Articles
<![CDATA[KARAKTERISTIK MEDIASI PERBANKAN SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN INDONESIA (ANALISIS ASPEK KEADILAN, KEPASTIAN HUKUM, DAN KEMANFAATAN) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (403.517 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p18
<![CDATA[Terdapat kesulitan dalam menentukan kedudukan lembaga mediasi sebagai pilihan penyelesaian sengketa antara Bank dengan Nasabah jika ditinjau dari sisi keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan yang mampu dihasilkan bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Disatu sisi mediasi perbankan memiliki berbagai keunggulan karakteristik, namun disisi lain masih banyak kendala yang harus dihadapi agar mediasi perbankan ini dapat terlaksana dengan efektif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini termasuk ke dalam penelitian hukum normatif yang meletakan hukum sebagai sebuah bangunan sistem norma. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder data. Seluruh data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian disajikan dalam suatu laporan yang bersifat deskriptif analisis. Dari aspek keadilan mediasi perbankan yang dilaksanakan Bank Indonesia perlu mendapat perhatian serius karena dikhawatirkan tidak mampu bersikap obyektif yang akhirnya akan merugikan nasabah. Dari Aspek Kepastian Hukum : belum maksimalnya pengaturan mengenai kewenangan untuk menjatuhkan sanksi administratif kepada bank yang tidak mematuhi isi kesepakatan mediasi menjadi permasalahan utama, dan dari Aspek Kemanfaatan : belum dikenal luasnya lembaga mediasi perbankan di kalangan masyarakat menjadi faktor penghambat tersendiri. Sehingga untuk mengatasi permasalah ini lembaga mediasi perbankan independen oleh asosiasi perbankan harus segera dibentuk dan Bank Indonesia perlu mensosialisaikan kembali keberadaan lembaga mediasi perbankan kepada masyarakat luas dengan menampilkan segenap keunggulan karakteristik yang dimilikinya.]]>
<![CDATA[The Expansion of Administrative Decision Meaning Based on Government Administration Law: a Dispute Submission Process Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Ketut Sudiarta]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Bela Siki Layang]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Pasek Pramana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (512.869 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p02
<![CDATA[The establishment of Government Administration Law brings significant change to the competence of the previously restricted Administrative Court to become expanded. This study aims to find the philosophical considerations from the extension of Administrative Decision meaning on Government Administration Law, to classify the legal implication arising from the regulation of the expansion of administrative decision meaning towards dispute submission process in Administrative Court and to formulate ideal attitude of the State Administrative Judge in resolving State Administrative Disputes. This is a combination of normative and empirical legal research. The study indicated that the legislator main consideration in regulating the expansion of administrative decision meaning on Government Administration Law is to expand the absolute competence of Indonesian Administrative Court which previously felt very narrow. The implication arises after new regulation consists of: the expansion of Administrative Court adjudicate authority for factual actions, subject expansion that have the authority to issue Administrative Decision, the expansion of the Administrative Court adjudicate authority over Administrative Decision which has a legal consequences although still need the approval from above instance, the regulation that Administrative Decision can be sued through the Administrative Court of any potential loss that may arise by the issuance of its Administrative Decision and the expansion towards the parties who have a chance to field a State Administrative accusation. The ideal attitude of State Administrative Judge is the judge should remain based on the strong theoretical concepts of the law so can create understanding and attitude in handling a case in Indonesian Administrative Court.]]>
<![CDATA[Position of Collective Labor Agreement as a Company Autonomous Law: Industrial Relation Dispute Settlement Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Ade Harriesta Martana]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyoman A. Martana]]>;
<![CDATA[Bagus Hermanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (366.933 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p02
