Articles
<![CDATA[Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw ]]>
<![CDATA[Agustiawan, M. Hendri]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Rozah, Umi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 4, No 2 (2023): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18206
<![CDATA[Due to recent discoveries and technological advancements in neuroscience, we can gain a deeper understanding of the human brain that significantly impact juvenile criminal law, particularly concerning children's behavior and ability to regulate impulsive behavior. This study aims to analyze the current age of criminal responsibility in the Indonesian legal system using a neurolaw perspective that considers cognitive neuroscience and legal theory. The research utilizes normative legal research methodology with a statute approach and a neuroscience approach. The data obtained from literature research is then analyzed conceptually. The study results indicate that the age of criminal responsibility for children in Indonesia is 12 years; however, it has not yet reached 18 years. According to the neurolaw perspective, brain development within this age range is not fully matured and continues to undergo behavioral changes. This research implies the urgency of revising regulations regarding the age of criminal responsibility for children in Indonesia, considering the discoveries in neuroscience. Using a neurolaw perspective can encourage changes in legal policies that pay more attention to neurological factors in assessing juvenile criminal responsibility. As far as the law governs human behavior, the brain plays a crucial role in controlling that behavior. Therefore, a better understanding of the brain will lead to better and fairer laws.]]>
<![CDATA[Ambiguity Degrees of Courtesy in Trial: Ethical and Legal Norms, Legal Reasoning in Judicial Decisions ]]>
<![CDATA[Helmi, Muhammad Ishar]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Zada, Khamami]]>;
<![CDATA[Encep, Encep]]>
<![CDATA[ Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.23540
<![CDATA[Courtesy reasons are the basis for the legal reasoning of mitigation, as stated in the decision. Courtesy reasons only happen in one case. The Criminal Code explains the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of a sentence that is not considered decent in a conference. Explicitly, the word courtesy is not a reason to lighten the sentence. Article 197, paragraph 1, letter f of the Criminal Procedure Code contains the words "articles of statutory regulations which are the basis for punishment or action and articles of statutory regulations which are the legal basis of the decision." This paper uses normative legal research methods to analyze legal problems with analytical and prescriptive discipline. The findings in this research show that courtesy is not worthy of consideration in the decision as a basis for mitigation. Courtesy is an obligation for all parties in a court conference. Because when a party does not act politely, it is a crime against the judiciary or an insult to the Court. Also, courtesy norms are individual subjectivities that cannot be determined by law, especially by judges. Judges do not judge ethical norms but legal norms. The legal norms align with criminal law in that the use of norms of courtesy causes their application to criminal law because of their abstract and different nature.]]>
<![CDATA[DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Bhakti, Rizky Atswari]]>;
<![CDATA[Putrajaya, Nyoman Serikat]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Diponegoro Law Journal Vol 6, No 4 (2017): Volume 6 Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi S1 Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (721.632 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/dlj.2017.19779
<![CDATA[Disparitas pidana adalah penerapan sanksi pidana yang tidak sama terhadap tindak pidana yang sama atau sejenis atau terhadap tindak-tindak pidana yang sifat berbahayanya dapat di perbandingkan tanpa dasar pembenaran yang jelas. Disparitas pidana membawa problematika tersendiri dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Pemidanaan yang berbeda atau disparitas pidana merupakan bentuk dari diskresi hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan, di sisi lain pemidanaan yang berbeda atau disparitas pidana ini pun membawa ketidakpuasan bagi terpidana bahkan masyarakat.Faktor penyebab disparitas pidana dapat bersumber dari hukum itu sendiri dan juga bersumber pada diri hakim. Baik yang bersifat eksternal maupun internal. Disparitas pidana ini kedepannya dapat di minimalisir dengan menerapkan pedoman pidana “sentencing guidelines” yaitu ada dua variabel yang mengaturnya, yakni satu; keadaan-keadaan yang meliputi tindak pidana (yang menentukan tingkatan atau level dari tindak pidana tersebut), dua; catatan kriminal dari pelaku tindak pidana (misal residive, pelaku gabungan tindak pidana dan lain sebagainya). Usaha lain untuk meminimalisir disparitas yaitu meningkatkan peranan pengadilan banding dan di bentuknya komisi-komisi yudisial guna mengawasi kinerja hakim dalam memutus suatu perkara.Penulisan hukum tentang Disparitas Pidana dalam Putusan Hakim di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis empiris. Dikaitkan dengan pendekatan empiris yang mengkaji pada kenyataan yang terjadi terhadap disparitas pidana yang ada di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan observasi penelitian mengenai fakta-fakta yang didapat melalui wawancara dan diaplikasikan dengan di dasari teori-teori hukum yang ada, dengan wawancara dengan Hakim majelis di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang, serta melihat dan mengkaji putusan terkait dengan disparitas pidana terhadap tindak pidana pembunuhan yang terjadi di Kota Semarang. Penulisan hukum ini dapat dilihat bahwa disparitas putusan hakim dalam tindak pidana pembunuhan di mungkinkan selama disparitas itu tidak mencolok. Artinya dengan putusannya dapat memenuhi rasa keadilan bagi terdakwa dan masyarakat karena setiap kasus memiliki karakteristik yang berbeda antara yang satu dengan yang lain. Oleh karena itu, hakim dalam putusannya tidak boleh mementingkan unsur objektif dari pelaku saja. Selain itu agar putusan hakim bisa memenuhi rasa keadilan, maka diperlukan kerja sama antara aparat penegak hukum yang meliputi; Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, Hakim, Pengacara, Komisi Yudisial, Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dan masyarakat.]]>
