Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Syntax Transformation

Analisis Gelar Perkara dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Di Kepolisian Fajar Sudariyanto; Helvis Helvis; Wasis Susetio
Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol 2 No 11 (2021): Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Publisher : CV. Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jst.v2i11.451

Abstract

This study describes the important role of the case title process in the settlement of criminal cases, especially in the police, to find out the case title process carried out by investigators in uncovering criminal cases to the process of stopping investigations and to find out the obstacles experienced by investigators in carrying out case titles. Then also to find out what are the legal consequences in the case of a legally flawed case, whether in the end it can be pre-trial. The research method used is a type of normative legal research conducted by reviewing library materials or secondary materials. Normative research aims at systematizing, correcting and clarifying the applicable legal rules in certain legal fields by conducting an analysis of authoritative texts that include primary and secondary legal materials as well as ensuring consistent and consistent law. The data source consists of primary data, namely the results of interviews and then analyzed. The primary legal material used is related to the investigation of criminal acts by the police, namely Law no. 8 of 1981 the Criminal Procedure Code, the Chief of Police Regulation, and the Criminal Procedure Code. The results of the study indicate that the case title is carried out to provide legal status for handling cases, so that the settlement process does not experience errors in decision making, which will affect the process of handling criminal cases. The inhibiting factors for the implementation of case titles are the time that is not possible if all criminal cases are carried out with a Case Title, the costs are quite high while the budget is inadequate, the number of investigators in the police is not sufficient, the author's suggestion is that the rules regarding the title of cases in the police are made in detail in the Criminal Procedure Code
Kajian Yuridis Pelaksanaan Aksi Hak Asasi Manusia Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Setiaji Wibowo; Joko Widarto; Markoni Markoni; Wasis Susetio
Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol 4 No 4 (2023): Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Publisher : CV. Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jst.v4i4.719

Abstract

Indonesia as a Law State upholds human rights as stated in constitution and law. After Indonesia Reformation, one of the efforts to fulfill human rights by Indonesian Government is stated in National Action Plan for Human Rights (RANHAM) implemented through 5 year phase and is currently on the fifth generation. Each generation has its target and accomplishment based on the development of current human rights issues in Indonesia. RANHAM has a long coverage as a tool to fulfill human rights for its encouragement on the cooperation between ministries and institutions as well as local government (province and district level). This research explains RANHAM success and challenges as mandated by Presidential Regulation Number 53 of 2021 to fulfill human rights for persons with disabilities corresponds with Law Number 39 of 1999 and Law Number 8 of 2016. This research uses normative method by studying material from the secondary sources. Normative research aims to direct, analyze, systemize, interpret, and evaluate positive law. The research shows that the implementation of RANHAM in 2021 is the form of human rights fulfilment by Indonesian Government as its responsibility as written in constitution article 28I section 4 and Indonesian Law of Human Rights Number 39 of 1999. The challenge arises from RANHAM could be mitigated by Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 19 of 2022 and by the policy made by Directorate General of Human Rights as the secretariat of RANHAM national committee. The first recommendation suggests that RANHAM national committee monitor and facilitate the implementation of RANHAM by other Indonesian government institution. The second recommendation suggests that Directorate General of Human Rights could further strengthen its authority to coordinate with other government institution.