<![CDATA[Collective Labor Agreement (CLA) is one of the main pillars that can be used in resolving disputes that occur in the company, However, there are problems concerning the implementation of CLA. The purpose of this research is to find and identify factors that can trigger disputes in the implementation of CLA, the probability of amendment of the CLA, identify the position of CLA in resolving Industrial Relation Disputes and find a mechanism of settlement in the implementation of the CLA. The research was carried out using empirical legal methods and analyzed using qualitative methods. The results are presented in a descriptive analysis report. The results of this research showed differences in interpretation, when unclear validity arrangements and adjustments of the new legislation happen were triggering disputes in the implementation of the CLA. Based on goodwill from the CLA parties, amendments could be made through negotiations in accordance with the mechanism stipulated in the Laws and Regulations. The position of CLA is an autonomous law that applies to the company and is an important element in preventing and resolving Industrial Relation Disputes. Finally, the settlement through bipartite, tripartite and Industrial Relation Court are the mechanism that can be taken for interest disputes.]]>
<![CDATA[Indonesian Labor Sector During Covid-19 : Weighing the Impact of Company Saving Policy and Workers Protection ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Devi Yustisia Utami]]>;
<![CDATA[Gede Agus Angga Saputra]]>;
<![CDATA[Alia Yofira Karunian]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p02
<![CDATA[The COVID-19 pandemic has a very significant impact on the global economy, especially in the business sector, which has suffered significant losses. On this matter it is deemed necessary to carry out research with the objectives first, to determine whether the policies implemented by companies in the form of employment termination and temporary workers layoff in order to survive the company can be legally justified, second, to determine what forms of legal protection should be obtained by workers in an industrial relationship with companies amidst of COVID-19, and third, to determine what forms of work relations/alternative policy models that can be offered to companies to be able to ease the burden on the company while being able to provide protection for workers amidst COVID-19. Research method that is applied is normative legal research with a statutory approach and legal concepts. The results show that company policies in the form of layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic can be justified as long as they comply with the provisions of Article 163 to Article 165 of the Manpower Law, the act of laying off workers can be justified as long as it complies the provisions of the Minister of Manpower Circular Letter Number 5/1998 and Minister of Manpower Circular Letter Number 907/2004. Legal protection that shall be obtained if a worker is laid off must comply with the provisions of Article 156 of the Manpower Law. Companies can implement an industrial relationship by implementing Work From Home (WFH) during the COVID-19 pandemic.]]>
<![CDATA[Surveillance Function in Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrated Criminal Justice System Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Nengah Adiyaryani]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p04
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the role of law enforcement officer in integrated criminal justice system and to find the concept of surveillance patterns that need to be established for law enforcement officer for the future integrated criminal justice system (ius constituendum). This is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis using qualitative methods and the results are presented in descriptive analysis report. The results show that the integrated criminal justice system did not have an integrated surveillance system in a special form that was implemented by the law enforcement officers and its society yet. It still applying an internal and conventional surveillance pattern. Hence, empowering the existing surveillance pattern and creating an integrated surveillance pattern could be a solution to overcome the weakness of the surveillance system in the Integrated Criminal Justice System nowadays which caused by the fragmented surveillance system without any external-cross institutional surveillance.]]>
<![CDATA[Perbandingan Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak Pada Putusan Hakim: Studi Kasus Perkara Lingkungan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[I Wayan Dedi Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i01.p13
