Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Sanksi Pidana terhadap Penimbunan Masker Medis dan Hand Sanitizer pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 I Gede Aditya Triyana; l Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3429.291-296

Abstract

Terkait proteksi warga dalam pandemi covid-19 misalnya ketika ini yaitu adany penimbunan masker dan Hand Sanitizer oleh oknum pelaku bisnis, Kejanggalan tentang langkanya barang menciptakan kondisi dimana pemerintah dan segenap aparat bersama-sarna memeriksa penyebab terjadinya Penimbunan barang tadi. Yang mengakibatkan ketersediaan menjadi langka dan harganya melonjak mahal. Dari larar belakang bisa dirumuskan kontlik yaitu I. Bagaimanakah Pengaturan tentang penimbunan barang pada saat terjadi kelangkaan barang menurut UU No.7 tahun 2014 di masa pandemi Covid-19? 2. Bagaimanakah sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku penimbunan masker med is dan Hand Sanitizer dalam UU No. 7 tahun 2014 di masa pandemi Covid-19? Penelitian hukum normatif merupakan jenis penelitian dalam artikel ilmiah ini. Penelitian ini menerangkan bahwa kejahatan penimbunan dan pelipatgandaan harga masker dan Hand Sanitizer diatur pada UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 mengenai Perdagangan. sanksi hukuman pidana yang diberikan ada pada Pasal 107 VU No. 7 Tahun 2014 mengenai Perdagangan.
Transaksi Jual Beli Melalui Media Instagram Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Eletronik I Made Satria Wibawa Tangkeban; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3451.416-421

Abstract

The internet is an electronic and information medium that is developing very rapidly. The internet is widely used in various activities, namely trade, trading activities that use the internet known as e-commerce. Trading on the internet itself raises many problems related to the law and all its risks. Problems that can arise include default. The research aims are to analyze the rights and obligations of the parties in buying and selling transactions via Instagram and the legal consequences that arise if the seller in the sale and purchase transaction through Instagram defaults. The research method used is normative legal research, with using statutory approach. Primary sources of legal materials, sources of secondary legal materials were analyzed using systematic interpretation techniques. The result shows that in the buying and selling activities carried out on Instagram, there are often deviations in rights and obligations that are no longer in accordance with existing norms in society and legal remedies that can be taken if there is a default from one of the parties, be it the seller. and buyers who make online transactions can be sued within the environment of the general court or outside the court and can be subject to direct fines for parties who do not perform in default.
Peranan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik I Putu Angga Permana; I Made Arjaya; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3452.422-428

Abstract

This study is included in the category of empirical legal research carried out to fulfill the following objectives, 1) Assessing the rules related to criminal act of defamation in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, 2) Examining the process of legal proof in criminal act of defamation under the Law of Information and Electronic Transactions. From the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that along with the increasing number of criminal cases through online media, the enforcement of electronic documents as legal evidence becomes very important due to the absence of physical evidence. The rules regarding the criminal act of defamation are included in the "Law. No.11 / 2008 article 5 paragraph (1) and (2) on Information and Electronic Transactions "where the presence of this new law is an enlightenment related to online criminal cases (cybercrime). Then, it was also found that only if the use of trial evidence was in accordance with the existing regulations in Indonesia, then proof of a criminal act, especially defamation, could be said to be legitimate. Substantially, defamation is classified as a criminal offense, so it is necessary to have a way of proof if the case occurred is not physically but through online media (Cybercrime).
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penjambretan Mengakibatkan Matinya Korban I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3478.452-456

Abstract

Increasing crime mugging, crime that commits crime by confiscating valuables. Based on this research, the writer raises the formulation the problem: 1. How regulation mugging criminal sanctions, 2. How imposition criminal sanctions for the perpetrator that results as result mugging. This type research uses the normative method, with an invited-invited, conceptual, case approach. regulation mugging criminal is articles 362-367 of Criminal Code concerning robbery, where mugging regulated in Criminal Code, so crime mugging refers to article 365 paragraph (3) criminal act robbery with violence. Perpetrators mugging which result in death may be subject to Article 365 paragraph (3) with a maximum penalty 15 years in prison. regulation mugging crime based on Articles 362-367 Criminal Code because mugging included in category violent crime which deals with the elements article 365 paragraph (3) robbery with violence. Mugging subject to imprisonment and imprisonment for the mugging subject to a maximum imprisonment of 15 years. Mugging is regulated in article 362 if not with violence and 365 paragraph (3) if it is done with violence. For law enforcers, it is better if law enforcers use the Man In The Street model in providing protection to the community.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) di Media Sosial I Made Andy Sabda Permana; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4137.562-566

