Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.265
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Ius Constituendum JURNAL MERCATORIA Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Jurnal Darma Agung LEGAL BRIEF International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Al-Hikmah JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Law_Jurnal Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL
Sunarmi, Sunarmi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 134 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 134 Documents
Search

 10   11   12   13   14 
Risiko Hukum Penggunaan Smart Contract pada Ethereum di Indonesia M. Ulul Azmi; Sunarmi Sunarmi; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 3 - March 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i3.140

Abstract

Aktivitas ekonomi secara global telah beradaptasi dan melakukan digitalisasi, ekonomi digital membuat aktivitas bisnis masyarakat berubah, dari yang awalnya bersifat manual kini perlahan bertransformasi menjadi serba digital, sehingga berbagai aktivitas menjadi lebih praktis dan efesien. Dibalik kelebihan yang ditawarkan namun ada hal penting lainnya yang perlu diperhatikan yaitu mengenai risiko-risiko yang akan ditimbulkan terkait aktivitas tersebut mengingat belum adanya regulasi yang mengatur secara khusus di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana risiko hukum yang ditimbulkan terhadap penggunaan smart contract pada ethereum di Indonesia. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah risiko hukum penggunaan smart contract pada ethereum di Indonesia dapat ditimbulkan dari berbagai sisi mulai dari risiko hukum regulasi, risiko hukum kontrak, dan risiko kepatuhan.
Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kelalaian Petugas Bank Terhadap Surat Peringatan Lelang Tanpa Tanda Tangan Nasabah (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 40/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn) Ferawati Br.Tarigan; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto; Mahmul Siregar
Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Vol 2, No 2 (2023): Januari - Juni
Publisher : Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection which is explained in Article 18 concerning Standard Clauses, it explains the provisions in making an agreement that includes standard clauses. Customers as consumers are required to receive legal protection for the use of service products offered by the bank. Guarantees with Mortgage are given through the Deed of Granting Mortgage (APHT), if the debtor as the provider of Mortgage is in default (default). Execution of the Mortgage Guarantee is the last step taken by the creditor as the recipient of the Mortgage if the creditor or bank in collecting non-performing financing is not effective enough, then based on Article 20 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage, it can be conducted by way of public auction.This study uses a normative juridical approach. The normative juridical approach is an approach that is based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and laws and regulations related to this research.
PERBEDAAN PUTUSAN PRAPID P.N. TARUTUNG NO. 6/PID.PRA/2020 DAN PUTUSAN PRAPID P.N. MEDAN NO. 5/PID.PRA/2021 Jenda Riahta Silaban; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmud Mulyadi
Law Jurnal Vol 3, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v3i2.3103

Abstract

ABSTRACTDecision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 21/PUU-XII/2014,date. 28/04/2015, expanded the prepid object regarding "the validity of the determinationof the suspect". One of the cases regarding testing the validity of the suspectdetermination in this study was between the Pre-Trial Decision at the Tarutung DistrictCourt No. 6/Pid.Pre/2020, date. 31/08/2020 which is different from the Medan DistrictCourt No. 5/Pid.Pre/2021, date. 16/02/2021 An. Petitioner "P.S.H". The problems are:Factors that influence the disparity in the pretrial decision on the determination of differentcorruption suspects in the Prapid P.N.Trt Decision. No. 6/Pid.Pra/2020 with the Decisionof Prapid P.N.Mdn. No. 5/Pid.Pre/2021; and Analysis of legal considerations for thedisparity of the pretrial decision. This research is normative legal research, which isdescriptive analysis in nature. The Investigating Prosecutor at the North SumatraProsecutor's Office has done this and corrected the entire series of investigations andinvestigations, so the determination of the suspect he has determined is appropriate anddeclared valid by the pretrial judge at the Medan District Court. In the context of theinvestigation conducted by the Attorney General's Office Investigator HumbangHasundutan, it was actually only an error in the administration of investigations andinvestigations. The administrative error, by setting the suspect first, instead of findingsufficient evidence as ordered by law. Determination of suspects should be carried outbased on Article 183 jo. Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code jo.Article 422 Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia No. PERJA-039/A/JA/10/2010 concerning Administrative and Technical Management of Cases ofSpecial Crimes.Keywords: Pretrial; The validity of the determination of the suspect; District Court.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP JUDI ONLINE DI POLDA SUMATERA UTARA KAITANNYA DENGAN KEABSAHAN PEMBUKTIAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK Taryono Raharja; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi; Sunarmi Sunarmi
Law Jurnal Vol 3, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v3i2.3100

