p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.858
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Tadulako Law Review PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Akta Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia USU Journal of Legal Studies Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Jurnal Notariil Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Akta Yudisia JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA Cepalo Vyavahara Duta Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Journal of Social Research COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yuridika Perspektif Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PENAFSIRAN TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN Afriana, Anita
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2013): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.907 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v11i1.46

Abstract

Formal judicial, law of evidence in Indonesia does not accommodate electronic documents as evidence, while in practice in Indonesia through e-commerce transactions has been widely used business transactions electronically. With further increase electronic activity, evidence that can be used by law should also include such information or documents electronically. Recognition of electronic information as evidence in court is still questionable validity. In the practice of the courts in Indonesia, the use of electronic data as valid evidence is virtually never existed, though in some countries, the electronic information recorded in electronic equipment has been taken into consideration in the judge decide a case, either criminal or civil. Practice it was not the party who filed the electronic evidence to face trial , except for criminal cases, so that the civil judge in the District Court, for example at the Bandung District Court decides there is no case which recognizes the electronic evidence as evidence that the same force with tool - proof evidence contained in Article 164 HIR. With this fact suggests that civil disputes generally in the District Court is not a dispute relating to the business and leads of electronic transactions. Evidence is not provided for in Article 164 HIR, can not be regarded as valid evidence. This is because the law of civil procedure is a formal legal binding. As the most powerful man in deciding a case , and is regarded as the person who can give vonnis van de rechter (judge 's decision) , a judge granted flexibility to find the law (rechtsvinding), either by means of legal interpretation (wetinterpretatie) or by digging , following the and understand the legal values that live in the community. Legal theory lex specialis derogat lex generalis also be a reference judge in admitting electronic evidence as valid evidence, the law specifically waives the old law, Through the ITE Law, related to the strength of evidence of electronic evidence, the judges should be admitted as electronic evidence and legal evidence has the same probative force of evidence set forth in the HIR
MENAKAR PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI INDONESIA Afriana, Anita; Chandrawulan, An An
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2019): JURNAL BINA MULIA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (296.695 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Pada asasnya semua jenis perkara perdata diselesaikan melalui mekanisme beracara yang sama sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku. Bagi pihak yang bersengketa dengan nilai gugatan kecil, penyelesaian melalui pengadilan dengan prosedur yang biasa bukanlah pilihan yang tepat karena waktu dan biaya yang dihabiskan untuk beracara di pengadilan dianggap tidak sebanding dengan besarnya nilai yang dipersengketakan. Oleh karena itu melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PerMa) No. 2 Tahun 2015 diatur tata cara menyelesaikan gugatan sederhana yang sesungguhnya mengadopsi mekanisme Small Claims Court (SCC) yang telah digunakan banyak negara, baik negara dengan sistem common law maupun civil law. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah bagaimana SCC di negara Singapura dan Belanda serta penerapannya di Indonesia. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif, antara lain difokuskan pada perbandingan hukum selanjutnya dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif. Penerapan penyelesaian sengketa dan penegakan hukum melalui SCC di Singapura dan Belanda memiliki perbedaan yang antara lain dipengaruhi oleh sistem hukum. Di Indonesia, SCC diintegrasikan dalam PerMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 yaitu prosedur penyelesaian gugatan sederhana yang cukup efektif menyelesaikan gugatan sederhana secara cepat, dengan prosedur yang berbeda dengan penyelesaian perkara sebagaimana diatur dalam HIR/RBg, namun dalam praktik terdapat kendala dalam hal eksekusi. Kata kunci: gugatan sederhana; small claims court; sengketa perdata, pengadilan.  ABSTRACT Basically all kinds of civil cases are solved through the same mechanism as arranged in the rules. For the disputing party with the value of a small lawsuit, the settlement through court with the usual procedure is not the right choice because the time and cost spent on litigation are considered to be incompatible with the amount of disputed value, therefore enforced by Supreme Court Regulation (PerMa) Regulation No. 2 Year 2015 about the procedure of simple lawsuit settlement. Mechanisms used to resolve simple claims as regulated in PerMA No. 2 of 2015 actually adopts a mechanism in the Small Claims Court (SCC) that has been used previously in many countries, both in countries with common law and civil law systems. The issues to be discussed are how the SCC in Singapore and the Netherlands and their application in Indonesia. This article is a small part of the results of research conducted by normative juridical methods which are among others focused on comparative law, then analyzed by juridical qualitative. Application of settlement of disputes and law enforcement through the SCC in Singapore and the Netherlands has differences which, among others, are affected by the legal system. In Indonesia, SCC is integrated into PerMA No. 2 Year 2015, it is quite effective to settle a simple lawsuit quickly, with a different procedure with the settlement of the matter as regulated in HIR/RBg, bridges between court procedures and outside the courts but there are obstacles in terms of execution.Keywords: civil dispute; court; simple lawsuit; small claims court.
MENINJAU KEMBALI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA : ASPEK KELEMBAGAAN DALAM RANGKA TERCAPAINYA KEPASTIAN HUKUM Afriana, Anita; Sudaryat, Sudaryat; Mantili, Rai; Rahmawati, Ema
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 14, No 2 (2019): SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (216.77 KB)

