Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.781
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung Sriwijaya Law Review Constitutional Review Jurnal HAM Nagari Law Review Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jambura Law Review PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Sasana Legal Spirit Jurnal ABDIMAS (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) UBJ Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Bina Hukum Lingkungan Trunojoyo Law Review Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Law and Legal Reform Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Scientia Law Review Khazanah Hukum
Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 38 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Choices of Law for Democratic Regional Head Election Dispute Resolution Institutions in Indonesia Amancik, Amancik; Ahmad Saifulloh, Putra Perdana; Ayub, Zainal Amin; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Ramadhani, Susi
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 6 NO. 2 JULY 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24792

Abstract

This research aimed to provide a conceptual idea regarding legal options in resolving disputes of democratic regional head elections in Indonesia with two proposed options. The first option included revising the Election and Regional Election Law to grant authority to the Constitutional Court (MK) and Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) for adjudicating disputes. The second option proposed implementing the Fifth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution to reconstruct the Constitutional Court as an election court correlating with the primary role of upholding regulations. These proposed options would grant the Constitutional Court the authority to examine and adjudicate substantial matters related to the constitutionality of elections. Furthermore, the analysis used normative legal research including statutory, comparative, and conceptual methods.
KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH PLASTIK GUNA MENDUKUNG PROGRAM WISATA KAWASAN PESISIR PROVINSI BENGKULU Satmaidi, Edra; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Reformas, Tradis
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 6, Nomor 1, Oktober 2021
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengelolaan sampah dewasa ini masih menjadi problem yang belum terselesaikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji permasalahan dalam pengelolaan sampah plastik di Bengkulu guna mendukung Kawasan Wilayah Pesisir. Hasilnya terdapat beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang mempunyai korelasi dengan pengelolaan sampah plastik di Indonesia yaitu UU Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, UU Pengelolaan Sampah dan beberapa undang-undang lainnya termasuk Jakstrada Kota Bengkulu yang bertujuan menumbuhkan kesadaran bagi masyarakat akan lingkungan hidup yang baik dan sehat di Provinsi Bengkulu. Penelitian ini juga mengemukakan Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Plastik yang ideal untuk mendukung Kawasan Wisata Wilayah Pesisir Provinsi Bengkulu.
Reforming the Indonesian Bureaucracy through State Civil Apparatus Reform, Could It be Optimized with Technology? Amancik, Amancik; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Nggilu, Novendri M.; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Various Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Beyond
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13753

Abstract

Bureaucracy, from a societal perspective, is often perceived as complex, slow, and inefficient. Despite these criticisms, bureaucracy remains a fundamental component of governance and plays a crucial role in societal functioning. As such, bureaucratic reform has been a prominent focus of policy discussions for several decades. A technology-driven government system, coupled with a bottom-up approach, has the potential to enhance efficiency, transparency, and accountability in public administration. However, in practice, such reforms have been largely confined to central government institutions and select agencies. This study aims to explore the integration of technology within the bureaucratic system in Indonesia, with a focus on its comprehensive implementation across government structures. Employing a normative research methodology, the study emphasizes the need for the government to take proactive steps in developing a skilled workforce in information technology. The authors also recommend strategically mapping positions that can integrate technological expertise throughout government departments. Furthermore, the study proposes a comprehensive examination of the potential for replacing executive positions with artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline and simplify bureaucratic processes.  In addition to technological advancements, bureaucratic reform must be accompanied by legal reform, particularly in the areas of data security and the protection of personal information. This includes redefining bureaucratic and personal data categories to ensure robust safeguards. The Personal Data Protection Law should play a pivotal role in integrating these data types and ensuring their protection. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act and the Personal Data Protection Act should foster collaboration between the government and technology companies to develop effective security solutions. Lastly, strengthening the Ombudsman as a public service oversight institution is essential to ensuring transparency and accountability in the implementation of bureaucratic and technological reforms.
Breaking the Cycle of Injustice: Revolutionizing Human Rights Violations Resolution Through the 1945 Constitution Amancik, Amancik; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Masyhar, Ali; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim; Barus, Sonia Ivana
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.7460

Abstract

The stagnation of human rights enforcement in Indonesia's Reformation Era has highlighted a critical imbalance: the current system prioritizes punishing perpetrators of serious human rights violations over addressing the recovery and well-being of victims. This research introduces The Constitution of Peace as a transformative, victim-centered model for resolving serious human rights violations outside the courtroom, aligning with the principles and soul of the 1945 Constitution. The proposed model comprises three innovative approaches: first, mediation facilitated by the National Human Rights Commission to foster dialogue and accountability; second, the provision of compensation, restitution, and assistance to victims through the Witness and Victim Protection Agency, ensuring tangible support for recovery; and third, an official apology by the relevant authority, accompanied by the fulfillment of economic, social, and culpability obligations. Together, these measures aim to correct the limitations of the current retributive framework by prioritizing restorative justice and victim empowerment. By embracing these victim-oriented solutions, this model not only addresses the legal and moral obligations enshrined in the 1945 Constitution but also fosters reconciliation and societal healing. The research underscores the transformative potential of the Constitution as a foundation for peace, justice, and the resolution of entrenched human rights challenges. It calls for a paradigm shift from punitive measures to a more holistic approach, ensuring that justice serves both the dignity of victims and the broader goal of national harmony.
Quo Vadis Profesi Jurnalis Investigasi di Era Digital dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Penyiaran Sauni, Herawan; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Putra, David Aprizon
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 22, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v22i4.1533