Abstract

ABSTRACTSoccer betting and poker are electronic crimes, but in the process of snaring offenses they often stilluse the provisions of Article 303 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, instead of referring to theprovisions of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The policyposition of Law no. 11 of 2008 is a special position according to the principle of "lex specialis derogatlex generalis". The gap in Article 63 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code which still regulates theprovisions of special criminal rules is seen to overlap with the position of Article 27 of the ITE Lawwhich carries a penalty of six years in prison. So it is considered important to discuss the rules ofposition in the online gambling investigation procedure at the North Sumatra Regional Police. Thisresearch will examine and analyze 1) How is criminal law enforcement against online gamblingcrimes at the North Sumatra Regional Police; and 2) The validity of electronic evidence in provingonline gambling crime cases. The results of the research formulate where law enforcement againstonline gambling crimes prioritizes due process of law indicators; and regarding the validity ofelectronic evidence as digital evidence in uncovering criminal cases of online gambling, it must fullymeet the evidentiary requirements, so that it can be used at the investigative level.Keywords: Law enforcement; online gambling; North Sumatra Police
PENYIDIKAN KASUS PELANGGARAN LALU LINTAS YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN: STUDI PADA SATLANTAS POLRESTA DELI SERDANG M. Adityo Andri Cahyo Prabowo; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Marlina Marlina
Law Jurnal Vol 3, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v3i2.3101

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe process of handling traffic violation cases often experiences obstacles, especially in theinvestigation of traffic violation cases that cause fatalities. This study deliberately raises theObstacles faced by the Deli Serdang Police Traffic Unit in investigating and investigating casesof traffic violations that caused the death of motorized vehicle drivers, and the efforts of the DeliSerdang Police Traffic Unit in overcoming obstacles to investigations and investigations intocases of traffic violations that lead to the death of motorists. This research is a legal researchthat is descriptive in nature. Using a statutory approach. The results of the study show that:Obstacles faced by Sat Then investigators in investigating cases of violations that lead to death.The efforts made by the investigators are a process of raising awareness for Motorized Vehicledrivers to prioritize safety when driving on traffic roads that do not have road dividers. Wherethe driver's awareness and understanding efforts when overtaking the vehicle in front shouldtake into account the speed, space and time of the motorized vehicle being driven to avoidtraffic accidents; and the public should provide direct witness testimony in the field where thecrime scene (TKP) was conducted to the Traffic Unit Officer of the Deli Serdang Police who wason duty because to maintain the integrity of the information obtained from witnessing a trafficaccident as a whole.Keywords: Violation; death; Deli Serdang Traffic Unit
PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA ONLINE DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI POSO Jimmy Donovan; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmud Mulyadi
Law Jurnal Vol 3, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v3i2.3102

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe concept of proof in online criminal trials in early research is often echoed thatevidence tends to be a formality, even though detention is carried out. So that tends to bein online crime, the defendant/legal adviser cannot verify and identify the evidencesubmitted by the public prosecutor. While the evidence determines the truth whether thedefendant committed a crime or not. To find out the concept of implementing onlinecriminal justice during the Covid-19 period, as well as how to get around the obstacles andsolutions carried out by the Poso District Court regarding the concept of proof during theCovid 19 pandemic, it is necessary to conduct research. The results of the study foundthat in the context of proof it is necessary to maintain the system evidence in the contextof fulfillment of the nature of material truth. In order to get around the obstacles within thescope of the Poso District Court where the obstacles to fulfilling the principle of trials thatare open to the public as well as technical obstacles within the scope of HumanResources in the legal structure system, it is necessary to complete the fulfillment ofelements in Technology and Information Personnel. To maximize the costs incurred thefulfillment strategy will be borne by the defendant.Keywords: Trial; Criminal Cases; Online; Poso District Court.
Penerapan Asas Equality Before the Law dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika Terhadap Pengguna Narkotika di Kalangan Publik Figur Zulkarnain Zulkarnain; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Edi Yunara
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 5 - May 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i5.160

