Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Dispen-ku Android-Based Application: Assisting Religious Court Judges in Deciding for Marriage Dispensation Zuhriah, Erfaniah; Mayasari, Lutfiana Dwi; Rahmawati, Erik Sabti; Razak, Abdul Qayuum Bin Abdul; Sukadi, Imam
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i2.8773

Abstract

The high rate of child marriage in Indonesia following the marriage dispensation procedure demands an application to help judges decide the proposals accurately and effectively. This 4D development model research aims to create a standard reference in making decisions regarding the dispensation of marriage proposals using an application. The first stage is defining variables used at the application as measurement, the second stage is designing, namely the process of preparing a conceptual framework in the form of technological innovation, the third stage is developing technological innovation and the fourth stage is disseminating, namely the use of an application. At the defining stage, the variables to measure the level of urgency in granting the marriage dispensation include Social, Partnership Role, Financial, Spiritual, and Reproductive or Sexual Readiness. At the designing stage, the Dispen-Ku application is created using Kodular, a website that provides tools for creating Android applications using block programming. In the disseminating stage, the Dispen-ku application which has been uploaded to the Playstore page is distributed to research subjects, namely two judges in Religious Courts.
Contextualizing Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia: Addressing Negative Stigma Bachri, Syabbul; Sudirman, Sudirman; Zuhriah, Erfaniah; Ramadhita, Ramadhita
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jua.v7i2.35041

Abstract

Islamic inheritance law is stigmatized due to its rigidity and conservativity. The rigidity and conservatism of Islamic inheritance can be seen in the view that Islamic inheritance rules cannot be changed or modified. In addition, the assumption of Islamic inheritance rules does not consider the social developments that occur over time. This research aims to explore how Islamic inheritance law is applied in Indonesia and how contextualization is carried out in response to existing stigma. This research employs a qualitative study with a normative juridical approach. The research data is derived from documents and texts on Islamic inheritance law and concrete cases of contextualization of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia in different situations and contexts. The data are analyzed using descriptive interpretative techniques with the application of Amina Wadud's hermeneutics of tauhid. The research findings indicate that Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia has undergone contextualization, thus negating the negative stigma attached to Islamic inheritance. Contextualization is achieved by understanding and advocating Islamic inheritance law in the Indonesian context, reconstructing the basic concepts of Islamic inheritance law according to the Indonesian context, and promoting the resolution of inheritance conflicts through consultation and mediation. This research offers a model of inheritance division applied in Indonesia that is contextual and flexible based on Amina Wadud's hermeneutics of tauhid.
Studi Yuridis Sosiologis Perlindungan Hukum Pencatatan Perkawinan Penghayat Kepercayaan Suku Samin di Kabupaten Blora Fuadi, Mohammad Irvan Nafis; Zuhriah, Erfaniah; Muhammad, Muhammad
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum November
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v7i2.6241

Abstract

This study is motivated by the persistent gap between the constitutional recognition of indigenous belief adherents following Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 and the actual administrative practices in Blora Regency, particularly regarding the marriage registration of the Samin community. This research aims to analyze the forms of legal protection, policy implementation, and the structural, substantive, and cultural barriers affecting the marriage registration of Samin Indigenous Faith Adherents. Using a qualitative approach and Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and analyzed using descriptive qualitative techniques. The findings reveal that although legal instruments such as Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 and Government Regulation No. 40/2019 formally acknowledge indigenous believers, implementation at the local level remains constrained by administrative unpreparedness, limited public outreach, bureaucratic complexity, and low legal awareness. The practice of listing Islam on identity cards (KTP) has become a pragmatic strategy for administrative convenience, but it hinders the community’s ability to register marriages as indigenous belief adherents. The imbalance among legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture results in ineffective legal protection. This study concludes that systemic reforms are required, including capacity-building for local officials, the establishment of standardized procedures for marriage registration, the development of supportive local regulations, and more inclusive legal education and outreach programs. These recommendations are expected to ensure equal and culturally respectful marriage registration services for the Samin community.
A Review of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice on the Implementation of Restorative Justice Through Penal Mediation in Indonesia Ahmad Wildan Rofrofil Akmal; Siti Nur Syifa; Erfaniah Zuhriah
QIYAS: JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM DAN PERADILAN Vol 10, No 2 (2025): OKTOBER
Publisher : UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/qys.v10i2.7790

Abstract

Abstracts: This study examines the implementation of restorative justice through the mechanism of penal mediation within Indonesia's criminal justice system, using John Rawls’ theory of justice as a theoretical framework. The research is grounded in the need for a more humane, participatory, and efficient alternative for resolving minor criminal offenses, as opposed to the conventional retributive justice system. This is a normative legal study employing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The data sources consist of primary and secondary legal materials obtained through literature review. The findings reveal that penal mediation has been applied in cases such as petty theft, defamation, and domestic violence, involving offenders, victims, families, and the community in the restorative process. This implementation reflects Rawls’ principles of justice particularly the equal basic liberties and the difference principle—in protecting vulnerable groups such as juvenile offenders and first-time offenders. In conclusion, penal mediation aligns not only with restorative justice values and the Islamic legal concept of maslahah, but also embodies a substantive model of justice that is inclusive and responsive to local values. Therefore, this approach deserves to be formally institutionalized within the national criminal law system.Keywords: Penal mediation, restorative justice, John Rawls’ theory of justice, Indonesian criminal law, non-litigation resolution.Abstrak : Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan keadilan restoratif melalui mekanisme mediasi penal dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, dengan menggunakan perspektif teori keadilan John Rawls. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari kebutuhan untuk menghadirkan alternatif penyelesaian perkara pidana ringan yang lebih manusiawi, partisipatif, dan efisien dibandingkan sistem peradilan konvensional yang cenderung retributif. Penelitian ini merupakan studi hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Sumber data diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mediasi penal telah diterapkan dalam sejumlah kasus seperti pencurian ringan, penghinaan, dan kekerasan rumah tangga, dengan melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga, dan masyarakat dalam proses pemulihan. Implementasi ini mencerminkan prinsip keadilan Rawls, yaitu kebebasan dasar yang setara dan prinsip perbedaan, khususnya dalam melindungi pelaku dari kelompok rentan seperti anak dan pelaku pertama. Kesimpulannya, mediasi penal bukan hanya sejalan dengan nilai-nilai keadilan restoratif dan maslahah dalam hukum Islam, tetapi juga mencerminkan prinsip keadilan substantif yang inklusif dan adaptif terhadap nilai lokal. Oleh karena itu, pendekatan ini layak untuk dilembagakan secara normatif dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional.Kata kunci: Mediasi penal, keadilan restoratif, teori keadilan John Rawls, hukum pidana Indonesia, penyelesaian non-litigasi.