Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

DIGITALISASI SISTEM INFORMASI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Yulianto, Winasis; Amelia, Dyah Silvana; Nurman, Muhammad
CERMIN: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 9 No 2 (2025): AGUSTUS - DESEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat - Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36841/cermin_unars.v9i2.7963

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi telah membawa perubahan mendasar dalam penyelenggaraan kekuasaan kehakiman, termasuk dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) sebagai pengawal konstitusi. Sebagai lembaga negara hasil amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, MK dituntut untuk tidak hanya menegakkan konstitusi secara normatif, tetapi juga adaptif terhadap transformasi digital dalam sistem peradilan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penguatan konstitusionalisme digital melalui penerapan peradilan berbasis teknologi informasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya dalam kerangka e-court, i-judiciary, dan integrated judiciary. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, historis, dan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan teknologi digital oleh MK melalui pengembangan website resmi, sistem e-court, court recording system, e-perisalah, serta integrasi dengan sistem e-government telah berkontribusi signifikan terhadap peningkatan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan akses publik terhadap keadilan konstitusional. Namun demikian, penguatan integrated judiciary masih memerlukan penyelarasan antarlembaga negara, penguatan infrastruktur teknologi, serta peningkatan literasi digital masyarakat guna mewujudkan budaya sadar berkonstitusi secara berkelanjutan.
Penerapan Terapi Deep Breathing Exercise untuk Mengurangi Dyspnea pada Ny.D Dengan Stemi di Ruangan Krisan Rsud Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru Ramadhani, Desy; Nurman, Muhammad; Indrawati, Indrawati
World Health Digital Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Knowledge and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69693/wolgitj.v2i2.75

Abstract

Dyspnea atau sesak napas adalah kondisi dimana seseorang mengalami kesulitan bernapas atau merasakan napas menjadi cepat dan dangkal. ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) merupakan salah satu bentuk sindrom koroner akut yang mengindikasikan terjadinya iskemia miokard berat dan memerlukan penanganan segera. STEMI berdampak pada sistem pernapasan melalui terjadinya disfungsi ventrikel kiri yang menyebabkan kongesti paru dan edema paru akut, sehingga menimbulkan sesak napas dan hipoksemia. Penatalaksanaan non farmakologis, salah satunya dengan terapi deep breathing exercise untuk mengurangi dyspnea. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan asuhan keperawatan pada Ny. D dengan pemberian terapi deep breathing exercise untuk mengurangi dyspnea dengan stemi di ruangan krisan RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan studi kasus dengan pendekatan proses keperawatan yang meliputi pengkajian, penetapan diagnosa, intervensi, implementasi dan evaluasi. Intervensi terapi deep breathing exercise diberikan selama 3 hari sebanyak 5 kali sesi dengan durasi ±5 menit. Hasil asuhan keperawatan menunjukkan pasien mengalami sesak napas (dyspnea) sebelum intervensi, kemudian setelah 3 hari dilakukan pemberian terapi deep breathing exercise, sesak napas yang dialami pasien menurun, pernapasan awal 27x/menit menjadi 21x/menit. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa terapi deep breathing exercise dapat menurunkan dyspnea yang dialami pasien. Diharapkan pasien mengaplikasikan terapi deep breathing exercise jika mengalami sesak napas berulang.
Evaluasi Sikap Berdemokrasi Mahasiswa Ditinjau dari Berpikir Kritis dan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation pada Mata Kuliah Kewarganegaraan Nurman, Muhammad
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v12i2.34236

Abstract

Students' democratic attitudes are influenced by the application of the group investigation learning model and students' critical thinking skills. This study aims to evaluate students' democratic attitudes after learning using the group investigation learning model, and the interaction of the group investigation learning model and critical thinking on students' democratic attitudes. The target population in this study were all students of the Elementary Madrasah Teacher Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic University of Mataram, while the accessible population were students of the Elementary Madrasah Teacher Study Program Semester I, Academic Year 2025/2026. Sampling was done randomly, this was done because the number of semesters I of the Elementary Madrasah Teacher Study Program consists of six classes and each class consists of 30 students. Then, four classes were taken to be used as research samples, namely two classes as experimental classes and two classes as control classes. Based on the results of random sampling, it was found that IB, ID as experimental classes and IA, IE as control classes. The design of this study used a treatment by level 2 x 2 design. The independent variables consisted of the group investigation and conventional learning models (A). The independent variable attributes are classified into 2: high critical thinking and low critical thinking (B). The research hypothesis was tested using a two-way 2 x 2 analysis of variance (ANOVA) and continued with the Dunnet t test. The results of the study showed that (1) The democratic attitudes of students who learned using the group investigation learning model were higher than those who learned using the conventional learning model, (2) There was an interaction between the learning model and critical thinking skills on students' democratic attitudes.
Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka di Madrasah Nurman, Muhammad
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v9i2.34919

