Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian sebagai Tindak Pidana Ringan Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Gede Mahadi Waisnawa Hanata Putra; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.183 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3081.19-24

Abstract

Indonesian Criminal Law is currently a legacy from the Dutch East Indies Government which has been adapted and passed by Law No. 16 of 1946 to be implemented nationally. The purpose of this research is to describe the regulation of theft of minor crimes in the Criminal Code before the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 and to describe the juridical consequences of Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2012 on theft as a minor criminal act in the Criminal Code. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results show that according to Article 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code, procedures for granting authority to investigate and review cases are carried out by the investigator himself and should not be disturbed by the prosecutor. This Perpres adjusts articles 364, 373, 379, 384, 407 and article 482 of the Criminal Code to Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, fulfill this element of the requirement and enter a case where the value of the commodity does not exceed Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, the case is examined by expedited procedure, which is tried by a judge, and the assignment and review of the case is carried out by the investigator himself without the interference of the prosecutor.
Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Made Mahadwiva Surya Krishna; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (454.264 KB)

Abstract

Corruption is a special crime that is extraordinary in nature (extra ordinary crime), as a result the resolution is also extraordinary by using the principle of retroactivity with an accelerated settlement process using evidence as regulated in Article 26A of Law No. 31 of 1999 No.UU No. 20 of 2001. The purpose of the research is to analyze and reveal the arrangement of evidence in criminal corruption and the strength of the reversal proof system in corruption. The research method is normative law with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials are primary and secondary. From the legal materials that have been collected then analyzed using the construction technique of interpretation, argumentation, evaluation and systematization. The research results reveal that the arrangement of evidence is compiled in criminal corruption, namely evidence in the form of witness evidence, letters, instructions and statements from experts and defendants, other evidence in the form of electronic or electronic information based on Article 26A of Law No. 31 of 1999 No. UU no. 20 of 200 1. The proof system in criminal corruption adopts a limited reversal proof system, which is no longer the prosecutor's obligation to decide, but the suspect must prove that his assets are not the result of a crime.
Pelaksanaan Pengambilan Sidik Jari dalam mengungkap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian I Kadek Aris Setiawan; l Nyoman Gede Sugiarta; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.473 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3419.251-254

Abstract

The increase in the crime of theft has become one of the concerns in the community, so in this case the implementation of fingerprinting in exposing the crime of theft is to reveal the identity of the victim of theft. Based on these problems, the purpose of this research is to analyze the role of fingerprints in uncovering the criminal act of theft and the process of taking fingerprints in proving the perpetrator of the crime of theft. The research method used is normative and empirical legal method. Sources of data used are primary and secondary sources of law. Data collection techniques by interviewing, taking notes, quoting, reading, and summarizing the literature. After the data is collected, it is analyzed qualitatively. The result shows that the role of fingerprints in uncovering criminal acts of theft is that they can be used as evidence, by using a system or method of fingerprint identification, fingerprint records in the form of letters or expert statements can be used as additional evidence in addition to other evidence. found at the scene of the case in conducting an investigation.
Penyebaran Iklan pada Media Elektronik yang Memuat Konten Pornografi Ratu Agung Dewangga Arinatha Gunawan; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.567 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3421.261-267

Abstract

The government has issued Law Number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography. The objectives of this law are, among other things, to maintain and realize social life that is ethical, has a noble personality, upholds the values ​​of the One and Only Godhead, and respects the dignity and dignity of humanity. The purpose of research on legal regulations regarding pornographic advertisements on social media and as well as efforts to prevent perpetrators of spreading advertisements on electronic media containing pornographic content. The type of research used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are divided into primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting material in research uses library research techniques, namely reading, taking notes, quoting, summarizing, and examining data information from regulations or literature related to the problem. Furthermore, the data collected was analyzed using a systematic method of handling legal materials.
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Penimbunan Masker Medis dan Hand Sanitizer pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 I Gede Aditya Triyana; l Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (523.21 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3429.291-296

Abstract

Terkait proteksi warga dalam pandemi covid-19 misalnya ketika ini yaitu adany penimbunan masker dan Hand Sanitizer oleh oknum pelaku bisnis, Kejanggalan tentang langkanya barang menciptakan kondisi dimana pemerintah dan segenap aparat bersama-sarna memeriksa penyebab terjadinya Penimbunan barang tadi. Yang mengakibatkan ketersediaan menjadi langka dan harganya melonjak mahal. Dari larar belakang bisa dirumuskan kontlik yaitu I. Bagaimanakah Pengaturan tentang penimbunan barang pada saat terjadi kelangkaan barang menurut UU No.7 tahun 2014 di masa pandemi Covid-19? 2. Bagaimanakah sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku penimbunan masker med is dan Hand Sanitizer dalam UU No. 7 tahun 2014 di masa pandemi Covid-19? Penelitian hukum normatif merupakan jenis penelitian dalam artikel ilmiah ini. Penelitian ini menerangkan bahwa kejahatan penimbunan dan pelipatgandaan harga masker dan Hand Sanitizer diatur pada UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 mengenai Perdagangan. sanksi hukuman pidana yang diberikan ada pada Pasal 107 VU No. 7 Tahun 2014 mengenai Perdagangan.
Transaksi Jual Beli Melalui Media Instagram Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Eletronik I Made Satria Wibawa Tangkeban; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.754 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3451.416-421

