Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
15.696
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Format : Jurnal Imiah Teknik Informatika JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization Tech-E Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO Jurnal CoreIT BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Komputer) Technomedia Journal Riau Journal of Empowerment The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science) JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) KOMPUTIKA - Jurnal Sistem Komputer Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer dan Matematika Jurnal Tekno Kompak Building of Informatics, Technology and Science Jurnal Ilmiah Betrik : Besemah Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology) Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Kerangka Kerja Teknologi Informasi Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Sisfotek Global Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat TIN: TERAPAN INFORMATIKA NUSANTARA Journal of Computer Science, Information Technology and Telecommunication Engineering (JCoSITTE) Jurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) JiTEKH (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Harapan) Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Jurnal Ilmiah Infrastruktur Teknologi Informasi Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Reputasi: Jurnal Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak EXPLORER J-Intech (Journal of Information and Technology) BEES: Bulletin of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal Sisfotek Global Jurnal Telematics and Information Technology (TELEFORTECH) Bulletin of Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (JIMASIA) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Inovasi Paradigma Journal of Engineering and Information Technology for Community Service Journal of Computing and Informatics Research JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences) Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Informatics, Electrical and Electronics Engineering TEKNOSIA Jurnal INFOTEL Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering and Informatics Journal of Data Science and Information System Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Media Jawadwipa Bulletin of Artificial Intelligence International Journal of Informatics and Data Science Journal of Decision Support System Research Journal of Information Technology
Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
(Scopus ID : 57446859700), Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 135 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 135 Documents
Search

 10   11   12   13   14 
Combination of MOORA and ITARA Methods in Decision Support Systems for Measuring the Performance of Quality Control Teams Hendrastuty, Nirwana; Wang, Junhai; Sulistiyawati, Ari; Darwis, Dedi; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Jumaryadi, Yuwan; Sumanto, Sumanto
TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara Vol 6 No 6 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/tin.v6i6.8382

Abstract

The problems that often arise in evaluating the performance of the Quality Control team are the subjectivity in determining the weight of criteria and the limitations of traditional methods in producing objective and consistent rankings. To address this issue, this research integrates the Indifference Threshold-based Attribute Ratio Analysis (ITARA) and Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods within a decision support system. The ITARA method is used to determine the weights of criteria based on data variation, making them more representative of real conditions, with the result that Accuracy of Product Defect Identification becomes the most dominant criterion with a weight of 0.3999, followed by Response Speed to Issues at 0.1877, while other criteria have lower weights. Furthermore, the MOORA method is used to calculate the preference of alternatives, resulting in a final ranking. The analysis results indicate that the Quality Assurance Team ranks first, followed by the Quality Improvement Team in second place, while the Quality Inspection Team is in the last position. To test the reliability of the model, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying the weights of the main criteria. The results show that the ranking structure is relatively stable, with changes only occurring in the positions of the first and second ranks when the accuracy weight is reduced by 0.2. In conclusion, the combination of ITARA-MOORA proves to be capable of producing objective, robust, and reliable performance evaluations as a basis for strategic decision-making in enhancing the quality of the quality control teams.
Combination of Response to Criteria Weighting Method and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in the Decision Support System for the Best Supplier Selection Faruk Ulum; Junhai Wang; Dyah Ayu Megawaty; Ari Sulistiyawati; Riska Aryanti; Sumanto Sumanto; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
J-INTECH ( Journal of Information and Technology) Vol 13 No 01 (2025): J-Intech : Journal of Information and Technology
Publisher : LPPM STIKI MALANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32664/j-intech.v13i01.1810

