p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.056
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Rechtsidee Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Unram Law Review INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Varia Justicia Jambura Law Review Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Syntax Idea ADIL : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Journal of Social Science Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Risalah Hukum NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Indonesian Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Journal of Asian Social Sciences Research International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Journal of Social Science Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law RechtIdee Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan SASI Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

JURIDICAL STUDY ON THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL PARDON AND VICTIM PROTECTION IN JUVENILE CASES: ANALYSIS OF DECISION NUMBER 2/PID.SUS-ANAK/2021/PN RGT Rani Adriana; Nurini Aprilianda; Sriti Hesti Astiti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4111

Abstract

Abstract
IMPLICATIONS OF PERSONAL DATA LEAKS FROM THE PUBLICATION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN THE SUPREME COURT DECISION DIRECTORY ON PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION Roni Evi Dongoran; Nurini Aprilianda; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4450

Abstract

The publication of court decisions in the Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Directory is a form of public information disclosure. However, in practice, these publications often contain the personal data of the parties involved, such as their National Identification Number, full address, and the identity of victims, even in cases where this information should be redacted. This situation creates the potential for personal data leaks that could open up opportunities for information misuse, violate privacy rights, and pose security risks. This study aims to analyze the implications of personal data leaks originating from the publication of court rulings in the Supreme Court's ruling directory on personal data protection in the era following the enactment of Law-Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection and the issuance of the Supreme Court Chief Justice's Decree Number 2-144/KMA/SK/VIII/2022 concerning Public Information Service Standards in Courts. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, case analysis, and conceptual approach, supplemented by a study of examples of publicly published decisions. The results of the study show that there are still discrepancies between the practice of publishing decisions and the obligation to protect personal data. These findings indicate the need to strengthen editorial policies, obscuring standards, and internal monitoring mechanisms so that the openness of judicial information does not sacrifice the privacy rights of the public. This study is expected to contribute to improving the governance of decision publication and strengthening the personal data protection regime in Indonesia.
THE HARMONIZING INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE STATE FINANCIAL LOSSES IN CORRUPTION CASES Dian Devananda Akbar; Prija Djatmika; Nurini Aprilianda
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4684

Abstract

The disharmony in authority among various institutions including the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (BPKP), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Inspectorates, Regional Apparatus Work Units (SKPD), Public Accountants, and Judges in calculating state financial losses in corruption crime cases has led to legal uncertainty and debates over which institution holds the legitimate authority to determine such losses. Through juridical, philosophical, and sociological analysis, this study finds that the source of disharmony lies in the ambiguous norms of the Corruption Crime Law, which does not explicitly designate a single institution authorized to determine state losses. Based on its constitutional position, this research asserts the urgency of establishing BPK as the sole institution authorized to calculate state losses, accompanied by vertical harmonization of the roles of other institutions, strengthening of BPK's institutional capacity, standardization of audit methodologies, and a reaffirmation of corruption as a serious crime requiring evidentiary certainty. This study concludes that harmonizing authorities is an urgent step to strengthen the effectiveness and integrity of corruption law enforcement while enhancing public trust in Indonesia's anti-corruption mechanisms.
LEGAL PROGRESSIVENESS TOWARDS THE RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE Febi Karina; Nurini Aprilianda; Lucky Endrawati
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v4i1.187

Abstract

Legal protection for victims of sexual violence is a crucial element in a modern criminal justice system focused on substantive justice and victim recovery. Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes has introduced the strengthening of victims' rights through restitution mechanisms and the Victim Assistance Fund as a form of accountability for perpetrators and the state. However, in criminal justice practice, problems persist when requests for restitution are not submitted by investigators or public prosecutors, thus limiting judges' ability to fulfill victims' rights. This study aims to analyze the rights and authorities of law enforcement officers in submitting restitution requests and to examine the mechanisms and procedural law for fulfilling victims' restitution rights that are not submitted in court. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that although the normative framework for restitution is regulated in the TPKS Law and Government Regulation Number 29 of 2025, the procedural law is still not comprehensive. However, Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022 provides space for an active and progressive role for judges in ensuring the fulfillment of victims' restitution rights. This research emphasizes the urgency of harmonizing regulations and strengthening the role of the state in the recovery of victims of sexual violence.
THE PARADOX OF CHILD SENTENCING IN MURDER CASES: CRITIQUING THE 'BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD' PRINCIPLE IN INDONESIAN COURTS. Denny Ardian Priambodo; Nurini Aprilianda; Milda Istiqomah
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal offenses are no longer committed only by adults, but also by children, along with the development of technology and social dynamics. Indonesia, through Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, provides protection for children in conflict with the law. However, in practice there are still court decisions considered not to have fully applied the principle of the best interests of the child, such as the decision of the Penajam District Court imposing a 20-year sentence and the Lamongan District Court imposing an 11-year sentence. This research is a normative juridical study using a statutory and conceptual approach through library research. The results show that: (1) judges’ considerations are based on both juridical and non-juridical aspects; (2) the application of the best interests of the child principle has not been consistent and has not been fully oriented toward social reintegration; (3) sentencing that is not in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law has the potential to damage the child’s future and hinder the fulfillment of the child’s rights, in line with Arif Gosita’s concept of child protection. By examining these two decisions, it becomes important to emphasize that it is recommended to optimize restorative justice, improve the quality of guidance and rehabilitation in Juvenile Development Institutions and Correctional Centers, and strengthen inter-agency collaboration, including the active involvement of child psychologists in court proceedings.
Juridical Implication of the Legal Vacuum in Providing Compensation in Lieu of Restitution Ryan Ilham Fibriansyah; Nurini Aprilianda; Nadzriah Ahmad
RechtIdee Vol 20, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v20i2.22001