<![CDATA[CRIMINAL POLICY ON INDONESIAN POLICE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD 2021-2023 ]]>
<![CDATA[Nugroho, Sofyan]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Supeno, Bambang Joyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal Philosophy of Law Vol 5, No 1 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56444/jpl.v5i1.4895
<![CDATA[Criminal policy or criminal politics as an effort to prevent and control crime is essentially an integral part of efforts to protect society (social defense) and efforts to achieve social welfare, both of which are an integral part of social politics (social policy). This is related to the criminal justice system is carried out by the police as the front guard in maintaining security and social order in society and law enforcement. Legal reform carried out by the Police through Restorative Justice is a new instrument in realizing social justice. Therefore, the first formulation of the problem in this paper is a) What is the regulatory framework of Indonesian Police Restorative Justice in Indonesia? b) How is the implementation of Indonesian Police Policy of Restorative Justice in Indonesia period 2021 – 2023? Methodologically, this research uses a qualitative approach, with a qualitative research design and literature study. The research results show a number of findings: First, there are still very few cases that use alternative dispute resolution for criminal acts. Second, the importance of a legal and regulatory policy framework that is based on restorative justice that is fair and has legal certainty.]]>
<![CDATA[THE LEGAL FORCE OF IMPLEMENTING SEMA NUMBER 2 OF 2023 REGARDING INTERFAITH MARRIAGES BASED ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY ]]>
<![CDATA[Pulungan, Muhammad Al Faisal]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Saptanti, Noor]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 32 No 3 (2024): JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v32i3.4381
<![CDATA[In general, everyone wishes to marry someone of the same faith so they can build and nurture a family with the same religion. However, in reality, interfaith marriages often occur in society due to unlimited human interactions and socialization, especially because Indonesia is a diverse country with many religious followers. The fact is, all religions in Indonesia prohibit interfaith marriages. In Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, Article 2 paragraph (1) states that "marriage is legitimate if carried out according to the laws of each respective religion and belief." This implies that a legitimate marriage must be conducted according to the same religion and belief, not different ones. However, there are still instances where some district courts grant applications for interfaith marriages. In Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU/XII/2014, the Constitutional Court firmly rejected interfaith marriages, and the Supreme Court also issued SEMA Number 2 of 2023 regarding Guidelines for judges in adjudicating cases of applications for registration of marriages between people of different religions. Despite the clear prohibition, interfaith marriages continue to occur.]]>
<![CDATA[Controversy Over The Rejection Of Interfaith Marriage Approval: Between The Circular Of The Supreme Court And The Population Administration Law In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Ridwan, Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Saptanti, Noor]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 6 (2023): December 2023 (Indonesia - Morocco - Angola) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Inara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v4i6.753
<![CDATA[This article aims to review the tension between the Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 2023 regarding Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases of Registration of Marriages between Different Religious and Belief Communities (SEMA) and Law Number 24 of 2013 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration (Adminduk Law), which creates a contradictory situationregarding interfaith marriages. Interfaith marriages havesparked controversy because they are not explicitly accommodated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. As a result, parties involved in legal disputes face difficulties in navigatingthe applicable regulations. This article is a normative research with a conceptual approach. The research results indicate a conflict between SEMA and the Adminduk Law regarding interfaith marriages in Indonesia, creating inconsistency in legal regulations. SEMA, as a Supreme Court guideline, suggests rejection of approval, while the Adminduk Law allows it with court determination as a condition. Hans Kelsen's Stufen theory shows a legal hierarchy, with theAdminduk Law above SEMA. However, the inconsistency between the two poses challenges in achieving legal certainty and balancing diversity. The implementation of the Stufen Theory inIndonesia involves a hierarchy of regulations, with SEMA included as a type of regulation.Although SEMA applies in the judiciary, debates surrounding the rejection of interfaithmarriages highlight the inconsistency with the Adminduk Law.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Consequences Of Using Power Of Attorney In Nominee Agreements: Flexibility And Legal Limitations ]]>
