Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia: Suatu Eksperimen yang Tidak Kunjung Selesai Rosadi, Otong
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (614.931 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPada Pasal 18 UUD 1945 diamanatkan agar pemerintah menjalankan otonomi seluas-luasnya dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Meski demikian, sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1945, UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1948, dan beberapa perundang-undangan lain hingga UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 dan kini UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014, menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk menganut sistem rumah tangga otonomi yang berbeda-beda. Pada sisi lain, dalam Pasal 18 UUD 1945 tidak secara tegas diatur mengenai pemegang titik berat otonomi. Politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang berlaku menyisakan pertanyaan penting apakah Pasal 18 UUD 1945 (sebelum perubahan) dan Pasal 18, Pasal 18A dan Pasal 18B UUD 1945 (pasca perubahan) merupakan politik hukum yang tetap, yang dapat dijadikan dasar konstitusionalitas bagi politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apabila demikian, akan timbul pertanyaan baru terkait penyusunan (politik) perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apakah hal tersebut merupakan kebijakan hukum yang terbuka (open legal policy) sehingga pemerintah dan DPR bisa semaunya memberikan tafsir dan mengisi maksud Pasal 18 sesuai dengan politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang dikehendakinya atau bukan? Perbedaan materi muatan dalam setiap peraturan perundang-undangan dan penempatan titik berat pada level (satuan) pemerintahan yang berbeda-beda membuktikan bahwa pola pengaturan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia merupakan suatu eksperimen yang tidak pernah selesai.Constitutionality of Local Government Regulations in Indonesia: A Never Ending ExperimentAbstractArticle 18 of the 1945 Constitution instructs the implementation of widest possible autonomy in the performance of Regional Government. However, since the implementation of Law Number 1 of 1945, Law Number 22 of 1948, and other legislations up to Law Number 32 of 2004 and even Law Number 23 of 2014, there has been a tendency of adopting differing systems (bylaws) of autonomy between the laws. Meanwhile, Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution does not strictly assign a particular governmental level or unit as the emphasis for the implementation of autonomy. Such legal politics invites a major question to be addressed, namely whether the legislations, including Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution (pre-amandment), as well as Article 18, 18A, and 18D of the 1945 Constitution (post-amandment) are not fixed legal politics to serve as the constitutionally for the legislations on regional government? And if so, is the legislation on regional government an open legal policy that allows the Peoples Consultative Assembly (DPR) and the government to freely interpret the content of Article 18A as they wish? The differing emphasis on the governmental level and unit for autonomy demonstrates that the matter of regional government somehow is a never-ending experimentation. This article utilizes normative and historical approaches in conductiong content analysis on regional goverment legislations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a7
Ide Bernegara dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: Rekonstruksi Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pascaamandemen Rosadi, Otong
Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, JANUARI 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article tries to answer the question of whether the idea of the state underlying the amendment of the 1945 Constitution? Then how to put this need in the context of (re) construction of statehood in the future. This writing is a description of the analysis with the normative approach of philosophical and juridical. The conclusion of this article states that the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, which was originally expected to improve the state administration system and state life, has actually reduced the ideas of the state that had originally been arranged systematically and directed by the founders of the state. The fifth amendment of the 1945 Constitution should be placed as the great effort of the Indonesian nation to restore the 1945 Constitution to its authenticity, as the document of the establishment of the State, the milestone of the nation's achievement / goal, the ideals and goals of the state, as well as the philosophy, values, a fundamental constitution.
HUKUM KODRAT, PANCASILA DAN ASAS HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Otong Rosadi
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 10, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.98

