p-Index From 2021 - 2026
17.447
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika Jurnal Buana Informatika Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi JUSIFO : Jurnal Sistem Informasi Format : Jurnal Imiah Teknik Informatika JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization Tech-E Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO Jurnal CoreIT BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Komputer) Technomedia Journal Riau Journal of Empowerment IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development) The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science) JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) KOMPUTIKA - Jurnal Sistem Komputer Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer dan Matematika Jurnal Tekno Kompak Building of Informatics, Technology and Science Jurnal Ilmiah Betrik : Besemah Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology) Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Kerangka Kerja Teknologi Informasi Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Sisfotek Global Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat TIN: TERAPAN INFORMATIKA NUSANTARA Journal of Computer Science, Information Technology and Telecommunication Engineering (JCoSITTE) Jurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) Teknika JiTEKH (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Harapan) Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Jurnal Ilmiah Infrastruktur Teknologi Informasi Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Reputasi: Jurnal Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak EXPLORER J-Intech (Journal of Information and Technology) BEES: Bulletin of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Jurnal Sisfotek Global Jurnal Telematics and Information Technology (TELEFORTECH) Bulletin of Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (JIMASIA) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Inovasi Paradigma Journal of Engineering and Information Technology for Community Service Journal of Computing and Informatics Research JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences) Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Informatics, Electrical and Electronics Engineering TEKNOSIA Jurnal INFOTEL Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering and Informatics Journal of Data Science and Information System Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Media Jawadwipa Bulletin of Artificial Intelligence International Journal of Informatics and Data Science Journal of Decision Support System Research Journal of Information Technology Jurnal Informatika
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Hybrid Entropy and CRADIS Method Approach in Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Employees Junhai Wang; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Very Hendra Saputra
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 4 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i4.8985

Abstract

Selecting the right employees is a key factor in improving organizational performance and productivity. However, in many organizations, the employee selection process is still conducted through manual assessments and subjective judgments, which may lead to bias and inconsistent decisions. Therefore, a systematic and objective approach is needed to support the evaluation process. This study integrates the Entropy method and the CRADIS method within a decision support system to determine the best employee candidates. The Entropy method is applied to calculate objective criteria weights based on the variation of information in the data, while the CRADIS method is used to rank candidates according to their proximity to the ideal solution and distance from the anti-ideal solution. The integration of these two methods provides a framework that reduces subjectivity in determining criterion importance and produces more discriminative ranking results. The findings indicate that candidate GF achieved the highest score of 0.6848, followed by EY with 0.6835 and AR with 0.6528, showing that these candidates have performance profiles closest to the defined criteria. In addition, sensitivity analysis using several scenarios of criteria weight changes demonstrates that the proposed model is relatively stable, with an overall ranking consistency of 81.8%, while alternatives AR, DI, and FR show 100% ranking stability. These results indicate that the Entropy–CRADIS approach can improve the accuracy, objectivity, and reliability of employee selection decisions in multi-criteria decision-making environments.
HYBRID METHOD USING ITARA AND MACONT FOR SELECTING THE BEST CUSTOMERS IN A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM Junhai Wang; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Riska Aryanti
Teknosia Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 20 No. 01 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/teknosia.v20i1.48331

Abstract

This research is motivated by the company's challenges in objectively identifying high-value customers due to the numerous assessment criteria, heterogeneous data, and the use of conventional methods that are prone to subjective bias and ranking instability. To address these challenges, this study develops a decision support system based on the hybrid ITARA–MACONT method, where ITARA is used to determine criteria weights rationally based on indifference threshold deviation, while MACONT is applied to perform compromise aggregation in the alternative ranking process. The results show that the system can produce clear and consistent customer rankings, with Customer TY achieving a score of 0.7141 and ranking first, followed by Customer RD with a score of 0.6561 in second place, and Customer AH with a score of 0.5859 in third place. These findings indicate that the integration of ITARA–MACONT is effective in enhancing the objectivity, transparency, and stability of top customer selection results, thereby supporting strategic decision-making aimed at improving customer loyalty and business profitability.
Integration of Data Assessment Method Weighting and Proximity Indexed Value for Best Employee Selection in Decision Support Systems Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Dyah Ayu Megawaty; Faruk Ulum; Agung Deni Wahyudi; Fadila Shely Amalia
CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering, and Informatics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Volume 4 Number 4 October 2026
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/chain.v4i4.378

