Articles
<![CDATA[The Role of Notaries and Land Titles Registrar in Collecting Duties on The Land and Building Rights Acquisition on The Making of Sale and Purchase Deeds in Singaraja City ]]>
<![CDATA[Nyoman Edy Febriana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Parsa]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Artha]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 9, No 2 (2022): June 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v9i2.21362
<![CDATA[The main objective of this study is to know the role of Land Titles Registrar (PPAT) in collecting duties on the Land and Building Rights Acquisition (BPHTB) on the sale and purchase transactions in Singaraja City. Furthermore, we investigate the duties and obligations of the PPAT in supervising the payment of BPHTB. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach with empirical juridical methods. The main finding is the role of PPAT as the official who makes BPHTB quotations during sales and purchase transactions in Singaraja City shows a very important role. Also, we have presented the duty and obligation of PPAT in supervising the payment of BPHTB is to make taxpayers aware that taxes are paid in accordance with applicable regulations. ]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of “Do Not Resusitate (DNR)” In Indonesia's Law and the Study of Ethical Principles of Their Implementation ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Radhitya Vidianditha]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ria Tri Harini Dwi Rusiawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Budapest International Research and Critics University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i2.5355
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze and examine in depth the implementation of the " Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)" medical action in the perspective of legislation in Indonesia. This study also discusses and examines the ethical principles in the implementation of " Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)" as part of Euthanasia and pseudo-euthanasia. This research uses normative legal research methods, using a statutory approach (status approach), and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study are the first with not explicitly regulated the implementation of " Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)" as part of Euthanasia or pseudo euthanasia depending on the case and condition of the patient being treated by medical personnel in Indonesian legislation, making frequent conflicts both from the side of the patient or medical personnel. Second, several countries in the world already have national guidelines to make it easier to do " Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)", Indonesia, which only relies on ethical studies, is deemed insufficient for medical personnel to do " Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)", So there are often ethical dilemmas.]]>
<![CDATA[Mengkaji Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Alih Daya Pasca Berlakunya UU Cipta Kerja ]]>
<![CDATA[Raja Tua Hamonangan]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 4 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan dan memahami pengaturan pekerja alih daya di Indonesia pasca berlakunya Undang–Undang Cipta Kerja dan untuk memahami dan menganalisa kemampuan pengaturan pada UU Cipta Kerja dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja alih daya dari tindakan eksploitasi. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan sistem konsep hukum. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Pengaturan pekerja alih daya di Indonesia pasca berlakunya UU Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No 35 Tahun 2021 bahwa ketentuan alih daya diatur pada BAB III Pasal 18 sampai dengan Pasal 20 tidak berbeda jauh dengan ketentuan Pasal 66 UU Cipta Kerja. Bahwa perubahan yang dilakukan terhadap Undang–Undang Ketenagakerjana perihal aturan alih daya dalam UU Cipta Kerja dan PP No 35 Tahun 2021 tidak menunjukkan penguatan terhadap perlindungan hak pekerja sebagaimana tuntutan pekerja selama ini, justru sebaliknya. Bahwa pengaturan pada UU Cipta Kerja menunjukkan semakin mudahnya pengusaha menggunakan pekerja alih daya pada semua sistem yang kehendakinya dan semakin menunjukkan peran pemerintah mulai tergerus. Pemerintah saat ini seakan menyerahkan semua urusan tersebut kepada para pihak, sehingga peran pemerintah dalam mengatur/mengontrol pelaksanaan hubungan kerja antara pengusaha dan pekerja/buruh terkhusus pada sistem outsourcing menjadi lemah. Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Pekerja Alih Daya, Eksploitasi, UU Cipta Kerja. ABSTRACT This article aims to demonstrate and understand the regulation of outsourced workers in Indonesia after the enactment of the Job Creation Law and to understand and analyze the regulatory capacity of the Job Creation Law in providing legal protection for outsourced workers from exploitation. The writing of this article uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and legal concept analysis. The results of the study show that the regulation of outsourced workers in Indonesia after the enactment of the Job Creation Law and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 that the provisions for outsourcing are regulated in Chapter III Articles 18 to 20 are not much different from the provisions of Article 66 of the Job Creation Law. That the changes made to the Manpower Law regarding the outsourcing rules in the Job Creation Law and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 do not show the strengthening of the protection of workers' rights as demanded by workers so far, quite the opposite. Whereas the regulation in the Job Creation Law shows that it is easier for employers to use outsourced workers in all sectors that they want and it shows that the role of the government is starting to erode. The current government seems to hand over all these matters to the parties, so that the government's role in regulating/controlling the implementation of working relations between employers and workers/laborers, especially in the outsourcing system, is weak. Key Words: Legal Protection, Outsourcing Employees, Exploitation, Job Creation Law.]]>
