Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Discover the Legal Concept in the Sociological Study Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Putu Edgar Tanaya; Bagus Hermanto
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (543.066 KB) | DOI: 10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.69

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper specifically examines the concept of law in a sociological study to find out how the law develops and how the law implemented or enforced as a unity in the legal system. This paper-based on the normative juridical method, using legal materials collected and analyzed using qualitative methods. The results show that the sociological of law studies as part of the activities of drafting legal products and the preparation of legal products is not just a juridical process. The processes of transformation from social desires into laws and regulations both in political and sociological contexts do not only occur during the formation of a regulation, continue and continually correct the legal products that produced. Law enforcement related to the sociology of law that observes the reality of how the law is working on different social structures, this scientific approach is expected to not only provide advice related to the development of legal science alone, but also must be applied, but unfortunately in the development of this science itself is not able to develop dynamically because observations that are not equally displayed in providing input to the development of legal protection in Indonesia.
Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 128/PUU-XIII/2015 dalam Pengisian Jabatan Perangkat Desa I Nengah Suantra; Bagus Hermanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (532.224 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1631

Abstract

Perubahan UUD NRI 1945 mendorong lahirnya Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pelindung konstitusi dan penjamin hak konstitusional warga negara Indonesia. Putusannya bersifat final dan mengikat, namun terdapat problematika berkaitan dengan kekuatan mengikat, makna filosofis dan akibat hukum implementasi Putusan Nomor 128/PUU-XII/2015 perihal pengujian atas Pasal 33 ayat (1) huruf g. dan Pasal 50 ayat (1) huruf c. UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa terkait syarat bagi calon kepala desa atau perangkat desa. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian dan penulisan hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Putusan MK No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 bermakna sebagai pengendalian sosial, merevitalisasi hak pilih warga Negara yang tadinya dianulir sebagai calon kepala desa atau perangkat desa, dan warga Negara yang berpendidikan paling rendah sekolah menengah umum atau sederajat dapat menggunakan hak konstitusionalnya dalam pengisian jabatan kepala desa atau perangkat desa. Putusan MK No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 termasuk putusan yang membatalkan suatu norma hukum, pelaksanaannya secara langsung sesuai dengan substansi, tanpa memerlukan perubahan terlebih dahulu atas UU No. 6 Tahun 2014. Hasil penelitian itu diharapkan dapat mendukung penguatan implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 128/PUU-XII/2015 dari aspek kekuatan mengikat, makna filosofis, dan akibat hukum implementasinya.Amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia encouraged the birth of the Constitutional Court as a protector of the constitution and a guarantor of the constitutional rights of Indonesian citizens. The decision is final and binding, but there are problems related to binding force, philosophical meaning and the legal consequences of the implementation of Decision Number 128/PUU-XII/2015 regarding the examination of Article 33 paragraph (1) letter g. and Article 50 paragraph (1) letter c. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages relates to requirements for prospective village heads or village officials. This paper uses research methods and normative law writing with a statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 means as social control, revitalizing the voting rights of citizens who were previously disqualified as candidates for village head or village officers, and citizens with the lowest education of public high school or equivalent can use their constitutional rights in filling the position of village head or village officials.  Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 including decisions that cancel a legal norm, its implementation is directly in accordance with the substance, without requiring prior changes to Law No. 6 of 2014. The results of the study are expected to support the strength of the implementation of the Constitutional Court Ruling Number 128/PUU-XII/2015 in terms of binding force, philosophical meaning, and the legal consequences of its implementation.  
Implementasi Green Constitution di Indonesia: Jaminan Hak Konstitusional Pembangunan Lingkungan Hidup Berkelanjutan I Gede Yusa; Bagus Hermanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (515.038 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1524