<![CDATA[Najlalinka, Zahrafhia]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Tuhana, Tuhana]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): April 2024 ( Indonesia - Kenya - Libya ) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Inara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v5i2.795
<![CDATA[The practice of nominee agreements involving the use of power of attorney has become an intriguing topic in the context of modern law. Nominee agreements refer to agreements entered into by certain parties, whereby one party cannot be the lawful owner of the ownership rights to an asset, particularly in the context of the participation of foreign nationals or among Indonesian citizens. However, this practice is also commonly employed by Indonesian citizens themselves, both in transactions between legal entities and individuals, as well as among individuals. Many of these practices are accompanied by formal resolutions through statements and power of attorney documents. This research aims to examine the legal consequences arising from such practices, as well as the extent to which they provide flexibility and the associated legal limitations.]]>
<![CDATA[Notary’s Legal Liability for Deeds Declared Null and Void ]]>
<![CDATA[Almira Rahma, Ardita]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Saptanti, Noor]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): April 2024 ( Indonesia - Kenya - Libya ) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Inara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v5i2.800
<![CDATA[Notary is a public official authorized to make authentic deeds. The authority of a Notary in making authentic deeds is the authority granted by the Notary Position Law as stipulated in Article 15 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. Notarial deeds have perfect evidentiary power, which means that as long as no defects and untruths are found in the deed, the judge must be convinced and believe in the deed. However, if a dispute arises against the authentic deed, then the deed can be canceled or null and void. In carrying out his official duties towards an authentic deed he made, Notary is charged with a responsibility. So that if a deed is declared null and void, the Notary can be held accountable. This research is normative legal research, using library techniques and document studies to collect legal materials. analysis of legal materials in this study using deductive analysis. The results of this research show that, the form of Notary's responsibility for deeds declared null and void can include, civil responsibility, criminal responsibility and administrative responsibility.]]>
<![CDATA[The Implementation of Actio Pauliana Creditor Law Bankruptcy Boedel Dispute Process to Achieve Substantive Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[Marpi, Yapiter]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwadi, Hari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i3.1305
<![CDATA[This Actio pauliana is actually a lawsuit that substantively attempts to confirm that the debtor's legal actions are declared legally invalid if they harm the creditor. In bankruptcy law, actio pauliana is an important instrument so that substantive justice, especially for creditors, can be implemented optimally. This research aims to analyze the substantive justice aspects of actio pauliana in the field of bankruptcy law. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The research results confirm that the essence of actio pauliana in bankruptcy disputes is viewed from the aspect of substantive justice, namely that it is aimed at protecting creditor rights, especially when there are debtor legal actions that can harm creditors. Apart from that, Actio Pauliana also emphasizes the restitutive aspect as per the substantive justice concept, namely being able to declare the debtor's actions to have no legal force if the action is detrimental to the debtor and reduces the number of bankruptcy debts as has been determined. In its development, the actio pauliana lawsuit in bankruptcy actually represents the fairness aspect as a manifestation of substantive justice so that in the future the actio pauliana lawsuit will not only represent factual losses, but also include potential losses that directly harm creditors and can be proven fairly and properly]]>
<![CDATA[Celah Korupsi Kebutuhan Medis Di Indonesia Pada Masa Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Wicaksono, Adi Hardiyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v5i3.471-483
<![CDATA[Isu potensi korupsi kebutuhan medis pada masa pandemi Covid-19 yang diberitakan media online menunjukkan ada ketidakpercayaan pemerintah pada para pihak terkait efektivitas penyaluran dan penggunaan kebutuhan medis bagi para tenaga medis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis adanya celah korupsi pada saat diadakannya pengadaan alat medis di Indonesia pada saat pandemi Covid-19. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil analisa menunjukkan: potensi besar korupsi pada aparatur pemerintahan akan adanya momentum covid-19 yang menjadi cenderung berpotensi diuntungkan karena seluruh aspek pemerintahan sedang terfokus pada pandemi covid-19, ditambah lagi adanya peraturan yang pada intinya menyatakan bahwa biaya yang dikeluarkan dalam rangka pelaksanaan kebijakan penanggulangan covid-19, merupakan bagian dari biaya ekonomi untuk penyelamatan perekonomian dari krisis dan bukan merupakan kerugian keuangan negara. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah celah korupsi dalam hal kebutuhan medis di Indonesia pada masa covid-19 terbuka karena adanya Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) dan/atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional dan/atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan, yang mengatur bahwa penggunaan biaya untuk penanggulangan covid-19 bukan merupakan kerugian keuangan negara.]]>
