Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW

Status Hukum dan Perlindungan Jaminan Sosial terhadap Pekerja Ojek Online dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Muhammad Raqel Elang Pangestu; Henry Arianto
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v9i1.17052

Abstract

The development of digital transportation technology has led to the rise of online motorcycle taxis as an application-based economic innovation that employs a large workforce. However, classifying drivers as partners rather than workers has created legal issues, particularly regarding labor protection and social security. This study analyzes the legal status of online motorcycle taxi drivers under Indonesian labor law and examines the form of social security protection available in Indonesia and several other countries. Using a normative-empirical legal method with a qualitative approach, data were obtained through statutory review, literature study, and interviews with drivers, platform operators, and the Department of Manpower. The results show that the relationship between platforms and drivers meets the elements of work, wages, and control that legally define an employment relationship, despite being formally categorized as a partnership. Consequently, drivers do not receive social security protection as workers and must pay contributions independently. Comparative studies in the United Kingdom and Singapore reveal clearer legal recognition of platform-based workers. In conclusion, regulatory reform is needed in Indonesia to align labor and social security frameworks with technological developments and ensure equal protection for online motorcycle taxi drivers.
Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Pandi serta Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) dalam Sengketa Nama Domain Misyela, Kezia; Henry Arianto
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v9i1.17053

Abstract

The rapid growth of information technology has led to a significant rise in the use of domain names as strategic digital identities for individuals, businesses, and institutions. This development increases the likelihood of disputes, particularly when domain names are registered or used without proper rights or in bad faith. This study examines the legal standing and binding force of decisions issued by the Indonesian Internet Domain Name Registry (PANDI) and analyzes the procedural model of dispute resolution through the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Process (PPND) within Indonesia’s legal framework. Using a normative juridical approach, this research reviews relevant legislation, regulatory instruments, and academic literature on domain name governance and Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The findings indicate that PANDI’s decisions are binding within the non-litigation system and derive their authority from statutory mandates, while still allowing parties to challenge the outcome before the Commercial Court. Furthermore, the PPND mechanism demonstrates efficiency and adaptability, embodying the principles of responsive law and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Consequently, PPND serves as an essential mechanism for ensuring legal certainty and maintaining the integrity of Indonesia’s digital landscape.