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis penerapan asas equality before the law dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana narkotika terhadap pengguna narkotika di kalangan publik figur. Kajian dan analisis dilakukan dengan memperbandingkannya dengan kasus-kasus masyarakat biasa sebagai pengguna narkotika. Menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif bersifat deskriptif-analisis, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, penegakan hukum tindak pidana narkotika terhadap pengguna narkotika dapat direhabiltasi berdasarkan Peraturan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI, Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI, Menteri Kesehatan RI, Menteri Sosial RI, Jaksa Agung RI, Kepala Kepolisian Negara RI No. dan Kepala Badan Narkotika Nasional RI tentang Penanganan Pecandu Narkotika dan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika ke Dalam Lembaga Rehabilitasi; Kedua, penerapan asas equality before the law belum dapat berjalan efektif terhadap pelaku publik figur sebagai penyalahguna narkotika, bahkan terhadap publik figur, baik tuntutan maupun hukuman pidana penjara lebih berat lagi; Ketiga, penerapan asas equality before the law dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana narkotika terhadap pengguna narkotika di Indonesia terdapat hambatan-hambatan sistem hukum. Disarankan sebaiknya, Undang-Undang Narkotika No. 35 Tahun 2009 dilakukan amandemen terkait frase “Pengguna Narkotika” yang berdampak pada dihukumnya pengguna narkotika dengan pidana penjara. Dalam mengatasi hambatan tersebut, diperlukan upaya terintegrasi antara para stakeholder.
Pertimbangan Jaksa dalam Mengajukan Upaya Hukum Banding Terhadap Putusan Narkotika Pemidanaan yang Dituntut Rehabilitasi Hermoko Febriyanto; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Marlina Marlina
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 5 - May 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i5.164

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang pertimbangan hukum Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam pengajuan upaya banding terhadap perkara narkotika yang dituntut rehabilitasi sebagaimana dalam beberapa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sei Rampah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif bersifat deskriptif-analisis, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa pertimbangan hukum Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam pengajuan upaya banding dalam perkara narkotika yang dituntut rehabilitasi, majelis hakim belum menerapkan pemidanaan relatif terkait upaya perbaikan/pengobatan terhadap pelaku sebagai “Pecandu”, “Penyalah Guna”, dan “Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Disarankan sebaiknya hakim mempertimbangkan kategori pelaku dengan menggali fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan.
Peranan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam Pelaksanaan Restrukturisasi Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Melati Fitri; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmul Siregar
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 6 - June 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i6.165

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang peranan otoritas jasa keuangan dalam pelaksanaan restrukturisasi perjanjian kredit perbankan masa pandemi covid 19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif bersifat deskriptif-analisis, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa peranan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam pelaksanaan restrukturisasi perjanjian kredit perbankan di masa pandemi corona virus disease terbagi ke dalam empat bagian yaitu berperan sebagai pembuat regulasi, pelaksanaan pengawasan bank, penegakan hukum, dan perlindungan konsumen. Disarankan sebaiknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan melaksanakan fungsi penegakan hukumnya dengan memuat sanksi dalam Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Tentang Stimulus Perekonomian Nasional Sebagai Kebijakan Countercyclical Dampak Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 dan melakukan penindakan terhadap oknum-oknum bank yang menyalahgunakan kebijakan restrukturisasi perjanjian kredit perbankan.
PROBLEMATIC OF REFUSAL THE APPLICATIONS FOR SUSPENSION OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS FOR SUBSIDIARIES OF STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES Mhd Edwin Prananta Surbakti; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Budiman Ginting; Dedi Harianto
NOMOI Law Review Vol 4, No 1 (2023): May Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v4i1.14949