Abstract

Goal of legislation establishment is fair legislation carries out mission of prosperous society. To achieve the goal, process of the establishment has to be based on moral nation as philosophical foundation. For Indonesian people, Pancasila on Preamble of UUD 1945, not only as national goal but also as fundamental basic rule of state, should be the basis of legislation establishment.Keywords: legislation establishment, Pancasila, moral nation, legal principle
Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia: Suatu Eksperimen yang Tidak Kunjung Selesai Otong Rosadi
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (614.931 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPada Pasal 18 UUD 1945 diamanatkan agar pemerintah menjalankan otonomi seluas-luasnya dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Meski demikian, sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1945, UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1948, dan beberapa perundang-undangan lain hingga UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 dan kini UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014, menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk menganut sistem rumah tangga otonomi yang berbeda-beda. Pada sisi lain, dalam Pasal 18 UUD 1945 tidak secara tegas diatur mengenai pemegang titik berat otonomi. Politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang berlaku menyisakan pertanyaan penting apakah Pasal 18 UUD 1945 (sebelum perubahan) dan Pasal 18, Pasal 18A dan Pasal 18B UUD 1945 (pasca perubahan) merupakan politik hukum yang tetap, yang dapat dijadikan dasar konstitusionalitas bagi politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apabila demikian, akan timbul pertanyaan baru terkait penyusunan (politik) perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah. Apakah hal tersebut merupakan kebijakan hukum yang terbuka (open legal policy) sehingga pemerintah dan DPR bisa semaunya memberikan tafsir dan mengisi maksud Pasal 18 sesuai dengan politik perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah yang dikehendakinya atau bukan? Perbedaan materi muatan dalam setiap peraturan perundang-undangan dan penempatan titik berat pada level (satuan) pemerintahan yang berbeda-beda membuktikan bahwa pola pengaturan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia merupakan suatu eksperimen yang tidak pernah selesai.Constitutionality of Local Government Regulations in Indonesia: A Never Ending ExperimentAbstractArticle 18 of the 1945 Constitution instructs the implementation of widest possible autonomy in the performance of Regional Government. However, since the implementation of Law Number 1 of 1945, Law Number 22 of 1948, and other legislations up to Law Number 32 of 2004 and even Law Number 23 of 2014, there has been a tendency of adopting differing systems (bylaws) of autonomy between the laws. Meanwhile, Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution does not strictly assign a particular governmental level or unit as the emphasis for the implementation of autonomy. Such legal politics invites a major question to be addressed, namely whether the legislations, including Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution (pre-amandment), as well as Article 18, 18A, and 18D of the 1945 Constitution (post-amandment) are not fixed legal politics to serve as the constitutionally for the legislations on regional government? And if so, is the legislation on regional government an open legal policy that allows the People's Consultative Assembly (DPR) and the government to freely interpret the content of Article 18A as they wish? The differing emphasis on the governmental level and unit for autonomy demonstrates that the matter of regional government somehow is a never-ending experimentation. This article utilizes normative and historical approaches in conductiong content analysis on regional goverment legislations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a7
KEWENANGAN CAMAT DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN PEMERINTAH NAGARI DI KECAMATAN SULIKI KABUPATEN LIMA PULUH KOTA Ricky Edwar; Otong Rosadi
UNES Law Review Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i1.203

Abstract

Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government mandates the District Government to provide guidance and empowerment to the Village / Nagari Government through the Regional Apparatus / Camat organization. Article 226 paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government states that in addition to carrying out the tasks referred to in article 25 paragraph (1) the Camat receives the delegation of part of the Regent / Mayor's authority to carry out part of the government affairs which fall under the authority of the Regency / City. Based on the background of the above thought, the problems discussed are, first, how is the implementation of the Camat's authority in empowering the Nagari government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency? and second, what are the obstacles faced in empowering Nagari government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota district? This research is a descriptive analytical study, with the normative juridical approach as the main approach and the empirical juridical as the support for the main approach. The data collected are secondary data and primary data. Data collection techniques with field studies through interviews for primary data and literature study for secondary data. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and presented in descriptive analytical form, which only described how the Camat's authority was exercised, the obstacles faced and the efforts made to overcome obstacles in the implementation of the Camat's authority in empowering the Nagari Government in Suliki District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, Government Regulation Number 17 of 2018 concerning Districts and Regulation of the Regent of Fifty Cities Number 72 of 2016 concerning the Position of the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions and Administration of the sub-districts has arranged in detail the duties and authorities of the Camat in empowering the Nagari government. However, the fact is that the guidance, empowerment and supervision of the nagari are mostly carried out by sectoral institutions / agencies. This, of course, will indirectly result in a reduction in the authority of the Camat in carrying out activities, especially those concerning Nagari governance. As a result, the control range is too far causing ineffective and inefficient implementation of tasks in the sub-district as well as in the nagari. The obstacles faced by the sub-district head in the process of empowering the village government are the limited and unclear authority which results in unallocated budgets to empower the village government and the lack of coordination between the District Government and the Nagari Government. The effort made by the sub-district head is to continue carrying out his duties in accordance with the Regulation of the Regent of Fifty Cities Number 72 of 2016 concerning 2016 concerning the Position of the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions and Work Procedures of the sub-districts
PENYUSUNAN PRODUK HUKUM SEBAGAI KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAHAN NAGARI DI KECAMATAN BAYANG KABUPATEN PESISIR SELATAN Sahnan Sahuri Siregar; Otong Rosadi; Darmini Roza
BULETIN ILMIAH NAGARI MEMBANGUN Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : LPPM (Institute for Research and Community Services) Universitas Andalas Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/bina.v3i2.203

