Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : rechtsidee

Sanctions Against Working Groups for the Selection of Goods/Services Providers in Cases of Tender Collusion (Study: Comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia) Bukit, Liametami Benedicta; Sugiyono, Heru
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1093

Abstract

The general background of this study is the persistent dominance of tender collusion in Indonesia’s procurement sector, which undermines fair competition and public welfare. The specific background focuses on KPPU Decision No. 15/KPPU-L/2023, where the Working Group (POKJA) was proven negligent but exempted from sanctions due to its unclear legal status under Law No. 5/1999. The knowledge gap lies in the absence of explicit regulatory authority to sanction POKJA, creating ambiguity in defining “other parties” within tender collusion provisions. The aim of this research is to compare Indonesia’s regulatory framework with Malaysia’s system, which empowers MYCC to impose administrative sanctions directly on public officials involved in bid rigging. The results show that Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 provides broader investigative and enforcement powers, enabling more effective deterrence, while Indonesia relies on fragmented administrative mechanisms that weaken accountability. The novelty of this study is its comparative legal analysis demonstrating how dual-authority competition bodies enhance integrity in public procurement. The implications highlight the urgency to revise Law No. 5/1999, clarify POKJA’s legal standing, and establish expert data-analysis bodies to strengthen preventive measures against future tender collusion. Highlights: Indonesia’s weak sanctioning framework leaves POKJA’s accountability unclear in tender collusion cases. Malaysia’s MYCC demonstrates stronger enforcement through integrated administrative and public powers. Reform of Law No. 5/1999 is essential to strengthen oversight and prevent future bid-rigging practices. Keywords: Tender Collusion, POKJA, Competition Law, MYCC , Procurement Governance
Co-Authors Adyuanas, Affan Afif, Muhamad Shafwan Agus Setiyo Budi Nugroho Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aji Lukman Ibrahim Ali, Jovansyah Alisya Rahma Saebani Amandha, Rendytha Khansa Amiruddin, Alifiya Mafaza Arazid, Arazid Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Aulia, Fara Aurellia Zerikha Syah Aurora Jillena Meliala Azzahra, Shalma Berliana Purwono Putri Budiman, Jodhy Farrel Bukit, Liametami Benedicta Chrys Auditya Dewi Clarence, Jennifer Dianrachma, Mitari Dinanti, Dinda Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Dylan Rajasa Chandra Faidurrahman Faidurrahman Fajar, Rahula Fuad Sholihin Hana Humaira Sachmaso Handoyo Prasetyo Haryanto, Imam Hendra Parulian Herbawani, Chahya Kharin Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Ibnu Sholeh Herdidenanto Iwan Erar Joesoef Laksana, Ajie Agung Liansah, Irene Lina Husnul Khairiyyah Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Malik Ibrahim Martin Batara Tambunan Michael Giovanni Joseph Mouna Suez Sianturi Muhammad Arafah Sinjar Muhammad Farhan Gayo Muhammad Fikri Muhammad Rahadian Hasbi Muthia Sakti Oktalia, Ilvana Pardede, Jeremy Raisha Cantika Mutiara Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Ramadhanti Achlina Tri Putri Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Ridha Wahyuni Ridwan, Ridwan Rizal, Sultan Ahmad Rizkianti, Wardani Rochela Amalia Narindra Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni Salwa Noviana Putri Samodro, Dewanto Suci Amalia Tirachim Suherman Suherman Suprima Suyanto, Heru Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda Syakur, Muhammad Zidan Asy Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin Zahra Athirah Zahra Awaliany Safitri Zakia Fitri, Anggi Rachma