Abstract

Criminal offenses position victims as aggrieved parties affected by crimes committed against them. The protection and recovery measures for the losses victims bear should guarantee justice, ensuring victims receive compensation for the harm caused. Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Penal Code implies that compensation is an additional punishment imposed on the defendant. However, imprisonment, supervision, or community service are only applied if the defendant cannot provide compensation, failing to guarantee the compensation the victim is entitled to, as outlined in the court decision. In such cases, state involvement is required. This research aims to examine juridical implications of the legal vacuum in providing compensation in lieu of restitution. Using a normative method with statutory and analytical approaches, and grammatical and teleological interpretations, the study reveals that the absence of specific regulations leads to injustice, legal disadvantages, and legal uncertainty affecting victims of criminal offenses, particularly regarding their right to restitution. 
Are Judges Listening? Rethinking Sentencing in Child Sexual Violence through Victim Impact Statements in Indonesia Ramadianto, Anang Riyan; Istiqomah, Milda; Aprilianda, Nurini
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 25 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2025.25.2.15724

Abstract

The protection of victims' rights, especially child victims of sexual violence, remains a major challenge in Indonesia's criminal justice system. One critical yet underutilized instrument is the Victim Impact Statement (VIS), which allows victims to convey the psychological, emotional, social, and economic impact of the crime they experienced. However, the implementation of VIS in Indonesia is still limited due to the absence of explicit regulation in the current Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This paper aims to examine the role of VIS in strengthening victim protection and to analyze the inhibiting factors affecting its implementation in the Karanganyar District Court. Using a socio-legal approach, this study combines normative legal research with empirical data gathered through interviews with judicial actors. The findings reveal that the main obstacles lie in three areas: the lack of legal substance (absence of specific VIS regulation), weak legal structure (limited procedural guidelines and institutional support), and unsupportive legal culture (stigmatization of victims and lack of victim-centered perspectives among legal practitioners). The study proposes a structured model of VIS based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2022 and international practices, aiming to fill the normative gap and support future reform of Indonesia’s criminal procedure law. Strengthening VIS as a legal and procedural tool is essential for ensuring justice that is not only punitive but also restorative and responsive to the needs of victims.
REKONSTRUKSI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA TRANSFORMASI DARI EFISIENSI PROSEDURAL MENUJU KEADILAN KEMANUSIAAN Refangga, Galih; Aprilianda, Nurini; Sujiantoro, Sujiantoro; Budi Santoso, Sigit
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v17i1.154

Abstract

Reconstruction of the model of Indonesia's criminal justice system in the contemporary era faced with tensions between the efficiency of law enforcement and the protection of human rights. The birth of the new Criminal Procedure Code shows a tendency to strengthen the crime control model paradigm that is oriented towards effectiveness and efficiency, but has the potential to ignore the principle of due process of law. This study uses a normative-critical approach by examining the dynamics of regulations, judicial practices, and modern legal theories. The results of the study show that the mechanistic-legalistic judicial model has not been able to realize substantive justice because it emphasizes formal procedures too much and ignores the humanitarian dimension. Therefore, reconstruction is needed through an integrative-protection justice model that combines the family model approach, protection principles, and integrative legal theory. This model places the law not only as an instrument of enforcement, but also as a means of social recovery and the protection of human dignity. Thus, a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice can be achieved more comprehensively and sustainably. Keywords: Criminal Justice System, Substantive Justice, Due Process of Law, Crime Control Model, Protection
Juvenile Criminal Responsibility in Muslim-Majority States: Between Sharia, State Law, and Restorative Justice Julisa Aprilia Kaluku; Nurini Aprilianda; Prija Djatmika; Alfons Zakaria; Fatiha Gourari
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v18i1.32848