<![CDATA[Legality of Using Forex Trading Robot Applications in Commodity Futures Trading ]]>
<![CDATA[Anindya Primadigantari]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of World Science Vol. 1 No. 7 (2022): Journal of World Science ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Riviera Publishing ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58344/jws.v1i7.63
<![CDATA[The purpose of this writing is used to analyze and understand the use of the Trading Robot Application in Futures Trading assets against a norm that is already in force in Indonesia with several phenomena that occur as a result of the use of a forex transaction trading robot application that is misused to commit crimes. The research method used in this paper is normative law which includes the statue approach, the historical approach and the sociological approach. The results of the study that the use of the Trading Robot Application has not been regulated in Law Number 10 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 32 of 1997 concerning Commodity Futures Trading and is an act that does not have a permit so that it can be subject to criminal sanctions. This creates a legal vacuum that can lead to uncertainty in the disharmonization of laws and regulations, especially in futures trading. Thus, it is necessary to update the law by aligning technological advances by covering aspects of legality, specifications, qualifications of trading robots, and the concept of illegal is an administrative violation as an effort to ensure legal certainty.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA TERHADAP KARYA SENI HAND LETTERING ]]>
<![CDATA[Made Arie Wiedhayanti]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 12 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.504 KB)
<![CDATA[Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa pengaturan seni hand lettering berdasarkan hak cipta dan mengkaji perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap penggunaan hand lettering tanpa ijin. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif. Tulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan hand lettering dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta memiliki kekaburan norma termasuk ke bagian mana terkait ciptaan yang dilindungi. Hand lettering diperlukannya aturan yang jelas untuk mendapatkan kepastian hukum. Perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap penggunaan hand lettering tanpa ijin mengacu pada Pasal 96 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dimana pencipta yang merasa dirugikan hak ekonominya berhak mendapatkan ganti rugi. Ganti rugi yang dapat dimintai kepada pelanggar hak cipta berdasarkan Pasal 99 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta yaitu berupa permintaan untuk memberikan penghasilan yang diperoleh kepada pencipta baik sebagian atau seluruhnya. This paper aims to analyze the art of hand lettering based on copyright and examine the legal protection of copyright against the use of hand lettering without permission. The writing of this scientific paper uses the type of normative research. This paper uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the hand lettering arrangement in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright has a vague norm including which parts are related to protected works. Hand lettering requires clear rules to obtain legal certainty. Copyright legal protection against the use of hand lettering without permission refers to Article 96 paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright where creators who feel that their economic rights have been harmed are entitled to compensation. Compensation that can be requested for copyright violators based on Article 99 paragraph (2) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright is in the form of a request to provide income earned to the creator, either partially or completely.]]>
<![CDATA[Authority of a Notary Related to Marriage Agreements After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Ida Bagus Kade Wahyu Sudhyatmika]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to analyze the arrangements related to marriage agreements in Indonesia and examine the authority possessed by notary related to marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court Decision. This paper is a normative legal research method since the focus of the study departs from the vagueness of norms by using several approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicated that arrangements related to marriage agreements are subject to the provisions of the Marriage Law and the Civil Code. Referring to the provisions in Article 29 of the Marriage Law, it is understood that at or before the marriage takes place both parties with mutual consent can enter into a written agreement ratified by the civil registration officer, after the contents also apply to third parties. Furthermore, there has been a change in the authority of the Notary after the Constitutional Court’s Decision, however, until now the Notary has not been able to ratify the marriage agreement as referred to in the Constitutional Court’s Decision. For that we need a new mechanism that can be regulated in implementing regulations related to the authority of a Notary to ratify a marriage agreement, which the result that the ratification of a marriage agreement made by anNotary can be accessed by the public and can provide legal certainty for the parties involved in the marriage agreement, including third parties and also notaries who ratify.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGALITAS ABORSI BAGI KORBAN PEMERKOSAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DOKTER DENGAN INDIKASI MEDIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Komang Wahyuni Purnama Ningrum]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 9 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (188.252 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i09.p20