Abstract

Unlimited freedom of expression causes hate speech crimes to occur more and more in society, especially on social media, especially related to this crime, there is still no special regulation as a regulation in minimizing cases like this. The purposes of this study are to examine the legal regulation of hate speech crimes through social media and criminal liability for hate speech through social media. This study uses normative law through a statutory and conceptual approach based on primary and secondary legal materials with document studies, then the results are presented in a descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that the basis for violating the law for those who make hate speech on social media is based on Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE and Law No. 19 of 2016 on amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008. In accordance with legal regulations Therefore, the responsibility for hate speech crimes on social media is regulated in Article 45A paragraph (2) of Law Number 19 of 2016 which will be given a maximum imprisonment of 6 years and/or a maximum fine of 1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Rupiah).
Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Melakukan Penahanan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Sosial Media Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4144.602-606

Abstract

Authority is what is called formal power, power comes from legislative power (given by law) or from executive administrative power. Authority, which usually consists of several powers, is power over a certain group of people or power over an area of ​​government. The purposes of this study are to analyze the arrangement of the prosecutor's authority in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media and the prosecutor's obstacles in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media. The research method applied in this research is normative legal research with a statutory and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by means of a literature study. The of used are primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of legal materials. After the legal material has been collected, it will then be processed and analyzed using the method of processing legal materials systematically and presented descriptively. The results of the study reveal that the prosecutor's authority is regulated in the criminal procedural law code, the prosecutor's authority law. Which includes several laws, among others, Law no. 16 of 2004 which regulates the prosecutor's office, so that from the law it can be ascertained about the rights and powers of the prosecutor so that law enforcers, especially the prosecutor's office, can make detentions in accordance with the rules that have been in force, so that there is no abuse of authority by law enforcers, especially prosecutors and as The prosecutor's office should be obliged to realize equality for all Indonesian citizens who are being entangled in criminal, civil and other cases.
Kekuatan Email Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Perdata Cokorda Agung Cahaya Darmadi; I Made Minggu Widyantara; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4146.611-617

Abstract

The rapid development of technology and telecommunications makes it easier for someone to send a letter via e-mail because the use of e-mail is considered cheap and fast. In addition, the data that we send via email will be stored, so that if at any time there is a problem related to the letter, it is easy to find physical evidence of the letter in the email. From this phenomenon, this research was conducted with the aim of examining how to prove the use of email based on the ITE Law and examine the strength of email in the trial process when it is associated with article 1866 of the Civil Code. This study uses a normative legal research type by applying the legislation approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary obtained through literature study. After the data is collected, the data is processed by descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that e-mail verification as evidence in civil case trials can be used in trials regarding the legal aspects of e-mail application in enforcing the law. With the development of today's technology through communication media known as the internet, it has changed the way of thinking and acting which then has an impact on the law. The strength of e-mail evidence as a process of proof in court when it is associated with Article 164 HIR regarding valid evidence.
Eksploitasi Anak Sebagai Pedagang Asongan ditinjau dari UU Perlindungan Anak pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Cipta PutraI Ketut Wira Cipta Putra; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4175.667-672

Abstract

Legal arrangements for child exploitation during the Covid-19 pandemic have not yet been included in the Criminal Code (KUHP). So that parents who employ their children as hawkers are still free from legal snares and can easily justify economically. This study aims to examine the legal arrangements for perpetrators of criminal acts of child exploitation as hawkers and reveal criminal sanctions for perpetrators of acts of exploitation of children as hawkers during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research method uses normative legal research by applying a conceptual approach and legislation. The data used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal data obtained by the recording method. After the data has been collected, the next step is to process and analyze it in a systematic way with legal intervention. The results of the study show that legal arrangements for perpetrators of criminal acts of exploitation of children during the Covid-19 pandemic, one of which is child exploitation, are not specifically regulated in Article 13 of Law no. 35 of 2014 amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. Therefore, in this case there is a void of norms, but the crime of child exploitation based on the provisions of Article 103 of the Criminal Code states that crimes against children are a special crime. Related to criminal sanctions, they are sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of ten years or a maximum fine of Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiah
Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Timur) I Gede Eka Suantara; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4640.66-71

Abstract

Indonesia is a legal state in which all aspects are regulated by applicable law to determine the obligations, rights and obligations in monitoring one's own and social desires. Of course, the existence of applicable laws in Indonesia has a very good influence in order because it can control all kinds of criminal activities that occur in society. This study aims to reveal the form of criminal sanctions and legal considerations given by the panel of judges in imposing a sentence on the perpetrators of the crime of forging letters which were carried out together. This research uses normative legal writing method. Sources of data used are primary and secondary data. Data analysis is used in a qualitative, in-depth and comprehensive way and when analyzing legal materials, namely by argumentation through explaining legal incident materials or legal results in detail to facilitate interpretation in the analysis. The results in the study indicate that in terms of considering the judge's role when giving criminal sanctions to the defendant on behalf of Ahmad Saifudin in the decision Number 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Tim, in which the defendant was sentenced for what he had done, he was sentenced to 1 year 2 months jail. The conclusion of the study is that joint criminal sanctions in carrying out the criminal act of forging letters together can be imposed as described in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code regarding the crime of forging letters, threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of six years. The researcher hopes that in deciding a case the judge can consider everything
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4642.78-82