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine the application of strict liability principle in PT WAJ's decision and PT BMH’s decision and also examine the basics of the application of the strict liability principle in environmental cases between PT WAJ’s decision and the PT BMH’s decision. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of this study are the first, there are a difference in opinion of judges in applying strict liability principle in environmental cases in Indonesia, in PT WAJ’s decision, judges applies strict liability principle because it’s considered to have fulfilled the elements of Article 88 of the PPLH Law and precautionary principle. Whereas in the PT BMH’s decision, judges put aside the strict liability principle in their legal considerations and didn’t provide the reasons. Second, the basics of the application of the strict liability principle in environmental cases between PT WAJ’s decision and the PT BMH’s decision, that are the differences in petitum (things requested) from each of the Plaintiffs' lawsuit in the Decision, and judges prioritizes civil procedural law principles in handling act which breaks the law of Environment’s cases. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengkaji penerapan prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak dalam Putusan Nomor 456/Pdt.G-LH/2016/PN Jkt. Sel (Putusan PT WAJ) dan Putusan Nomor 24/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Plg (Putusan PT BMH) serta mengkaji dasar-dasar yang membedakan diterapkannya prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak dalam perkara lingkungan hidup antara Putusan PT WAJ dengan Putusan PT BMH. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, yang pertama adanya perbedaan pendapat majelis hakim dalam penerapan prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak dalam perkara lingkungan di Indonesia yaitu dalam Putusan PT WAJ majelis hakim menerapkan prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak karena dianggap telah memenuhi unsur-unsur Pasal 88 UU PPLH dan prinsip kehati-hatian, sedangkan dalam Putusan PT BMH, majelis hakim mengesampingkan prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak dalam pertimbangan hukumnya dan tidak memberikan alasan atas keputusannya tersebut. Kedua yaitu dasar yang membedakan diterapkannya pertanggungjawaban mutlak dalam perkara lingkungan hidup antara Putusan PT WAJ dengan Putusan PT BMH yaitu adanya perbedaan petitum (hal-hal yang diminta) dari masing-masing Gugatan pihak Penggugat dalam Putusan dan hakim lebih mengedepankan asas-asas hukum acara perdata dalam penanganan perkara PMH Lingkungan.]]>
<![CDATA[Perseroan Perorangan Pada Usaha Mikro dan Kecil: Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Organ Perseroan ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Devi Yustisia Utami]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p08
<![CDATA[The purpose of this article was to determine the position of company organs and to analyze the authority and responsibility of company organs in Individual Limited Liability Company. This study used a normative juridical method with a statutory and concept approach. The study indicated that the position of the company's organs in Individual Limited Liability Company is different from the Limited Liability Company organs. The organs of Limited Liability Company consist of the General Meeting Shareholders (GMS), Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners, while the organs of the Individual Limited Liability Company consist of Shareholders as well as Directors and doesn’t have Board of Commissioners. The authority and responsibility of the Individual Limited Liability Company organs can be seen in the provisions of article 109 number (5) of the Job Creation Law which includes articles 153 letter d and 153 letter j. Individual Limited Liability Company in Indonesia adhere to the one tier system, but there are differences between the one tier system in Indonesia and the Anglo Saxon countries. The company's organs in Anglo Saxon countries still consist of the GMS, Directors and Commissioners who can hold concurrent positions, whereas in Individual Limited Liability Company in Indonesia, shareholders only hold concurrent positions. as the Board of Directors and eliminate the organs of the Board of Commissioners. Individual Company Organs in PP No. 8/2021 is not in accordance with the provisions of the company organs in the above regulations, namely the Job Creation Law and the Company Law. Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan organ perseroan pada perseroan perorangan serta menganalisis wewenang dan tanggung jawab organ perseroan perorangan. Metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan organ perseroan pada perseroan perorangan berbeda dengan organ PT pada umumnya. Organ PT terdiri dari RUPS, Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris, sedangkan organ perseroan perorangan terdiri dari Pemegang Saham sekaligus Direktur namun tidak memiliki organ Dewan Komisaris. Wewenang dan tanggung jawab organ perseroan perorangan dapat dilihat pada ketentuan pasal 109 angka (5) UU Cipta Kerja yang menyisipkan pasal 153 huruf d dan 153 huruf j. Perseroan perorangan di Indonesia menganut one tier system, namun terdapat perbedaan mengenai one tier system yang dianut oleh Indonesia dengan yang dianut oleh negara Anglo Saxon. Pada negara Anglo Saxon organ perseroan tetap terdiri dari RUPS, Direksi dan Komisaris yang dapat dirangkap jabatan, sedangkan pada perseroan perorangan di Indonesia pemegang saham hanya merangkap jabatan sebagai Direksi dan tidak ada organ Dewan Komisaris. Organ perseroan perorangan pada PP No. 8/2021 tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan organ perseroan pada peraturan diatasnya yakni UU Cipta Kerja dan UUPT.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGATURAN PRINSIP TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (TUPE) DALAM DUNIA KETENAGAKERJAAN INDONESIA (DIANTARA POTENSI DAN HAMBATAN) ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (369.067 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i04.p18
