Articles
<![CDATA[Penanganan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Melalui Rehabilitasi Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Pelaksanaan Asas Dominus Litis Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Ngurah Budiyasa]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Surat Perintah Menteri Kehakiman Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 memberikan kewenangan kepada kejaksaan untuk mengambil keputusan rehabilitasi dalam kasus penyalahgunaan narkoba selama proses penuntutan. Namun dalam prakteknya, Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar tidak dapat melaksanakan perintah tersebut. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan kajian terhadap penerapan pedoman tersebut dan hambatan pelaksanaannya oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar. Diharapkan kajian ini menjadi bahan sosialisasi dan kontribusi pemerintah. Metode penelitian hukum empiris digunakan dalam metode penelitian. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah informasi yang diperoleh melalui wawancara di Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar dan informasi yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh informasi tentang persyaratan, definisi dan pelaksanaan rehabilitasi serta hambatan pelaksanaannya.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan karena Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayu Putri Arisandy]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[In everyday life, a person often becomes a victim of crime in the form of other people's crimes. Protection goes beyond these boundaries, so law enforcement is used against criminals to protect their rights. Forced defense cross-border criminals are often prosecuted for crimes they have committed, even if the criminals act in self-defense. Referring to the problems above, the formulation of the problems discussed are: 1). To what extent do the legal arrangements for the criminal act of compulsory defense go beyond the limits? 2). What is the legal protection for perpetrators of cross-border crimes in forced defense? Discussions were held on the formulation of questions. Namely: 1. Legislative provisions regarding extrajudicial criminal defense actions are regulated in Article 49 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and are clearly defined in Section 49 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. Basically, being forced to defend against attacks. 2. The form of legal protection for the perpetrators of the crime of murder is contained in article 338 of the Criminal Code and is an additional mandatory defense to article 49 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[Putusan Hakim Terkait Bukti Tidak Langsung (Circumstantial Evidence) Pada Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Pusat Nomor 777/Pid.B/2016/Pn Jkt.Pst) ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Minggu Widyantara]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivony Stefania Seran Tahuk]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jph.6.2.2025.196-200
<![CDATA[Crime is the entirety of human behavior including conduct and behavior that is against the law and should be punished as outlined in a form of legislation. Premeditated murder is classified as a criminal offense and should be punished. In Decision Number 777/Pid.B/2016/PN JKT.PST, a case of premeditated murder was proven and Jessica Kumala Wongso was the defendant. When convicting a prisoner, judges use circumstantial evidence. This research seeks to define circumstantial evidence in Decision Number 777/Pid.B/2016/PN JKT.PST. How does the court defend the conclusion of circumstantial evidence in Decision Number 777/Pid.B/2016/PN JKT.PST? This research uses normative legal research. Decision Number 777/Pid.B/2016/PN JKT. PST is based on the judge's assessment of the results of the formulation of the problem and conclusions as well as indirect evidence or circumstantial evidence.]]>
<![CDATA[Empowering Village Administrators in Preventing Disputes Through Basic Paralegal Training in Apuan Village, Susut District, Bangli Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Sunarta]]>;
<![CDATA[Ayu Prasetya Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Doctoral Community Service Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Law Doctoral Community Service Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55637/ldcsj.2.2.7606.92-95
<![CDATA[Cases or disputes are common in both urban areas and rural areas. The existence of differences in interests causes disputes to occur both in the private sphere and in the public sphere. Likewise, in Apuan Village, small clashes often occur which sometimes cause disharmony in society. The importance of understanding community law and village officials will greatly help defuse and resolve disputes that arise in the community. The purpose of this research is to provide basic paralegal training to village officials to prevent disputes from occurring. The implementation method is by conducting interviews with the Apuan Village Government. This can happen due to the lack of public knowledge, especially the poor and marginal people about the law. Paralegal arrangements have been regulated in Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 3 of 2021 concerning Paralegals in Providing Legal Aid. very important socialized to the village level. As a follow-up step, it is necessary to provide basic paralegal knowledge for village officials as a protector of the community if there is a dispute in the community.]]>
