Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.197
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Mimbar Keadilan Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus YUSTISI Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Batulis Civil Law Review YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Journal Evidence Of Law Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Business Management and Economic Development Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Law and Economics Anayasa Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Future Academia : The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research on Scientific and Advanced International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Krisnadi Nasution
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 55 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 55 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Legal Protection for Consumers Using Transportation Services on The River Hardianto, Irwansyah Rizki; Nasution, Krisnadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discusses legal protection for consumers who use river transportation services, which aims to ensure the safety and comfort of users. With a normative juridical approach, this study uses the analysis of laws and regulations and a conceptual approach to evaluate the implementation of laws in the river transportation sector. The results show that despite regulations that protect consumer rights, implementation in the field still faces various challenges. Many business actors do not comply with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that regulate passenger safety, exacerbated by the weak supervision and socialization from the government. This research recommends increased supervision, more effective socialization, and strict law enforcement to ensure that consumer rights are optimally fulfilled.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR. 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 TENTANG PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR “STARBUCKS ROKOK” Bimarcelline Agatha; Krisnadi Nasution
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16201

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap merek atas pemberlakuan surut yang dilakukan oleh hakim pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 tentang pembatalan merek terdaftar Starbucks rokok sebagai upaya mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode pendekatan yang pada penelitian ini yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual didukung dengan sumber hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier yang dianalisa menggunakan deskriptif analisis dan intepretasi menggunaan metode argumentum per analogium guna menarik suatu kesimpulan dalam bentuk argumentasi untuk menjawab isu hukum. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini penyelesaian sengketa merek terkenal seringkali mengacu pada ketentuan merek yang berlaku saat ini dengan mengabaikan fakta tentang waktu permohonan pendaftaran merek khususnya pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 sehingga menimbulkan kerugian dan ketidakpastian hukum bagi pemilik merek terdaftar. Diharapkan hakim harus cermat melihat fakta dan waktu peristiwa dengan tidak memberlakukan surut suatu aturan dalam putusannya, sehingga putusan yang dihasilkan memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi pemilik merek yang terdaftar. Kata kunci: Merek Terkenal; Pemberlakuan Surut; Perlindungan Hukum.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR. 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 TENTANG PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR “STARBUCKS ROKOK” Bimarcelline Agatha; Krisnadi Nasution
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16201

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap merek atas pemberlakuan surut yang dilakukan oleh hakim pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 tentang pembatalan merek terdaftar Starbucks rokok sebagai upaya mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode pendekatan yang pada penelitian ini yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual didukung dengan sumber hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier yang dianalisa menggunakan deskriptif analisis dan intepretasi menggunaan metode argumentum per analogium guna menarik suatu kesimpulan dalam bentuk argumentasi untuk menjawab isu hukum. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini penyelesaian sengketa merek terkenal seringkali mengacu pada ketentuan merek yang berlaku saat ini dengan mengabaikan fakta tentang waktu permohonan pendaftaran merek khususnya pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 sehingga menimbulkan kerugian dan ketidakpastian hukum bagi pemilik merek terdaftar. Diharapkan hakim harus cermat melihat fakta dan waktu peristiwa dengan tidak memberlakukan surut suatu aturan dalam putusannya, sehingga putusan yang dihasilkan memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi pemilik merek yang terdaftar. Kata kunci: Merek Terkenal; Pemberlakuan Surut; Perlindungan Hukum.
Fair Legal Protection for Bankruptcy Respondent Debtors Sosilo, Peter; Nurjaya, I Nyoman; Prasetyawati, Endang; Nasution, Krisnadi
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, MARCH 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v6i1.2154

Abstract

Introduction: One of the important principles regulated in the Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations is the Going Concern Principle, which can enable a business entity or individual to run again even though it has fallen into bankruptcy, in this case the assets belonging to the debtor can be managed by the curator to obtain income as an effort to fulfill the debtor's debts. gradually to creditors.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze just legal protection for debtors who are respondents to bankruptcy in the Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical, examining positive legal norms with the concept of law as it is written in the book, namely by conducting studies of statutory regulations and literature studies.Results Main Findings of the Research: The application of the principle of business continuity in bankruptcy cases and postponing debt payment obligations is within the framework of legal protection for debtors and has a positive impact on increasing the company's economic value which in turn is used to pay debts to its creditors.
PENGGUNAAN ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Muhammad Anas Thurmudzi; Krisnadi Nasution
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Februari
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58487/akrabjuara.v7i1.1754