Abstract

Konsep Green Constitution yang telah diadopsi dalam beberapa konstitusi di dunia seperti Konstitusi Ekuador 2008 dan Konstitusi Perancis 2005, selaras dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 pasca amandemen yang memuat konsep Green Constitution sebagaimana dirumuskan pada Pasal 28H Ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 yang mencerminkan generasi hak asasi manusia ketiga yakni hak kolektif dan hak pembangunan, berupa hak atas lingkungan hidup, serta Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 yang mencerminkan pembangunan lingkungan hidup yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia secara konstitusional. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menganalisis konsep Green Constitution di dalam Konstitusi Indonesia (UUD NRI Tahun 1945). Di sisi lain, juga secara intensif mengkritisi implementasi dari konsep Green Constitution yang berkaitan dengan pembangunan lingkungan hidup yang berkelanjutan. Tulisan ini berfokus pada dua permasalahan hukum yakni : bagaimanakah konsep Green Constitution dalam konteks UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan pengaturannya di Indonesia serta bagaimanakah implementasi konsep Green Constitution dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dalam konteks menjamin hak asasi manusia atas lingkungan hidup berkelanjutan. Adapun tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan metode penulisan socio-legal dengan pendekatan studi konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Melalui tulisan ini diharapkan dapat menegaskan bahwa konsep Green Constitution di Indonesia dimaknai sebagai konstitutionalisasi norma hukum lingkungan sebagaimana diatur dan terimplementasi dalam ketentuan Pasal 28H ayat (1) dan Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 serta konsiderans menimbang huruf a, b, f, Pasal 1 angka (2), Pasal 44, Penjelasan Bagian I. Umum angka (1) dan (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Namun demikian, Green Constitution belum tercermin secara holistik, terbatas pada indikator masyarakat, namun belum didukung indikator hukum dan indikator pelaksana praktik hukum.Green Constitution concept which has been adopted by several constitution in the world such as The Constitution of Ecuador 2008 and The Constitution of France 2005, inline with 1945 Indonesian Constitution after Amendment that contains Green Constitution concept in the Article 28H paragraph (1) 1945 Indonesian Constitution which shows the third human rights generation such as collective rights and development rights especially the rights of environmental, and in Article 33 paragraph (4) 1945 Indonesian Constitution that contains sustainable environmental development in Indonesia constitutionally. The main purpose of this journal is to analyze the concept of Green Constitution in the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Besides, it also intends to criticize the implementation of the Green Constitution concept that relates to sustainable environmental development. This paper focuses on two law problems: how the concept of green constitution in 1945 Indonesian Constitution with other regulations is and how the implementation of green constitution concept in the 1945 Indonesian Constitution in the context guarantee human right for sustainable environmental development is. This paper is set as a socio-legal Research with conceptual study and statutory approach. This paper is expected to affirm that the Green Constitution in Indonesia is valued as environmental norm constitution as arranged and implemented in Article 28H paragraph (1) and Article 33 paragraph (4) 1945 Indonesian Constitution and Considering part a, b, f, Article 1 Sub-article (2), Article 44, Elucidation I. General part (1) and (5) The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 Year 2009 about Protection and Management of Environment. However, the Green Constitution has not been reflected holistically. It is still limited on society indicators and has not been supported by legal indicators and indicators of legal practice.
Are there Obstacles after the Administrative Court Absolute Competence Extension of Indonesia? Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana; Bagus Hermanto
Varia Justicia Vol 16 No 2 (2020): Vol 16 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/variajusticia.v16i2.3590

Abstract

The enactment of the Law Number 30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration with the expansion of Administrative Court competence stimulate confusion and obstacles in norms and theoretical also practical obstacles for the justice enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges. On the other hand, this law is contrary and potentially conflict with Government Administration Law. To resolve this legal problem, Indonesia Supreme Court issuing several Supreme Court Regulation and Circular Letter of Supreme Court for each expansion of Administrative Court competence otherwise the confusion and obstacle in theoretical and practical spheres still conducted the problem for the justice enforcers. This study has aims to analyze and discuss concerning confusion and obstacles faced by enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges and the attitude or solution towards those obstacles. This study is using normative and empirical method with qualitative types as a descriptive analysis article.
Dynamics on Constitutional Court Decision towards Indonesia Citizenship Arrangement: Dinamika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Pengaturan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia Bagus Hermanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2023

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution amendment led into Indonesia state order transition that related also towards state fundamental aspects, including citizenship issue. Discourse has been raises on material and formal context on citizenship arrangement, and develops consideration according to Constitutional Court consent into several Constitutional Court Decisions. This article intention related on dynamics and problematic over citizenship arrangement after Indonesi reform, and Constitutional Court Decision consideration on citizenship issues to evaluate needs to reformulate citizenship arrangement. This article was arranged based on legal research with thesis on arrangement dynamics and Constitutional Court Decision relevance on citizenship supported with statutory laws, conceptual, legal facts, and legal cases approaches. The results reflected citizenship arrangement dynamics related material, formal, legal needs, era and human rights development comprehensively. The Constitutional Court Decision considers Indonesia citizenship into nationalities, maximum protection, full constitutional rights, and comitment to defending single citizenship stelsel into current statutory laws.
Quo Vadis Protection of The Basic Rights of Indonesian Workers: Highlighting The Omnibus Legislation and Job Creation Law Nyoman Mas Aryani; Ayu Putu Laksmi Danyathi; Bagus Hermanto
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 17, No 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.34948