Abstract

Choosing the right supplier is a strategic factor in supporting operational efficiency and a company's competitive advantage. This process requires a decision support system that is able to assess various alternatives objectively and in a structured manner. This study aims to develop a decision support system in the selection of the best supplier by combining the Response to Criteria Weighting (RECA) and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) methods. The RECA method is used to objectively determine the weight of each criterion based on the variation of data between alternatives, so as to reduce subjectivity in the weighting process. Meanwhile, the MAUT method functions to calculate the total utility value of each supplier based on the normalization value and weight that has been obtained. The results of the RECA method show the objective weight of each criterion, which is then used in the MAUT calculation process. The results of the analysis, obtained in the best supplier selection based on the total score of each candidate, it can be seen that PT Global Niaga Mandiri ranks first with the highest score of 0.6512, this shows that this company is the best choice in the supplier selection process. In second place is UD Anugrah Bersama with a score of 0.399, followed by PT Indo Logistik Prima in third place with a score of 0.3451. The combination of the RECA and MAUT methods has been proven to be able to produce accurate, rational, and accountable decisions. This system provides a measurable approach in filtering supplier alternatives efficiently and is relevant to be applied to various other multi-criteria decision-making contexts.
Decision Support System for Determining Strategic Warehouse Locations Using a Combination of the WENSLO Weighting and RAWEC Method Junhai Wang; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Temi Ardiansah; Faruk Ulum; Sumanto Sumanto
JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Vol. 24, No. 1, January 2026
Publisher : Department of Informatics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12962/j24068535.v24i1.a1456

Abstract

Determining the location of a strategic warehouse is a crucial decision in supply chain management as it directly affects distribution efficiency, logistics costs, and service levels. This problem is multi-criteria and complex, requiring an approach that can accommodate differences in the importance of criteria as well as variations in performance among alternatives objectively. This study aims to develop a Decision Support System to determine a strategic warehouse location by combining the Weights by Envelope and Slope (WENSLO) weighting method and the Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC) ranking method. The WENSLO method is used to generate criteria weights based on the nonlinear strength of each criterion, while the RAWEC method is applied to calculate the final values and determine the ranking of warehouse location alternatives. A case study was conducted on eleven alternative locations with the main criteria including location cost, accessibility, safety, distribution travel time, and proximity to suppliers. The study results showed that Location TR obtained the highest final score of 0.9673 and was designated as the top priority warehouse location, followed by Location RD with a score of 0.6235 and Location HO with a score of 0.338, while Location QC had the lowest score of −0.975. These findings demonstrate that the combination of the WENSLO and RAWEC methods can produce rankings that are objective, consistent, and easy to interpret, making them a reliable decision-support tool for determining strategic warehouse locations and potentially applicable to other logistics and distribution problems.
Comparison of Case-Based Reasoning and Hybrid Case-Based Methods in Expert System for Diagnosing Rice Plant Diseases Roznim, Roznim; Mesran, M.Kom, Mesran; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Ambarsari, Erlin Windia
Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : PDSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61944/bids.v4i2.132

Abstract

Rice plants are susceptible to various types of diseases that can reduce productivity and quality of the harvest. Therefore, an expert system is needed that can help the disease diagnosis process quickly and accurately. This study compares two approaches in expert systems, namely the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) method and the Hybrid Case-Based method, to diagnose rice plant diseases based on the symptoms experienced. Data on symptoms and types of diseases were analyzed using both methods to see the level of suitability of the resulting diagnosis. The test results showed that the Hybrid Case-Based method produced a higher level of certainty for all types of diseases compared to the CBR method. For example, Bacterial Leaf Blight disease has a certainty value of 99.5% in the Hybrid method, higher than 83.8% in the CBR method. These findings indicate that the Hybrid method is more effective and accurate in the process of diagnosing rice plant diseases. Thus, an expert system based on the Hybrid Case-Based method is recommended to support decision making in the agricultural sector, especially in early detection of rice diseases
Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Restaurant Waiter Using a Combination of WENSLO Weighting and AROMAN Methods Aryanti, Riska; Wang, Junhai; Wahyudi, Agung Deni; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Darwis, Dedi
JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Bhayangkara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54732/jeecs.v10i2.4

