Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.127
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Didaktika Religia Qawanin: Journal of Economic Syaria Law
Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
Universitas Islam Kadiri
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 82 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 82 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
STUDI KOMPARASI PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA PADA PASAL 127 UU NARKOTIKA NO. 35 TAHUN 2009 DAN PASAL 609 KUHP NASIONAL NO.01 TAHUN 2023 Zaenal Arifin, Muhammad; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 inpress (2026): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v15i2 inpress.8943

Abstract

Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Data yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 menganut sistem pemidanaan ganda (double track system) dengan menempatkan rehabilitasi sebagai bagian dari pemidanaan terhadap penyalahguna narkotika. Sementara itu, KUHP Nasional mengintegrasikan penyalahgunaan narkotika ke dalam sistem hukum pidana umum dengan orientasi pemidanaan yang berlandaskan tujuan, proporsionalitas, dan penghormatan terhadap martabat manusia, namun belum mengatur rehabilitasi secara spesifik. Dengan demikian, diperlukan harmonisasi pengaturan agar pemidanaan terhadap penyalahguna narkotika dapat memberikan kepastian hukum, perlindungan hak asasi manusia, serta berorientasi pada pemulihan.
PELAKSANAAN PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA BERDASARKAN PASAL 97 KHI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA TULUNGAGUNG Endryani, Ellysa; Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 inpress (2026): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v15i2 inpress.9391

Abstract

This study examines the Implementation of Joint Property Division Based on Article97 of the KHI at the Tulungagung Religious Court. This study aims to analyze theimplementation of Article 97 of the KHI to determine the implementation or legalpractice related to the division of joint property at the Tulungagung Religious Courtand to determine the obstacles or constraints faced in implementing the article. Theresearch method used in this study is empirical legal research. The results of thestudy indicate that (1) The implementation of the division of joint property at the Tulungagung Religious Court can be carried out in two ways, namely it can beaccumulated with divorce cases and can be filed separately after the divorce. In theprocess, the case of the division of joint property at the Tulungagung ReligiousCourt follows the provisions stipulated as stated in Article 37 of Law No. 1 of 1974in conjunction with Article 79 of the KHI. (2) There are two obstacles faced in theimplementation of Article 97 of the KHI in the Tulungagung Religious Court,namely (a) Lack of sense of justice for the parties when the division of joint propertyis carried out naturally or naturally (b) The husband does not contribute toproviding for his wife during the marriage, which can result in a different divisionof joint property. Obstacles to the division of joint property reviewed from the theoryof law enforcement show that: (1) The role of the Judge as a legal structure hascarried out its function well because it offers a natural division of joint propertyand carries out contra legem (2) The substance regarding the division of jointproperty in the legal system does not yet reflect upright law enforcement, thuscausing legal uncertainty in society (3) The culture in the division of joint propertyhas been running well, by showing the awareness of society that obeys theapplicable law and the Judge tries to produce decisions that meet the dimensionsof justice, certainty and benefit
Co-Authors Agustina, Inge Agyl Jatikusuma, R. Maredian Al-Mighfar, Anas Alfian, M. Rizki Nur Amrulloh, Muhammad Wahyu Anita Rahmawati Anugrah, Eka Fifty Asrori, Mokhamad Aziz Zamzam, Zanuba Arifia Bagaswara, M. Yoga Bambang Budiono Bambang Sugianto Britama, Azriel Putra Candra Surya Kurniawan Chaliati Dewi, Tutik Mahanani Umi Dharmawan, Eka Yudha Dicky Wahyudi Dimyati, Amalia Ramadhani Endryani, Ellysa Fitriyanti Fitriyanti Gusmiarto, Dodik Hendrawan, Rizki Bagus Hermawan, Yudi Hidayah, Fajar Khoirul Imadhudin, Rizky Ramadhan Indriyanto, Anang Ismail Marzuki Jayanto, Lucky Dwi Juliati, Atik Jumali Jumali Kiswara, Anggita Surya Kusuma, Amita Arum Lestari, Mega Zuni Eka Listiana, Enik M. Rizal Fahmi M. Saifuddin Zuhri, M. Saifuddin Machmud, Yudhy Marjuki Marjuki Matsnal Hakim, Muassisil Husna Mindarsih, Mindarsih Mubarok, Dzikri Musafirin, Ardeta Nabil Az Zaidan Mustakim Mustakim Pertiwi, Adea Ninda Priyastu, Juniar Kintam Rahardian, Alvin Ridwan, Mochammad Robby Rinto Syahputra, Mochamad Zanu Risan Pasha, Rossyda Nurhairy Riskawati Riskawati, Riskawati Rofi'an, Moh Rofik, HIdayatur Rokhim, Moh. Kholilul Rudiana Rudiana, Rudiana Saifudin, Ahmad Ibnu Sari, Nawang Dwiparvita Sasongko, Rama Uji Sokheh, Mohammad Hidayatus Sugeng Supriadi, Sugeng Sujatmiko, Iwan Aji Sulistyo, Gagot Suparyanto, Bambang Surnawan, Eko Idya Susilo Raga, Dimas Hendrawan Sya’bana, Indana Lazulfa Teguh Ariyanto Tri Oktovia, Mochammad Andrie Trijanto, Mohammad Trismawati, Ninik Retno Tustarama, Rekha Wahyudi Wahyudi Widyaningrum, Fitria Ayu Wulandari, Kartika Ika Yudhy Machmud Zaenal Arifin, Muhammad