Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.899
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung Sriwijaya Law Review Constitutional Review Nagari Law Review Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jambura Law Review PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Sasana Legal Spirit Jurnal ABDIMAS (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) UBJ Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Bina Hukum Lingkungan Trunojoyo Law Review Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) RechtIdee Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Law and Legal Reform Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Scientia Law Review Khazanah Hukum Jurnal HAM Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum
Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
RECONSTRUCTING THE STATUS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RESEARCHERS: MEREKONSTRUKSI STATUS PENELITI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIONAL Sonia Ivana Barus; Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh; Amancik; Syifa Nikenuna
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/jcls.v5i1.143

Abstract

Researchers at state institutions were forced to leave their positions, including those at the Constitutional Court. Researchers then lose the opportunity to hold the title of research professor. These researchers were also given a new duty, which was to help courts and give Constitutional Justices substantial support. The predicate “assistance" in this rule, which receives no detailed explanation, leads to multiple interpretations and affects the productivity of assistants to expert constitutional judges. Based on this, it is interesting to discuss how the status quo regulates career paths and academic freedom of Constitutional Court researchers in personnel law and how the ideal concept of setting career paths and academic freedom for researchers at the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative research method, in which its results implicitly suggest a return to the previous rules. The researcher also suggests that the positions of assistant judge and researcher be strictly separated and that opportunities be provided for researchers to hold the title of academic professor. Researchers think BRIN should merge research institutions with the same form and function.
Reforming the Indonesian Bureaucracy through State Civil Apparatus Reform, Could It be Optimized with Technology? Amancik Amancik; Sonia Ivana Barus; Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh; Novendri M. Nggilu; Asrul Ibrahim Nur
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Various Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Beyond
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13753

Abstract

Bureaucracy, from a societal perspective, is often perceived as complex, slow, and inefficient. Despite these criticisms, bureaucracy remains a fundamental component of governance and plays a crucial role in societal functioning. As such, bureaucratic reform has been a prominent focus of policy discussions for several decades. A technology-driven government system, coupled with a bottom-up approach, has the potential to enhance efficiency, transparency, and accountability in public administration. However, in practice, such reforms have been largely confined to central government institutions and select agencies. This study aims to explore the integration of technology within the bureaucratic system in Indonesia, with a focus on its comprehensive implementation across government structures. Employing a normative research methodology, the study emphasizes the need for the government to take proactive steps in developing a skilled workforce in information technology. The authors also recommend strategically mapping positions that can integrate technological expertise throughout government departments. Furthermore, the study proposes a comprehensive examination of the potential for replacing executive positions with artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline and simplify bureaucratic processes.  In addition to technological advancements, bureaucratic reform must be accompanied by legal reform, particularly in the areas of data security and the protection of personal information. This includes redefining bureaucratic and personal data categories to ensure robust safeguards. The Personal Data Protection Law should play a pivotal role in integrating these data types and ensuring their protection. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act and the Personal Data Protection Act should foster collaboration between the government and technology companies to develop effective security solutions. Lastly, strengthening the Ombudsman as a public service oversight institution is essential to ensuring transparency and accountability in the implementation of bureaucratic and technological reforms.
Gagasan Konstitusi Pangan: Urgensi Pengaturan Hak Atas Pangan Warga Negara dalam Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh
Jurnal HAM Vol 12 No 2 (2021): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2021.12.227-244