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan karena banyaknya protes dari masyarakat sipil atas Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) Penyiaran yang muncul di publik atas Inisiatif Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). RUU tersebut dikhawatirkan masyarakat sipil karena beberapa pasalnya berpotensi mengurangi independensi pers dan dipandang membatasi jurnalisme kegiatan investigatif serta Profesi Jurnalis Investigasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan analitis dan konseptual, yang berdasarkan bentuknya merupakan tipe penelitian deskriptif. Kesimpulan Penelitian ini, Desain Legislasi RUU Penyiaran yang Menguatkan Profesi Jurnalis Investigasi, yaitu: pertama, Menyusun RUU Penyiaran Berdasarkan Prinsip Partisipasi Publik Bermakna; dan kedua, Memberikan Jaminan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Profesi Jurnalis Investigasi. Agar berhasil membentuk regulasi yang legitimate penelitian ini menyarankan DPR dan Presiden harus menggunakan kewenangan konstitusionalnya dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang untuk tidak menyetujui pasal-pasal yang mengancam kebebasan pers pada umumnya dan profesi jurnalis pada khususnya, termasuk jurnalis investigasi.
Right to Information and Anti-SLAPP on Consumer Protection in Indonesia Sauni, Herawan; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Akhmad, Akhmad; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 10 Issue 1, January 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v10i1.4544

Abstract

Anti-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) is a provision that provides legal protection to the public who fight for public interests recognisedrecognised in legislation, usually in the environmental field; however, this study examines the projection of Anti-SLAPP for consumer protection. This research is normative legal research with a legislative, case, and conceptual approach, examining legal protection for consumers when submitting reviews on social media by highlighting the freedom of opinion guaranteed by legislation. The results of this study led to a balance of rights to information, and SLAPP was implemented for the benefit of all Indonesian people to foster meaningful participation in consumer protection. This study provides suggestions to Lawmakers on issuing regulations that specifically address Anti-SLAPP. These regulations are important to protect consumers from all threats, especially criminal entanglements, and as a guide for law enforcement officers in handling SLAPP cases in Indonesia. Lawmakers can issue regulations that, in revising the Consumer Protection Law, include anti-SLAPP provisions.
Agricultural Land Product-Sharing Transactions in the Local Community of the Besemah Tribe Herawan Sauni; Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh; Sonia Ivana Barus; Akhmad Akhmad; Asrul Ibrahim Nur
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v8i1.42925

Abstract

This study aims to determine the pattern of transactions for the results of agricultural land in the local community of the Besemah tribe. By using explorative juridical methods, and empirical legal research, as well as functional interpretation, it can be concluded that: 1. In order to fulfill the need for resources (land) for agricultural land (paddy fields or farm) in the Besemah community, it is carried out using various models. The models are nyaseh, surungan, tempohan, paruan, and sande. 2. The existence of profit-sharing legal institutions (nyaseh, surungan, tempohan,paruan, and sande) are still in force in the besemah tribal community. 3. The legal institutions for the sharing of agricultural land (nyaseh, surungan, tempohan,paruan, and sande) are not solely oriented towards economic aspects, but what really stands out are the aspects of mutual help and kinship. 4. In essence, Nyaseh, Surungan, Tempohan, Paruan, and Sande are agricultural land production sharing agreements with models that vary widely according to the nature and allotment of the land (right to use) itself. 5. In the transaction for the results of agricultural land (nyaseh, surungan, tempohan,paruan, and sande) in practice there are no formalities as stipulated in the law. For the semah community, the existence of these formalities will actually lead to rigidity, and eliminate the philosophy of the existence of these legal institutions.
RECONSTRUCTING THE STATUS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RESEARCHERS: MEREKONSTRUKSI STATUS PENELITI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIONAL Barus, Sonia Ivana; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Amancik; Nikenuna, Syifa
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/jcls.v5i1.143

Abstract

Researchers at state institutions were forced to leave their positions, including those at the Constitutional Court. Researchers then lose the opportunity to hold the title of research professor. These researchers were also given a new duty, which was to help courts and give Constitutional Justices substantial support. The predicate “assistance" in this rule, which receives no detailed explanation, leads to multiple interpretations and affects the productivity of assistants to expert constitutional judges. Based on this, it is interesting to discuss how the status quo regulates career paths and academic freedom of Constitutional Court researchers in personnel law and how the ideal concept of setting career paths and academic freedom for researchers at the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative research method, in which its results implicitly suggest a return to the previous rules. The researcher also suggests that the positions of assistant judge and researcher be strictly separated and that opportunities be provided for researchers to hold the title of academic professor. Researchers think BRIN should merge research institutions with the same form and function.
Co-Authors Akhmad Akhmad Akhmad Akhmad Ali Masyhar Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik Amancik, Amancik Aris Hardinanto Asrul Ibrahim Nur Ayub, Zainal Amin Barus, Sonia Ivana Barus, Sonia Ivana Barus, Sovia Ivana Beni Kurnia Illahi Beni Kurnia Illahi Beni Kurnia Illahi Busyra Azheri David Aprizon Putra, David Aprizon Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman Edra Satmaidi Evis Garunja Fernando, Zico Junius Herawan Sauni Illahi , Beni Kurnia Ivana Barus, Sonia Khairul Fahmi Kurnia Illahi, Beni Masri, Esther Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin Muwaffiq Jufri, Muwaffiq Nikenuna, Syifa Novendri M Nggilu Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Putra, David Aprizon Ramadhani, Susi Raphael D. Jackson-Ortiz Reformas, Tradis Sauni, Herawan SAUNI, HERAWAN Simabura, Charles Solehuddin Solehuddin Sonia Ivana Barus Sonia Ivana Barus Sulaiman, Dindha Shahrazade Yuliandri, Yuliandri