Abstract

The internet is an electronic and information medium that is developing very rapidly. The internet is widely used in various activities, namely trade, trading activities that use the internet known as e-commerce. Trading on the internet itself raises many problems related to the law and all its risks. Problems that can arise include default. The research aims are to analyze the rights and obligations of the parties in buying and selling transactions via Instagram and the legal consequences that arise if the seller in the sale and purchase transaction through Instagram defaults. The research method used is normative legal research, with using statutory approach. Primary sources of legal materials, sources of secondary legal materials were analyzed using systematic interpretation techniques. The result shows that in the buying and selling activities carried out on Instagram, there are often deviations in rights and obligations that are no longer in accordance with existing norms in society and legal remedies that can be taken if there is a default from one of the parties, be it the seller. and buyers who make online transactions can be sued within the environment of the general court or outside the court and can be subject to direct fines for parties who do not perform in default.
Peranan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik I Putu Angga Permana; I Made Arjaya; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (509.908 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3452.422-428

Abstract

This study is included in the category of empirical legal research carried out to fulfill the following objectives, 1) Assessing the rules related to criminal act of defamation in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, 2) Examining the process of legal proof in criminal act of defamation under the Law of Information and Electronic Transactions. From the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that along with the increasing number of criminal cases through online media, the enforcement of electronic documents as legal evidence becomes very important due to the absence of physical evidence. The rules regarding the criminal act of defamation are included in the "Law. No.11 / 2008 article 5 paragraph (1) and (2) on Information and Electronic Transactions "where the presence of this new law is an enlightenment related to online criminal cases (cybercrime). Then, it was also found that only if the use of trial evidence was in accordance with the existing regulations in Indonesia, then proof of a criminal act, especially defamation, could be said to be legitimate. Substantially, defamation is classified as a criminal offense, so it is necessary to have a way of proof if the case occurred is not physically but through online media (Cybercrime).
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penjambretan Mengakibatkan Matinya Korban I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (592.24 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3478.452-456

Abstract

Increasing crime mugging, crime that commits crime by confiscating valuables. Based on this research, the writer raises the formulation the problem: 1. How regulation mugging criminal sanctions, 2. How imposition criminal sanctions for the perpetrator that results as result mugging. This type research uses the normative method, with an invited-invited, conceptual, case approach. regulation mugging criminal is articles 362-367 of Criminal Code concerning robbery, where mugging regulated in Criminal Code, so crime mugging refers to article 365 paragraph (3) criminal act robbery with violence. Perpetrators mugging which result in death may be subject to Article 365 paragraph (3) with a maximum penalty 15 years in prison. regulation mugging crime based on Articles 362-367 Criminal Code because mugging included in category violent crime which deals with the elements article 365 paragraph (3) robbery with violence. Mugging subject to imprisonment and imprisonment for the mugging subject to a maximum imprisonment of 15 years. Mugging is regulated in article 362 if not with violence and 365 paragraph (3) if it is done with violence. For law enforcers, it is better if law enforcers use the Man In The Street model in providing protection to the community.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) di Media Sosial I Made Andy Sabda Permana; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.47 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4137.562-566

Abstract

Unlimited freedom of expression causes hate speech crimes to occur more and more in society, especially on social media, especially related to this crime, there is still no special regulation as a regulation in minimizing cases like this. The purposes of this study are to examine the legal regulation of hate speech crimes through social media and criminal liability for hate speech through social media. This study uses normative law through a statutory and conceptual approach based on primary and secondary legal materials with document studies, then the results are presented in a descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that the basis for violating the law for those who make hate speech on social media is based on Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE and Law No. 19 of 2016 on amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008. In accordance with legal regulations Therefore, the responsibility for hate speech crimes on social media is regulated in Article 45A paragraph (2) of Law Number 19 of 2016 which will be given a maximum imprisonment of 6 years and/or a maximum fine of 1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Rupiah).
Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Melakukan Penahanan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Sosial Media Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (162.214 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4144.602-606