Abstract

The selection of the best employee is a multi-criteria decision-making problem because employee performance is evaluated using several criteria with different levels of importance. Subjective criterion weighting may not fully represent the characteristics of the assessment data and can influence the resulting decision. This study proposes the integration of Data Assessment Method (DAM) Weighting and Proximity Indexed Value (PIV) within a Decision Support System for best employee selection. DAM Weighting is employed to determine objective criterion weights based on the information contained in the assessment data, while PIV is used to evaluate the relative proximity of each employee alternative to the reference condition. The results show that the criterion weights are relatively balanced, with R1 obtaining the highest weight of 0.1494 and R4 the lowest weight of 0.1381. The PIV calculation produces different proximity values among the nine employee alternatives, with Alt-08 obtaining the lowest value of -2.2864, followed by Alt-09 at -1.8580 and Alt-06 at -1.7148. Based on the resulting ranking, Alt-08 is identified as the best employee. These findings indicate that the integration of DAM Weighting and PIV can provide an objective, quantitative, and data-oriented mechanism for supporting best employee selection in a Decision Support System.
A Hybrid SITDE Weighting and HYBSO Method in Decision Support Systems for Warehouse Employee Selection Tri Widodo; Okma Arnilia; Iryanto Chandra; Sahrial Ihsani Ishak; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Volume 4 Number 3 September 2026
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/jaiti.v4i3.344

Abstract

Warehouse employee selection is a complex process because it involves various heterogeneous criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, such as physical tests, accuracy, work experience, discipline, and teamwork ability. A selection process that still relies on subjective judgment risks producing inconsistent and suboptimal decisions. This study proposes a hybrid method that integrates skewness impact through distributional evaluation (SITDE) for objective determination of criteria weights with a hybrid solution algorithm (HYBSO) for systematic ranking of alternatives. The results of applying this method indicate that Work Experience has the highest weight of 0.2813, followed by the Discipline Test (0.1969) and Physical Test (0.1926), while the Accuracy Test (0.1641) and Teamwork Test (0.1652) have lower weights. The final ranking results show that Candidate HW ranks first with a score of 0.3596, followed by Candidate FN (0.7066) and Candidate DK (0.9162). The sensitivity analysis evaluates the stability of the ranking results under changes in criterion weights across 20 scenarios, demonstrating the robustness of the proposed SITDE-HYBSO method and identifying candidates whose ranking positions are more sensitive to variations in criterion importance. These findings confirm that the SITDE-HYBSO hybrid method is capable of producing objective, consistent, and accountable employee selection decisions, while also providing an adaptive mechanism to respond to changes in organizational priorities.
Employing PIPRECIA-S weighting with MABAC: a strategy for identifying organizational leadership elections Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Sitna Hajar Hadad; Ahmad Ari Aldino; Pritasari Palupiningsih; Gibtha Fitri Laxmi; Dyah Ayu Megawaty
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Vol 13, No 6: December 2024
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/eei.v13i6.7713

Abstract

The election of organizational leaders, especially in organizations whose members have diverse backgrounds and interests, can cause various problems. Problems in the selection of school organization leaders include the absence of an objective selection of organizational leadership candidates because they are selected based on comparisons between candidates without considering the criteria in the selection of organizational leadership candidates. Research related to the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) and simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) methods has never been conducted so far, so it is a reference in conducting this research using the MABAC and PIPRECIA-S methods. This study aims to select the head of the school organization using the MABAC method and PIPRECIA-S weighting can increase the objectivity of the criteria assessment results by relying on calculations from the PIPRECIA-S weighting method. Based on the selection results using the MABAC method and PIPRECIA-S weighting, candidate 1 was recommended as the leader of the school organization because it achieved rank 1 with a total score of 0.293. The contribution of this research is to help in the selection of the head of the organization using the PIPRECIA-S and MABAC methods as a decision-making solution.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Distance-Based MCDM Methods Using Response to Criteria Weighting: A Ranking Stability and Sensitivity Analysis Sumanto Sumanto; Ryan Randy Suryono; Riska Aryanti; Hetty Rohayani; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Desyanti Desyanti
Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Volume 4 Number 4 October 2026 (Issue in Progress)
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/itsecs.v4i4.377

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate new store location is a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem because potential locations must be evaluated using multiple criteria with different performance characteristics. This study proposes an integrated distance-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework using RECA Weighting combined with TOPSIS, SPOTIS, and EDAS to determine objective criterion importance and evaluate the stability and robustness of alternative rankings. The dataset consists of eight potential store locations evaluated using six criteria: Rental Cost, Building Area, Accessibility, Consumer Traffic, Parking Availability, and Infrastructure. RECA Weighting is applied to determine objective criterion weights based on performance variation, while TOPSIS, SPOTIS, and EDAS are used to generate preference scores and rankings through different distance-based evaluation mechanisms. The results show that Consumer Traffic obtains the highest criterion weight of 0.1824, while Parking Availability receives the lowest weight of 0.1422. The ranking results identify LS5 as the best-performing alternative, followed by LS3, although several alternatives exhibit different ranking positions across the applied methods. Weight-variation analysis using Spearman rank correlation shows that SPOTIS achieves perfect ranking stability with a correlation of 1.0000, TOPSIS demonstrates very strong stability with a correlation of 0.9286, while EDAS produces a lower correlation of 0.1429, indicating greater ranking variation. These findings demonstrate that SPOTIS provides the highest robustness to criterion weight changes, followed by TOPSIS, whereas EDAS is more sensitive to weight variations due to its average-solution-based evaluation mechanism. Overall, the proposed framework provides a comprehensive approach for objective weighting, ranking stability assessment, sensitivity analysis, and robustness evaluation in new store location selection.
Decision Support System for the Selection of Outstanding Students Using the MAUT Method Ridha Maya Faza Lubis; Mesran Mesran; Nopri Prayoga; Sindi Apri Nesya; Agus Perdana Windarto; Rizkah Fadillah; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
International Journal of Informatics and Data Science Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : ADA Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64366/ijids.v3i1.542