Abstract

This community service activity was carried out on Wednesday, August 21, 2019 with the first aim, to find out and analyse the background knowledge and experience of the nagari device to influence knowledge and abilities (expertise) in the preparation of Nagari Legal Products. Second, to find out and analyse how to increase the capacity of knowledge and abilities (expertise) of the Nagari Tool kit in preparing Nagari Legal Products? Third, to find out and analyse the right strategy to increase the capacity of the nagari government apparatus and members of Bamus Nagari so that they are able to draft a Nagari Regulation that is based on the needs of the nagari community. Community service activities in the form of training are carried out using lecture, question-answer, deepening and training methods. The lecture method is used as a preliminary briefing on several theories, concepts, and laws and regulations relating to nagari legal products, as well as to increase the motivation of nagari devices in the preparation of nagari legal products. While the question-and-answer method provides an opportunity for participants to discuss obstacles that arise during their practice and experience in arranging nagari legal products. The training method is used to practice the formulation of nagari regulations. Based on the activities that have been carried out, it can be concluded that almost all the training participants were very enthusiastic in participating in the training that was held with an indication that the active participants were discussing, the nagari as participants were present from the beginning of the opening until the end of the opening. After the training ended, he was able to understand and practice well all the material delivered during the service activities. The obstacle that arises is the limited space in the Bayang Sub district area, so that the place is done in the Nagari Office Hall which is too large and not soundproof so that the implementation of activities must use a loudspeaker.
KOORDINASI ANTARA KEPOLISIAN NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN APARAT PENGAWAS INTERNAL PEMERINTAH DALAM PENYELIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANA DESA Awi Ramadani; Otong Rosadi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 6 No 2 (2022): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2022)
Publisher : Programa Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v6i2.249

Abstract

Article 385 of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government adheres to the norm that the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus is obliged to conduct an examination of alleged irregularities that are reported by the public. This research is a legal research with a descriptive analytical specification. The form of coordination between the Indonesian National Police and the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus in the Investigation of Corruption Crimes of Village Funds in the Legal Territory of the Pesisir Selatan Police is in the form of horizontal coordination. Coordination was carried out in 2019 there were 2 (two) investigations, in 2020 there was 1 (one) investigation regarding alleged criminal acts of corruption in the village funds of the South Gurun Panjang, Kec. Shadow. Furthermore, in 2021 there will be 1 (one) investigation regarding the alleged criminal act of misappropriation of village funds in Nagari Nanggalo Koto XI Tarusan. Coordination is carried out to examine documents related to state finances, namely village funds that are suspected of being misappropriated. The coordination carried out by the Pesisir Selatan Police with APIP has been carried out so far by telephone, Discussion, Exposure (Degree of Cases) which includes APIP. Obstacles in Coordination Between the Indonesian National Police and the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus in Investigating the Crime of Village Fund Corruption in the Legal Territory of the Pesisir Selatan Police is when the APIP states that the act was only an administrative error and then he pays compensation for the amount of money that is claimed for the loss, then law enforcement will discontinued. The role of APIP is only “understood” through various Memorandums of Understanding. On the other hand, the independence and competence of APIP is also a separate obstacle.
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST THE CRIMINAL ACT OF DESTRUCTION OF CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEMS IN WEST SUMATRA WATERS Bilsofer Hikman; Otong Rosadi; Iyah Faniyah
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2022): Vol 4 No. 2 Edisi 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.199 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v4i2.1049

Abstract

Laporan Polisi Model A Nomor: LP-A/179/VII/2019/SPKT Polda-SBR, 12 Juli 2019. Dimana telah terjadi Tindak Pidana Perikanan yaitu penangkapan Usmanto memanggil Adek dan Muhamad Nur memanggil Ujang menggunakan 1 ( satu) ) unit perahu motor sedang mengangkut 56 (lima puluh enam) karung terumbu karang di Perairan Bungus tepatnya pada posisi 01º 03' 020” S - 100º 23' 983” E Kota Padang pada hari Kamis, 11 Juli 2019 sekitar pukul 20.00 WIB , yaitu Terumbu karang yang diambil dari perairan laut Kota Padang yang hangus. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitik. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh pendekatan yuridis empiris. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder dan data primer. Semua data dan bahan yang diperoleh dari hasil penelitian disusun dan dianalisis secara kualitatif, dan disajikan dalam bentuk deskriptif kualitatif. Dari hasil penelitian dapat dijelaskan bahwa: Proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana perusakan ekosistem terumbu karang di perairan Sumatera Barat diawali dengan Laporan Polisi Model A Nomor: LP-A/179/VII/2019 /SPKT Polda-SBR, setelah itu disusul dengan dikeluarkannya Surat Perintah Penyidikan, Surat Perintah Penyitaan, dan Surat Penggeledahan berdasarkan Pasal 1 angka 16, Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf b angka 1, Pasal 7 ayat (1 ) huruf d, Pasal 11 Pasal 38 ayat (2), Pasal 39, Pasal 40, Pasal 44, Pasal 128, Pasal 129, Pasal 130 dan Pasal 131 KUHAP, serta Pasal 86 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2004 yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 tentang Perikanan. Setelah dilakukan pemeriksaan, diketahui bahwa perahu motor yang dioperasikan Usmanto dan Muhamad Nur itu ditemukan 56 (lima puluh enam) karung terumbu karang yang diambil dari perairan laut Kota Padang yang hangus. Hambatan dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana perusakan ekosistem terumbu karang di perairan Sumatera Barat, terdiri dari faktor hukum dan non hukum. Faktor hukum terdiri dari: Kesulitan mencari keterangan ahli, kesulitan mencari bukti, menetapkan tersangka jika dilakukan oleh korporasi, dan menemukan tempat perkara atau menentukan locus delicti karena berada di ZEE. Kendala non hukum terdiri dari: kesempatan kerja karena masyarakat sulit mencari pekerjaan, rendahnya tingkat pendidikan masyarakat pesisir, lemahnya pengawasan dari instansi terkait, masyarakat yang tidak mengetahui hukum, Belum adanya sosialisasi kepada masyarakat tentang pentingnya terumbu karang.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum; Tindak Pidana; Perusakan Ekosistem; Terumbu Karang.
THE URGENCE OF INVESTIGATION TERMINATION ORDERS (SP2LID) IN THE CRIMINAL ACTION INVESTIGATION PROCESS AS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE KAPOLRI NUMBER : SE/7/VII/2018 Azan Fujiyanto; Otong Rosadi; Iyah Faniyah
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2022): Vol 4 No. 2 Edisi 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (65.487 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v4i2.1050

