Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

KENDALA DAN CARA HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PASCA UU ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN: SUATU PENDEKATAN ATAS PENANGANAN PERKARA FIKTIF POSITIF Wairocana, I Gusti Ngurah; Layang, I Wayan Bela Siki; Sudiarta, I Ketut; Martana, Putu Ade Hariestha; Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

After the enactment of the Law of Government Administration, had implied to shifting paradigm concerning the regime of Administrative Decision from negative fictive became positive fictive. However, the regulation into Law of Government Administration contains several obstacles on pratical scope towards Administrative Court Judges. Meanwhile enactment of Supreme Court regulation however Adiministrative Court Judges searching the suitable method after implication of positive fictive regime in the Administrative Procedural Law System. This study aims to analyze and discuss concerning obstacles and method by the Administrative Court Judges solving the practical obstacles after enactment of the Law of Government Administration. This study results is presented in a descriptive analysis paper.
Quo Vadis Pengadilan Khusus di Indonesia dalam Batasan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bagus Hermanto; Nyoman Mas Aryani
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.403-418

Abstract

In Indonesia, special courts represent a phenomenon of judicial deference which is associated with an independent judicial system and supports the efficient and effective administration of justice. However, the practice in Indonesia shows that there is a need for further discursive research and thinking in the organization of the special justice system in Indonesia, based on internal and external issues in the realization of a special justice order that promotes substantive justice and is based on effectiveness, efficiency, and justice that is based on the needs of legal specificity under the specialized court context. This article utilizes dogmatic legal research based on a statutory approach, a case law approach, and a conceptual approach on a micro-legal research basis to examine the revamping of special courts in Indonesia, including the elaboration of Constitutional Court Decisions relevant to the strengthening of constitutional consolidation in post-reform Indonesia. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that the dynamics of special justice in Indonesia seem to be based on specific needs, international intervention in several cases, and ideas when the 1945 Constitution was amended by strengthening in accordance with conditions and times to achieve substantive justice. Similarly, the failure to build several special courts has become a discourse in recent decades, as various Constitutional Court decisions have directed topics that may be seen in the formation of special courts in the future. These include the existence of electoral and medical courts, which have also emerged as ideas for revamping specialized courts in Indonesia.
Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede; Hermanto, Bagus; da Cruz, Rosino; Wisnaeni, Fifiana
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.55819

Abstract

The quality of regulatory and legislative measures, both within and outside the hierarchy in Indonesia, can be assessed using certain indicators. These indicators demonstrate a stagnation and a slight shift towards other legal issues. To improve the quality of regulatory and legislative measures, it is necessary to amend preventive and evaluative mechanisms. This condition provides a foundation for further analysis of all problems, with a focus on creating a positive system that prioritizes urgency and required improvements. This paper aims to analyze the preventive and evaluative mechanisms of legislation in Indonesia objectively. This article uses the doctrinal legal method, utilizing legal concepts, statutory laws, legal facts, and legal case approaches. It suggests amending the current mechanism and recommends reforms towards both preventive and evaluative mechanisms to improve regulatory and legislative quality in Indonesia. This study was concerned with formulating grounded principles and concepts, and providing proof of concept for preventive and evaluative mechanisms towards statutory laws, which would ensure the sustainability of Indonesia's legislative and regulatory reform.
Indonesia's Directive Legislation: Balancing with Pancasila Law-Idea Hermanto, Bagus; Subawa, Made; Hattori, Mariko; Ivory, Jared
Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2024
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52738/pjk.v4i2.568

Abstract

The implementation of the Omnibus Law in the formation of laws and regulations in Indonesia commenced with the introduction of directive legislation in a range of sectors. Conversely, the Omnibus Law has given rise to a number of issues, particularly in relation to the Pancasila law-idea. This is because the Omnibus Law is perceived to be at odds with the Pancasila law-idea, with critics arguing that it fails to reflect the spirit of Pancasila in terms of both practice and legislative methodology. This paper aims to examine, evaluate and identify potential avenues for the development of national regulations in alignment with the principles of the Omnibus Law, taking into account the role of Pancasila as an ideological and legal foundation. This paper demonstrates that the Pancasila idea-law can serve to balance and harmonise the various understandings held by countries around the world, particularly in relation to the application of the Pancasila law-idea as a foundation in the practice of Omnibus Law and the formation of national regulations.
Justifikasi Hak Politik Mantan Narapidana: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perundang-Undangan Aryani, Nyoman Mas; Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (392.298 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1729

