Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Perpu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Antara Kegentingan Yang Memaksa dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi K. Harjono, Dhaniswara; Panjaitan, Hulman; Tobing, Gindo L.
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (240.365 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i12.11323

Abstract

Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang Udang (PERPU) dalam kegentingan yang memaksa sebagai salah satu bentuk peraturan perundang-undangan menurut UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 jo UU No. 15 Tahun 2019 jo UU No. 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang Undangan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum juridis normatif atau yang juga dikenal sebagai penelitian hukum doctrinal. Penelitian ditujukan terhadap asas-asas hukum dalam ketentuan normatif, penerapan hukum positif atau yang bersifat ius constitutum. Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Dalam perspektif konstitusional, baik dari segi putusan MK No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 tanggal 1 Februari 2010 maupun doktrin yang mengatur alasan-alasan konstitusional penerbitan PERPU khususnya untuk memaknai “hal ikhwal kegentingan yang memaksa”, dikaitkan dengan putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVII/2020 tanggal 3 Nopember 2021, maka penerbitan PERPU No. 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja tidak memenuhi alasan konstitusional dan terkesan dipaksakan. Hal ini telah mengakibatkan penebitan PERPU No. 2 Tahun 2022 merupakan perbuatan yang melanggar putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi dan berdampak negatif dalam sejarah ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia
KAJIAN BAKTI SOSIAL PENGOBATAN SESUAI UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN Suminah, Suminah; Panjaitan, Hulman; Parulian, Adrian; Ciputri, Leony
Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): Special Issue Vol. 7 No. 4 Tahun 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i4.39043

Abstract

Manusia sebagai makhluk sosial dan juga sebagai makhluk individu (pribadi) yang tidak dapat berdiri sendiri dalam hubungannya di masyarakat, dalam memenuhi kebutuhannya baik material maupun immaterial. Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidupnya, manusia perlu berinteraksi dengan manusia lain, agar interaksi yang terjadi tertib, maka perlu adanya pengaturan oleh hukum. Interaksi dalam pelayanan kesehatan diatur oleh hukum yang mengatur tentang kesehatan. Bentuk pengabdian kepada masyarakat dalam memberikan dukungan kepada mereka yang membutuhkan secara sukarela tanpa mengharapkan imbalan dan pengakuan, dikenal sebagai suatu kegiatan bakti sosial. Pengobatan pada masyarakat kurang mampu dapat dilaksanakan lewat pengobatan secara gratis yang dapat dilakukan lewat kegiatan bakti sosial pengobatan, agar tercapai masyarakat yang sehat, sehingga dapat melakukan kegiatan sehari-hari secara optimal, agar tercapai cita-cita bangsa. Dengan masyakat yang sehat akan tercapai pendidikan yang optimal karena memiliki otak yang cerdas. Sehingga kesejahteraan di masyarakat akan tercapai. Bakti sosial pengobatan merupakan pelayanan kesehatan yang sangat diperlukan mengingat masih banyaknya masyarakat yang memiliki ekonomi menengah ke bawah dan jauh dari sarana kesehatan.
The Cost Burden Paradox in Petty Corruption Enforcement: A Socio-Legal Study Based on Cost-Awareness Sandhy, Andhika Prima; Panjaitan, Hulman
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.564

Abstract

Law enforcement efforts against petty corruption in Indonesia are currently trapped in a serious economic inefficiency paradox, where case-handling operational costs often far exceed the value of the savings from avoided state losses. This problem is further complicated by norm disharmony between the efficiency spirit in Law Number 1 of 2023 and the rigidity of sectoral regulations effective as of January 2026. This study aims to analyze such inefficiency using the EAL approach and formulate a new Cost-Awareness-based settlement model. The research method applied is socio-legal, synthesizing doctrinal analysis of norm conflicts with secondary data evaluation regarding case cost burdens and social behavior. Research findings reveal that the conventional retributive approach creates a double loss for state finances. Fundamental juridical barriers are identified in the form of a regulatory “double lock”: Article 4 of Law Number 31 of 1999 which closes the material discretion space, and Article 82 letter c of Law Number 20 of 2025 formally excluding corruption from the restorative justice mechanism. To unravel this deadlock, the study recommends a limited double amendment to both articles, the application of financial sanctions in the form of Double Restitution accompanied by administrative sanctions of dismissal, and the strengthening of public oversight through Citizen Auditors. This model is offered as a concrete solution to ensure legal certainty and state budget efficiency.
Religious Freedom and House of Worship Licensing on Private Land Siahaan, Ester Debora; Panjaitan, Hulman; Saragi, Paltiada
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 6 Issue 2, April 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v6i2.3826