Abstract

As technology develops, new breakthroughs emerge which are considered more practical and make it easier for parties to settle business disputes out of court using Online Dispute Resolution. The Online Dispute Resolution method has not yet been regulated, meaning that there is a legal vacuum regarding the use of Online Dispute Resolution. This research is legal research. The approach used to answer this legal issue is the statute approach, which is an approach using legislation and regulations. Conceptual approach (conceptual approach) is used to examine and analyze the framework of thought, conceptual framework or theoretical basis of legal issues to be studied. Based on the results of the analysis of legal materials, it is concluded that the use of Online Dispute Resolution can be carried out where the Article 4 paragraph (3) of ADR Act stipulates that as long as it has been agreed upon by the disputing parties, dispute resolution through arbitration can occur in the form of electronic documents. Then, according to Article 5 of the ITE Act, it states that electronic information and/or electronic documents and/or their printouts are legal evidence. Even so, Online Dispute Resolution has not been able to run optimally because there are no separate regulations, therefore special arrangements regarding Online Dispute Resolution are needed to ensure legal certainty.
Reconstruction of the Authority of the Administrative Court (Ptun) To Ad-judicate Positive Fictitious Decisions Laksono, Nowo; Nasution, Krisnadi; Budiarsih
Law and Economics Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): June: Law and Economics
Publisher : Institute for Law and Economics Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discusses the lack of effectiveness in the authority of the State Administrative Tribunal (PTUN) in handling disputes arising from positive fictitious decisions, as regulated in Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. This law emphasizes PTUN's role in providing legal certainty for decisions that are deemed legally granted despite the absence of a response from the relevant authorities. Although PTUN has jurisdiction over such disputes, the overly formalistic procedural approach often leads to lawsuits being dismissed or deemed inadmissible, contradicting the principles of modern administrative justice.This study aims to reconstruct PTUN's authority to enhance its effectiveness in adjudicating cases involving positive fictitious decisions. A normative juridical approach is applied by examining applicable legal provisions, analyzing court rulings, and referring to relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that procedural rigidity and normative ambiguity remain significant obstacles, particularly in determining the object of the dispute and proving the silence of government officials or agencies. This research offers a conceptual reconstruction of PTUN's authority, advocating for a more progressive judicial interpretation and the enforcement of the due process of law principle. Strengthening PTUN’s role is expected to improve administrative accountability, expand public access to justice, and provide better legal certainty in addressing uncertainties arising from government inaction
State Responsibility In Providing Compensation To Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations Fakhruzy, Agung; Krisnadi Nasution; Ahmad Sholikhin; Frans Simangunsong
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.286

Abstract

The philosophical basis for providing compensation lies in the state's responsibility for its failure to prevent crimes. From a juridical perspective, Article 35 of Law Number 26 of 2000 on the Human Rights Court indicates that the provision of compensation is still dependent on a court decision. As such, even when gross human rights violations have occurred and victims are identified, if the accused is not proven guilty in court, they cannot be held accountable for providing compensation to the victims. This situation has the potential to create a vertical normative conflict with Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, particularly regarding fundamental human rights that must be fulfilled by the state. This study aims to examine the principles and the role of the state in providing compensation to victims of gross human rights violations. It employs a normative legal research method with a conceptual and philosophical approach, and data collection is carried out through literature review and legal document analysis. The research findings show that the principle of state responsibility in providing compensation to victims of gross human rights violations must be grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Analysis of Inventory As An Object of  Fiduciary Security In Credit Agreements Juridical Philosophical And Sociological Review Happy Trizna Wijaya; Made Warka; Krisnadi Nasution
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.288

