Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Yuridis dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Fitnah dan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor: 14/Pid.B/2024/PN.Jkt.Utr) Hardy Christianto Rasenda; Markoni Markoni; I Made Khantika; Dyah Permatasari
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i3.7564

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh permasalahan penerapan Pasal 310 ayat (2) dan Pasal 311 ayat (1) KUHP tentang pencemaran nama baik dan fitnah yang dalam praktik sering menimbulkan kriminalisasi terhadap perbuatan yang sejatinya bersumber dari sengketa keperdataan. Hal ini tercermin dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 14/Pid.B/2024/PN.Jkt.Utr. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis pembuktian unsur delik pencemaran nama baik dan fitnah serta pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus, serta didukung teori pembuktian dan teori hukum pidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa alat bukti yang diajukan penuntut umum tidak memenuhi unsur “menyerang kehormatan atau nama baik” maupun “tuduhan palsu dengan maksud diketahui umum”. Hakim menilai perbuatan terdakwa dilakukan dalam konteks hubungan hukum keperdataan yang sah dan dilandasi keyakinan atas hak sewa yang legal, tanpa adanya niat jahat atau kesengajaan untuk mencemarkan nama baik. Kesimpulannya, hakim mengedepankan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi terdakwa dengan menerapkan asas in dubio pro reo. Penelitian ini menyarankan agar penyidik dan jaksa lebih selektif menilai alat bukti guna mencegah kriminalisasi terhadap sengketa keperdataan.
Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan di PT. BFIE TBK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cikarang Nomor: 298/Pid.B/2024/PN.Ckr) Revson Bowonseet; Markoni Markoni; Sura Mahlemna Anabertha Sembiring; I Made Kantikha
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i3.7620

Abstract

Maraknya tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan di lingkungan korporasi, termasuk di PT BEFIE Tbk, mencerminkan lemahnya pengawasan internal dan rendahnya integritas pejabat perusahaan. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cikarang Nomor 298/Pid.B/2024/PN.Ckr menjadi contoh konkret penyalahgunaan wewenang yang merugikan perusahaan dan menurunkan kepercayaan publik terhadap tata kelola korporasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis terjadinya tindak pidana tersebut, bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta upaya pencegahannya berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan teori pemidanaan, teori pertanggungjawaban pidana, dan teori utilitarian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggelapan terjadi akibat penyalahgunaan jabatan oleh pegawai yang memiliki kewenangan atas aset perusahaan. Majelis hakim menjatuhkan pidana penjara 10 bulan dan 1 tahun 10 bulan kepada para terdakwa, namun sanksi tersebut dinilai belum memberikan efek jera dan keadilan substantif karena tidak disertai kewajiban pengembalian kerugian perusahaan. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana seharusnya mencakup restitusi atau penyitaan aset pelaku. Disarankan agar hakim menjatuhkan pidana tambahan berupa perampasan aset, serta perusahaan memperkuat sistem pengawasan dan audit internal.
Criminal Liability of a Juvenile Offender in Sexual Violence Resulting in Reproductive Organ Injury to the Victim Novia Safitri Berliansari; I Made Kantikha; Markoni; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 8 No 1 (2026): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v8i1.1626

Abstract

This study examines juvenile criminal liability and judicial reasoning in Decision No. 12/Pid.Sus-Anak/2025/PN Sbw through the lens of proportional justice. Employing normative (doctrinal) legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by analyzing the applicable legal framework on juvenile justice and sexual violence, relevant criminal law doctrines on liability and causation, and the structure of the court’s reasoning. The findings show that the elements of criminal liability were established covering the actus reus, mens rea, accountability, and the causal nexus between the conduct and the victim’s injury, and yet the sentencing rationale largely centered on the offender’s status as a child under the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Act. As a result, the judgment did not sufficiently articulate the victim’s severe reproductive harm as a decisive aggravating factor for proportional sentencing. This study argues for more robust and transparent judicial reasoning that integrates juvenile justice principles with victim-protection mandates, including a harmonized reading of the juvenile justice regime and the sexual violence legal framework, to secure a substantively fair balance between child protection and victims’ rights.
Relationship Between the President and the DPD in Indonesia’s Asymmetric Bicameral System Irmanjaya Thaher; Markoni Markoni; Dzaki M. Ihsan
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v3i2.1777

