Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST)

Comparison of Students' Chemistry Learning Outcomes through Verification of Concept Maps and Mind Maps in Discovery Model Learning Auliah, Army; Islawati, Islawati
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v4i1.13711

Abstract

Chemistry learning requires an understanding of complex abstract concepts. The Discovery Learning model has been applied to improve student understanding, but the verification stage in this model is often an obstacle in connecting the concepts found. This study compares the verification of concept maps and mind maps in improving student learning outcomes. The research method used is comparative descriptive, with two experimental groups each using concept maps and mind maps. The research instruments include learning outcome tests, assessment rubrics, and observations. The results showed that concept maps support systematic understanding more, while mind maps are more effective in developing flexibility of thinking. The verification process plays a role in correcting student misconceptions. These findings provide insight for educators to adjust learning methods to improve understanding of chemical concepts.
Analysis of Learning Outcome Indicator Completion through Verification of Concept Maps and Mind Maps in the Discovery Learning Model Yunus, Muhammad; Islawati, Islawati; Auliah, Army
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v4i1.13712

Abstract

A less systematic conceptual understanding can hinder the completion of student learning outcomes. This study aims to compare the verification of concept maps and mind maps in improving student understanding in the Discovery Learning model. The method used is descriptive comparative, with two experimental groups each using concept maps and mind maps. The research process includes pretest, intervention with verification, posttest, and student reflection. Data collection was carried out through learning outcome tests, assessment rubrics, and observations. The results of the study showed that concept maps support more systematic understanding, while mind maps are more effective in developing flexibility of thinking. The verification process plays a role in correcting students' conceptual errors. These findings provide insight for educators to adjust learning methods to improve learning outcomes.