<![CDATA[Tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan pidana yang diidentikkan dengan kriminalisasi pengangkatan janin oleh dokter spesialis dengan gejala klinis sejauh undang-undang nomor 36 tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan dan sertifikasi yang sah untuk kriminalisasi penghentian aborsi untuk korban penyerangan. Metode penelitian: dalam eksplorasi ini mengadopsi pengaturan eksplorasi yang sah dengan metodologi yang diterapkan dan sumber informasi pemeriksaan berasal dari internet dan tulisan ilmiah. Untuk mengatur informasi dikumpulkan dengan prosedur pengumpulan informasi dokumentasi dan diperiksa dengan metode penyelidikan kuantitatif. Berdasarkan Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa aborsi yang diperbolehkan di Indonesia adalah pengangkatan janin provocatus, lebih spesifik aborsi provocatus untuk tanda klinis atau dalam bahasa klinis disebut dengan pengangkatan janin provocatus medicalis. Ditegaskan pula bahwa tanda krisis kesehatan dalam situasi darurat yang mengancam kondisi yang benar-benar memerlukan tindakan klinis tertentu untuk menyelamatkan sang ibu. Kemudian, pada saat itu, dalam aborsi, pasien dijamin dengan payung hukum yang bergantung pada Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang kesehatan. Objectives to know the criminal arrangements identified with the criminalization of fetal removal by specialists with clinical symptoms as far back as law number 36 of 2009 on Health and legal certification for the criminalization of termination of abortion for victims of assault. Research methods: in this exploration adopts a legitimate exploratory arrangement with the methodology applied and the source of the examination information comes from the internet and scientific writing. To organize information collected by documentation information collection procedures and examined by quantitative investigation methods. Based on the results of the study revealed that the abortion allowed in Indonesia is the removal of the fetus provocatus, more specifically provocatus abortion for clinical marks or in clinical language called fetal removal provocatus medicalis. It is also emphasized that signs of a health crisis in an emergency situation that threaten a condition that really requires certain clinical measures to save the mother. Then, at that time, in abortion, patients were guaranteed under a legal umbrella that depended on Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning on health.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM JASA PELAYANAN MEDIS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ketut Leona Trida Yuliani]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 10 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (188.226 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i10.p05
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kajian penyelesaian sengketa pasien dan upaya penyelesaian sengketa konsumen dalam jasa pelayanan medis berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kesehatan sebagai konsumen dari jasa pelayanan medis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum yuridis empiris, Jenis Pendeketan yaitu Pendekatan Perundang-undangan (The Statute Approach) dengan teknik pengumpulan data menggali sumber-sumber suatu karya yang telah ada sebelumnya. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini ialah, di dalam ke-22 bab Undang-undang Kesehatan diatur dengan jelas terkait berbagai hal-hal yang di bidang kesehatan mulai dari hal terkecil seperti definisi akan pengertian yang sering ditemui di dunia kesehatan, kemudian asas dan tujuan pembangunan kesehatan, hak yang diperoleh perseorangan dan juga kewajiban yang wajib ditanggung oleh perseorangan dalam pembangunan kesehatan dan pada upaya penyelesaian persengketaan pasien dapat dilakukan dengan jalur mediasi yang lumrah digunakan atau juga dengan jalur hukum. Dan disinilah undang-undang nomor 36 tahun 2009 mengambil perannya sebagai hukum yang mengatur peraturan terkait dunia kesehatan. This study was conducted to find out how to study patient dispute resolution and consumer dispute resolution efforts in medical services based on the Health Law as consumers of medical services. The type of research used is empirical juridical law, the type of approach is the Legislative Approach (The Statute Approach) with data collection techniques to explore the sources of a work that has existed before. The results of this study are, in the 22 chapters of the Health Law, it is clearly regulated related to various matters in the health sector starting from the smallest things such as definitions of definitions that are often encountered in the world of health, then the principles and objectives of health development. In addition, the rights obtained by individuals as well as obligations that must be borne by individuals in health development and in efforts to resolve patient disputes can be carried out by means of mediation which are commonly used or also by legal means. And this is where law number 36 of 2009 takes on its role as the law that regulates regulations related to the world of health]]>
<![CDATA[KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS BERBASIS CYBER NOTARY MELALUI TELECONFERENCE ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewa Gede Prawira Buwana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v11.i01.p19