Abstract

The quality of service staff is a key factor in determining business success because they are the front line that interacts directly with consumers. However, performance evaluations of service staff are often still carried out subjectively, based only on the supervisor's perception or brief experiences with customers. This research discusses the application of a decision support system to determine the best restaurant service by combining the Weights by Envelope and Slope (WENSLO) method in criteria weighting and the Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN) in the alternative ranking process. The dataset used in this study was collected in 2025 from one of the restaurants in the Lampung area, involving nine waiters as evaluation candidates using six criteria. The six criteria used consist of four benefit criteria: service speed, friendliness, accuracy, and customer satisfaction. The weighting results using the WENSLO method indicate that the order mistakes criterion received the highest weight of 0.7253, followed by completion time with a weight of 0.1700, while the other criteria have relatively small weights. The AROMAN method is used to calculate the final values of alternatives based on the specified weights, resulting in a ranking of restaurant servers. The analysis shows that alternative Waiters KS ranks first with the highest score of 1.6097, followed by Waiters QN and Waiters RB. This finding proves that the combination of the WENSLO and AROMAN methods can produce objective, systematic results, and supports restaurant management in making strategic decisions regarding the selection of the best employees.
Pelatihan Literasi Digital untuk Guru dan Siswa dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Windarto, Agus Perdana; Hutahaean, Jeperson; Sussolaikah, Kelik; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Inovasi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35126/jpmi.v5i1.998

Abstract

This community service activity aims to improve the digital literacy of teachers and students to support the quality of distance learning. The implementation method was carried out through practice-based training involving 20 participants from among teachers and students. Evaluation results showed that before the activity, the digital literacy level of participants was in the basic to intermediate category with an average score of 1-2, while after the activity there was a significant increase to an average score of 4-5. Participants' satisfaction responses also showed that 80% expressed satisfaction or were very satisfied, confirming the effectiveness of the training. This activity successfully addressed the needs of partners regarding the constraints of low digital competency in online learning, despite the limitations of the limited number of participants and the short duration of implementation. Therefore, this activity is recommended to be expanded and integrated into the ongoing professional development program for teachers and students.
Improving Decision Accuracy Through LOPCOW Weighting and AROMAN Methods in Retail Store Location Selection Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Yusra Fernando; Agung Deni Wahyudi; Yohanes Eka Wibawa; Nuzuliarini Nuris
Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer (JIMA-ILKOM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 1 March 2025
Publisher : PT. SNN MEDIA TECH PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v4i1.57

Abstract

Choosing a strategic store location is an important factor in retail business success, but this decision is often influenced by data uncertainty and scale differences among criteria that can lead to bias in the decision-making process. This study proposes the use of LOPCOW to objectively determine the criterion weights based on data variability among alternatives, and AROMAN to reduce the influence of scale differences among criteria through gradual normalization. With this approach, it is hoped to obtain a more accurate, fair, and consistent ranking of locations. The ranking results in the selection of retail store locations are based on the final value of each alternative location. The location with the code LKM ranks highest with a final value of 0.8212, indicating that this location has the most optimal characteristics compared to other locations. The results of the study show that the combination of these two methods can produce more optimal and reliable decisions in selecting retail store locations, which in turn can enhance competitiveness and operational success in the retail business. The contribution from the ranking results of this retail store location provides significant strategic insights in the decision-making process for business expansion. By leveraging a quantitative approach that generates a final value for each location alternative, this research is able to provide an objective foundation for managers or decision-makers in selecting the best location. The identification of LKM locations as the most superior alternative indicates that the evaluation method used is effective in revealing the competitive advantages of a location based on the established criteria.
Hybrid Entropy and CRADIS Method Approach in Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Employees Wang, Junhai; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah; Saputra, Very Hendra
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 4 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i4.8985

