Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Dynamics of Access to Justice for Marginalized Communities in Urban Green Space Utilization Conflicts During Ongoing Social and Environmental Transitions Geofani Milthree Saragih; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.271

Abstract

Urban green-space conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge for marginalized communities, exacerbating existing social and environmental inequalities in cities undergoing rapid urbanization and environmental transitions. This study explores the dynamics of access to justice for marginalized groups in the context of urban green-space conflicts, focusing on the barriers they face and the enabling factors that improve their ability to access legal remedies. Through a socio-legal research design, data was collected using surveys, case reviews, and stakeholder interviews, which were analyzed to identify key physical, socio-economic, and institutional barriers that hinder equitable access to green spaces. Findings revealed that marginalized communities often experience physical barriers such as limited proximity to green spaces, socio-economic disparities that prevent them from accessing legal resources, and institutional constraints, including discriminatory urban planning policies. Despite these challenges, enabling factors such as legal aid networks, participatory forums, and inclusive urban planning policies emerged as crucial elements in improving access to justice for these communities. Moreover, the study examined the impact of social and environmental transitions, such as urbanization and climate change, on justice outcomes, showing that these transitions can either exacerbate or alleviate barriers depending on how policies are implemented. The study emphasizes the need for policy reforms that promote equity in urban planning and legal aid systems, ensuring that marginalized communities are included in decision-making processes. Future research should explore the impact of environmental justice policies in global contexts and investigate new legal frameworks to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations.
Penyuluhan Anti Bullying terhadap Karang Taruna “Bintang Timoer” Dusun Jetak dalam Menciptakan Kondisi Masyarakat yang Harmonis Sutarto, Retno Eko Mardani; Aisyah Rukmi Widowati; Siti Fatimah; Aziz Widhi Nugroho; Azahery Insan Kamil; Aisyania Yogi Puspita; Siti Nurjanna Lessy; Rengga Kusuma Putra
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v6i2.10959

Abstract

Violence and bullying are social issues that still frequently arise among adolescents, both in schools and communities. Lack of knowledge about the forms, impacts, and prevention mechanisms of bullying means that such behavior is often considered normal and not immediately addressed. This community service activity aims to increase the understanding and awareness of adolescents, especially in the Karang Taruna "Bintang Timoer" community in Jetak Hamlet, Pule Village, regarding the importance of bullying prevention through an educational, participatory, and community-based approach. The implementation method includes counseling, interactive discussions, and case simulations that are expected to be able to pioneer positive behavior in the adolescent environment. The results of the activity showed an increase in participants regarding the definition, types, psychological and social impacts of bullying, and prevention strategies. Participants were also able to identify forms of behavior that constitute bullying and develop simple response steps that can be implemented within the youth organization in particular and the community in general. Evaluation through a post-activity questionnaire will show a significant increase in participants' understanding of anti-bullying. This activity is expected to be the first step in building.
Human Rights Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Ethical Governance and Regulatory Frameworks Rengga Kusuma Putra; Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Wardhani; Edvardas Juchnevicius; Sandra Leoni
Discourse Journal on Law and Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): May: Discourse on Law and Society
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/djls.v1i2.147

Abstract

The rapid advancement and integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into diverse sectors of society have generated complex ethical and human rights challenges. Technologies involving surveillance, data collection, algorithmic decision-making, and facial recognition pose significant risks to privacy, equality, and freedom of expression. This study examines the intersection of AI and human rights through a comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in the European Union (EU), the United States (US), and Asia. Employing a comparative legal approach, the research analyzes international and national regulatory instruments, including the EU AI Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Case studies of AI-related human rights violations, such as algorithmic bias and discrimination, are incorporated to illustrate real-world implications. Findings reveal substantial differences in governance approaches: the EU emphasizes a risk-based model prioritizing human rights protections, while the US and Asia adopt more fragmented or centralized strategies. The study underscores the urgent need for global regulatory harmonization to safeguard fundamental rights and promote ethical AI development. By highlighting both strengths and limitations of existing frameworks, the research contributes to ongoing debates on balancing innovation with accountability, transparency, and human rights protection in the digital era.
Balancing Individual Rights and State Authority in Criminal Justice Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Procedural Fairness and Legal Accountability Rengga Kusuma Putra; Retno Saraswati; Edvardas Juchnevicius; Aulia Rahman
Journal of Civil Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): December : International Journal of Civil Criminal Law
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/jccl.v1i3.142

Abstract

Background: Criminal justice reform has become a crucial global issue in maintaining the balance between the protection of individual rights and state authority, particularly amid the increasing complexity of law enforcement and the risk of abuse of power. Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship between the principles of due process of law, legal accountability, and the rule of law within criminal justice systems, as well as to compare their implementation in common law and civil law systems. Methods: This research employs a normative and comparative approach through the analysis of legal regulations, criminal justice practices, case studies of procedural violations, and cross-country comparisons, supported by interviews with academics and legal practitioners. Results: The findings indicate that although the principles of due process, legal accountability, and the rule of law are widely recognized, their implementation still faces significant challenges, including weak oversight, procedural inconsistencies, and limited institutional capacity. The comparative analysis also reveals a growing convergence between common law and civil law systems in adopting human rights-based standards, despite differences in procedural approaches. This study concludes that the holistic integration of these three principles is essential to establish a fair, transparent, and accountable criminal justice system.