Abstract

Berdasarkan potret buruk pemenuhan hak atas pangan, maka penelitian ini mengusulkan penguatan norma jaminan perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak atas pangan dalam rencana Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945. Tujuan penelitian ini agar dimuatnya hak atas pangan sebagai materi muatan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini: UUD 1945 mengalami kelemahan, terutama pengaturan dalam jaminan, pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak atas pangan yang tidak secara eksplisit diatur. Yang diperkuat dengan fakta-fakta beberapa kasus krisis pangan di Indonesia memberikan justifikasi bahwa eksistensi hak atas pangan urgen dimuat dalam Amandemen UUD 1945 Kelima untuk memperkuat hak atas pangan dalam konstitusi dan amandemen konstitusi juga memberikan jaminan ketersediaan lahan pertanian demi mewujudkan ketahanan pangan. Dalam amandemen tersebut, Penulis menilai memberikan kepastian hukum kepada warga negara agar haknya di bidang pangan lebih terjamin. Sehingga bisa dikatakan bahwa UUD 1945 adalah Konstitusi Pangan.
Model Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Polarisasi Politik Pemilu 2024 di Indonesia Zico Junius Fernando; Wiwit Pratiwi; Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum [Edisi Khusus]
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pemilihan Umum (PEMILU) 2024 diramalkan masih akan kental dengan polarisasi politik yang tidak kunjung usai sejak Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tahun 2014 lalu antara masyarakat pendukung Joko Widodo (Jokowi) yang diusung Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan (PDI-P) melawan Prabowo Subianto yang diusung oleh Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya (GERINDRA). Tren polarisasi itu berlanjut pada pemilihan Gubernur DKI Jakarta pada tahun 2017 yakni kelompok yang pro-Joko Widodo dan pro- Basuki Cahaya Purnama dengan kelompok yang anti-Joko Widodo dan anti-Basuki Cahaya Purnama serta berlanjut dalam Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tahun 2019 yang pada saat itu polarisasi politik memuncak dan membelah masyarakat namun mereda sejak kontestan yang berlaga masuk dalam satu Pemerintahan dalam Kabinet Indonesia Maju, tapi memang masih menyisakan polarisasi politik yang dikhawatirkan dapat meledak kembali pada Pemilihan Umum (PEMILU) 2024. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif yaitu berupa penelitian kepustakaan (library research) yang dilakukan dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum baik primer, sekunder dan atau tersier. Teknik dalam pengumpulan bahan yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan. Bahan-bahan yang telah terkumpul dianalisis secara kualitatif dan untuk melakukan klasifikasi bahan-bahan hukum, penulis menggunakan analisis isi (content analysis). Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa polarisasi politik menjelang Pemilihan Umum (PEMILU) 2024 berpeluang besar terjadi dan efeknya sangat tidak baik bagi iklim demokrasi di Indonesia. Menggunakan dan menanamkan nilai-nilai Pancasila adalah salah satu solusi yang bisa digunakan sebagai penyelesaian masalah polarisasi politik di Indonesia.
Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ as a Judicial Review Method: Comparison Between Constitutional and Islamic Law Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh; Shabrian Hammam Fanesti; Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti; Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman; Dhita Widya Putri
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.34435

Abstract

Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ is a method of applying general legal rules to specific contextual cases. The Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ process involves determining the law based on its sharīʿah sources, then examining the case or reality to be faced before applying the law. Thus, Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ is the process of describing cases based on reality. This is because the main key in realizing the law lies in a deep understanding of reality. Therefore, this paper aims to study and introduce Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ as a method of Judicial Review in Islamic law and its potential contribution to constitutional law science. Based on the findings of this study, the Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ method can be adopted by constitutional judges to test laws against the 1945 Constitution. This research recommends applying Taḥqīq al-Manāṭ in constitutional judges' deliberation meetings to prevent decisions that undermine the public interest, and it can be implemented through constitutional conventions. This article uses a normative research methodology that focuses on document studies..
Co-Authors Akhmad Akhmad Akhmad Akhmad Ali Masyhar Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik, Amancik Aris Hardinanto Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asrul Ibrahim Nur Ayub, Zainal Amin Barus, Sonia Ivana Barus, Sonia Ivana Barus, Sovia Ivana Beni Kurnia Illahi Beni Kurnia Illahi Beni Kurnia Illahi Busyra Azheri David Aprizon Putra Dhita Widya Putri Dhita Widya Putri Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman Edra Satmaidi Evis Garunja Fernando, Zico Junius Firdaus, Arifin Herawan Sauni Herawan Sauni Herawan Sauni Herlita Eryke Illahi , Beni Kurnia Ivana Barus, Sonia Khairul Fahmi Kurnia Illahi, Beni Masri, Esther Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti Musa Sarjo Muwaffiq Jufri, Muwaffiq Novendri M Nggilu Novendri M Nggilu Nur Firdaw Buerahen Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Putra, David Aprizon Raka Fachriansyah Rakhmatusakdiyah Ramadhani, Susi Raphael D. Jackson-Ortiz Reformas, Tradis Saiful Anwar Sauni, Herawan SAUNI, HERAWAN Shabrian Hammam Fanesti Simabura, Charles Solehuddin Solehuddin Sonia Ivana Barus Sonia Ivana Barus Sonia Ivana Barus Sonia Ivana Barus Sulaiman, Dindha Shahrazade Syarifah Izzatul Afifah Syifa Nikenuna Wiwit Pratiwi Yuliandri, Yuliandri Zico Junius Fernando