Abstract

Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 regarding judicial review which invalidates the provisions of the Article 4 paragraph (3) of the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 which states the prohibition of including candidates who are ex-convicts of drug cases, sexual crimes and corruption. However, the enactment of General Election Commission Regulation triggered pros and cons. On the one hand, the substance of the regulation regulates the prohibition and revoking the political rights of ex-convicted and contrary with the higher regulations, because it regulates the contrary substance with higher regulation. But on the other hand, this is a progressive step which is the hope for parties to shown the good image and free corruption legislative bodies. This paper raises 2 (two) problem formulations are (1) how is the regulation through the Election Commission Regulation related to political rights of convicted corruption cases and (2) how is the justification of the Human Rights dimension of the political rights of ex-corruption convicted. The purpose of this paper is to examine and find out how the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 regulates the political rights of ex-corruption convicted as well as legal implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018 towards General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018. This study specifically uses normative legal method through library research and analyzed systematization into a descriptive analytical paper. The results showed that the enactment of the Election Commission Regulation that normalized the prohibition of passive political rights for ex-convicts contained several weaknesses and ultimately annulled by the Supreme Court’s Decision. Viewed from the perspective of Human Rights related to political-rights, in its application, there must be a limitation in the time of the revocation of rights.
QUO VADIS PENGATURAN PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN DALAM BINGKAI PEMBENAHAN HUKUM KEWARGANEGARAAN INDONESIA: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 80/PUU-XIV/2016 dan Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015; Putusan Nomor 279/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Jpr; Nomor 297/Pdt/2009/PT.Smg; dan Nomor 321/Pdt/2009/PT.Smg Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Child Protection
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v17i2.703

Abstract

Dinamika pasca reformasi mendorong sejumlah perubahan dan pergeseran paradigmatik terhadap tatanan ketatanegaraan Indonesia, terkait aspek kewarganegaraan yang mengalami sejumlah pergeseran dan perubahan dalam kurun dua dekade terakhir. Pergeseran karakter ketatanegaraan yang mendorong reformasi hukum kewarganegaraan juga mendorong sejumlah isu sensitif termasuk perkawinan campuran menjadi salah satu aspek penting yang diatur dalamnya. Namun demikian problematik mengemuka ditandai dengan temuan sejumlah putusan pengadilan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mencirikan perlunya pembenahan pengaturan kewarganegaraan khususnya perkawinan campuran ke depan. Tulisan ini menelisik lebih jauh terkait dengan dinamika pada putusan pengadilan serta pelbagai pertimbangan hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait dengan perkawinan campuran dalam konteks pembenahan hukum kewarganegaraan di Indonesia, serta tulisan ini mengkaji dan menganalisis lebih mendalam terkait ius constituendum pengaturan kewarganegaraan yang khususnya menyangkut perkawinan campuran. Adapun permasalahan yang dianalisis pada tulisan ini terkait dengan dinamika dan problematik perkawinan campuran yang muncul dalam telaah putusan pengadilan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, serta pengaturan ke depan terkait perkawinan campuran yang merefleksikan hak asasi manusia. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dalam bingkai penelitian hukum makro menyasar pada pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual hukum serta studi kasus hukum. Hasil akhir tulisan ini bahwa problematik yang fundamental berangkat dari masalah formal dan material pengaturan kewarganegaraan berimplikasi terhadap pengaturan perkawinan campuran yang ditandai sebagai problematik sebagaimana sejumlah putusan pengadilan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait. Tawaran alternatif yang penting yakni reformulasi Undang-Undang Kewarganegaraan yang mengatur terkait perkawinan campuran mencirikan nilai hak asasi manusia ke depan.
The Guardian of Ideology and the Pancasila by the Constitutional Court Decision Hermanto, Bagus; Mas Aryani, Nyoman
Literasi Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): LITERASI HUKUM
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/lh.v7i2.7697

Abstract

The Constitutional Court also fulfils its role as guardian of ideology as a judicial institution with special authority. This has been attempted through a number of Constitutional Court decisions that have been the basis for the positioning and repositioning of Pancasila in its proper state. In particular, this paper investigates, reviews and analyses the role of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of ideology, the practice of various Constitutional Court decisions that reflect efforts as the custodian of ideology, as well as the attitude or direction of the Constitutional Court in maintaining the spirit of Pancasila in relation to the role of custodian of ideology. This paper shows that through its role in re-establishing the inseparable relationship between Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, which is the basis for resolving constitutional cases, the Constitutional Court has endeavoured to uphold Pancasila. Nevertheless, critics argue that the use of Pancasila as a touchstone has led to legal uncertainty, and that elements of the state apparatus still make historical mistakes in the placement of Pancasila.
QUO VADIS KEBIJAKAN DATA PRIBADI DI INDONESIA: PENORMAAN LEMBAGA PENGAWAS Aryani, Nyoman Mas; Hermanto, Bagus
Literasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): LITERASI HUKUM
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/lh.v7i1.7522