Abstract

The legal position of SOE subsidiaries does not have legal certainty, giving rise to multiple interpretations. There are multiple interpretations in statutory regulations and jurisprudential decisions, namely the decisions of the Supreme Court Number: 21P/HUM/2017 and the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 01/PHPU-PRES/XVII/2019. The approach used is the law approach, and the case approach. Source of data used in the form of secondary data. Data collection techniques and tools used were library research, field research, document studies and interview guides. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively. The results showed that the BUMN subsidiary, namely PTPN I, was a holding structure of PTPN III, which declared the status of a BUMN, due to direct state capital participation in the form of 1 Series A Dwi Warna share. In accordance with PP No. 72 of 2016 that a subsidiary in the holding structure, namely PTPN I, receives a special assignment from the government in the form of a Public Service Obligation (PSO), Management Rights (HPL) and the Partnership and Community Development Program (PKBL), Based on Article 2A Paragraph (7) ) a BUMN subsidiary in a holding structure, namely PTPN I, is treated the same as a BUMN. As a result, creditors are not authorized to apply for bankruptcy and PKPU, but are the Minister of Finance in accordance with Article 223 in conjunction with Article 2 paragraph (5) of Law Number 37 Years.
Co-Authors Aben Bintang Manondang Situmorang Ade Nona Halawa Ade Yuliany Siahaan Adi Saputra Adji Suryapranata Agnest Elga Margareth Agung Anugrah Lubis Agusmidah Agusmidah Aida Nur Hasanah Alemina Alemina Aloysius Supriyadi Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Amanda Serena Andreas Iriando Napitupulu Anthonius Ginting Arfin Fachreza Ashri Azhari Baeha Aulia Annisa Bagus Firman Wibowo Balqis Siagian Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution BUDIMAN GINTING Chandra Purnama Charles Silalahi Citra Valentina Nainggolan Dara Qurratu’ Aini Yusuf Dede Aquari Irawan Surbakti Dedi Harianto Delfani Febryana Lubis Deliana Simanjuntak Dezky Muji Setyo Diah Ayu Oktriningsih Dwi Putri Rezky Sihite Edi Yunara Ediwarman Ediwarman Edy Ikhsan Edy Suranta Tarigan Edy Yunara Efendi Tambunan Ekaputra Ekaputra Ekaputra, Mohammad Endame Suranta Ginting Eri Lukmanul Hakim Pulungan Faisal Akbar Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Anshari Dwana Fatimah Islamy Nasution Ferawati Br.Tarigan Fernando Enrico Fermi Partahi Finita Serena Hutabarat Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar Frans B.S. Siagian Frengky Manurung Gusfen Alextron Simangunsong Hady Saputra Siagian Hanifah Azizah Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasyim Purba Hendra Adiwijaya Hendra Eko Triyulianto Hermoko Febriyanto Ilham Rohjadina Iman Rahmat Gulo Imastian Chairandy Siregar Indah Chairani Saragih Indra Sakti Iqbal Ramadhan Satria Prawira Ismawansa Ismawansa Ivan Jovi Hutauruk Jelly Leviza Jenda Riahta Silaban Jhordy M.H. Nainggolan Jimmy Donovan Joharlan Hutagalung Juni Kristian Telaumbanua Jusmadi Sikumbang Kamaluddin Pane Keizerina Devi Keizerina Devi Azwar Kristi Emelia Pasaribu Kuo Bratakusuma Laurentia Ayu Kartika Putri Lisa Andriansyah Rizal M Febriyandri Satria M Yamin Lubis M. Adityo Andri Cahyo Prabowo M. Ekaputra M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Ichsan Rouyas Sitorus M. Ulul Azmi Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Manambus Pasaribu Maranatha Purba Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Martuasah Tobing Mayanti Mandasari Sitorus Melati Fitri Mhd Edwin Prananta Surbakti Mirza Nasution Muhammad Aulia Rizki Agsa Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Firdaus Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Haris Muhammad Hendra Razak Muhammad Husairi Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan Muhammad Syarif Muhammad Zhafran Nanda Lucya Gultom Nanin Aprilia Fitriani Novrilanimisy Novrilanimisy Nur Istiono Nurjannah Siregar O.K Saidin Omar Akbar Aldian Pinem Prayogo Hindrawan Putra Rizki Akbar Rachmat Aribowo Rahmat Anshar Hasibuan Ridho Ansari Simanjuntak Rina Alamanda Nasution Robert, Robert Ruben Tambunan Rudi Haposan Siahaan Rudy Rudy Rumondang Hotmayuliance N Runtung Runtung Selatieli Zendrato Sheila Miranda Hasibuan Simon Simon Sinulingga, Tommy Aditia Sondy Raharjanto Sri Endhayani Ginting Suka Sudarma Setiawan Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhdi Maulana Nst Suherman Nasution Sukarja, Detania Sukses M. P. Siburian, Sukses M. P. Sumurung P Simaremare Suranta Ramses Tarigan Surtan Harista Muda Hasibuan Surya Ari Wibowo Susi Muliyanti Sutan Sinomba Parlaungan Harahap Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafruddin Kalo Syafruddin Sulung Hasibuan T Keizerina Devi Azwar T. Devi Keizerina Azwar T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Tamiarisa Amanda Fasa Rambe Tan Kamello Taryono Raharja Taufik Taufik Tedi Franggoes Andri Siburian Tengku Keizerina Devi Teuku Fathir Mustafa Tri Murti Lubis Tumpal Utrecht Napitupulu Tunggul Yohannes Ucox Pratua Nugraha Utari Maharany Barus Utary Maharani Barus Utary Maharany Barus Venia Utami Keliat Vina Trinanda Dewi Wahyu Simon Tampubolon Widodo Ramadhana Yahya Ziqra Zam Zam Jamilah Zulkarnain Zulkarnain