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional relationship between the President and the Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah/DPD) within Indonesia’s asymmetric bicameral system, focusing on how institutional design influences executive-legislative relations and regional representation. Although the 1945 Constitution recognizes the DPD as the second chamber of parliament, its legislative, supervisory, and advisory powers remain significantly weaker than those of the House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat/DPR), creating an imbalance that limits its constitutional role in overseeing executive policies affecting regional interests. This research employs a normative legal method based on statutory, constitutional, and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution, laws governing the legislature, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant scholarly literature on bicameralism and constitutional governance. The findings reveal that the asymmetrical distribution of authority has reinforced executive dominance through legislative processes primarily controlled by the DPR, while the DPD’s participation remains consultative rather than determinative. Consequently, regional aspirations are often insufficiently reflected in national policymaking, reducing the effectiveness of checks and balances envisioned in a bicameral legislature. The study further argues that the constitutional relationship between the President and the DPD requires institutional strengthening through expanded legislative participation, more effective oversight mechanisms, and greater involvement in decision-making concerning regional autonomy, fiscal decentralization, and natural resource governance. Such reforms would enhance democratic accountability, improve the representation of regional interests, and promote a more balanced constitutional system without undermining governmental stability. Ultimately, strengthening the DPD’s constitutional position would contribute to a more effective bicameral legislature capable of supporting responsive governance and reinforcing Indonesia’s constitutional democracy.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM ANGGOTA KEPOLISIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA ANTARA RANAH PIDANA DAN ETIK Cahyo Aribowo; Markoni; I Made Kantikha; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i3.6473

Abstract

This study is motivated by the existence of dual mechanisms of accountability for members of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) who commit narcotics-related crimes, namely criminal proceedings in the general courts and ethical-administrative proceedings through the Police Professional Code of Ethics Commission (KKEPP). This dual system often raises debates regarding the legitimacy of ethical sanctions, the application of the ne bis in idem principle, and the consistency of law and ethics enforcement within the Indonesian legal system. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal accountability system for Polri members who commit narcotics crimes in both the criminal and ethical domains, as well as to examine the principles of professional ethics in relation to criminal court decisions and KKEPP decisions. This research applies the legal system theory and professional ethics theory. The method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the Indonesian legal system recognizes criminal and ethical accountability as two distinct but complementary mechanisms. Criminal court decisions determine the legal guilt of the offender, while KKEPP decisions assess integrity, moral responsibility, and the professional suitability of Polri members. Ethical sanctions in the form of Dishonorable Discharge (PTDH) do not violate the ne bis in idem principle because they fall within the domain of administrative law and professional ethics. The relationship between criminal and ethical decisions is complementary and plays an important role in maintaining professional integrity, institutional professionalism, and public trust in Polri
Teknik Penanganan Masalah Penyidikan Kepolisian pada Satuan Reserse Kriminal Kepolisian Resor Kota Bulungan Kalimantan Utara (Studi Kasus Pembunuhan Korban Lansia di Panti Sosial Tresna Wherda) Brian Daven Kyher Gultom; Joko Widarto; Markoni; Nardiman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.5657

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the problems faced by the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Bulungan Police Resort in North Kalimantan in handling murder cases involving elderly people in social care facilities. This study also aims to propose solutions and techniques to deal with these investigative problems. This study discusses the challenges faced by the Bulungan City Police Resort criminal investigation unit in handling murder cases involving elderly victims. This emphasizes the importance of quality training for investigators to effectively address the complexity of such cases. Data collection methods included document analysis and interviews. The data analysis method used is qualitative descriptive analysis. This study highlights the challenges faced by the criminal investigation unit in handling murder cases involving elderly victims at the Bulungan City Police Resort. This research identifies difficulties in the management and use of evidence in criminal investigations, including challenges in collecting and examining evidence at crime scenes. This study emphasizes the need for quality training for researchers to effectively address the complexity of such cases. The research analysis concluded that the investigation of violence against the elderly at the Tresna Wherda Social Home faces challenges such as limited evidence, complex cases, and possible mental disorders of the perpetrators. Handling violence against the elderly requires a holistic approach involving the police, health institutions, social workers, and the community as a whole
Perlindungan Hukum Substantif bagi Perusahaan Penanaman Modal Asing terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Pelaksanaan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Christy Antoni Sitompul; I Made Kantikha; Markoni; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3464