Abstract

Juvenile justice in Muslim-majority jurisdictions reveals a persistent normative tension between Sharia-based conceptions of criminal responsibility, state-centred legal regulation, and international child protection standards. This article comparatively examines juvenile criminal sanction policies in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, and Indonesia, with primary attention to the construction of criminal responsibility, models of sanctioning, institutional responses, and the place of community-based restorative mechanisms. Using a comparative approach, the study analyses how these jurisdictions negotiate the relationship between Islamic legal principles, national legislation, and culturally embedded local wisdom in responding to children in conflict with the law. The findings identify three general patterns: a predominantly punitive Sharia-oriented framework, a statutory-rehabilitative framework, and a hybrid framework combining legal reform with suboptimal local implementation. Among the four jurisdictions, Indonesia occupies a distinctive position because it institutionalises diversion and restorative justice while also allowing for socially grounded forms of reconciliation. With reference to this comparative synthesis, the article advances Dumot Justice as its principal conceptual contribution—a restorative-pluralist framework that integrates child protection, victim restoration, social accountability, and communal balance within a rights-sensitive juvenile justice design. The study concludes that sustainable juvenile justice reform in Muslim jurisdictions requires a jurisprudential model that integrates Sharia, national law, child protection, and culturally embedded restorative practices. Keywords: restorative justice; Islamic law; comparative legal analysis; child right protection.
Co-Authors A. Kadir, Nadhilah Abda Abda Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid Adi Kusumaningrum Agusta, Dika Ahmad Fauzi Ahmad Fauzi Al-Uyun, Dhia Alfons Zakaria Anang Riyan Ramadianto Anindita, Raras Natasya Ansori, Ansori Ardi Ferdian Arief Rahman Mahmoud Ashifa Yona Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang Bambang Sugiri Bambang SUGIRI Bambang Sugiri Budi Santoso, Sigit Chyntia Vindy Rahmani Cindy Shafira Denny Ardian Priambodo Dewi, Riska Ameliana Dian Devananda Akbar Didik Purnomo, Didik Dwi Ayu Rachmawati Endriyanti, Megah Novita Erny Herlin Setyorini Fachrizal Afandi Faizin Sulistio Faizin Sulistio Faizin Sulistio Faizin Sulistyo Faizin Sulistyo Faizin Sulistyo Fatiha Gourari Febi Karina Febrianika Maharani Fibriansyah, Ryan Ilham G. Gunawan Guntur Aris Prabowo Hanif Hartadi Harini, Novitasari Dian Phra Hartadi, Hanif Hensi Septia Utami Herman Suryokumoro Heru R. HADI Heru Ratno Hadi I Nyoman Nurjaya I Nyoman NURJAYA I NYOMAN NURJAYA Ifahda Pratama Hapsari Imera Azzahra Alivia Imera Azzahra Alivia Imtina, Salma Salsabila Indriana Prima Puspita Sari Ismail Navianto Istislam, - Joko Cahyono Julisa Aprilia Kaluku Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti Kadir, Nadhilah A. Krisna, Liza Agnesta Lucky Endrawati Lucky MH SH. Endrawati Luth, Thohir Luth, Thohir Machmud, Aris Megah Novita Endriyanti Milda Istiqomah Mubarok, Djihadul Mufatikhatul Farikha Mufatikhatul Farikha, Mufatikhatul Mufatikhatul Farikhah Mulyono, Bambang Hery Nababan, Anisa Magdalena Nadhilah A. Kadir Nadzriah Ahmad Nani Susilowati Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Novalia Pertiwi Pakpahan, Hartato Pradana, Indra Kurnia Okta Prastiti Siswayani Prastiti Siswayani Pratama, I Gusti Agung Ananta Pratama, I Gusti Ananta Prawati, Linda Prema, I Ketut Arjuna Satya Priadi, Randy Hilman Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika, Prija Ramadianto, Anang Riyan Rani Adriana Refangga, Galih Rohmat Rohmat Rohmat rohmat Roni Evi Dongoran Ruba'i, Masruchin Ruba?I, Masruchin Ruba’I, Masruchin Ryan Ilham Fibriansyah Ryan Ilham Fibriansyah Ryan Ilham Fibriansyah Samsul Huda Asrori Satya Prema, I Ketut Arjuna Setiawan Noerdajasakti Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Setiawan Nurdayasakti Shinta Ayu Purnamawati Siagian, Nurul Inayah Silfiah, Rossa Ilma Siti Noer Endah Situmorang, Septriono Solehuddin Solehuddin Sriti Hesti Astiti St. Fatima Sudarsono SUDARSONO Sugiri, Bambang Sugiri, Bambang Suhariningsih Sujiantoro, Sujiantoro Sulistiyo, Faizin Sulvia Triana Hapsari Sulvia Triana Hapsari Sulvia Triana Hapsari Susilo, Hariyanto Suwitno Yutye Imran Syihabuddin Tanaem, Jerymia Seky Tanriawan, Florensya Octavia Tohom Hasiholan Widyanti, Yeni Eka Yola Eska Afrina S yuliani, anggi ari