Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REFORM

Guidelines for Implementing Imprisonment Sentences with Single Formulation (A Critique of Book I of the National Criminal Code) Musa, M.; Zulhuda, Sonny; Endri, Endri; Susanti, Heni; Rinaldi, Kasmanto
LAW REFORM Vol 20, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i1.52851

Abstract

The most basic difference in the criminal system between the Criminal Code (WvS) and the National Criminal Code is the provision of sentencing guidelines. It is important to formulate guidelines for sentencing as a provision to achieve the objectives of punishment because they are related to the formulations of single and alternative penalties for criminal acts in the provisions of the National Criminal Code. This paper aims to conduct a theoretical study on the formulation of the criminal system from the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation contained in Book I of the National Criminal Code, as a general rule that applies to Book II of the National Criminal Code and criminal law out of the National Criminal Code. The results of the study show that the formulation of criminal application guidelines with a single formulation contained in the provisions of Article 57 of the National Criminal Code theoretically does not follow the rules of the criminal system as they should. The provisions of Article 57 are placed in the 3rd paragraph to regulate "Guidelines for the Implementation of Imprisonment Sentences with a Single Formulation and Alternative Formulations." Lawmakers no longer include guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation, as previously existed in the Draft of the National Criminal Code. The consequence of not regulating the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation is that judges cannot make flexible choices in applying sentences that are in accordance with the objectives of the sentence.
Co-Authors A Admiral Abd Thalib, Abd ABDUL MUIN Afrian, Fadillah Afrinald Rizhan Ahmed, Mahmoud Tmsah Akbar, Aryo Alhidayatullah Anis Fauzi Anis Fauzi, Anis Ansori, Wakhid Aprinelita Aprinelita ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Arlina, Sri Asmara, Halmadi Atma Hajri, Wira Ayu Efritadewi Budi Mulianto Deliana, Deliana DESI APRIANI, DESI Dia Meirina Suri Efendi Ibnususilo Elvira Hoesein Radia Encep Syarifudin ENDRI ENDRI Erdianto Effendi Evi Yanti Faishal Taufiqurrahman Faujiah Febrianto, Surizki Fitri Diah Kusuma, Fitri Gangsar Lukmanjaya Gustomi, Leo Fajar Hamzah, Rosyidi Hanafri, Muhammad Iqbal Harviasantri, Selvi HENDRA GUNAWAN B11211055 Hengki Firmanda Heni Widiyani Heriyanto Heriyanto Hermawan, Silvy Legiana Humaidi, Adip Indah Sri Wahyuningsih IRSAN TAUFIK ALI Iryanti, Ita Janitra, Fitria Endah Karya, Detri Kasmanto Rinaldi, Kasmanto Kurnia Wijayanti Kurniadi Kurniadi, Kurniadi Lestari, Leny M.Musa, M.Musa Machdum Bachtiar Maduri, Mutia Maliki, Budi Ilham Marlina Marlina Meduri, Mutia Moza Dela Fudika, Moza Dela Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Noor Muhammad Syafii Musa, M. Nabila, Nabila Nizwardi Jalinus Normajatun, Normajatun Norsyafa’ah Nurhayati, Tutty Pangaribuan, David Pardosi, Agnes Mariana Prasja, Teguh Rama Purnomo, Armando Tri Cahyo Putri, Marta Desi Rafli, Dwi Yusuf Rahman, Khairul Rika Perdana Sari, Rika Perdana Rismahayani, Rismahayani Roro Rukmini Widiaswari Shilvirichiyanti, Shilvirichiyanti Sonny Zulhuda Sri Wahyuni Suparto Suparto Supriyadi, Bagus Syafrinaldi Syafrinaldi Syarifudin, Encep Triyana, Yeni Tutik Ekasari Wahyu Kurniawan Waskito Waskito, Waskito Wedayanti, Made Devi Yuda, Dwi Yufrizal Yufrizal, Yufrizal Yusramizza, Yusramizza Zulfahmi, Rio Satya Zulkifli Zulkifli