Abstract

This study is motivated by the imbalance of bargaining power and the weak implementation of the pacta sunt servanda principle in construction service practices, which affects the effectiveness of legal protection for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) companies. This research aims to analyze the forms of breach of contract by the Employer and examine the effectiveness of substantive legal protection within the national legal system toward PT. Global Contractor Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and case study approaches, analyzed descriptively and prescriptively. Normatively, contractual relations are governed by the Indonesian Civil Code as lex generalis, as well as the Construction Services Law and the Investment Law as lex specialis. The findings reveal breaches of contract in the form of delayed and reduced payments, unilateral changes to the scope of work without formal amendments, and neglect of administrative obligations. These findings indicate that substantive legal protection is conditional, as it depends on contractual compliance. Therefore, strengthening contract design, ensuring balanced risk allocation, harmonizing regulations, and enhancing effective regulatory supervision are necessary to ensure legal certainty and minimize breaches of contract.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Atas Penyelewengan Dana Operasional Oleh Departemen Sumber Daya Manusia di PT. Global Hotma Abadi Jaya Hotma Dame Silaban; Markoni; I Made Kantikha; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3473

Abstract

Misappropriation of corporate operational funds may cause financial losses and give rise to legal liability for individuals, directors, and corporations. The case at PT. Global Hotma Abadi involved the Human Resources Department through visa cost mark-ups, fictitious employee additions, manipulation of overseas workers’ salary allowances, and unauthorized expense claims. This study aims to analyze the forms, processes, and legal liability arising from such misappropriation using theories of legal liability and corporate theory. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that weak internal supervision, the absence of periodic audits, and ineffective control systems were the main factors enabling the misconduct. The actions fulfill the elements of unlawful acts under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, resulting in civil liability in the form of compensation for the perpetrators, while directors may also bear responsibility for negligence in supervision. The study recommends strengthening internal audits, implementing risk-based supervision, and developing whistleblowing systems within the company.
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Praktik Penghangusan Kuota Internet oleh Penyelenggara Jasa Telekomunikasi di Indonesia Herlina; Markoni; Helvis; Idris Wasahua; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3474

Abstract

The rapid development of mobile telecommunications services has made internet access a primary necessity. However, the practice of forfeiting unused internet data quotas raises legal issues concerning consumers’ legal position, legal protection, and the liability of telecommunications service providers. This study employs contract law theory, legal protection theory, and legal interpretation and construction theory, using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although consumers are formally bound by valid contractual agreements, their substantive position remains unequal due to the dominant role of service providers in determining service terms and conditions. The forfeiture of unused data quotas prevents consumers from fully benefiting from services they have already paid for, thereby conflicting with the principles of balance and good faith in contract law. Furthermore, legal protection remains ineffective because no adequate compensation mechanism is provided, despite the existence of actual consumer losses that satisfy the elements of legal liability. Therefore, stricter regulations and improved service policies are necessary to ensure fairness, accountability, and effective consumer protection.
Rekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Platform P2p Lending Dalam Mitigasi Risiko Gagal Bayar Massal di Indonesia Jonggara Simanjuntak; Markoni Markoni
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i6.9401

