Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : INVOTEC

Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model Warju, Warju
INVOTEC Vol 12, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Technological and Vocational Education-Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502

Abstract

There are many models of evaluation that can be used to evaluate a program. However, the most commonly used is the context, input, process, output (CIPP) evaluation models. CIPP evaluation model developed by Stufflebeam and Shinkfield in 1985. The evaluation context is used to give a rational reason a selected program or curriculum to be implemented. A wide scale, context can be evaluated on: the program's objectives, policies that support the vision and mission of the institution, the relevant environment, identification of needs, opportunities and problems specific diagnosis. Evaluation input to provide information about the resources that can be used to achieve program objectives. Evaluation inputs used to: find a problem solving strategy, planning, and design programs. Evaluation process serves to provide feedback to individuals to account for the activities of the program or curriculum. The evaluation process is conducted by: monitoring sources can potentially cause failure, prepare a preliminary information for planning decisions, and explain the process that actually happened. Product evaluation measure and interpret the achievement of goals. Evaluation of the products also come to: the measurement of the impact of the expected and unexpected. The evaluation is conducted: during and after the program. Stufflebeam and Shinkfield suggest product evaluation conducted for the four aspects of evaluation: impact, effectiveness, sustainability, and transportability. The decision making process is done by comparing the findings / facts contained in context, input, process and product standards or criteria that have been set previously.
Co-Authors 'Ilmi, Muhammad Iklil Ulil Abdi, Ferly Abdi, Ferly Isnomo Abdi ADI TRISNA, RIO Al Fahrurrozi, Mochammad Arya Alam, Ruumy Bahrul Alam Anggara Ardiyanta Anggara Sukma Ardiyanta ANGGRAINI, BAGUS Anwari, Muhammad Syahrul Anwari, Muhammad Syahrul Anwari Arifianti, Lailatus Arifianti, Lailatus Sa'diyah Yuniar Ariyanto, Sudirman Rizki Ariyanto, Sudirman Rizki Ariyanto Arya Mahendra Sakti Ata Syifa’ Nugraha Athirmidzi, Falah Athirmidzi Bagas Surya Hadi Buitjahjanto, I Gusti Putu Asto Diah Wulandari Diastian Vinaya Wijanarko Diastian Vinaya Wijanarko Djoko Sungkono(2) Drastiawati, Novi Dyah Riandadari FAIQOTIN NISA, IHDAA Ferly Isnomo Abdi Firlani, Tony Firman Yasa Utama Firmansyah, Lutfi Setiawan Firmansyah Ganda, Andita Nataria Fitri Hamdani, Riza Arif HANDIWI, RIA Haratama, Kusuma Refa Hidayatullah, Rachmad Syarifudin I Gusti Putu Asto Buditjahjanto I Made Muliatna I Made Muliatna Ibisono, Gigih Chandra IHSAN NURKHAKIM Isnantyo, Fajar Danur Jahjanto, I Gusti Putu Asto Jarot Danang Priambodo Komarudin Komarudin Komarudin Komarudin Lestari, Yoni Dwi Lilik Anifah Manathan, Yoel Andrew Manathan Marniati Marniati, Marniati Melinda Astuti Muhammad Nurtanto Muhammad Pratama Muhammad Yandi Pratama Mutohhari, Farid Novi Sukma Drastiawati Nugraha, Ata Syifa' Nur Kholifah Nuur Wachid Abdul Majid Pratama, Muhammad Yandi Prayata, Muhammad Tharieq Prayata Priambodo, Jarot Danang Putu Sudira Rabiman, Rabiman Rachmad Syarifudin Hidayatullah Ria Handiwi Rina Harimurti Rio Adi Trisna ROJIL GHUFRON, MOCHAMMAD RUSY ANADY, NOVY Soeryanto Soeryanto Soeryanto Soeryanto Soeryanto Soeryanto Soffan Nurhaji Supari Muslim Supari Muslim Surya Catur Sudrajat, Surya Catur Susi Tri Umaroh Susi Tri Umaroh Suyitno Suyitno TRI UMAROH, SUSI Trisna, Rio Adi Ulfiyah, Laily Umaroh, Susi Umaroh, Susi Tri Wahyu Cahyadi Wahyu Robby Cahyadi Widoretno, Yustin Widoretno, Yustin Setiya Widoretno Wiyanto, Theodorus Yelma Dianastiti Zainal Arifin