Abstract

Authority is what is called formal power, power comes from legislative power (given by law) or from executive administrative power. Authority, which usually consists of several powers, is power over a certain group of people or power over an area of ​​government. The purposes of this study are to analyze the arrangement of the prosecutor's authority in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media and the prosecutor's obstacles in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media. The research method applied in this research is normative legal research with a statutory and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by means of a literature study. The of used are primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of legal materials. After the legal material has been collected, it will then be processed and analyzed using the method of processing legal materials systematically and presented descriptively. The results of the study reveal that the prosecutor's authority is regulated in the criminal procedural law code, the prosecutor's authority law. Which includes several laws, among others, Law no. 16 of 2004 which regulates the prosecutor's office, so that from the law it can be ascertained about the rights and powers of the prosecutor so that law enforcers, especially the prosecutor's office, can make detentions in accordance with the rules that have been in force, so that there is no abuse of authority by law enforcers, especially prosecutors and as The prosecutor's office should be obliged to realize equality for all Indonesian citizens who are being entangled in criminal, civil and other cases.
Co-Authors A A Ngurah Bagus Krishna Wirajaya A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A. Kompiang Dhipa Aditya A.A. Laksmi Sagung Dewi Ni A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Ngurah Alit Bramandhita Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anandia, I Gusti Agung Ayu Sita Angelina, Rica Zakia Arianto Hulu Arief Wibowo Arini, Desak Gde Dwi Armunanto, Ardellia Luckyta Putri Ayu Prasetya Dewi Aziz Muhaimin Budiastra, I Kadek Roger Cipta PutraI Ketut Wira Cipta Putra Cokorda Agung Cahaya Darmadi Cokorda Agung Cahaya Darmadi Cokorda lstri Dharmasatyari Desak Ade Devicia Cempaka Desak Ketut Parwati Desak Ketut Parwati Dewanti Arya Maha Rani Diah Gayatri Sudibya Diantara, I Komang Triana Diyatmika, Kadek Purwa Sastra Dwi Nova Indriyani Eka Andrean Ramadhan Febriani, Cynthia Firdaus, Ilham Gede Mahadi Waisnawa Hanata Putra Gede Oka Swarbhawa I Gede Aditya Triyana I Gede Agus Sudiantara I Gede Eka Suantara I Gede Pande Udayana I Gede Susila Putra I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat I Gusti Ayu Gita Dwiyanthi Merta I Gusti Bagu Suryawan I Gusti Bagus Suryawan, I Gusti Bagus I Gusti Ngurah Agung I Gusti Ngurah Budiyasa I Kadek Aris Setiawan I Ketut Arya Darmawan I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Yoga Pasupati I Komang Giri Maharta I Komang Widnyana I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Arjaya I Made Ary Supartawan I Made Dwi Payana I Made Irvan Ariansyah Putra I Made Khrisna Dwi Payana I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I MADE MINGGU WIDYANTARA, I MADE MINGGU I Made Oka Wiradharma I Made Rai Dwi Surya Atmaja I Made Satria Wibawa Tangkeban I Made Sepud I Made Sepud I Made sepud I Made Sepud I Made Widi Adi Peremana I Made Wisnu Wijaya Kusuma I Made Yogi Astawa I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sutama I Nyoman Sutama I Putu Angga Permana I Putu Arta Setiawan I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha I Putu Gd Yoga Danan Kamadjaya I Putu Gde Iwan Putra Darmayatna I Wayan Ari Subakti I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Kusuma Purwanta I Wayan Panca Eka Darma I Wayan Panca Eka Darma I Wayan Rideng I Wayan Sunarta I Wayan Werasmana Sancaya Ida Ayu Gede Wulandari Ida Ayu Made Wahyuni Dewi Ida Ayu Naradita Ida Ayu Putu Widiati Ida Bagus Agung Pariama Manuaba Ida Bagus Diwangkara Kadek Jaya Kartika Kardiyasa, I Made Karna, Putu Indra Satya Kartika Dita Ayu Rahmadani Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding Komang Ariadarma Suputra Komang Sutriani Krisna, Dewa Gede Ary l Nyoman Gede Sugiarta l Nyoman Gede Sugiartha lda Ayu Mirah Widnyani Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja Made Mahadwiva Surya Krishna Made Rony Setiawan Mahendra, Kadek Amen Putra Mahendrawati, Ni Luh Mario Viano Rasi Wangge Maudy Aulia Putri Ni Kadek Widya Widiani Ni Luh Putu Yosi Pratiwi Ni Made Dwi Ari Cahyani Ni Made Elly Pradnya Suari Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Sintia Tarisa Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati Ni Nyoman Arif Tri Noviyanti Ni Putu P Novi Widiantari Ni Putu Ratih Puspitasari Ni Putu Widari Yasaputri Ni Putu Yuley Restiti, Ni Putu Yuley Nyoman Dita Ary Putri Pande Komang Satya Parama Hamsa Paramita, Ni Putu Ayu Prasetya Paramitha, Ni Made Wahyuni Pius. A. Samponu Pradiatmika, Putu Putra Pradipta, I Wayan Diva Adi Pratiwi, Ni Putu Indah Putra , Andrie Eka Putra, I Gede Made Doni Pramana Putra, I Putu Erick Sanjaya Putu Aditya Witanaya Putra Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna Putu Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu Suryani . Rahayu, Ni Putu Christina Elzaputri Ratih Cahya Pramitasari Ratu Agung Dewangga Arinatha Gunawan Rosalina Indah Putri Saputra, I Dewa Gede Agung Ary Junaedi Senastri, Ni Made Jaya Sonbai, Elisabeth Ayustina Putri Korassa Sri Ulina Theresa Perangin-Angin Sudibya, Diah Gayatri Sugiartha, I Nyoman Gede Sujana, Putu Krisna Widya Teo Dentha Maha Pratama Tjok Istri Agung Mellynia Putri Saraswati Triyana, I Gede Aditya Widiantara, Made Minggu Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu Yanti, Ni Kadek Derlin Yoga Wira Pranata