Abstract

Selecting the right employees is a key factor in improving organizational performance and productivity. However, in many organizations, the employee selection process is still conducted through manual assessments and subjective judgments, which may lead to bias and inconsistent decisions. Therefore, a systematic and objective approach is needed to support the evaluation process. This study integrates the Entropy method and the CRADIS method within a decision support system to determine the best employee candidates. The Entropy method is applied to calculate objective criteria weights based on the variation of information in the data, while the CRADIS method is used to rank candidates according to their proximity to the ideal solution and distance from the anti-ideal solution. The integration of these two methods provides a framework that reduces subjectivity in determining criterion importance and produces more discriminative ranking results. The findings indicate that candidate GF achieved the highest score of 0.6848, followed by EY with 0.6835 and AR with 0.6528, showing that these candidates have performance profiles closest to the defined criteria. In addition, sensitivity analysis using several scenarios of criteria weight changes demonstrates that the proposed model is relatively stable, with an overall ranking consistency of 81.8%, while alternatives AR, DI, and FR show 100% ranking stability. These results indicate that the Entropy–CRADIS approach can improve the accuracy, objectivity, and reliability of employee selection decisions in multi-criteria decision-making environments.
Decision Support System for Evaluating Textile Supplier Performance Based on Weights by Envelope and Slope and Mixed Aggregation by Comprehensive Normalization Technique for Multi-Criteria Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Junhai Wang; Pritasari Palupiningsih; Sufiatul Maryana
Journal of Computer Science, Information Technology and Telecommunication Engineering Vol 7, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/jcositte.v7i1.29131

Abstract

The textile industry is highly dependent on supplier performance in ensuring the quality of raw materials, timely delivery, price stability, and supply continuity. The complexity of supplier evaluation involving many criteria often leads to subjectivity and inconsistencies in decision-making when using conventional approaches. This study proposes a decision support system to evaluate textile supplier performance based on a combination of Weights by Envelope and Slope (WENSLO) and Mixed Aggregation by Comprehensive Normalization Technique for Multi-Criteria (MACONT). The WENSLO method is used to determine the weight of criteria objectively based on data distribution characteristics, while MACONT is applied to assess and rank supplier alternatives through a comprehensive normalization and aggregation process. The case study was conducted involving nine suppliers and five evaluation criteria, namely material quality, timeliness, price, supply capacity, and responsiveness. The results of the study indicate that the proposed model is capable of producing clear and stable supplier rankings, with Supplier A9, Supplier A7, and Supplier A2 occupying the top three positions. These findings demonstrate that the integration of WENSLO and MACONT can enhance the objectivity and consistency of decision-making, as well as provide a more reliable and relevant framework for evaluating textile suppliers to support data-driven supply chain management.
Comparative Analysis of CODAS, TOPSIS, and COCOSO Methods Using Objective Weighting in Multi-Criteria Decision Support Systems Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer (JIMA-ILKOM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Volume 5 Nomor 1 March 2026
Publisher : PT. SNN MEDIA TECH PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v5i1.78

