafiah, Anis Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Puteri Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono Hasan S Negara Hasan S Negara Hendriyanto, Agus Hidayah, Muhlishotul Hirtanto Hirtanto Hirtanto Hirtanto, Hirtanto Ibrahim . Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Pakhrurrozi, Imam Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indra Kurniawan Indra Kurniawan Ira Kurniawati Ira Kurniawati Ira Kurniawati Ira Kurniawati Ira Ira, Ira Kurniawati Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Juwita Rini K, Tri Atmojo Kanya Barndt Kharisma Ardhy W Khayati, Fitrotul Khoiriyah, Nor Kintoko Kintoko KOMARUDIN Komarudin Komarudin Krida Singgih Kuncoro Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurnia Awalia Kurniasih, Rini Kurniasih, Rini Kurniawati, Cici Kurniawati, Ira Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Laila Fitriana Laksono Trisnantoro Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Malikhah, Siti Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Marcelina, Thea Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardodo Mardodo Mardodo Mardodo Maulia, Dityana Mila Metikasari, Shinta Molinasari, Nitha Monika Agnes Henny Kinanti Mubarok, Ahmad Husni Muh. Zuhair Zahid Muhammad Zuhair Zahid, Muhammad Zuhair Muhlishotul Hidayah Muhtarom Muhtarom Muhtarom Muhtarom, Muhtarom Ningrum , Sri Adiningsih Utami Ningsih, Maya Kristina Nirawati, Lia Septy Nirawati, Lia Septy Nor Khoiriyah Nova Ayu Arisjanti Novi Dya Meylasari Novita, Aresti Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nuraini Muhassanah Nuraini, Latifah Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati, Nurrahmawati Nursanti, Yuli Bangun Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Hidayati Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi, Pangadi Pasaribu, Rita Rupiani Perwira, Nurul Yudha Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Pratiwi, Yulian Adhi Priyogo, Adi Purjiyo Purjiyo Puspitasari, Norma Puspitasari, Norma Puteri, Hanifa Alifia Putri, Amellia Putri, Astiwi Comastika Rahmadiansyah, Fatkhunur Fariza Rahmawati Fatkhul Janah Rahmawati Masruroh Rahmawati Masruroh, Rahmawati Retno Sari Ria Wahyu Wijayanti Riki Andriatna Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rina Agustina Rina Agustina Rina Kurniawati Riyadi Riyadi Rofiah, Faizatur Rubono Setiawan Rubono Setiawan Salman Alfarisy Totalia, Salman Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Samsul Maarif Sari, Retno Sarwanto Sarwanto Selvi Marcellia Setiawan Wicaksono Sigit Wahyudi Siswanto Siti Khoiriyah Siti Khoiriyah Siti Komsatun Siti Suprihatiningsih Soeyono Soeyono Soeyono, Soeyono Sri Adi Widodo Sri Adi Widodo Sri Subanti Sriyati, Sriyati Suharyanto Suharyanto Sukamto, Ika Sumiyarsi Sukarmin Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sulaiman Sulaiman Suprapto Suprapto Susantiningrum Tajuddin, Annas Tasyah Tarmo Tarmo Tarmo, Tarmo Tata Rahmasari Tika Karlina R Tri Atmojo K Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Yuliana Triana Harmini Trisnawati, Dwi Inayah Tsaqifah, Sofi Tunggu Biyarti Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ulfa, Nur Fitriyana Vera Dewi Susanti Wahyu Nofiansyah Wahyu Nofiansyah, Wahyu Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuni, Fina Tri Warifdah, Yumna Wicaksono, Setiawan Widodo Widodo Widodo, An Nur Ami Widodo, An Nur Ami Wulandari, Arum Nur Wulandari, Asih Yandika Nugraha Yudi Darma Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuliana, Tri Yumna Warifdah Zainnur Wijayaanto Zamroni Zamroni Zamroni Zamroni Zulaikah, Siti Zulfa, Faradina Nilam