Abstract

Due to the upward trends of business transaction both in conventional and online basis, it is deemed necessary to find an effective ways to settle disputes in the event of a losses to the consumers.In general, consumer disputesinvolve small amount of lossand complaint filed by the consumers for material compensation. In Indonesia, consumer disputeresolutionis carried out not only by the Consumer Dispute SettlementBody (BPSK)but also throughthecourts. Recently,there are manynewly-established consumer disputesettlement institutions.A quick, simple,and low-cost consumer dispute mechanism isneeded to cope with Indonesian economic growth by accelerating the time of a dispute settlement (time efficiency). The purpose of this research is find out how consumer disputes are resolved in Indonesia and legal discource in the frame work oft he consumer?s disputere solution which have lawcertainty.it can be concluded that the pluralityof consumer disputesettlement in Indonesia has ledtoconvoluted mechanisms and procedures in settling disputes. Dispute settlement through Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen/Consumers Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is not final and binding. Through this article, it is recommendedto utilise Small Claims Procedures that combines informal and formal mechanisms in order to achieve legal certainty in the settlement of consumer disputes in Indonesia.
KEDUDUKAN PEGAWAI NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM AKTA AUTENTIK PADA PROSES PENYIDIKAN DAN PERADILAN DITINJAU UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Andony, Fakta; Afriana, Anita; Prayitno, Indra
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.133

Abstract

The existence of a Deed Witness is part of the formal aspect of the deed. Without a witness deed, t the notary deed as a Notary Deed, but only has the power of proof as an underhand deed. In addition, the actions of Notary employees as witnesses to deeds in each Notary’s deed are included in the notary fi eld, so that if it is linked to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f of the Notary Position Law regarding keeping everything concerning deeds made by Notaries, the employees should a notary as a witness to the deed must be able to keep the contents of the deed confi dential. This article intends to fi nd out about the process of summoning notary employees who are witnesses to the deed for investigation and trial in connection with the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed and protecting the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed. The results show that summoning notary employees who are deed witnesses for investigation and trial based on UUJN is that there are no rules for special procedures for calling witnesses to deeds in the investigation and trial process. A witness to deed does not have the right of refusal as a notary, therefore what applies is the provision as reference to KUHAP and HIR/Rbg. Protection of the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed that there is no obligation for notary employees who are witnesses to the deed to keep the contents of the deed secret during the investigation and trial process. Notary employees who are witnesses to the deed do not completely violate the law because there are no rules in UUJN that regulate the oath to keep the contents of the deed confi dential
KEDUDUKAN ANGGOTA KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM SEBAGAI KREDITOR PADA KOPERASI SIMPAN KOPERASI PANDAWA MANDIRI GROUP YANG TELAH DINYATAKAN PAILIT ATAS DISITANYA BOEDEL PAILIT OLEH NEGARA Chairanie, Refhianti; Afriana, Anita
Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): PANJI KEADILAN Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/jpk.v4i1.1277