Abstract

Co-Authors A A Ngurah Bagus Krishna Wirajaya A.A. Kompiang Dhipa Aditya Anak Agung Ngurah Alit Bramandhita Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Andrie Eka Putra Ardellia Luckyta Putri Armunanto Arianto Hulu Arief Wibowo Arini, Desak Gde Dwi Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Putri Arisandy Aziz Muhaimin Cipta PutraI Ketut Wira Cipta Putra Cokorda Agung Cahaya Darmadi Cokorda Agung Cahaya Darmadi Cokorda lstri Dharmasatyari Desak Ade Devicia Cempaka Desak Ade Devicia Cempaka Desak Ketut Parwati Desak Ketut Parwati Dewa Gede Ary Krisna Dewanti Arya Maha Rani Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi Diah Gayatri Sudibya Dwi Nova Indriyani Eka Andrean Ramadhan Elisabeth Ayustina Putri Korassa Sonbai Gede Mahadi Waisnawa Hanata Putra Gede Oka Swarbhawa I Dewa Gede Agung Ary Junaedi Saputra I Gede Aditya Triyana I Gede Agus Sudiantara I Gede Ananda Prema Abimanyu I Gede Eka Suantara I Gede Made Doni Pramana Putra I Gede Pande Udayana I Gede Susila Putra I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat I Gusti Agung Ayu Sita Anandia I Gusti Agung Yuri Anindha I Gusti Bagu Suryawan I Gusti Ngurah Budiyasa I Kadek Aris Setiawan I Kadek Roger Budiastra I Ketut Arya Darmawan I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Yoga Pasupati I Komang Giri Maharta I Komang Triana Diantara I Komang Widnyana I Made Aditya Mantara Putra I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Arjaya I Made Ary Supartawan I Made Dwi Payana I Made Irvan Ariansyah Putra I Made Khrisna Dwi Payana I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Oka Wiradharma I Made Rai Dwi Surya Atmaja I Made Satria Wibawa Tangkeban I Made Sepud I Made sepud I Made Sepud I Made Sepud I Made Sepud I Made Widi Adi Peremana I Made Wisnu Wijaya Kusuma I Made Yogi Astawa I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sutama I Nyoman Sutama I Putu Angga Permana I Putu Arta Setiawan I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha I Putu Erick Sanjaya Putra I Putu Gd Yoga Danan Kamadjaya I Putu Gde Iwan Putra Darmayatna I Wayan Ari Subakti I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Kusuma Purwanta I Wayan Panca Eka Darma I Wayan Panca Eka Darma I Wayan Panca Eka Darma I Wayan Rideng I Wayan Sunarta I Wayan Werasmana Sancaya Ida Ayu Gede Wulandari Ida Ayu Gede Wulandari Ida Ayu Made Wahyuni Dewi Ida Ayu Naradita Ida Ayu Putu Widiati Ida Bagus Agung Pariama Manuaba Ida Bagus Diwangkara Indriawati, I Dewa Ayu Trisna Ivony Stefania Seran Tahuk Kadek Jaya Kartika Kadek Nadya Pramita Sari Kartika Dita Ayu Rahmadani Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding Komang Ariadarma Suputra Komang Sutriani l Nyoman Gede Sugiarta l Nyoman Gede Sugiartha lda Ayu Mirah Widnyani Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja Luh Putu suryani Made Ayu Adi Pradnyaningrat Made Mahadwiva Surya Krishna Made Minggu Widiantara Made Rony Setiawan Mahendra, Kadek Amen Putra Mario Viano Rasi Wangge Maudy Aulia Putri Mulyawati, Kade Richa Ni Kadek Derlin Yanti Ni Kadek Widya Widiani Ni Luh Putu Yosi Pratiwi Ni Made Dwi Ari Cahyani Ni Made Elly Pradnya Suari Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Sintia Tarisa Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati Ni Nyoman Arif Tri Noviyanti Ni Nyoman Arif Tri Noviyanti Ni Putu Ayu Yudiastini Ni Putu Christina Elzaputri Rahayu Ni Putu P Novi Widiantari Ni Putu Ratih Puspitasari Ni Putu Widari Yasaputri Nyoman Dita Ary Putri Nyoman Gde Antaguna Pande Komang Satya Parama Hamsa Pius. A. Samponu Putu Aditya Witanaya Putra Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna Putu Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu Putra Pradiatmika Ratih Cahya Pramitasari Ratu Agung Dewangga Arinatha Gunawan Rosalina Indah Putri Senastri, Ni Made Jaya Simon Nahak Sri Ulina Theresa Perangin-Angin Sukiani, Ni Ketut Teo Dentha Maha Pratama Tjok Istri Agung Mellynia Putri Saraswati Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu Yoga Wira Pranata