Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.815
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee PROSEDING SEMINAR UNSA RATU ADIL RECHTSTAAT Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Restorative Justice Surakarta Law and Society Journal UNTAG Law Review CERMIN: Jurnal Penelitian Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian LEGAL BRIEF Risalah Hukum International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Aksiologi : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum International Journal of Community Service SCHOOLAR: Social and Literature Study in Education IBLAM Law Review Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM) SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Adijaya Multidisiplin Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum J-CEKI
Frans Simangunsong
Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 70 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal Evidence Of Law

 1 
Pertanggung Jawaban Tindak Pidana Pelaku Pemerkosaan Sesama Jenis (Homoseksual) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Bintoro, Arifah Moerfitria; Simangunsong, Frans
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v2i3.385

Abstract

Man was made through God in pairs. Sexual desire arises between the developmentof man and woman. There is always a tendency that sexual intercourse when men and women are currently familiar with each other Some surround it illegally, while others surround it secretly. Very not always cases of sexual offense follow the form of what has been mentioned earlier. Humans sometimes engage in sexual relations with other individuals of the same sex, chances are that they happen to be women with women or men with men. Three different types of every sexual orientation are out there: heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual. Bisexuals express attraction to both sexes, homosexuals represent attraction to the same sex, and heterosexuals summarize attraction to different sexes. While homosexual men are generally referred to as openly gay and homosexual women as lesbians, those who are heterosexual are also known as heterosexuals. In general,while it is true that homosexuality itself is not recognized as unlawful, the laws of the country do not support gays in a broad sense. A person who is a member of an organized homosexual society has no right to marry or adopt. Law No. 1 of 1974, specifically Article1, which defines that marriage is limited to a ceremony between a man and a woman, is a law that expressly deals with sexual orientation or gender identity. The only genders allowed under Indonesian law remain male and female. Homosexuality was not a crime until recently. There are no regulations governing homosexuality when it comes tocommitting sexual crimes Homosexuality is an expression of sexual orientation. To attemptto prevent sexual crimes, the public must be educated honestly so that those with gay preferences have the same possibilities as individuals with the opposite sexual sign of hetenosex. And delay stigmatizing homosexuals for committing sexual crimes or systematically discriminating against them.
Melaksanakan Perintah Jabatan Sebagai Alasan Penghapusan Pidana Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor 3849 K/Pid.Sus/2019) Prasetya, Arya; Simangunsong, Frans
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v2i3.404

Abstract

Corruption is a disgraceful act aimed at financially benefiting oneself, one's family, or a group, which involves state administrators. Various arguments were put forward by the Defendant in the corruption case so that the judge set an acquittal. One of the reasons is the reason for criminal abolition. In decision Number: 3849 K/Pid.Sus/2019, the convict received an acquittal by the judge and one of the considerations was that the convict carried out an order of office. The lack of standard uniformity regarding carrying out this position order is one of the reasons for the failure of the prosecution of defendants in corruption cases. The results of the study concluded Article 51 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code is the basis for eliminating criminal liability for an act (justifying reasons) for carrying out a valid position order, while Article 51 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code is the basis for eliminating criminal responsibility to the perpetrator (forgiveness reasons). in good faith thinks that the order is based on a lawful order within his authority. In Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Law, a person who has been proven to have committed an act of corruption to benefit himself or another person or a corporation, abuses the authority, opportunity, or means available to him, position or position which can harm or means who has a position or position in the state economy.
Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Donu Bani, Ferdinand; Simangunsong, Frans
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v2i3.469

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the role of penal mediation as an alternative in solving environmental crimes outside the court, as well as to determine the construction of penal mediation as an alternative to solving environmental crime cases. Environmental quality degradation is often the result of human actions that are not commendable. Irresponsible and careless actions of humans who pollute and damage the environment are the most fundamental problems regarding difficulties in environmental management. Enforcement of environmental law by means of criminal law has so far been constrained by difficulties in proving that in the end there has been no resolution in several existing environmental cases. Apart from that, proving environmental crimes with criminal penalties requires high human resources and technology. Therefore, the application of penal mediation in resolving environmental crime cases must be carried out because it is beneficial for the environment and in line with the law that lives and develops in a society that already has a mechanism for settling cases through negotiations or deliberations to reach an agreement. This research method uses normative legal research using a statutory approach. The results of the analysis of this study show that penal mediation is an alternative to solving environmental crime cases that are carried out theoretically and more efficiently. Therefore, penal mediation can be used as an alternative solution to environmental crime cases.
Kedudukan Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Inkracht dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Suap dan Gratifikasi Sucipto, Malakh Joy Barak; Simangunsong, Frans
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1761