<![CDATA[PKM Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Tridana Mandiri di Denpasar ]]>
<![CDATA[Desak Gde Dwi Arini]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>;
<![CDATA[Desak Ade Devicia Cempaka]]>;
<![CDATA[Ida Ayu Gede Wulandari]]>
<![CDATA[ Community Service Journal (CSJ) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/csj.3.1.2020.29-35
<![CDATA[Sebagai sebuah lembaga pendidikan tinggi, Universitas Warmadewa harus dapat dipastikan selalu taat melaksanakan Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi sesuai dengan visi misi yang telah ditentukan. Kini setiap dosen didorong untuk bisa mengemas kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat baik secara berkelompok maupun perorangan yang nantinya menunjukkan kepedulian terhadap masyarakat. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dapat dilakukan dengan melakukan pencerahan dengan cara memberikan penyuluhan dan konsultasi hukum kepada masyarakat dalam berbagai bidang kehidupan di bidang perekonomian. Salah satu hal yang patut dicermati adalah keberadaan perjanjian kredit, dimana diharapkan setiap badan usaha koperasi wajib memiliki suatu perjanjian dalam hal ini perjanjian kredit.Perjanjian yang dibuat biasanya merupakan hal-hal prinsip saja, dengan maksud agar sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan dalam hal ini KUH Perdata. Hal-hal lain akan dimuat dalam suatu perjanjian yang lebih mudah untuk diubah sesuai perkembangan perekonomian. Pada akhirnya program ini diharapkan mampu memberikan pemahaman dan solusi kepada badan usaha koperasi khususnya Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Tridana Mandiri Denpasar, dapat tetap eksis sebagai bagian dari badan usaha yang sedang berkembang keberadaannya. Ketika terjadi kasus nasabah tidak bayar kewajiban yang disebut wanprestasi, proses penyelesaian sengketa diupayakan dengan cara musyawarah atau kekeluargaan.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan Sema 4 Tahun 2010 Bagi Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian ]]>
<![CDATA[Arief Wibowo]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Minggu Widyantara]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.34-39
<![CDATA[Abstract The process of investigating narcotics crimes does not only refer to the Criminal Procedure Code but also refers to Sema Number 4 of 2010 concerning the management of investigations conducted by the police, the problem is How to regulate the police investigation process against perpetrators of narcotics abuse? And how do you place the perpetrators of abuse in Sema number 4 in 2010? The method used by normatif is conducting field research through interviews sourced from primary data and secondary data, then processed descriptively qualitatively. The arrangement of the police investigation process against perpetrators of narcotics abuse is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code where police investigators are given investigations to case files. The implementation of the investigation originated with the existence of a report, There is a complaint, in the case of being caught and investigators have begun to investigate an event which is a criminal act the investigator notifies the prosecutor. "Placement of narcotics abuse can be done by Medical Rehabilitation and Social Rehabilitation. Drug rehabilitation is doing it as soon as possible. That requires a psychiatrist or addiction expert who can deal with drug addiction problems. Like other addicts, drug addicts often deny their condition and are difficult to ask for rehabilitation. Usually intervention from family or friends is needed to motivate and encourage drug users to want to undergo rehabilitation. Keywords: Implementation; investigation; narcotics; the abuse Abstrak Proses penyidikan tindak pidana narkotika tidak hanya mengacu pada KUHAP namun juga mengacu pada Sema Nomor 4 tahun 2010 mengenai manajemen penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh kepolisian, permasalahnnya adalah Bagaimana pengaturan proses penyidikan di kepolisian terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika? dan bagaimana penempatan pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika dalam sema nomor 4 tahun 2010? Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka/ data sekunder. Sedangkan pendekatan masalah yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual. Pendekatan perundang-undangan yaitu mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur mengenai sanksi pidana serta pencegahan terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika. Sedangkan pendekatan konseptual yaitu pendekatan dengan menggunakan konsep-konsep para ahli ilmu hukum yang ada hubungannya dengan penegakan hukum serta pengertian-pengertian narkotika dan pandangan ahli hukum mengenai narkotika. Pengaturan proses penyidikan di kepolisian terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika diatur dalam KUHAP dimana penyidik kepolisian dalam melakukan penyidikan sampai berkas perkara. Pelaksanaan penyidikan tersebut bersumber pada adanya laporan, adanya pengaduan dari, oleh karena itu penyidik kepolisian melakukan penyidikan peristiwa yang merupakan suatu tindak pidana, lalu penyidik memberitahukan hal itu kepada penuntut umum. Penempatan penyalahgunaan narkotika dapat dilakukan Rehabilitasi Medis dan Rehabilitasi Sosial. Rehabilitasi ialah merupakan upaya untuk menyelamatkan para pengguna narkotika, oleh sebab itu di perlukan psikiater atau seorang ahli adiksi untuk dapat menangani rasa ketergantungan narkotika. Biasanya para pecandu sering menyangkal kondisinya dan sangat sulit untuk di minta melakukan rehabilitasi, biasanya pada kasus ini di butuhkan dorongan kerluarga maupun teman untuk motivasi untuk pengguna narkoba bisa menjalani program rehabilitasi Kata Kunci: Pelaksanaan; penyidikan; narkotika; penyalahgunaan]]>
<![CDATA[Pemeriksaan Persiapan Dalam Proses Beracara di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar (Putusan No 4/G/2017/Ptun.Dps) ]]>
<![CDATA[Elisabeth Ayustina Putri Korassa Sonbai]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>;
<![CDATA[Luh Putu Suryani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.57-61
<![CDATA[Abstract Examination of preparations is the first step in resolving State Administrative disputes. Preparatory examination has a very important role, as the gateway to a state administrative dispute to be examined at the State Administrative Court. Before entering into an examination of the subject matter at an ordinary session that is open to the public, the Plaintiff is given the opportunity to perfect his lawsuit that is not perfect and to the Defendant can be asked for information or explanation regarding the State Administrative Decision that has been sued. Preparatory checks are held because remembering the Plaintiff in the State Administrative Court is generally a citizen who has a weak position, when compared to the Defendant as a State Administration Officer. The results of this study are seen in the case of decision no. 4 / G / 2017 / PTUN.DPS according to the rules contained in Article 63 of Act No. 5 of 1986 the plaintiff's claim must be declared not accepted by the Panel of Judges. So from that it can be concluded (1) Existence of preparatory checks in resolving disputes in the State Administrative Court? (2) The legal consequences of preparatory examinations in resolving disputes in decision no. 4 / G / 2017 / PTUN.DPS in the State Administrative Court? The problems that will be discussed will be reviewed based on the normative point of view; the approach used in this study is the legislative approach and the case approach, namely the approach used by reading the applicable literature and legislation. Keywords: Disputes; examination; preparation; state administrative court Abstrak Pemeriksaan persiapan adalah langkah awal dalam penyelesaian sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Pemeriksaan persiapan memiliki peranan yang sangat penting, sebagai pintu gerbang suatu sengketa tata usaha negara untuk diperiksa pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sebelum memasuki pemeriksaan terhadap pokok perkara pada sidang acara biasa yang terbuka untuk umum, Penggugat diberikan kesempatan untuk menyempurnakan gugatannya yang belum sempurna dan kepada Tergugat dapat dimintai keterangan atau penjelasan yang berkenaan tentang Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang telah di gugat. Diadakannya pemeriksaan persiapan dikarenakan mengingat Penggugat pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara pada umumnya adalah warga masyarakat yang mempunyai kedudukan yang lemah, apabila dibandingkan dengan Tergugat sebagai Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. Hasil penelitian ini dilihat dalam perkara putusan no 4/G/2017/PTUN.DPS sesuai aturannya yang terdapat dalam Pasal 63 Undang-Undang No 5 Tahun 1986 gugatan penggugat harus dinyatakan tidak diterima oleh Majelis Hakim.Maka dari itu dapat disimpulkan (1) Eksistensi pemeriksaan persiapan dalam penyelesaian sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara? (2) Akibat hukum dari pemeriksaan persiapan dalam penyelesaian sengketa putusan no 4/G/2017/PTUN.DPS di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara? Permasalahan yang akan dibahas nantinya akan dikaji berdasarkan sudut pandang normatif, Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus yaitu pendekatan yang digunakan dengan membaca literatur dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Kata kunci: Sengketa; pemeriksaan; persiapan; pengadilan tata usaha negara]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Jual Beli Barang Melalui E-Commerce ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Erick Sanjaya Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Putu Budiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.2.2019.239-243