Abstract

This study aims to objectively assess teachers' pedagogical performance through the application and comparison of three multi-criteria decision-making methods, namely CODAS, TOPSIS, and COCOSO, with the criteria weights determined using the ITARA method. The ranking results show differences in evaluation patterns among the methods, where the CODAS method places Teacher RD in the first rank, followed by Teacher GH and Teacher DG, while Teacher AN is ranked last. In contrast, the TOPSIS and COCOSO methods produced relatively consistent rankings, with Teacher TY ranking first, followed by Teacher AN and Teacher NH in TOPSIS, and Teacher NH and Teacher DG in COCOSO. These differences in results indicate that each method has a different evaluative perspective on the performance of alternatives, depending on the preference calculation approach used. Overall, this comparative analysis confirms that using more than one ranking method can provide a more comprehensive and balanced view in evaluating teachers' pedagogical performance, thereby supporting more accurate and data-driven decision-making.
Co-Authors Abhishek R Mehta Ade Dwi Putra Ade Surahman Adi Sucipto, Adi Aditia Yudhistira Agus Perdana Windarto Agus Wantoro Agustina, Intan Ahdan, Syaiful Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmadfauzy Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae Alita, Debby Amalia, Zahrina Andi Nurkholis Andika, Rio Aniyanti Tafonao An’ars, M. Ghufroni Arfinia Rahma Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ariany, Fenty Arie Qur’ania Arief Budiman Arshad, Muhammad Waqas Arsi Hajizah Asistyasari, Ayuni Ayu Megawaty, Dyah Bustanul Ulum Chandra, Iryanto Damayanti Damayanti Damayanti, Damayanti Daniarti, Yeni Daniel Prasetyo Tarigan Deas Andrian Dwijaya Debby Alita Dedi Darwis Dedi Triyanto Desyanti Dinda Titian Lestari Dodi Siregar Dodi Siregar Dwi Satria, M. Najib Dyah Aminatun Dyah Ayu Megawaty Eko Bagus Fahrizqi Erlin Windia Ambarsari Erliyan Redy Susanto Fadila Shely Amalia Fajar Irvansyah Faruk Ulum Febrianus Gea Ferico Octaviansyah Pasaribu, Ahmad Fernando, Yusra Fikri Hamidy Gibtha Fitri Laxmi Hamdan Sobirin, Muhammad Heni Sulistiani Heni Sulistiani Ida Mayanju Pandiangan Imam Ahmad Imam Ahmad Iryanto Chandra Isnain, Auliya Rahman Jeperson Hutahaean Jumaryadi, Yuwan Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Kiki Septiani Kurniawan, Arsy Laurent Nababan Mahendra, Ferdian Jerry Mahesa Raihan Rifqi Mandasari, Berlinda Marzuki, Dwiki Hafizh Megawaty, Dyah Ayu Merlin Puspita Sari Mesran Mesran Mesran, Mesran Mohammad Taufan Asri Zaen Muhaqiqin muhaqiqin Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Nirwana Hendrastuty Nuari, Reflan Nuralia Nuralia Nurman Fadhlullah nurnaningsih, Desi Nuzuliarini Nuris Octaviansyah, A. Ferico Oprasto, Raditya Rimbawan Palupiningsih, Pritasari Parjito Parjito Pasaribu, A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasha, Donaya Permata, Permata Pramuditya, Andri Prastowo, Kukuh Adi Priandika, Adhie Thyo Pritasari Palupiningsih Purbha Irwansyah, Irsyad Pustika, Reza Putra, Ade Dwi Putra, Rulyansyah Permata Putri Sukma Dewi Putri Sukma Dewi Qadhli Jafar Adrian R Metha, Abhishek Rahmadianti, Fitrah Amalia Rahman, Miftahur Rasli, Roznim Mohamad Reflan Revife Purba Rilo Nur Devija Rini Nuraini Riska Aryanti Rohmat Indra Borman Romadhoni, Randi Roswita Daeli Roznim, Roznim Ruziana binti Mohamad Rasli Ryan Randy Suryono S. Samsugi Safi, Mudar Sanriomi Sintaro Saputra, Alvin Setiawan, Dandi Setyani, Tria Sinta, Ratna Sari Roma Siti Mahmuda Sitna Hajar Hadad Sofiansyah Fadli Sri Agustiani Br Siburian Subhan Subhan Sufiatul Maryana Sufiatul Maryana Sumanto Sumanto Sumanto Sumanto Surahman, Ade Susanto, Erliyan Redy Sussolaikah, Kelik Syaiful Ahdan Temi Ardiansah Trisnawati, Fika Ulum, Faruk Untoro Adji Very Hendra Saputra Very Hendra Saputra Wahyudi, Agung Deni Wang, Junhai Waqas Arshad, Muhammad Widiyanti, Adella yasin, ikbal Yohanes Eka Wibawa Yuliani, Asri Yuri Rahmanto Yusra Fernando