Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : TAJDID

Filsafat Al-Fârabî Sebagai Kritik Ideologi Burhanuddin, Nunu
TAJDID Vol 25 No 1 (2018): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Research and Development Institution, Darussalam Institute for Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (0.272 KB) | DOI: 10.36667/tajdid.v25i1.339

Abstract

The scientific heritage of Abu Nasr al-Farabi is known to the world of Islam around fifty years ago and hasn’t been fully explored and researched. For about a thousand year or more, al-Farabi philosophy has been forgotten and most of his works and masterpiece was let alone and remain untouched and almost vanished. This condition seeks an effort to place al-Farabi work in Islamic constellation horizon proportionally and comprehensively. This research is aimed at investigating al-Farabi philosophy as one of the creative and original Muslim philosophical work ideology critic. “Ideology critic” in this context is an indication that a system function’s properly and cover ‘a thought’ and influence the material at the thought it self. Some of al-Farabi’s thought can be interpreted as a concept related to ideology critic it carries, just the emergence at the greatest Greek works translation project in Islamic world, the tendency of al-Farabi to logic matter built by Aristoteles as well as problems in the best country.
Hukum Kausalitas antara Al-Ghazali dan Ibn Rusyd Burhanuddin, Nunu
TAJDID Vol 23 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Research and Development Institution, Darussalam Institute for Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (0.272 KB)

Abstract

The anomaly in the intellectualism of classic Islam has dragged the main exponent of Sunni, Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali who is against the principles of science, into an argument. The stigma appears because he is considered to have criticized the theory of causalities as tradition apart. Although this doesn't weaken the role of the human mind, we are cautioned that this critic can ruin the scientific foundation. The intense debate comes up from this because Al-Ghazali proved that he was still in agreement with “the principle that nothing can happen without n cause”, that is the adage of Ibn Rusyd,  a Muslim philosopher from Cordova. The later philosopher then criticized AI-Ghazali, otherwise known as Hujattul Islam by giving different characters on the elements of physics like fire, cotton etc. If the water and the fire have no specific characteristic so it is nonsense God creates water and fire, because eventually those materials are not slightly different. If in the nature there is no specific mechanism, so there is no specific characteristic. This is a step forward that legitimizes causality as the primary relation and not the common relation. The writer of this paper would like to emphasize something unspeakable when AI-Ghazali limits absolutisms of the cause but does not refuse the cause. It is surely unavoidable that Ibn-Rusyd, the philosopher from Cordova conveys an impression that he goes to war without fighting.