<![CDATA[The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 article 1 paragraph 3, which reads "the State of Indonesia is a country of laws". This means that all members of society must be based on the law. The modern era of globalization, this versatile, all human activities have to be implemented quickly and easily. Selling is one of the fulfillment of human needs. E-Commerce is the business model of modern non-face (do not bring the perpetrators of the attempt to physically or real). Is there any formulation raised namely (1) How the legal sale and setting items through e-commerce? (2) How legal protection for consumers who suffered losses due to selling of goods e-commerce? Research methods used are normative, approach to research legislation, researching yet details rules governing consumer protection against businesses trading online, and then processed and analyzed with the use of interpretation and legal argumentation systematically as well as poured are descriptive. The results of this study are sale of goods law setting through Electronic Commerce (E-Commerce) have been set up in the ACT ITE and UUPK. legal protection for consumers who suffered losses due to the trading of goods electronic commerce (e-commerce) in the ACT ITE has been regulated in article 28 paragraph 1 regarding the losses consumers in e-commerce. As it known article 19 UUPK is set the compensation responsibility.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Sumpah Pada Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi Palsu dalam Proses Perkara Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Ardellia Luckyta Putri Armunanto]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Sepud]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.2.2019.143-147
<![CDATA[Eyewitness is one tool evidence is crucial in the process of proof at this stage of the review. A witness sworn or promised mandatory before or after he gave his statement at trial. Giving false information is a criminal offense regulated in Article 242 of the Criminal Code. Formulation of the problem in the writing of this research are: 1) how is the position of the oath against false witnesses in a criminal proceeding? and 2) how will criminal sanctions against witnesses who give false information in the process of criminal cases?. The type of research used in the writing of this is normative and legal research using approach problem in the form of a statutory approach, the conceptual approach and the approach to the case using legal materials in the form of source material the law of primary, secondary, and tertiary. Legal materials collection technique is done by way of reading, gathering and documentation. Analysis of legal materials used i.e. descriptive analysis that refers to a particular problem and is associated with the opinion of the experts, legislation and break it in the form of a research. The position of the oath on the false witnesses in a criminal proceeding is not considered a valid instrument of evidence, so that the information has no value the power of proof. Criminal sanctions against witnesses who give false information in the process of criminal cases will be subject to imprisonment for seven to nine years in accordance with Article 242 of the book the laws of criminal law.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Penyelesaian Berkas Perkara Pidana Dalam Tahap Pra Penuntutan ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Agung Ayu Sita Anandia]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Arjaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Sukaryati Karma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.2.2019.181-186
<![CDATA[Pre prosecution is the authority of the public prosecutor to examine and study investigation and interrogation report before the investigation assigned to the Court. The police act as investigators while the prosecutor's office is a public prosecutor, because the Criminal Code Procedure provides different authority. As a result of differences in authority, investigation and interrogation report made by investigators must be examined first before being delegated to the trial. This research is about: (1) how is the authority of the police and prosecutors in the pre-prosecution stage? (2) What is the procedure for the settlement of criminal investigation and interrogation report in pre-prosecution stage at the Denpasar District Prosecutor's Office? This study uses normative legal research methods with sources of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study can be concluded (1) the authority of the police in the pre-prosecution stage is to conduct an investigation and make a case file. The authority of the prosecutor's office in the pre-prosecution process only checks and examines case files whether the case files made by the investigator have met the terms and conditions of the Criminal Procedure Code. (2) The procedure for settling this case file is carried out by receiving a notification letter on the start of investigation, the appointment of a public prosecutor, research of case files by prosecutors, prosecution, delegation of suspects and evidence, additional inspection by the prosecutor general, transfer of case files, suspects and evidence to court.]]>
