p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.721
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Cakrawala Pendidikan Language Circle : Journal of Language and Literature International Journal of Education BAHASA DAN SASTRA Lingua Cultura Englisia Journal English Review: Journal of English Education PUJANGGA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra EXPOSURE JOURNAL Journal of English Language Studies Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Madani (JPMM) Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English Indonesian EFL Journal Jurnal SOLMA Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics ELT-Lectura Journal on Education JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN Deiksis JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Logat: Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia dan Pembelajaran Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) SOSCIED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (RDJE) Rangkiang: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat English Journal JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Jurnal PkM (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) JEdu: Journal of English Education Journal Of Academia In English Educations (JADEs) Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) Studies in English Language and Education Hortatori : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia RANGKIANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat AMMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat EduInovasi: Journal of Basic Educational Studies INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching International Journal of English Language and Pedagogy LINGUISTS : JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : EXPOSURE JOURNAL

EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION ABILITY IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A TEXT ANALYSIS OF TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM FROM GENDER PERSPECTIVE Pratiwi, Widya Rizky; Sundari, Hanna; Juhana, Juhana
EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS Vol 13, No 1 (2024): Exposure
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/exposure.v13i1.14399

Abstract

Building arguments for academic writing, such as constructing justification for a research proposal, is regarded a complex task. Moreover, it is believed that male and female authors use and produce the language differently, including perhaps providing thesis and arguments for research. Extensive research on rhetorical analysis of students’ theses has been widely conducted; however, little we know the way they state their claims from gender perspectives. To fill the void, this study aims to explore how Indonesian male and female authors construct and state their arguments in Introduction section for justifying their research from the perspectives of argumentation ability, underpinned by the concepts of transitivity system of SFL approach. Informed by qualitative descriptive research paradigm particularly text analysis, ten Introduction sections from selected English thesis proposals written by male and female authors at a university in Banten Province, Indonesia were subject to analyze. The finding of the research shows that either male students or female students expressed their arguments of their research topic and justification in almost similar fashion. The most frequent processes over the clauses were material process, relational process (attributive and identifying), and mental process (male: 59%, 20%, 11%; female: 49%, 20%, 14%). These findings underscore the common strategies employed by students, regardless of gender, in establishing their research objectives and setting the stage for their academic work. Such insights can be of significance for educators and researchers aiming to guide students in optimizing their academic writing skills, particularly in crafting compelling Introduction sections for thesis proposals.  
EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION ABILITY IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A TEXT ANALYSIS OF TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM FROM GENDER PERSPECTIVE Pratiwi, Widya Rizky; Sundari, Hanna; Juhana, Juhana
EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Exposure
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/exposure.v13i1.14399

Abstract

Building arguments for academic writing, such as constructing justification for a research proposal, is regarded a complex task. Moreover, it is believed that male and female authors use and produce the language differently, including perhaps providing thesis and arguments for research. Extensive research on rhetorical analysis of students’ theses has been widely conducted; however, little we know the way they state their claims from gender perspectives. To fill the void, this study aims to explore how Indonesian male and female authors construct and state their arguments in Introduction section for justifying their research from the perspectives of argumentation ability, underpinned by the concepts of transitivity system of SFL approach. Informed by qualitative descriptive research paradigm particularly text analysis, ten Introduction sections from selected English thesis proposals written by male and female authors at a university in Banten Province, Indonesia were subject to analyze. The finding of the research shows that either male students or female students expressed their arguments of their research topic and justification in almost similar fashion. The most frequent processes over the clauses were material process, relational process (attributive and identifying), and mental process (male: 59%, 20%, 11%; female: 49%, 20%, 14%). These findings underscore the common strategies employed by students, regardless of gender, in establishing their research objectives and setting the stage for their academic work. Such insights can be of significance for educators and researchers aiming to guide students in optimizing their academic writing skills, particularly in crafting compelling Introduction sections for thesis proposals.  
Co-Authors Achmad Muhajir Agung Ahmad Syahida Agus Sulaeman Agustean, Nevi Santy Alfi Diotama Saputra Amrina Rosyada Ancila Putri Perwitasari Andang Saehu, Andang Anita Anita Anwar Saleh Harahap Ardiasih, Lidwina Sri Arif Rahman Audi Yundayani Ayu Bandu Retnomurti, Ayu Bandu ‘Aathifah, Alya Baron, Rifari Budi Abudin Dadang Romawi Damayanti Damayanti Darwadi, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Dasmo Dasmo Defina Elis Solihat Fakhrurrazi M. Amin Fazri Nur Yusuf Febriyanti, Rina Husnaini Gustaman Saragih Hidayat, Nur Hayati Ira Miranti, Ira Irfan Hadi Irfan Hadi Irwan Herika Juhana Juhana Juhana, Juhana Juhana, Juhana Kristanto, Dionisius Destyawan Leonard, Leonard Lestarai, Feby Herdini Livia Septiani Lutfiansyah Lutfiansyah Malik, Aulia Ananda Maya Puspitasari, Maya Mohammed H. Alaqad Mutmainah Mutmainah Nadiva, Umi Najemi, Silvia Nanik Retnowati Nilandari, Ary Ningrat, Yuliati Nunung Prasetyo Nur Syamsiah Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurmala Hendrawaty Nurmala Hendrawaty Oom Rohmah Syamsudin Puji Astuti, Nina Rezki Adriani Riani Noor Yoshania Rifari Baron Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Rina Husnaini Febriyanti, Rina Husnaini Rr. Astri Indriana Oktavita Sakura Ridwan Salsabila, Salma Setiyowati Setiyowati Sinta Herawati Sofiah, Vivi Sri Arfani, Sri Suciati Suciati Supeno Suryanti, Dwi Retno Susianti Rosalina Suwarno, Tono Suwarno Syamsul Arifin Tono Suwarno Suwarno Vinesya Yuslia Fatma Widya Widya Rizky Pratiwi, Widya Rizky Wiranty, Glenda Mutia Wisma Yunita Yusuf, Fazri Nur Zainal Rafli, Zainal Zuhairi, Aminudin ‘Aathifah, Alya