Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Need-Assessment sebagai Kunci Perencanaan Program BK Komprehensif: Kajian Systematic Literature Review Cahyaningtyas, Kania; Suherman, Uman
G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Agustus 2025. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/g-couns.v9i3.7412

Abstract

Need assessment adalah fondasi penting dalam perencanaan program bimbingan dan konseling (BK) komprehensif. Dengan memahami kebutuhan khusus setiap siswa secara terstruktur, konselor dapat menyesuaikan program BK agar lebih sesuai, sehingga menghasilkan intervensi dan sistem pendukung yang lebih efektif. Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya asesmen kebutuhan siswa untuk memahami berbagai dimensi kebutuhan, seperti pribadi, sosial, belajar dan karier. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode PRISMA dalam systematic literature review untuk menyeleksi 20 artikel relevan untuk mengeksplorasi keterlibatan siswa, integasi teknologi, dan strategi asesmen. Prosesnya mencakup penentuan pertanyaan, pemilihan sumber, dan penyaringan ketat agar hasilnya tepat. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa teknologi seperti aplikasi digital dapat meningkatkan efisiensi pengumpulan data, sementara keterlibatan aktif siswa memastikan hasil yang relevan dan valid. Tantangan utama dalam program BK adalah rendahnya partisipasi siswa dan keterbatasan sumber daya. Solusinya dapat berupa pelatihan konselor dan pemanfaatan teknologi. Penelitian ini membantu konselor merancang program BK yang lebih efektif dan menegaskan pentingnya need assessment dalam manajemen BK. Kata kunci: need assessment, perencanaan program, bimbingan dan konseling, teknologi
How Reliable and Valid Is the Student Autonomy Scale When Examined Through the Rasch Model? Yuca, Verlanda; Suherman, Uman; Nurihsan, Juntika; Budiman, Nandang; Magistarina, Elrisfa
International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education Inpress (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/00699za0002

Abstract

Autonomy can influence students to regulate themselves through thinking, feeling, behaving, acting, being responsible for the decisions made and living them with social considerations. Several existing instruments for assessing student autonomy still contain items that are not yet relevant to the needs of Indonesian students. This presents an interesting opportunity to develop and adapt them to the diverse social, cultural, institutional, and academic backgrounds of Indonesian students, as well as the dynamics of diverse student populations. This study aims to develop a scale to validate student autonomy used purposive sampling. This study was conducted in 2024, involving 378 students as participants consisting of 39 males and 339 females aged 17-23 years at Padang State University. This instrument is called the Student Autonomy Scale. This study uses a quantitative approach with 40 questions with "yes-no" formats as answer choices—data analysis using the Rasch model and Winsteps software. The results showed that the Cronbach Alpha value, which measures the interaction between people and items, was 0.68, included in the sufficient category. In addition, the item reliability of 0.99 indicates that the items in the autonomy questionnaire can be used to measure autonomy in students. The use of theory-based assessment methods, cross-cultural trials, and adaptive technology are some of the solutions proposed to improve the measurement quality. The Student Autonomy Scale developed in this study has a novelty that is specifically designed for the context of students in Indonesia with various considerations by adapting a comprehensive autonomy theory and integrating several important aspects and providing more precise, accurate, and standardized analysis in the era of disruption and the 21st century.
Empathy in Helping Professions: A Scoping Literature Review Diswantika, Noviana; Rusmana, Nandang; Suherman, Uman; Qurbi, Abdullah
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025143136-0-86

Abstract

Weak empathy results in a lack of destructive behaviour in social life, intolerance, and discrimination. Empathy is a more comprehensive and profound concept than conventional empathy. This study is a scoping literature review that aims to identify what is known about empathy in helping professions. A systematic search was conducted on electronic databases, namely ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Journal Nasional, and Taylor and Francis, studies from 2010-2025. Data analysis used PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The results of the study were mapped based on the following criteria: conceptualisation of empathy, factors in the development of empathy, and research on the development of empathy, and data analysed based on content analysis. The research findings show that applicable to various fields of helping professions. Factors that can influence empathy are divided into constructive empathy development, including altruism, cooperation, compassion, morality, justice, and happiness. However, destructive empathy development is related to ability, feelings, people, individuals, capacity, pain, social behaviour, and deficits. Research on empathy has developed significantly, especially in the fields of health and psychology, using quantitative research. However, further analysis is needed to develop a conceptual analysis of empathy that focuses on other fields of expertise in a more specific and comprehensive manner, taking into account the aspects, factors, and validity of empathy.
Autonomy in Indonesian Counseling Students at Universities: A Comparative Study Yuca, Verlanda; Suherman, Uman; Nurihsan, Juntika; Budiman, Nandang; Magistarina, Elrisfa
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025143139-0-86

Abstract

Student autonomy refers to an individual's ability to manage their own learning process, make informed academic decisions, and take responsibility for their personal development. The level of autonomy can vary depending on the campus environment, learning approach, and the type of academic support provided. This study aims to describe and analyze the differences in student autonomy between Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) and Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI). This study used a comparative, descriptive, and quantitative approach. Samples were purposively selected from students at Universitas Negeri Padang and Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia who actively attended lectures. The data collection instrument was The Autonomy Questionnaire for Students with the Guttman scale model with "yes-no" formats as answer choices that measured the dimensions of learning autonomy, decision-making, and academic responsibility. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a comparative test (t-test). The results of the analysis showed that Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia students had a higher level of autonomy than students from Universitas Negeri Padang. Most respondents from Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia were in the high autonomy category, while 50.4% of respondents from Universitas Negeri Padang were in the moderate category. The t-test results revealed significant differences between the two groups of students in aspects of decision-making and independent learning management. These differences can be attributed to variations in learning approaches, the role of lecturers as facilitators, and the more supportive academic environment at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. The results of this study emphasize the importance of developing learning strategies and campus culture that can encourage student autonomy more evenly across universities.