Abstract

The selection of outstanding students is one of the efforts of universities in giving awards to students who have the best academic and non-academic achievements. The problem that often occurs in the selection process of outstanding students is that assessments still focus on one main criterion, namely the Cumulative Achievement Index (GPA), so that the results obtained are less objective and do not reflect the overall ability of students. Therefore, this study aims to design and implement a Decision Support System (DSS) in the selection of outstanding students by considering various assessment criteria. The method used in this study is Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT), which is one of the multicriteria decision-making methods. The criteria used in the study included GPA, foreign language skills, organizational activeness, number of scientific papers, and history of taking remedial exams. The MAUT method is used to calculate the utility value of each alternative based on the weight and value of each criterion, so that student rankings are obtained objectively. The results of the study show that the implementation of DSS using the MAUT method can help the selection process of outstanding students in a more systematic and transparent manner. Based on the calculation results, the best alternative was obtained in alternative A5 on behalf of "Loli" students with a final utility value (Ui) of 2.2196, so that it was designated as an outstanding student. The resulting system is expected to be a supporting solution in making decisions about the selection of outstanding students in the university environment.
Modified Simple Additive Weighting with Ideal Distance Compensation for Improved Ranking Stability Riska Aryanti; Junhai Wang; Setiawansyah Setiawansyah; Ayuni Asistyasari; Yosep Nuryaman; Pritasari Palupiningsih
IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Online First
Publisher : Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ijid.2026.6130

Abstract

The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is a widely recognized and straightforward approach for multi-criteria decision-making. Yet it is prone to ranking instability due to its sensitivity to weight variations, normalization scales, and extreme values. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces a Modified SAW method with Ideal Distance Compensation (SAW-I), which integrates a distance-based adjustment relative to positive and negative ideal solutions within the traditional weighted summation framework. This enhancement considers not only total scores but also the relative position of each alternative in the decision space. The method was applied to two case studies. When compared to other MCDM techniques—SMART, MOORA, GRA, MAUT, WP, and WASPAS-SAW-I demonstrated very high Spearman rank correlations, approaching 1, confirming strong consistency and reliability. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that SAW-I maintains stable rankings even under variations in weights, highlighting its robustness, adaptability, and effectiveness. The sensitivity analysis shows highly stable performance, demonstrating perfect correlation (1.0000) with SMART and WP, and very strong correlation (0.9762) with MOORA, GRA, MAUT, and WASPAS. These results confirm that SAW-I provides high compatibility and consistent rankings, making it more reliable and robust.
Multi-Scenario Comparative Analysis of Objective Weighting Techniques in MOORA-Based Decision Support Systems Wang, Junhai; Setiawansyah, Setiawansyah
Jurnal Informatika Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31294/informatika.v13i2.12510