Abstract

Artikel ini akan berfokus pada sebuah konsep dalam kebijakan data pribadi yang memberikan perlindungan terhadap masyarakat, dengan mengkajinya dari perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Kemajuan teknologi khususnya dunia maya atau cyber yang tentunya membawa perubahan positif bagi kemajuan umat manusia dan sudah menjadi sebuah kebutuhan di era digital seperti saat ini, namun juga tidak dapat dipungkiri terdapat dampak negatif yang menghancurkan kehidupan manusia. Perlindungan data pribadi menjadi bagian dari hak asasi manusia yang merupakan hak privasi dimana hukum yang berlaku secara internasional menetapkannya sebagai hak yang harus dilindungi. Artikel penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, perbandingan dan kasus terkait penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Hasil dan rekomendasi yang dapat diajukan terkait perlindungan, Indonesia belum mengatur perlindungan penanggulangan penyalahgunaan data pribadi secara khusus dalam sebuah undang-undang melainkan masih diatur secara terpisah di beberapa undang-undang. Untuk itu diperlukan sebuah formulasi kebijakan tata kelola data yang baik dan pengawasan yang ketat sehingga mampu melindungi masyarakat dari kejahatan siber.
DYNAMICS OF PANCASILA AS A BASIS FOR THE QUALITY OF INDONESIAN LEGISLATION: A POSITIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION: DINAMIKA PANCASILA SEBAGAI LANDASAN KUALITAS LEGISLASI INDONESIA: PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Subawa, Made; Hermanto, Bagus; Giri, Ni Putu Niti Suari
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v4i01.94

Abstract

This article interrogates the dimensions of the fifth-generation national philosophy of Indonesia, the 'Pancasila', and its potential to serve as the cornerstone for enhancing the quality of legislation in Indonesia. The prevailing concern is that the quality of Indonesian legislation is frequently compromised in terms of material and formal aspects, irrespective of the multidimensional, multidisciplinary, and even cross-border challenges confronting various developing countries. In order to address these concerns, it is imperative to delve into the fundamental principles of the 'Pancasila', with a view to contributing to the development of a future legal framework characterised by enhanced quality. The present article is limited to two main issues, namely (1) the dynamics of the five principles of the Indonesian state ideology as a legal ideal, and (2) the futuristic dimension based on positive law and the Constitutional Court's decisions related to the aforementioned principles as a basis for improving the quality of future legislation. The results obtained demonstrate that the recognition of the inseparable nature of the five principles of the United Nations as a legal ideal and the primary source of national law is paramount. This underscores the necessity for future legislative formations to deliberate on the incorporation of the principles of the Pancasila as a consideration in enhancing the quality of future legislation.
Formulasi Pengaturan Undang-Undang Berbasis Omnibus Legislation Terhadap Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Hermanto, Bagus
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i1.1008

Abstract

Dinamika hak asasi manusia pasca reformasi di Indonesia ditandai dengan lemahnya substansi hukum, tidak komprehensif, tidak efektif, dan tidak mencerminkan pengaturan yang sejalan dengan perkembangan global maupun kebutuhan hukum dalam perkembangan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Pengaturan yang diperlukan untuk diformulasi dengan berbasis metode omnibus legislation dalam undang-undang komprehensif terkait ruang lingkup konseptual hak asasi manusia, perencanaan pembangunan hak asasi manusia, penataan struktur dan birokrasi hak asasi manusia, pengaturan terhadap kelompok rentan, penyesuaian perkembangan global dengan kebutuhan pengaturan domestik terkait hak asasi manusia. Tulisan ini mengkaji, menganalisis dan menelaah dinamika penerapan metode omnibus legislation di Indonesia, serta persoalan hak asasi manusia dan formulasi norma undang-undang komprehensif hak asasi manusia berbasis omnibus legislation. Tulisan ini menegaskan bahwa metode legislasi ini dapat diterapkan dalam pengaturan hak asasi manusia dengan pengaturan yang menyangkut konsep, perkembangan, penyesuaian hukum internasional dan domestik, kelompok rentan, pembangunan hak asasi manusia, institusi dan birokrasi hak asasi manusia, dan penegakan serta pilihan hukum penyelesaian pelanggaran hak asasi manusia.