Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Comparison of IB-NOSA and Discovery Learning Models on Students' Scientific Literacy and Scientific Argumentation Skills in High School Nur Rezki Octavia; Rachmawaty Rachmawaty; Oslan Jumadi; Firdaus Daud; Nur Rezki Octavia; Rachmawaty Rachmawaty; Oslan Jumadi; Firdaus Daud; Hartono Hartono
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v6.i4.2026.9

Abstract

This study aimed to describe and compare the effects of the IB-NOSA and Discovery Learning models on scientific literacy and scientific argumentation skills of tenth-grade high school students, as well as to examine the significant differences between the two models in the context of Biology learning. This study was quasi-experimental research with a pretest–posttest nonequivalent control group design. The study involved two classes, namely Experimental Class I which was taught using the IB-NOSA model and Experimental Class II which was taught using the Discovery Learning model. The research sample consisted of 72 students of grade 10, with 36 students in Experimental Class I and 36 students in Experimental Class II. Data were collected using a scientific literacy test based on contextual stimuli and a scientific argumentation test in the form of essay questions assessed using the Toulmin Argumentation Pattern rubric. Before hypothesis testing, the data were analyzed using normality and homogeneity tests as prerequisite tests. Hypothesis testing was conducted using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The results showed that the Sig. value was 0.131 (p > 0.05), indicating that H₀ was accepted for the scientific literacy test, and the Sig. value was 0.004 (p < 0.05), indicating that H₀ was rejected. Thus, it can be concluded that the IB-NOSA and Discovery Learning models have a relatively similar effect on scientific literacy, but the IB-NOSA model is more effective in improving students’ scientific argumentation skills.
The Influence of Synectics, Mind Mapping, Cooperative Learning (SM2CL) Models on Creative Thinking Skills and Understanding of Nutritional Concepts in Digestive System Material in Students Lisra Pratama; A. Mushawwir Taiyeb; Rachmawaty
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 12 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v12i2.14205

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Synectics, Mind Mapping, Cooperative Learning (SM2CL) learning model on creative thinking skills and understanding of the concept of the human digestive system in class XI students of MAN 3 Bone. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study with a quantitative approach. The research design is a pretest-posttest control group design. The population in the study were all class XI students in the 2025/2026 academic year who were spread into 2 study groups. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling, namely saturation sampling. A total of 2 study groups were used in this study, namely, study group XI A5 as the experimental class applied the SM2CL model and study group XI A6 as the control class applied the Direct Instruction model. Based on the results of the Ancova test, the significance value of the creative thinking skills variable was 0.001 < 0.05 and the significance value of understanding learning concepts was 0.041 < 0.05, so it can be concluded that the application of the synectics, mind mapping, cooperative learning (SM2CL) learning model has a significant or real effect on creative thinking skills and understanding concepts in class XI students of MAN 3 Bone.