Abstract

Kedudukan Indonesia sebagai negara hukum yang menekankan hukum sebagai pedoman utama dalam pengelolaan kekuasaan, termasuk dalam lembaga peradilan. Sebagai negara hukum, Indonesia meletakkan hukum sebagai pedoman terdepan dalam pelaksanaan kekuasaan, termasuk dalam lembaga peradilan. Putusan hakim yang seharusnya mencerminkan kebenaran dan keadilan justru kehilangan legitimasi ketika lahir dari praktik korupsi peradilan. Hukum positif Indonesia belum sepenuhnya menyediakan mekanisme yang jelas terkait pembatalan atau koreksi pada putusan inkracht namun kemudian terbukti lahir dari praktik suap dan gratifikasi. Permasalahan hukum yang muncul ialah adanya pertentangan antara asas kepastian hukum yang melekat pada putusan inkracht dengan prinsip keadilan substantif yang menolak legitimasi putusan hasil kejahatan. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini mengkaji kedudukan hukum putusan inkracht apabila terbukti dihasilkan melalui tindak pidana suap dan gratifikasi. Penelitian ini memakai metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan pada norma hukum. yaitu jenis penelitian yang menitikberatkan pada analisis terhadap norma-norma hukum yang berlaku secara formal. Pendekatan ini bertujuan untuk menelaah sistematis ketentuan hukum, asas hukum, dan doktrin yang membentuk struktur normatif dari permasalahan hukum yang diteliti, sehingga hasil kajian dapat memberikan argumentasi hukum yang preskriptif dan konstruktif terhadap isu yang diangkat. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa status inkracht tidak boleh dipandang absolut, karena hukum tetap menyediakan ruang koreksi melalui mekanisme luar biasa, seperti peninjauan kembali (PK). Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan kebijakan hukum pidana agar putusan pengadilan tidak menjadi alat pembenaran ketidakadilan, melainkan benar-benar menjamin kepastian hukum, keadilan substantif, dan integritas sistem peradilan di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Adhitya Wijayanto Agung Fakhruzy Ahmad Sholikhin Akbar Galih Hariyono Alan Rizki Dui Reandi Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Andhijaya, Moch Ramadhan Dewa Anwar, Cecareno Gilbrani Arie Mangesti, Yovita Arief Syahroni, Muh. Arrofi, Rendi Aryasepta Syaelendra Ashinta Sekar Bidari, SH, MH., Ashinta Sekar Azizah Nurina Putri Azizah, Aprilia Dela Nurul Berlian Sesaria Bintoro, Arifah Moerfitria Budiarsih Budiarsih Canygia Cesar Putra Kedua Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Deawit Sutriadi Dendy Valerian Wibowo Dianita Putri Oktavia Damayanti Dika Rahmat Nasution Donu Bani, Ferdinand Erny Herlin Setyorini, Erny Herlin Fardayana, M. Taj Bahy Farisi, Salman Ferdiansyah M. A Geuvarra, Arsyah Guntur, Sundaru Harap, Arsangela Putri Hendarto, Vanya Agatha Hervina Puspitosari, Hervina Ilahi, Mubarooq Ilmi, Iqbal Miftahul Imron, Muhamad Karmina Siska Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines M. Bagus Istighfariyo Mangesti, Yovita Arie Maria Novita Apriyani Marsella, Dian Dwi Mohammad Mohammad Muhammad Firmansyah, Muhammad Muhammad Iqbal Firdaus Murtadlo, Aly Nickholas Hartono Nugraha, Narendra Putra Nur Bintang Alfina Laila Pamungkas, Yudha Andra Pramesti, Yohana Putri Prasetya, Arya Prasetyo, Teguh Pribadi, Muhammad Teguh Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Putri, Serliana Novita Rossalia Ardiana R.Rivaldi Aldanta RACHMAN HAKIM, ARIEF Rachman, Moch. Nur Rachmatullah, Gaung Agung Raj Ravicky Fardenias Rhafshanjanie Prawira Negara Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Ronny Ronny Saputra Marpaung, Agung Risky Satria, I Gde Sandy Serliana Novita Rossalia Ardiana Putri Sibarani, Tagor Siska, Karmina Siti Badriyah Siti Badriyah Siti Rochmah Sitohang, Kalvin A Slamet Suhartono Sofiah Ely Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Sucipto, Malakh Joy Barak Syofyan Hadi Tri Budiman, Nanang Tri Oktaviani, Indah Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wardana, Andi Kusuma Widayata, Andhika Tedja Windi Jannati M.A.S Winny Savitri WIWIN YULIANINGSIH Wiwin Yulianingsih Yahya, Faris Helmi