p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.188
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems) Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Publikasi Pendidikan AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Daya Matematis Mimbar Sekolah Dasar SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Delta-Pi : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education) Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran) Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Indonesian Journal of Primary Education Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda) Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES) Autentik : Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Jurnal Dedikasi Infinity Jurnal Matematika dan Aplikasinya (IJMA) ELEMENTARY : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran JURNAL LENTERA KARYA EDUKASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Elementar : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (IJRER) Jurnal Didactical Mathematics Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Jurnal Guru Pencerah Semesta (JGPS) Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran Indonesian Journal of Primary Education J-CEKI Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar JREP Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Daya Matematis

Assessment of The Difficulty of Mathematics High-Level Reasoning Using Focus Group Discussion and Program Item Approaches Rukli Rukli; Ma'rup Ma'rup
Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 2 (2021): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jdm.v9i2.23577

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the difficulty level of high-level reasoning math problems by comparing the estimated difficulty level of the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) approach and the Iteman program. The estimation of the FGD approach uses a semantic differential scale on a scale of 1-7, while the Iteman program uses version 4.0. The study used a quantitative-comparative approach involving 79 FGDs of students and teachers of SMP/MTs in Soppeng Regency. Each FGD consisted of four people, one teacher and three students of class VIII. The comparative of difficulty level using Scheffe test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that the average level of difficulty in the FGD approach had significant similarity with the average level of difficulty in the output of the Iteman program approach. This means that the estimated level of difficulty of the FGD examinees has a similarity with the output of the Iteman program from the response data of the FGD examinees. This shows that examinees  from FGD in assessing the level of difficulty of high-level reasoning questions can be the teacher’s choice in schools other than the Iteman program.
ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM WITH GROUP WISE FOR COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING Rukli Rukli
Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1455.684 KB) | DOI: 10.26858/jds.v6i1.5600

Abstract

This study aims to put the parameters of the problem on a general scale with a group wise design. Placement of questions on a general scale can be interpreted that although the test participants responded to the character of the problem is not the same but the ability of test participants in Competitive Adaptive Testing (CAT) can be compared with each other. Data response question comes from four packages namely package 1, package 2, and package 3 National Exam on mathematics subjects. The total number of questions is 140. The data is analyzed with the Bilog_MG program. The results show that the number of questions meet the Rasch model of 109 questions. The matter can be entered into CAT bank. Although the test participants responded to the problem and the number of questions was not the same but the test scores were comparable
Co-Authors Abdul Wahid Abdul, Karim Adriana Adriana Adriana Adriana Agustan Agustan, Agustan Akib, Irwan Alfiani, Fikri Alif Kurnia Syam Andi Aswani Andi Nur Islamiah Zainal Anisah, Nur Rifqah Aqilah Salsabila Arfiani, Fifi Atan, Noor Azeam Ayu Sri Wahyuni Baharullah Daniel Happy Putra dina, Dina Amalia Erwin Akib Erwin Akib Fahmi Hidayat Fitri Ramadhani Fitriani Fitriani Fitrianti Haerul Hafidah Hafidah Herllina Idris, Hikmah Ima Arina Arif Iqramsyar, Muh Nur Irmawati M Irmawati M Irwan Akib Irwan Akib Jumrah Jumrah Jumrah Jumrah Karim Abdul Lili Fitriawati. S Lukman Lukman Ma'rup Ma'rup Ma'rup Ma'rup Marda Wati Mardawati, Mardawati Mentari Aulia Sari Miftahul Jannah Muh Nur Iqramsyar Muh. Ikram Riswandi Muhammad Ilham S Muhammad Ilham S Muhammad Safrullah Saleh Munirah Kusnadi, Munirah Nur Rifqah Anisah Nurawaliah, Asthi Nurjannah Nurjannah Nursakiah Nursakiah Nursakiah Nursakiah Nurul Amadyah Nurul Hijriah Nurwahida Nurwahida, Nurwahida Rachmat Alim Taqwa Rahayu, Erpin Rahmat Rahmat Rosleny Babo Saleh, Sitti Fithriani Sitti Aida Azis SITTI AIDA AZIS Sitti Chadijah Taiyeb Sitti Nurbaya Sitti Nurbaya Sitti Nurbaya Sitti Rahma Sitti Rahmah Tahir Sri Hartati Sufyan Sufyan Sukmawati Sukmawati Sukmawati Sukmawati Sulfasyah Sulfasyah Sulfasyah Sulfasyah Sulfasyah Sulfasyah, Sulfasyah Sunardi J Sutriani Sutriani Syamsiarna Nappu Syamsiarna Nappu, Syamsiarna Syamsidar Majid Syamsuddin, Agustan Syarifuddin Kune Tahir, Sitti Rahmah Tawakkal Tawakkal Tria Mulya Utari Wahyuni, Ayu Sri Zulrifqa Rofiqa Ali