Abstract

ABSTRAKKepailitan merupakan sita umum yang dilakukan atas seluruh kekayaan Debitor Pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh Kurator dibawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Permasalahan dalam Kepailitan dapat bersinggungan dengan Kasus Pidana, dimana kegiatan sita-menyita yang dilakukan dialam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana memiliki perbedaan. Penyitaan dalam Pidana merupakan kegiatan yang dilakukan guna kepentingan dalam pembuktian di dalam Persidangan. Spesifikasi yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi dokumen dan wawancara. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah, Pertama, Anggota KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group dapat disebut juga sebagai Kreditor yang kemudian disebut juga sebagai Kreditor Penyimpan atas kegiatan simpan-pinjam yang dilakukan didalam KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group. Kreditor Penyimpan masuk kedalam tingkatan Kreditor Konkuren, dimana setiap Anggota yang termasuk kedalam Kreditor Penyimpan tidak memiliki jaminan dan/atau hak istimewa didalam pengembalian terhadap Piutang yang dimilikinya. Kedua, Permasalahan didalam KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group yang bersinggungan dengan permasalahan dalam Hukum Pidana dapat diselesaikan melalui peraturan yang termaktub didalam KUHAP. Pembagian terhadap harta Pailit yang telah dilakukan sita dalam Hukum Pidana hanya dapat dimintakan kembali selama tidak terbukti merupakan hasil dari tindak Pidana.Kata kunci: kepailitan; koperasi; kreditorABSTRACTBankruptcy is a general confiscation of all assets of the Bankrupt Debtor, which is then handled and resolved by the Curator under the Supervisory Judge as regulated in Law Number 37 Year 2004 Problems in Bankruptcy can intersect with Criminal Cases, where confiscation activities carried out in Civil Law and Criminal Law are different. Confiscation in Criminal Law is an activity carried out for the benefit of proof in court. The specification is descriptive analytical using the normative juridical approach. The research stages used are literature study and field study with data collection techniques in the form of document study and interviews. The results, First, members of the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group can also be referred to as Creditor which is then also referred to as Depository Creditors for the savings and loan activities carried out within the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group. Depositing Creditors are included in the level of Concurrent Creditors, where each Member who is included in the Depository Creditors does not have guarantees and / or privileges in returning their Receivables. Second, problems within the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group that intersect with problems in Criminal Law can be resolved through the regulations contained in the Criminal Code. The distribution of Bankruptcy assets which have been confiscated under the Criminal Law can only be requested back as long as it is not proven to be the result of a criminal act.Keynotes: bankrupty; cooperative; creditor
MENINJAU KEMBALI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA : ASPEK KELEMBAGAAN DALAM RANGKA TERCAPAINYA KEPASTIAN HUKUM Afriana, Anita; Sudaryat, Sudaryat; Mantili, Rai; Rahmawati, Ema
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 14, No 2 (2019): SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25078/vd.v14i2.1255

Abstract

Due to the upward trends of business transaction both in conventional and online basis, it is deemed necessary to find an effective ways to settle disputes in the event of a losses to the consumers.In general, consumer disputesinvolve small amount of lossand complaint filed by the consumers for material compensation. In Indonesia, consumer disputeresolutionis carried out not only by the Consumer Dispute SettlementBody (BPSK)but also throughthecourts. Recently,there are manynewly-established consumer disputesettlement institutions.A quick, simple,and low-cost consumer dispute mechanism isneeded to cope with Indonesian economic growth by accelerating the time of a dispute settlement (time efficiency). The purpose of this research is find out how consumer disputes are resolved in Indonesia and legal discource in the frame work oft he consumer’s disputere solution which have lawcertainty.it can be concluded that the pluralityof consumer disputesettlement in Indonesia has ledtoconvoluted mechanisms and procedures in settling disputes. Dispute settlement through Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen/Consumers Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is not final and binding. Through this article, it is recommendedto utilise Small Claims Procedures that combines informal and formal mechanisms in order to achieve legal certainty in the settlement of consumer disputes in Indonesia.
PERANAN DISNAKERTRANS DALAM MELAKUKAN MEDIASI PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DI MASA PANDEM Karsona, Agus Mulya; Kusmayanti, Hazar; Afriana, Anita
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari - Juni 2022
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v8i1.167

Abstract

Salah satu bentuk penyelesaian sengketa alternatif yang biasa digunakan adalah melalui mediasi. Mediasi ini secara langsung merupakan suatu kewajiban yang harus dilakukan dalam proses persidangan di pengadilan. Instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/ Kota yang berwenang untuk menerima pencatatan perselisihan hubungan industrial dan melakukan mediasi adalah instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/Kota tempat pekerja/buruh bekerja. sejauh mana kesiapan Disnakertrans dalam menghadapi konfl ik antara buruh dan perusahaan di masa pandemi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifi kasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan uraian di atas maka sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial maka Disnakertrans memiliki peranan yang penting dalam menyelesaikan perselisihan hubungan industrial melalui proses mediasi, hal ini membuktikan pemerintah juga (dalam hal ini Disnakertrans) mendukung proses penyelesaian arbitrase, konsiliasi dan bipatride. Proses tersebut sangat berpengaruh besar terhadap penyelesaian suatu permasalahan hubungan industrial dan proses yang kerap dipakai untuk menyelesaikan tersebut adalah mediasi. Kelancaran mediasi sangat berpengaruh terhadap peranan mediator yang terampil dan pakar untuk menyelesaikan suatu masalah, namun hambatan mediasi di Disnakertrans ini adalah minimnya jumlah mediator tidak sebanding dengan jumlah perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial yang masuk dan perlu diselesaikan.
PERANAN DISNAKERTRANS DALAM MELAKUKAN MEDIASI PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DI MASA PANDEM Karsona, Agus Mulya; Kusmayanti, Hazar; Afriana, Anita
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari - Juni 2022
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v8i1.167