Abstract

This study presents a multi-scenario comparative analysis of objective weighting techniques integrated with the MOORA method in decision support systems to evaluate their consistency, robustness, and reliability in alternative ranking. Various objective weighting methods, including WENSLO, LOGSTA, RECA, LODECI, ITARA, CRISUS, MPSI, and SITDE, were applied to a decision matrix representing candidate store locations with multiple criteria such as rental cost, building area, accessibility, consumer traffic, parking availability, and infrastructure. The analysis was conducted under different data scenarios to examine the sensitivity of each method to variations in data characteristics. The results show that although there are differences in the weight distributions generated by each method, the final rankings produced by the MOORA approach remain highly consistent, with NSL 5 consistently ranked as the best alternative. Furthermore, the Spearman correlation analysis reveals very strong agreement among the methods, with correlation values of 0.9762 for WENSLO, LOGSTA, LODECI, ITARA, CRISUS, and MPSI, and perfect correlation values of 1.000 for RECA and SITDE. These findings indicate that the proposed approach is stable and not sensitive to the choice of weighting method, thereby enhancing confidence in the decision-making process. Overall, this study demonstrates that integrating multiple objective weighting techniques within a MOORA-based framework provides a reliable, objective, and consistent solution for multi-criteria decision-making problems.
Co-Authors Abhishek R Mehta Ade Dwi Putra Ade Surahman Adi Sucipto, Adi Aditia Yudhistira Aditia Yudhistira Agus Perdana Windarto Agus Wantoro Agustina, Intan Ahdan, Syaiful Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmad Ari Aldino Ahmadfauzy Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae Alita, Debby Amalia, Zahrina Andi Nurkholis Andika, Rio Aniyanti Tafonao An’ars, M. Ghufroni Arfinia Rahma Ari Sulistiyawati Ari Sulistiyawati Ariany, Fenty Arie Qur’ania Arief Budiman Arnilia, Okma Arshad, Muhammad Waqas Arsi Hajizah Asistyasari, Ayuni Ayu Megawaty, Dyah Bustanul Ulum Damayanti Damayanti Damayanti, Damayanti Daniarti, Yeni Daniel Prasetyo Tarigan Deas Andrian Dwijaya Debby Alita Dedi Darwis Dedi Triyanto Desyanti Desyanti Desyanti Dinda Titian Lestari Dodi Siregar Dodi Siregar Dwi Satria, M. Najib Dyah Aminatun Dyah Ayu Megawaty Eko Bagus Fahrizqi Erlin Windia Ambarsari Erliyan Redy Susanto Fadila Shely Amalia Fadila Shely Amalia Fajar Irvansyah Faruk Ulum Faruk Ulum Febrianus Gea Fernando, Yusra Fikri Hamidy Gibtha Fitri Laxmi Hamdan Sobirin, Muhammad Heni Sulistiani Heni Sulistiani Hetty Rohayani Ida Mayanju Pandiangan Imam Ahmad Imam Ahmad Iryanto Chandra Isnain, Auliya Rahman Iswan A. Thais Jeperson Hutahaean Jumaryadi, Yuwan Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Junhai Wang Kiki Septiani Kurniawan, Arsy Laurent Nababan Mahendra, Ferdian Jerry Mahesa Raihan Rifqi Mandasari, Berlinda Marzuki, Dwiki Hafizh Megawaty, Dyah Ayu Meilia Nur Indah Susanti Merlin Puspita Sari Mesran Mesran Mesran Mesran Mesran, Mesran Mohammad Taufan Asri Zaen Muhaqiqin muhaqiqin Muksin Hi Abdullah Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Nirwana Hendrastuty Nopri Prayoga Nuari, Reflan Nuralia Nuralia Nurman Fadhlullah nurnaningsih, Desi Nuzuliarini Nuris Octaviansyah, A. Ferico Palupiningsih, Pritasari Parjito Parjito Pasaribu, A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasha, Donaya Permata Permata Permata, Permata Pramuditya, Andri Prastowo, Kukuh Adi Priandika, Adhie Thyo Pritasari Palupiningsih Pritasari Palupiningsih Pritasari Palupiningsih Purbha Irwansyah, Irsyad Pustika, Reza Putra, Ade Dwi Putra, Rulyansyah Permata Putri Sukma Dewi Putri Sukma Dewi Qadhli Jafar Adrian R Metha, Abhishek Raditya Rimbawan Oprasto Rahmadianti, Fitrah Amalia Rahman, Miftahur Rasli, Roznim Mohamad Reflan Revife Purba Ridha Maya Faza Lubis Rilo Nur Devija Rini Nuraini Riska Aryanti Rizkah Fadillah Rohmat Indra Borman Romadhoni, Randi Roswita Daeli Roznim, Roznim Ruziana binti Mohamad Rasli Ryan Randy Suryono S. Samsugi Safi, Mudar Sahrial Ihsani Ishak Sanriomi Sintaro Saputra, Alvin Setiawan, Dandi Setyani, Tria Sindi Apri Nesya Sinta, Ratna Sari Roma Siti Mahmuda Sitna Hajar Hadad Sofiansyah Fadli Sri Agustiani Br Siburian Subhan Subhan Sufiatul Maryana Sufiatul Maryana Sufiatul Maryana Sumanto Sumanto Sumanto Surahman, Ade Susanto, Erliyan Redy Sussolaikah, Kelik Syaiful Ahdan Temi Ardiansah Temi Ardiansah Tri Widodo Trisnawati, Fika Ulum, Faruk Untoro Adji Very Hendra Saputra Very Hendra Saputra Very Hendra Saputra Wahyudi, Agung Deni Wang, Junhai Waqas Arshad, Muhammad Widiyanti, Adella yasin, ikbal Yohanes Eka Wibawa Yosep Nuryaman Yuliani, Asri Yuri Rahmanto Yusra Fernando