Abstract

Introduction: This article analyzes the legal protection of religious freedom regarding the licensing of houses of worship built on private land. While the Indonesian Constitution strictly guarantees the right to worship, administrative barriers often hinder this fundamental freedom. This study specifically addresses the practical challenges and discriminatory requirements faced by minority religious groups in navigating restrictive local regulations.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the legal alignment between constitutional rights and administrative regulations regarding the establishment of places of worship. Examine the interaction between individual land ownership rights (Property Certificate) and licensing requirements. Furthermore, this study explores a more sensitive legal protection model to ensure legal certainty for minority groups in Indonesia.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative legal method by examining legal norms, principles, and doctrines related to religious freedom. The study uses legislative, conceptual, and case approaches, focusing on Gereja Kasih Karunia Indonesia (GEKARI) in Jakarta. Data analysis is carried out qualitatively through systematic and constitutional interpretation of primary and secondary legal materials.Findings of the Research: The findings prove that restrictive administrative requirements, such as local community support, create a "social veto" that undermines constitutional religious freedom. This research offers a novel perspective by integrating agrarian law’s social function with administrative law to protect worship on private property. It concludes that shifting from a social-approval model to objective administrative verification is essential for legal certainty.
Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) dan Upaya Pemerintah Mengentaskan Kemiskinan di Kelurahan Sidorejo Hilir, Medan Tembung Panjaitan, Hulman; Desinta Desinta; Bago, Rhyfka Arlina; Sinurat, Yohana; Tamba, Josua Armando; Julia Ivana
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.8772

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of the Family Hope Programme (PKH) in Sidorejo Hilir Sub-district, Medan Tembung District, Medan City, as part of the government’s efforts to reduce poverty. The study focuses on the methods used to implement the PKH, the constraints and difficulties encountered during its implementation, and how the programme has impacted the socio-economic conditions of beneficiary families. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach to collect data through interviews, observations, and documentation with village officials, PKH facilitators, and Beneficiary Families (KPM). The research findings indicate that the implementation mechanism of the PKH in Sidorejo Hilir Sub-district has followed the procedures for data collection via the DTKS, verification, selection of beneficiary families, and the provision of assistance on a regular basis, as well as fulfilling responsibilities in the fields of education and health. The PKH has been shown to reduce the expenditure burden on poor families, improve access to education and health care, and encourage behavioural changes that foster greater awareness of the importance of education and health. However, the programme still faces a number of challenges. These include inaccurate beneficiary data, delays in disbursement, a limited number of field officers, and a lack of public understanding of the programme’s mechanisms and responsibilities. Overall, the PKH has made a positive contribution to poverty alleviation in Sidorejo Hilir. However, to achieve sustainable poverty alleviation, improvements are needed in data collection, coordination, support, and economic empowerment.
Co-Authors Aqilah, Zahra Nur Aulia, Ameytia Rizka B. Bulan, Z. Intan Bago, Rhfyka Arlina Bago, Rhyfka Arlina Bernard Nainggolan, Bernard Bethlen , Andrew Bethlen, Andrew Betlehn, Andrew Charlie S, Julivan Ciputri, Leony Desinta Desinta Desinta, Desinta Dhaniswara K. Harjono Evri, Evri Fatchurochim, Auwalu Gindo L. Tobing, Gindo L. Ginting, Andreas Halomoan Napitupulu, Josua Harjono, Dhaniswara K Irwan Panjaitan, Petrus Ivanna, Julia Jamaludin . Januar, Inri Jayadi Pandiangan, Hendri Jayadi, Hendri Jefferson, Steven Julia Ivana Junani, Natalia K. Harjono, Dhaniswara L. Panggabean , Mompang Lalamentik, Sylvia Anita Liawati, Mira Sonia Seba Manik, Alvin Putra Hariando Manik, Frita Rohani Manurung, Thessa D Triputri Marchiano Lumban Gaol, Hotben Mikael, San Monang Siregar, Jephyri Nababan, Ramsul Napitupulu, Diana R.W Nasution, Dinda Amelia Putri Noviyanto, Dedi Eka Nurhasanah, Cindy PAHALA, ERIC SANDY Pakpahan, Rachel Pakpahan, Rachel Meilisa Pangalila, Denny Parulian, Adrian Pieris, John PRAMANA, NDINTA HERRY Purba, Kevin Agatha Sandhy, Andhika Prima Saragi, Paltiada Siahaan, Despri Mariani Siahaan, Despri Mariyani Siahaan, Ester Debora Simanjuntak, Ade Hasiana Simanjuntak, Edison Simbolon, David Julianto Sinurat, Yohana Sri Widiarty , Wiwik Sri Yunita Suaris Firdaus Sembiring, Suaris Firdaus Suhartono, Anang Suminah Suminah, Suminah Suparman, Jaja Surya Dharma Sutopo, R. Bayu Probo Tamba, Josua Armando Tobing, Gindo L Tobing, Sthepany Veronika, Caroline Wijayati, Ani Wirata Laksmi, Gratia Wiwik Sri Widiarty Yanzalinda, Lisa Yeo, Susilo Kurniawan