Abstract

Salah satu bentuk penyelesaian sengketa alternatif yang biasa digunakan adalah melalui mediasi. Mediasi ini secara langsung merupakan suatu kewajiban yang harus dilakukan dalam proses persidangan di pengadilan. Instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/ Kota yang berwenang untuk menerima pencatatan perselisihan hubungan industrial dan melakukan mediasi adalah instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/Kota tempat pekerja/buruh bekerja. sejauh mana kesiapan Disnakertrans dalam menghadapi konfl ik antara buruh dan perusahaan di masa pandemi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifi kasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan uraian di atas maka sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial maka Disnakertrans memiliki peranan yang penting dalam menyelesaikan perselisihan hubungan industrial melalui proses mediasi, hal ini membuktikan pemerintah juga (dalam hal ini Disnakertrans) mendukung proses penyelesaian arbitrase, konsiliasi dan bipatride. Proses tersebut sangat berpengaruh besar terhadap penyelesaian suatu permasalahan hubungan industrial dan proses yang kerap dipakai untuk menyelesaikan tersebut adalah mediasi. Kelancaran mediasi sangat berpengaruh terhadap peranan mediator yang terampil dan pakar untuk menyelesaikan suatu masalah, namun hambatan mediasi di Disnakertrans ini adalah minimnya jumlah mediator tidak sebanding dengan jumlah perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial yang masuk dan perlu diselesaikan.
KEDUDUKAN PEGAWAI NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM AKTA AUTENTIK PADA PROSES PENYIDIKAN DAN PERADILAN DITINJAU UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Fakta Andony; Anita Afriana; Indra Prayitno
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.133

Abstract

The existence of a Deed Witness is part of the formal aspect of the deed. Without a witness deed, t the notary deed as a Notary Deed, but only has the power of proof as an underhand deed. In addition, the actions of Notary employees as witnesses to deeds in each Notary’s deed are included in the notary fi eld, so that if it is linked to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f of the Notary Position Law regarding keeping everything concerning deeds made by Notaries, the employees should a notary as a witness to the deed must be able to keep the contents of the deed confi dential. This article intends to fi nd out about the process of summoning notary employees who are witnesses to the deed for investigation and trial in connection with the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed and protecting the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed. The results show that summoning notary employees who are deed witnesses for investigation and trial based on UUJN is that there are no rules for special procedures for calling witnesses to deeds in the investigation and trial process. A witness to deed does not have the right of refusal as a notary, therefore what applies is the provision as reference to KUHAP and HIR/Rbg. Protection of the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed that there is no obligation for notary employees who are witnesses to the deed to keep the contents of the deed secret during the investigation and trial process. Notary employees who are witnesses to the deed do not completely violate the law because there are no rules in UUJN that regulate the oath to keep the contents of the deed confi dential
PENERAPAN ACARA SINGKAT DAN ACARA CEPAT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN: SUATU TINJAUAN POLITIK HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Anita Afriana
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Januari-Juni 2015
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.29 KB) | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v1i1.2