<![CDATA[Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan cyber notary di Indonesia dan keabsahan akta notaris yang dibuat melalui cyber notary berupa teleconference jika dikaitkan dengan konsep-konsep dalam pembuatan akta notaris. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penilitian hukum normatif dimana dilakukan pengkajian peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat dirumuskan kesimpulan sebagai berikut : (1) Konflik norma diantara pasal 15 ayat (3) dengan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf m UUJN bisa diselesaikan dengan cara tetap memakai kedua pasal tersebut yakni pasal 15 ayat (3) Undang-UUJN bisa dilaksanakan sepanjjang memenuhii Pasal 16 huruf m UUJN dan memenuhi otentitas akta pada pasal 1868 KUH Perdata; dan (2) Sertifikas transaksi yang dilakukan dengan cara cyber notary adalah akta otentik. Hal tersebut dikarenakan kewenangan tersebut sudah diatur didalam undang-undang yang terkait dengan pelaksanaan jabatan notaris. Hal ini karena dalam satu undang-undang dilarang untuk mengenyampingkan pasal yang lainnya dan sertifikasi transaksi yang menggunakan cyber notary adalah sah karena telah diatur dalam Pasal 15 ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 yang memberikan kewenangan kepada notaris untuk melakukan sertifikasi transaksi secara cyber notary dengan tetap memperhatikan unsur-unsur akta otentik. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze cyber notary arrangements in Indonesia and the validity of notary deeds made through cyber notaries in the form of teleconferences when associated with the concepts in making notary deeds. This legal research is a normative legal research in which an assessment of the applicable laws and regulations is carried out and uses secondary data as the main data. Based on the results of the research, the following conclusions can be formulated: (1) Norm conflicts between Article 15 paragraph (3) and Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m UUJN can be resolved by continuing to use the two articles, namely Article 15 paragraph (3) of the Law UUJN can be implemented as long as it fulfills Article 16 letter m UUJN and fulfills the authenticity of the deed in article 1868 of the Civil Code; and (2) Transaction certificates carried out by means of a cyber notary are authentic deeds. This is because this authority has been regulated in the law related to the implementation of the position of a notary. This is because in one law it is forbidden to override other articles and transaction certification using a cyber notary is valid because it has been regulated in Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 which gives authority to a notary to certify transactions automatically. cyber notary while paying attention to the elements of an authentic deed.]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN JAMINAN DALAM PEMBERIAN KREDIT PADA BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT DAN LAYANAN PINJAMAN BERBASIS P2P LENDING ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Adinda Wikan Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Bagiastra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i02.p08
<![CDATA[Penyaluran dana melalui Fintech P2P Lending memiliki perbedaan dengan penyaluran pada kredit umum yang dilakukan BPR, perbedaan tersebut terletak pada jaminan yang dijaminkan oleh debitur sehingga dikategorikan sebagai unsecure loan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui bagaimana fungsi jaminan pada perjanjian kredit dan eksistensi dari jaminan dalam kerjasama pemberian kredit antara BPR dengan Fintech P2P Lending. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan statue approach dan menggunakan pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan studi pustaka baik peraturan perundang-undangan maupun buku-buku serta jurnal ilmiah. Adapun hasil penelitian ini adalah pertama, jaminan berfungsi sebagai bentuk kepastian hukum yang diberikan debitur pada kreditur pada perjanjian kredit yang telah disepakati bersama apabila terjadi gagal bayar. Umumnya jaminan yang digunakan debitur adalah jaminan kebendaan yang kemudian akan dibuatkan perjanjian turunan baik berupa hak tanggungan, hak fidusia, hak gadai maupun hipotek dengan menerapkan asas publicitet. Kedua, jaminan yang diberikan debitur yang menggunakan layanan Fintech P2P Lending berupa jaminan perorangan (personal guarantee) yakni pihak ketiga yang sepakat menjadi penjamin apabila debitur tidak berhasil memenuhi kewajibannya. Penggunaan personal guarantee harus berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian dan prinsip know your customer sebab pihak yang menjadi guarantor harus sepakat dan setuju berperan sebagai penjamin dari hutang yang dimiliki debitur. Credit loan through Fintech P2P Lending is different from the general loan rent by BPR, the difference is on the collateral guaranteed by debitor so it is categorized unsecure loan. This study aims at finding how the function of collateral in the loan agreement and the existence of collateral in the cooperation between BPR and Fintech P2P Lending on granting credit loan. The research method used is normative research method with the statue approach and by collecting law material in the form of literature study of the law and regulations, books and scientific journals. The results of this research are, first is collateral has function as legal certainty that guaranted by debitor to creditor in the loan agreement agreed by both parties when defaulting. Generally collaterals use by debitor is in the form of materials collateral, and then accesoir agreement in the form of mortgage, fiducia rights, pawning right with publicitet principal. Second, collateral that provided by debitor using Fintech P2P Lending service is in the form of personal guarantee, it means the third party who agreed to guarantee when the debitor fails to pay the loan. The use of personal guarantee must be based on precautionary and know your customer principles, because the party who becomes the guarantor must agree the role as guarantor of debitor’s loan.]]>