Abstract

This study aims to produce a product model for evaluating civic education learning based on the independent curriculum. The research method uses the Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The research was conducted at Madrasah Aliyah involving civic education teachers and students. Data collection methods used observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques, namely descriptive analysis, inferential analysis, and covariance analysis. Qualitative analysis, namely data from interviews and observations were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis techniques. Triangulation was used to determine the credibility of the research results, namely triangulation of data sources (teachers, students, experts) and triangulation of methods. The research data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the main problems in evaluating civic education learning in the implementation of the independent curriculum include the dominance of cognitive assessments, the lack of authentic assessments, and suboptimal measurement of the Pancasila student profile dimensions. The developed civic education learning evaluation model has the following characteristics: (a) comprehensively measuring the dimensions of civic knowledge, skills, and character; (b) using diverse and authentic assessment techniques, especially projects and portfolios; (c) integrating formative and summative assessments; and (d) oriented towards the development of Pancasila student profiles. The project- and portfolio-based civic education learning evaluation model with the integration of continuous formative assessment can improve students' critical thinking skills by 45% and civic skills by 30% compared to conventional evaluation models. The developed evaluation model received high validation (a score of 4.74 out of 5) from curriculum and civic education learning experts, as well as a good level of practicality (a score of 4.30 out of 5) based on teacher assessments.
Evaluasi Diagnostik Berbasis Asesmen Kognitif dan non-Kognitif pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Nurman, Muhammad
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 10 No 4 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v10i4.34920

Abstract

This study aims to see the results of the implementation of cognitive and non-cognitive-based diagnostic assessments in civic education subjects at MTs. Lombok Timur. The method used in this study is a quantitative descriptive method. Data collection techniques include tests, questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation. Primary data sources were obtained from teachers and students, while secondary data were collected through analysis of diagnostic assessment implementation reports. Research data obtained through tests and questionnaires were analyzed and described with graphs depicting the number of students who obtained scores from the results of cognitive and non-cognitive diagnostic assessments. The results of the cognitive diagnostic assessment were obtained from a total of 130 students, 45 students who successfully obtained a score ≥ 70 and 85 students obtained a score < 70, and these results indicate that 65% of students have not reached the established graduation standards. The results of the non-cognitive diagnostic assessment regarding student learning style preferences include three main categories: 45 students have a visual learning style, 24 students show an auditory learning style, and 61 students have a kinesthetic learning style. 21% of students showed a very high interest in learning civics, 28% had a high interest, 48% had a low interest, and 3% had a very low interest. This data provides a clear picture of students' learning preferences, which can be used to design more engaging and relevant learning approaches.
Multiculturalism and Prior Knowledge as the Basis for Assessing Tolerance in Civic Education Nurman, Muhammad
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 6 No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2149

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to assess the impact of implementing a multicultural problem-based learning model and prior knowledge on students' tolerance attitudes in the Citizenship Education course. Methodology: The sampling technique was carried out using cluster random sampling to determine the experimental and control classes. Data collection methods included tests and questionnaires. Tests were used to collect data on prior knowledge, while questionnaires were used to collect data on students’ tolerance attitudes. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and inferentially. Inferential analysis employed a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) 2 x 2. Main Findings: The results of the analysis indicate that the implementation of a multicultural problem-based learning model and prior knowledge affect students' tolerance attitudes in the citizenship course. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the integration of two aspects that are rarely explicitly combined: multiculturalism as a socio-cultural framework and prior knowledge as a cognitive aspect in the assessment of tolerance attitudes. This approach produces a more comprehensive assessment instrument compared to previous studies.