Abstract

This article focused on the dynamics following the enactment of the Law on Job Creation. Pros and cons were raised publicly, with proponents arguing that the Omnibus Legislation method could be used to propose leaps and further forward steps for national economic acceleration with more effective and efficient investment and the creation of new job fields in Indonesia. However, the opposition argued that this law, enacted using the Omnibus Legislation method, was not prepared and did not involve workers or worker unions in the lawmaking process prior to its enactment. Furthermore, this law has crucial and controversial provisions that weaken workers’ rights fulfillment compared to the previous arrangement. This condition is the primary issue that created a chasm between workers with their rights and their employers, and it is the basis for further analysis of legal norms in the entirety of the Law on Manpower and the Law on Job Creation. With the use of a normative legal research method supported by a statutory law approach and a legal conceptual approach, as well as a legal material searching method and argumentative analysis, legal research is conducted. This article discovers and proposes fundamental principles, concept formulation, and concept proof comprehensively regarding Employment Law policy dynamics in Indonesia and pursues basic rights of workers protection after enactment of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation to ensure the realization of worker rights protection including industrial relations problem, and certainty guarantee that Employer must fulfill.
Kendala Dan Cara Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca UU Administrasi Pemerintahan: Suatu Pendekatan Atas Penanganan Perkara Fiktif Positif Wairocana, I Gusti Ngurah; Layang, I Wayan Bela Siki; Sudiarta, I Ketut; Martana, Putu Ade Hariestha; Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

After the enactment of the Law of Government Administration, had implied to shifting paradigm concerning the regime of Administrative Decision from negative fictive became positive fictive. However, the regulation into Law of Government Administration contains several obstacles on pratical scope towards Administrative Court Judges. Meanwhile enactment of Supreme Court regulation however Adiministrative Court Judges searching the suitable method after implication of positive fictive regime in the Administrative Procedural Law System. This study aims to analyze and discuss concerning obstacles and method by the Administrative Court Judges solving the practical obstacles after enactment of the Law of Government Administration. This study results is presented in a descriptive analysis paper.
Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede; Hermanto, Bagus; da Cruz, Rosino; Wisnaeni, Fifiana
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.55819

Abstract

The quality of regulatory and legislative measures, both within and outside the hierarchy in Indonesia, can be assessed using certain indicators. These indicators demonstrate a stagnation and a slight shift towards other legal issues. To improve the quality of regulatory and legislative measures, it is necessary to amend preventive and evaluative mechanisms. This condition provides a foundation for further analysis of all problems, with a focus on creating a positive system that prioritizes urgency and required improvements. This paper aims to analyze the preventive and evaluative mechanisms of legislation in Indonesia objectively. This article uses the doctrinal legal method, utilizing legal concepts, statutory laws, legal facts, and legal case approaches. It suggests amending the current mechanism and recommends reforms towards both preventive and evaluative mechanisms to improve regulatory and legislative quality in Indonesia. This study was concerned with formulating grounded principles and concepts, and providing proof of concept for preventive and evaluative mechanisms towards statutory laws, which would ensure the sustainability of Indonesia's legislative and regulatory reform.
Justifikasi Hak Politik Mantan Narapidana: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perundang-Undangan Aryani, Nyoman Mas; Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (392.298 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1729

Abstract

Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 regarding judicial review which invalidates the provisions of the Article 4 paragraph (3) of the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 which states the prohibition of including candidates who are ex-convicts of drug cases, sexual crimes and corruption. However, the enactment of General Election Commission Regulation triggered pros and cons. On the one hand, the substance of the regulation regulates the prohibition and revoking the political rights of ex-convicted and contrary with the higher regulations, because it regulates the contrary substance with higher regulation. But on the other hand, this is a progressive step which is the hope for parties to shown the good image and free corruption legislative bodies. This paper raises 2 (two) problem formulations are (1) how is the regulation through the Election Commission Regulation related to political rights of convicted corruption cases and (2) how is the justification of the Human Rights dimension of the political rights of ex-corruption convicted. The purpose of this paper is to examine and find out how the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 regulates the political rights of ex-corruption convicted as well as legal implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018 towards General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018. This study specifically uses normative legal method through library research and analyzed systematization into a descriptive analytical paper. The results showed that the enactment of the Election Commission Regulation that normalized the prohibition of passive political rights for ex-convicts contained several weaknesses and ultimately annulled by the Supreme Court’s Decision. Viewed from the perspective of Human Rights related to political-rights, in its application, there must be a limitation in the time of the revocation of rights.
The Guardian of Ideology and the Pancasila by the Constitutional Court Decision Hermanto, Bagus; Mas Aryani, Nyoman
Literasi Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): LITERASI HUKUM
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/lh.v7i2.7697

Abstract

The Constitutional Court also fulfils its role as guardian of ideology as a judicial institution with special authority. This has been attempted through a number of Constitutional Court decisions that have been the basis for the positioning and repositioning of Pancasila in its proper state. In particular, this paper investigates, reviews and analyses the role of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of ideology, the practice of various Constitutional Court decisions that reflect efforts as the custodian of ideology, as well as the attitude or direction of the Constitutional Court in maintaining the spirit of Pancasila in relation to the role of custodian of ideology. This paper shows that through its role in re-establishing the inseparable relationship between Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, which is the basis for resolving constitutional cases, the Constitutional Court has endeavoured to uphold Pancasila. Nevertheless, critics argue that the use of Pancasila as a touchstone has led to legal uncertainty, and that elements of the state apparatus still make historical mistakes in the placement of Pancasila.