<![CDATA[This research is aimed identifying the advantages of the regulation of TUPE principles, as well as inhibiting factors for outsourcing companies to apply the TUPE principles after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 27/PUU-IX/ 2011. The research was conducted by using normative-empirical method. The data of the research consisted of primary data and secondary data. All of the collected data were analyzed using qualitative method. The results of this research were presented in a descriptive analysis report. The results of the research indicated he advantages that could be obtained by workers in relation with regulation of the TUPE principles included protection of wages, welfare and working requirements, protection of workers when the company was taken over, protection of workers when there is a change of outsourcing company and regulation of the right to file a lawsuit to the industrial relations court. The inhibiting factors in the application of the TUPE principles in the outsourcing companies after the Decision of Constitutional Court were the lack of socialization and supervision of the government, various legal loopholes of discrepancies between the implementing regulation and the Decision of Constitutional Court, uncertainty severance regulation, assumptions that TUPE was a new burden which may disadvantage employers, and the lack of understanding of the workers related to their rights.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN OUTSOURCING DARI SISI PERUSAHAAN PENGGUNA JASA PEKERJA ]]>
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jish-undiksha.v5i2.9096
<![CDATA[AbstrakOleh : Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangan suatu perusahaan dalam menggunakan jasa pekerjaoutsourcing pada perusahaan tersebut dan untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah perusahaan pengguna jasa pekerjaoutsourcing dalam menjamin hak-hak perkerjaoutsourcing. Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan metode normatif empiris.Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder.Seluruh data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif.Hasil penelitian ini disajikan dalam suatu laporan yang bersifat diskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dasar pertimbangan perusahaan dalam menggunakan tenaga outsourcing ialah dapat dilihat dari sisi efektifitas, dimana perusahaan pengguna jasa tidak perlu lagi memikirkan tanggung jawab dalam urusan atau pekerjaan yang bukan merupakan kegiatan inti, karena sebagian urusan yang merupakan kegiatan penunjang telah diserahkan kepada perusahaan penyedia jasa.Oleh karena itu, terdapat pembagian resiko antara perusahaan pengguna jasa dengan perusahaan penyedia jasa. Sementara terkait perlindungan terhadap hak-hak pekerja outsourcing ditemukan fakta bahwa beberapa perusahaan outsourcing tidak memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak tenaga outsourcing dengan baik sehingga perusahaan pengguna jasa harus ikut berperan dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap pekerja outsourcing sesuai dengan yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Kata Kunci : Pelaksanaan, Outsourcing, Perusahaan Pengguna]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Upaya Perdamaian Oleh Debitor Pailit Setelah Adanya Putusan Pernyataan Pailit: Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Khrisna Dharma Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p13
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to explain the legal consequences of the issuance of a bankruptcy declaration decision to a debtor by a commercial court and to explain the arrangement of reconciliation efforts by a bankrupt debtor after a bankruptcy declaration decision: the perspective of Indonesian bankruptcy law. A normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a legal concept analysis approach was employed in this study. The method for gathering legal materials is to do a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The data was then qualitatively analyzed before being presented in a descriptive analytical report. The results of this study show that the legal implications of the bankruptcy declaration judgment, namely the loss of the debtor's right to manage and control his assets, as well as the recommended peace, are specifically specified in Articles 144 to 177 UUK - PKPU.]]>