Abstract

Fenomena gagal bayar massal pada Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (LPBBTI) menunjukkan pergeseran risiko yang fundamental: dari risiko kredit individual yang melekat pada setiap transaksi pinjam-meminjam menuju risiko sistemik yang berdampak luas terhadap stabilitas industri dan perlindungan pendana ritel secara kolektif. Meskipun POJK 40/2024 telah memperkuat standar prudensial penyelenggara secara signifikan, batas pertanggungjawaban hukum platform dalam skenario gagal bayar massal masih belum dirumuskan secara eksplisit dalam kerangka normatif yang berlaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komprehensif bentuk dan batas pertanggungjawaban hukum platform P2P lending berdasarkan hukum positif Indonesia, serta merumuskan model mitigasi risiko ideal melalui pengintegrasian mekanisme protection fund dan wind-down plans sebagai standar akuntabilitas prudensial. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif yang mengacu pada pengalaman regulasi Inggris dan Tiongkok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa platform tidak lagi dapat diposisikan sebagai perantara pasif, melainkan sebagai active system manager yang bertanggung jawab atas risiko operasional, sistemik, dan informasi yang berada dalam kontrolnya. Gagal bayar massal dapat menjadi dasar pertanggungjawaban perdata melalui wanprestasi maupun perbuatan melawan hukum apabila dipicu oleh kelalaian profesional dalam credit assessment, misrepresentasi risiko, atau kegagalan tata kelola yang bersumber dari struktur pengelolaan platform. Model mitigasi ideal yang dirumuskan menempatkan protection fund sebagai instrumen kuratif-terbatas dan wind-down plans sebagai mekanisme preventif untuk menjamin kelangsungan hak pendana, tanpa mengubah karakter P2P lending sebagai instrumen investasi yang mengandung risiko inheren.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Adel Chandra Alvina Alvina Anthony, Peter Ardiansah Astika Ulfah Izzati Bagio Kadaryanto, Bagio Ban Hin, Siaw Binsar M. Gultom Brian Daven Kyher Gultom Budi Asri, Dyah Permata Budi Setiawan Budi Setiawan Cahyo Aribowo Christian Elizar Christy Antoni Sitompul Dasuki Santoso Dekky Tiara Pra Setia Dyah Permata Budi Asri Dyah Permata Budi Asri Dyah Permatasari Dzaki M. Ihsan Ediyanto Edward Fernando Siregar Elawati, Tuti Elvinus Engel, Justi Elwis Tunendra Erwin Putra Pratama Eugenia, Edith Griselda Fauzan Ferdian Togi Sinurat Frianka Anindea Gautama, Maria Patricia Gistia Helty Gojali, Akhmad Hamdani Handy Hardy Christianto Rasenda Hartoto Suci Rahayu Helvis, Helvis Herlina Hero Samudra Horadin Saragih Hulain Hulain I Made Kanthika I Made Kanthika I Made Kantika I Made Kantikha I Made Kantikha I Made Kantikha I Made Kantikha I Made Kantikha I Made Khantika Idris Wasahua Irmanjaya Thaher Iswantoro Jaya Hotma Dame Silaban Jaya, Alfin Firman Joko Widarto Joko Widarto Jonggara Simanjuntak Julywaty Tenteram Kantikha, I Made kartini, kartini Kurniawan, Alan Kus Prih Bandono La Ode Sarifin Lidya Anggraeni M. S. Anabertha Sembiring Malemna Sura Anabertha Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring Maria Ulfa Arifia Mellisa Agustina Sinaga Muhamad Bahtiar Muharam, Irsan Nardiman Nardiman Nardiman, Nardiman Nelly Dharma Novia Safitri Berliansari Nursaban Rommy Nurul Ittaqullah Parman. Bm. Nainggolan Peter Anthony Porman Hutabarat Prihati Putra, Ichwan Fuad Chaerul Raditya Pratomo Randi Fryandika Revi Revi Revson Bowonseet Roman Destian Pahrori Rosalia Herlina Sutanti Rudi Fahrudi Saragih Saragih Setiaji Wibowo Sherry Arisanti Sihombing, Jasalmon Siregar, Pascal Raja Ilham Solihat, Ihat Sukarman Sura Mahlemna Anabertha Sembiring Tia Shabrina Tri Wahyu Pranoto Tulus Widodo Wasis Susetio Yohanes Lado Jera Yudhi Ongkowijaya Zulfikar Zulfikar Judge