Abstract

The development of the global economy is progressing rapidly in line with the dynamics of globalization. To support economic activities, large amounts of capital are required that are quick and easy to access. One of the ways to obtain such funds is by applying for credit through financial institutions. In the credit application process, collateral or security is typically required to guarantee the debt. One such object of fiduciary security is inventory. Inventory is a type of movable property that can serve as fiduciary collateral. This study aims to examine the concept of inventory as fiduciary collateral and to analyze its philosophical, juridical, and sociological foundations. The findings indicate that inventory, as fiduciary collateral, may include raw materials, goods in process, and finished goods. Philosophically, this type of collateral is based on a relationship of trust between creditor and debtor, particularly regarding the repayment of debt as agreed upon using the specified collateral.Juridically, the use of inventory as fiduciary collateral is regulated under Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, specifically in the Elucidation of Article 6 letter c. The unique characteristic of inventory lies in its dynamic and transferable nature, which results in the principle of droit de suite (right of pursuit) not being applicable. This is further emphasized in Articles 20 through 24 of the Fiduciary Security Law. Sociologically, fiduciary security agreements involving inventory contribute positively to economic activities within society and support the realization of equitable, prosperous, and just welfare.
EKSEKUSI JAMINAN KREDIT BERUPA KIOS PASAR OLEH BANK Hardianto, Tri; Nasution, Krisnadi; Setiadji, Sri
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 5 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The bank is an intermediary institution, meaning that its main activities are raising funds and channeling funds to the public. The funds withdrawn from the community are then channeled back to the community in the form of credit. Lending is generally done by entering into an agreement. "The agreement consists of a principal agreement, namely a debt and credit agreement and is followed by an additional agreement in the form of a guarantee agreement by the debtor. One object commonly used as collateral in a credit agreement is a market stall. The problem in this research is how the legal status of market kiosk ownership is used as a credit guarantee by the bank and how the bank's position in executing the credit guarantee is in the form of a market kiosk if the debtor defaults. In terms of the market stall material law cannot be categorized as an object because the market stall is only a permit to use the building, it cannot give birth to material relations even though the debtor has a permit in the form of a certificate of use of the right to sell in the form of KBP, SPTU, BPTU or type of permit to use the market stall others from the local government. Traders only have the right to lease or the right to use the market stall they occupy, the trader is not the owner. Until now because there are no regulations governing the mechanism of execution of credit guarantees in the form of market kiosks, execution of credit guarantees by binding under the form of market kiosks is carried out by asking the assistance of the market head or the market manager authorized to carry out the takeover of these market kiosks. transferred (leased) to other parties who intend to rent the kiosk.
WUJUD PENATAGUNAAN TANAH DALAM REFORMA AGRARIA YANG BERKEADILAN DAN BERKELANJUTAN Riawan, Ferry; Nasution, Krisnadi; Setyadji, Sri
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 5 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kebijakan penatagunaan tanah dalam mewujudkan reforma agraria yang berkeadilan dan berkelanjutan. Pelaksanaan reforma agraria perlu dilakukan sinergi yang kuat antara kegiatan penataan ruang dengan proses legalisasi aset untuk meminimalkan sengketa ruang dan pertanahan. Sengketa ruang dan pertanahan dinilai sebagai persoalan mendasar dalam kegiatan pembangunan. Dimana, sengketa ruang dan pertanahan banyak diakibatkan karena adanya tumpang tindih dan ketidaksesuaian izin penggunaan tanah. Sinkronisasi antara pengaturan penggunaan tanah atau lahan (land use) dengan proses administrasi pertanahan perlu dilakukan karena kondisi saat ini masing-masing pihak memiliki mekanisme dan acuan tersendiri terkait dengan pengaturan penggunaan dan pemanfaatan ruang. Penatagunaan tanah sebagai langkah implementasi rencana tata ruang, memberikan perlindungan hak pemilik tanah, sebagai bentuk partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan, wujud fungsi sosial tanah secara berkeadilan.
Co-Authors Agung Fakhruzy Ahmad Sholikhin Akbar, Dimas Fajriansyah Angraeni, Kartika Dyah Anhar, Andi Rangga Mahardika Ansory, Wachid Aditya Ariyanti, Riski Pebru Bimarcelline Agatha Budiarsih Budiarsih, Budiarsih Bukit, Jonneri Christina Tri Kurniasari Ekky Faridha Sari Evi Kongres Febriadi, Herry Ferry Riawan Firmansyah, Idris Frans Simangunsong Hanum, Rif’an Happy Trizna Wijaya Hardianto, Irwansyah Rizki Hardianto, Tri Henry Surya Wicaksono I Nyoman Nurjaya Idris Firmansyah Imam Sujono Izmy Savira Kurniawan, Alvin Laksono, Nowo Lucianus Budi Kagramanto M. Alfitra Gita Armanda Made Warka Made Warka, Made Mangesti, Yovita Arie Manurung, Saut Parulian Mas Rachmat Hidayat Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi Muhammad Anas Thurmudzi Noviekayati, IGAA. Novitiyaningsih, Leny Eka Nugroho, Muhammad Kelvin Adi Ratna Hastutik Riawan, Ferry Rif’an Hanum Riski Pebru Ariyanti Rosalinda Elsina Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina S Endang Prasetyawati Salviana, Fries Melia Sari, Ekky Faridha Sartika Alamsyah, Dwi Putri Setiadji, Sri Setyadji, Sri Slamet Suhartono Slamet Suhartono Sosilo, Peter Sri Setyadji Sukmawati Sukmawati Syahman Husni Ramadhan Syahmi, Taffy Faiq Syofyan Hadi Tedjokusumo, Dave David Wasana, Budi Yudhistira, Ferdian