Abstract

The Circular Letter of the Chief of Police Number: SE/7/VII/2018 concerning the termination of investigations is a rule made to fill a legal vacuum regarding the termination of investigations within the Police. This rule regulates the mechanisms and rules for stopping investigations that have been carried out to answer the community's need for legal certainty for reports that have been made previously. Legal certainty in the investigation process if the report or complaint previously made does not meet the criminal element or there is not enough evidence then the investigation must be stopped, answering the cessation of the investigation is published in the Internal Police Circular Letter Number: SE/7/VII/2018 concerning the termination of the investigation. also occurred within the West Sumatra Regional Police. This research is a descriptive analytical research. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used in this study are secondary data and primary data. All data and materials obtained from the research results were compiled and analyzed qualitatively, and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. From the results of the research, it can be explained that the urgency of SP2Lid as the implementation of the issuance of Circular Letter Number: SE/7/VII/2018 in the process of investigating criminal acts is that to fill the legal vacuum regarding the mechanisms and procedures for stopping investigations that are not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as being instructions regarding procedures for implementing the requirements in the investigation process addressed to Polri investigators, because the Chief of Police has the authority to issue circulars containing instructions or notifications regarding the provisions for stopping the investigation if in the case of the investigation the facts and evidence collected are not sufficient or the event is not a criminal act, the investigator can stop the investigation and not continue it to the investigation stage but if one day the reporter or investigator gets new facts and evidence (novum) then the previous stage of the investigation will be removed. The arrest can be reopened by going through the case title mechanism and then the investigator issues a Further Investigation Order.Keywords: SP2LID, Investigation, Crime, SE/7/VII/2018.
KOORDINASI ANTARA PENYIDIK POLRES PADANG PARIAMAN DENGAN BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL/ AGRARIA TATA RUANG KABUPATEN PADANG PARIAMAN DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA LARANGAN PEMAKAIAN TANAH TANPA IZIN Otong Rosadi; Hendra Hendra
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i4.283

Abstract

Article 2 of Law Number 51 Prp of 1960 concerning Prohibition of Land Use Without Permission from the Entitled Person or his legal proxy. This research is a legal research with a descriptive analytical specification. The implementation of coordination between the Padang Pariaman Police Criminal Investigation Unit and the Padang Pariaman BPN/ATR in the investigation of the prohibition of land use without a permit or legal proxy is in terms of proving the status of ownership of the land. The National Land Agency was asked for information regarding land grabbing because the authorities and understanding of land grabbing are related to the legality of ownership of the land, even though the reporting party has shown proof of ownership but still requires information from the National Land Agency. Coordination is also carried out in terms of testing the validity of the documentary evidence collected by investigators in land grabbing cases. Obstacles in Coordination Between the Padang Pariaman Police Criminal Investigation Unit and Padang Pariaman BPN/ATR in Criminal Investigations for Prohibition of Land Use Without a Permit or Legal Proxy, among which are often difficult to distinguish the authenticity of proof of land ownership and the existence of overlapping land ownership which this cannot be proven by BPN as the institution that issued the evidence on the pretext of differences in leadership policies at that time. There are different agencies issuing proof of ownership of the same plot of land to different parties. The existence of falsification of land documents so that the Land Agency takes a long time to test the authenticity of these documents and makes the investigation take a long time.