Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Hukum Islam

CRITICISM OF ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST ARTICLE 5 OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS RELATED TO THE APPLICATION OF QISHASH PUNISHMENT Salsabila, Adzanah Mariska; Faizal, Enceng Arif; Najmudin, Deden; Pahlevi, Mohamad Syahreza
Hukum Islam Vol 25, No 2 (2025): ISLAMIC LAW
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v25i2.38792

Abstract

Abstract The application of qishash punishment in Islamic criminal law is often debated because it is considered to be contrary to Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which rejects all forms of cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. This accusation is certainly misleading because it views qishash only from a symbolic-artificial perspective. The purpose of this study is to interpret Article 5 of the UDHR, analyze the concept of qishash punishment in fiqh jinayah, and critique Article 5 of the UDHR in relation to the application of qishash punishment. This study uses qualitative research with a normative juridical method through a statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach through library research on primary and secondary legal sources, which are then critically analyzed. The results of this study are able to criticize Article 5 of the UDHR with two main arguments, namely, first, qishash is not a cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment; second, there is caution in the application of qishash punishment through various critical theories and logic (evotivism theory, deconstruction theory, logical fallacy, cultural relativism theory, critical human rights theory, and postcolonial theory). The novelty of this research lies in its attempt to critique the human rights perspective on the application of qishash punishment by offering a maqashid al-syari'ah qishash approach, namely qishash as a mechanism for protecting the right to life (hifz al-nafs) as well as a form of substantive and proportional justice. The academic contributions of this research include enriching the study of Islamic criminal law with an integrative perspective, offering a critical analysis of the interpretation of Article 5 of the UDHR, and providing normative references for the development of a more contextual national criminal law.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Achtia, Alika Chairana Adistie, Malika Syaharani Aisy, Rihhadatul Akmal, Farhan Al-Khalik Ali, M. Farhan Alwan, Arif Aqshal, Nabil Aryanti, Annisa Asari, Ari Athoillah, Mohamad Aulia, Almas Azazy, Yusuf Azazy, Yusup Aziz, Muhammad Fadhlan Azzahra, Annisa Futri Cantika, Ghina Denisa, Elsa Fadil, Muhammad Irfan Fahrezi, Reza Faizal, Enceng Arif Faqihhuddin, Faridz Faruq, Raffi Muhammad Fathiyah Fatimah Azzahra Fauzi, Muhammad Rusydan Febrianti, Elsa Aulia Firdaus, Rasyid Ahmad Galih, Muhammad Rakyan Gilang Permana Halim, Halmi Abdul Hidayatulloh, Rizki Bagus Jefry Tarantang Joli, Angelika Khaerunisa, Syifa Mega Kholik, Muhamad Abdul Khosim, Ali Kusuma, Fajar Ichsan Mardiansyah, Andre Marzuq, Miftah Fauzy Maulana, Rayhan Muhamad Bagas Goval I Muhammad Kholid Muljana, Fathan Hadinur Malik Munawwaroh, Zharifa Attaqiyatul Muzaitun, Eka Novianti, Erika Nufus, Tsulis Zakiyyatun Nuraini, Elsa Nurfadillah, Syifa Nurhamidah, Dewi Siti Nurwijayanti Oganta, Apre Aldo Pahlevi, Mohamad Syahreza Prayoga, Fahmi puspita, dela Putra, Ahmad Zidan Muadi Putri, Rissa Aulia Rachmat, Muhammad Fadli Rahayu, Citra Rahayu, Wanda Fitri Rahma Atqiya, Auliya Rahmadani, Windy Rahmawati, Yunada Putri Ramadhani , Zaskia Herlia Ramadhani, Suciana Rizkiansyah, Aprila Rohman, Fikri Fathur Royani, Yayan Muhammad Rozikin, Opik Sabila, Muhammad Ilham Saepulloh, Usep Salsabila, Adzanah Mariska Septiani, Nabila Sofyani , Nisa Afifah Syifa, Najmatul Wahyuni, Resti Rienita Wardani, Emilia Kusuma Wijaya, Putra Arya Yuliana Sari Yuniarsih, Rina Isti Zaman, Badrul Zuhdi, Wilyan