Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : e-Journal of Linguistics

Improving Dayaknese-Speaking Learners’ English Pronunciation Ristati; I Nyoman Suparwa; I Nengah Sudipa; Ni Made Dhanawaty
e-Journal of Linguistics Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): July
Publisher : The Doctoral Studies Program of Linguistics of Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/e-jl.2019.v13.i02.p08

Abstract

The L1 influence causes difficulties for Dayaknese-speaking leaners (hereinafterreferred to as learners) of English in producing English sounds. In English, pronunciation playsimportant role to understand the communication. The purposes of learning English pronunciationfor learners are (1) able to communicate in English clearly and intelligibly, (2) able to get themeaning of information conveyed in real life situations, (3) able to improve self-confidencewhile communicating oral English, and (4) able to monitor the use of English (able to listen,understand, and produce). The teaching of English subject in Indonesian schools includes fourskills, namely listening, speaking, reading, and writing. While linguistic elements, such asvocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, and cultural patterns of discourse are the supporters ofthese four skills.This current research aimed to describe the implementation of behaviorism learning method andcommunicative approach as an attempt to improve English pronunciation for learners. Thiscurrent research was conducted by means of Research and Development (R & D) design,employing the stages as follows: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation.Testing was done with experiment, which compares the effectiveness between the old(conventional) learning method and the new method (behaviorism learning method with acommunicative approach). The indicators of the effectiveness of new method were the speed ofthe learners’ understanding, the learners’ creativity, and the learners’ learning outcomes.Experiment was carried out by comparing with previous condition and after using a new learningmethod (before-after) or also called one group pretest-posttest. Based on statistical count, t count= -34.37 and t table = 1.67, the value of t count falls on Ha acceptance area (new learningmethod was more effective than conventional learning method) or Ha was accepted and Ho wasrejected.
Co-Authors A Hadi Arifin Achmad Zahrudin Akhyar, Chairil Alfiana Alfiana Alfiana Alisa Adelena Altalarik, Agel Andi Amri Bahri, Halida Chairil Ahyar Chairil Akhyar Chairul Azman Chalirafi Chalirafi, C Chalirafi, Chalirafi Chetty Tristantia Tarigan Chiril Akhyar Cut Zahrani Darmawati Darmawati Dellis Pratika, Dellis EM Yusuf Iis Emmy Hamidah Eni Rakhmawati Fajar, M. Syahrial Fauzi, Iwan Ghazali Syamni Ghazali Syamni Husaini Husaini Husaini Husaini, Husaini Husaini I Nengah Sudipa I NYOMAN SUPARWA Ikramuddin, Ikramuddin Jummaini Khairina AR. Lesly Martha Cecylia Meka Lianti Lianti Listiana Sri Mulastih Listiana Sri Mulatsih Lusi Afriliana M. Raja Rafli Mardhiah, Ainol Maria Arina Luardini Mariyudi Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Matriadi, Faisal Misrita Muhamad Risal Tawil Muhammad Fikri Akbar Muhammad Hafidz Akbar Mursidah Mursidah Muttaqien Muttaqien Muttaqien Muttaqien Muttaqin Muttaqin Ni Made Dhanawaty Nofianti Nofianti Nurainun Nurjanna Ladjin Nurlela Nurlela Nurlela Nurlela, Nurlela Oki Dwipurwani Ola Liana ZK Pratiwi, Rati Putri, Lidia Syah Rahmaniar Raihan Cahaya Raisa Salsabila Reja Azwani Restu Widyo Sasongko Rico Nur Ilham Rieneke Ryke Kalalo Risa Novia Riska Yanti Rogas, Yasin Ali Saifuddin Salvador, Jude Anne P. Sean Michael Owen Wijaya Siti Zahara Sri Rizky Sri Wahyuni Sultan Fadlullah Nuri Sumi Amelya Harahap Sutriani Syamsul Bahri Syifa Azzahra T. Hafifah Poetry Zulmi Ulya Alfajri Wahyuddin Albra Wardhiah Wardhiah, Wardhiah Wardhiah Wardiah Wardiah Wendy Wendy Yanita Yoskapela Yoskapela Yurianti, Ridha Alifa Yusniar Yuyun Wahyuni Zuhra Zulfan Zulham Zulham Zulham Zulham, Z Zulhamdi Zulhamdi