Abstract

Hukum acara perdata yang saat ini berlaku di Indonesia masih mengacu pada peraturan yang berlaku pada masa Hindia Belanda yaitu Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) dan Reglement tot Regeling van Het Rechtswezen in de Gewesten Buiten Java en Madura (RBg). Dengan pemberlakuan yang sudah sangat lama ini pada beberapa hal tidak sesuai dengan keadaan dan kebutuhan masyarakat dalam mencari keadilan saat ini. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan suatu peraturan mengenai hukum acara perdata yang baru, yang saat ini sedang dilakukan pembahasan terhadap rancangan hukum acara perdata tersebut. Beberapa ketentuan baru yang diatur dalam rancangan hukum acara perdata dan tidak diatur sebelumnya dalam HIR dan RBg, antara lain adalah pemeriksaan dengan Acara Singkat dan Acara Cepat. Kedua ketentuan baru ini diharapkan sebagai langkah untuk mendorong percepatan pertumbuhan perekonomian Indonesia dengan mempercepat cara penyelesaian (efisiensi waktu) sengketa. Dengan adanya ketentuan mengenai pemeriksaan perkara dengan Acara Singkat dan Acara Cepat tersebut di atas, maka diharapkan akan membawa manfaat bagi masyarakat agar mendapatkan sarana penyelesaian sengketa secara efisien dan efektif, sehingga tercipta peradilan dengan biaya ringan khususnya bagi masyarakat yang kurang mampu. Selaras dengan tujuan di atas, maka dari sisi politik hukum, pengaturan Hukum Acara Perdata sangat urgent dengan melakukan pembaharuan materi hukum agar sesuai dengan tujuan negara dan kebutuhan masyarakat. Pembangunan hukum yang berintikan pembuatan dan pembaruan terhadap materi- materi hukum agar sesuai dengan kebutuhan, maka salah satu tujuan pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan adalah untuk terwujudnya kepastian hukum (tertulis) dalam masyarakat. Undang-undang tentang Hukum Acara perdata diharapkan dapat mengakomodir perkembangan kebutuhan hukum masyarakat khususnya hukum acara perdata guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan.  Kata kunci: hukum acara perdata, acara cepat, acara singkat, politik hukum.
Co-Authors A.A.P*, Karina Widyadhari Abdoel Harun Lamo Adelia Audiana Gerchikova Agitha Putri Andany Hidayat Agitha Agung La Tenritata Agus Mulya Karsona, Agus Mulya Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Alysia Elvaretta Aman Wibawa Ginting An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan Andony, Fakta Anrihal Rona Fajari Arini Yunia Pratiwi Artaji, Artaji Arvianda, Adzradhia Nabila Azizah Kamilah Putri Bagus Sujatmiko Baraba, Badar Betty Rubiati Bima Nuranda Cep Juli Chairanie, Refhianti Dede Kania Deviana Yuanitasari Deviana Yuanitasari Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dian Priharyanti Dinda Ayu Narassati Efa Laela Fakhirah, Efa Laela Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Elis Nurhayati Elisatris Gultom Elvaretta, Alysia Fajri, Anrihal Fakhirah, Efa Laela Fakta Andony Firdausa Pratonggopati, Hanna Ghani Satria Hartanto Handryas Prasetyo Utomo Hatami, Raka Fauzan Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hendri Sita Ambar Kumalawati Hessy Oktiarifadah Hilmansyah, Salma Syifaya Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Inayatillah, Revi Indra Prayitno Indriasri, Alivia isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Jonathan Fide Mulya Karina Widyadhari A.A.P* Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kusmiati, Susi Lastuti Abubakar Lastuti Abubakar Matteo Rossi Melin Simorangkir Meta Tarisha Qarani Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Muhammad Ridwan Fadhly Mulya, Jonathan Fide Nabiela Ramadhani Nanda Anisa Lubis Nun Harrieti, Nun Nuranda, Bima Nurfauzi, Febri Nurhakim, Lukman Ilman Nurhayati, Elis Nyulistiowati Suryanti Olwintra Sitorus Olwintra Sitorus Prayitno, Indra Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Purnama Trisnamansyah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Putri, Sherly Putri, Sherly Qarani, Meta Tarisha Radifan, Ody Raedi Rai Mantili Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Refhianti Chairanie Rian Fauzi Rahman Rusmiati, Elis Ruth Felyta Worang Salsabilla Novalika , Aurelia Sari, Melia Putri Purnama Sekarwati, Raden Ajeng Astari Seto Wahyudi Shafira Meidina Rafaldini Sherly Ayuna Putri Sherly Putri Shintadewi Dibrata Silitonga, Yoas Panggawa Simorangkir, Melin Singadimedja, Holyness N Sonny Dewi Judiasih Sudaryat Sujatmiko, Bagus Suparto, Susilowati Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Syahbaniar, Alia Putri Teguh Tresna Puja Asmara Tony Richard Alexander Samosir Vinie Rachmadiena Devianti Windy Riani Putri Yonathan Aji Pamungkas Zidna Sabrina